2013-01-14 16:13:37

by Xose Vazquez Perez

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [email protected] dead ?? Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Delay)

hi,

is [email protected] alive ?

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Delay)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:05:51 +0000
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification

THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.

YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE.

Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed:

[email protected]

Message will be retried for 2 more day(s)

Technical details of temporary failure:
The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn more at http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=7720
[(0) lists.ath9k.org. [194.45.26.84]:25: Connection refused]

----- Original message -----

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=xqctgQzI0LK3bCpj+73VZ3QyMn2PV0OVIHeGJAfJHCU=;
b=M9s64jWFyUQC/7YyUYCEyYKDvZWI7dKIZqzIco1CkTe2++8wGYSfkuA55hattkPhXM
VrYTuU3xcSmnju2/vRYcUmBoZ3m/rfn3bTxu99sK+rfpdEPsYcZkZGLSpxAyUNWn3ArV
SqBZzJUlDbYAR/D2Yhh1lotLdl4luuFmQV5ehE15Yd2e9QhUUPz7RjDZM4Jz2kXL7NZH
x3E7ZHHR1O7KgpYA82u/LpE/XBXMwakBOR8tf2OqbMgObFvuTCXox0idsR02kdp0PNqQ
04YxxXMVXAHh3uoP4BjgQ8YJ8sjaAmOiRtzSj1LTrIzL2Pu0mGJnJVbVD6P9/tHjK1SB
Hrtw==
X-Received: by 10.14.219.3 with SMTP id l3mr220164547eep.5.1358087265412;
Sun, 13 Jan 2013 06:27:45 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from localhost (88.45.218.87.dynamic.jazztel.es. [87.218.45.88])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f6sm17558343eeo.7.2013.01.13.06.27.43
(version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Sun, 13 Jan 2013 06:27:44 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:27:41 +0100
From: Xose Vazquez Perez <[email protected]>
User-Agent: Polo rio abaixo vai unha troita de pe, corre que te corre, quen a puidera coller...
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: linux-wireless <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: Re: ath9k bugs
References: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 01/13/2013 03:22 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:

> I also see the same bug with openwrt ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENT (12.09-rc1, r34185)
> on a Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH device:
> https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/9654

sorry, this was https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/12623






2013-01-14 22:36:53

by Pavel Roskin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [email protected] dead ?? Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Delay)

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:13:32 +0100
Xose Vazquez Perez <[email protected]> wrote:

> hi,
>
> is [email protected] alive ?

It's dead most of the time.

There have been DNS problems with ath5k.org and ath9k.org for months.
Sometimes the DNS records are valid, but most of the time, they are not.

I informed Michael Renzmann about it. He is the one who "maintains"
the lists. He is also the maintainer of MadWifi. He replied to me
that he knows about the problem.

I think we should remove ath5k and ath9k lists from the MAINTAINERS
file.

I believe most questions about ath5k and ath9k can be discussed in
linux-wireless.

Maybe a new list could be created to discuss all Atheros hardware on
Linux. It could be used to make sure that Atheros/Qualcomm engineers
are aware of the topic.

--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin

2013-01-16 22:08:52

by Pavel Roskin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [email protected] dead ?? Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Delay)

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:27:03 -0500
Pavel Roskin <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:13:32 +0100
> Xose Vazquez Perez <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > is [email protected] alive ?
>
> It's dead most of the time.

The [email protected] mailing list has been fixed.
[email protected] should be working as well.

--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin