2016-09-06 06:57:36

by Rajkumar Manoharan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] mac80211: allow driver to handle packet-loss mechanism

mac80211 keeps track of missing acks and triggers CQM packet-loss
mechanism whenever consecutive msdu failure reaches threshold limit
(STA_LOST_PKT_THRESHOLD). Drivers like ath10k offlaoded rate countrol
and aggregation to firmware. Such drivers have its own connection
monitoring algorithm that is offloaded to firmware for triggering
station kickout due to excessive tries. In VHT mode, single PPDU can have
more than 50 msdus at higher rates. Under noisy environment, single ppdu
failure can cause station kickout by current mac80211 lost_packet mechanism
while firmware is trying to adapt its rate table. This is causing frequent
connect and disconnect iteration when station is roaming around.

In such scenario, driver (or firmware) is not given enough chance to
tune its rate control. So for devices that report low ack events, add a
hardware flag to rely on their mechnism.

Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Manoharan <[email protected]>
---
include/net/mac80211.h | 5 +++++
net/mac80211/debugfs.c | 1 +
net/mac80211/status.c | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/net/mac80211.h b/include/net/mac80211.h
index cca510a585c3..6619fa1ccd01 100644
--- a/include/net/mac80211.h
+++ b/include/net/mac80211.h
@@ -2014,6 +2014,10 @@ struct ieee80211_txq {
* @IEEE80211_HW_TX_FRAG_LIST: Hardware (or driver) supports sending frag_list
* skbs, needed for zero-copy software A-MSDU.
*
+ * @IEEE80211_HW_REPORTS_LOW_ACK: The driver (or firmware) reports low ack event
+ * based on its own algorithm. For such devices, mac80211 does not report
+ * low ack event based on lost packets.
+ *
* @NUM_IEEE80211_HW_FLAGS: number of hardware flags, used for sizing arrays
*/
enum ieee80211_hw_flags {
@@ -2054,6 +2058,7 @@ enum ieee80211_hw_flags {
IEEE80211_HW_USES_RSS,
IEEE80211_HW_TX_AMSDU,
IEEE80211_HW_TX_FRAG_LIST,
+ IEEE80211_HW_REPORTS_LOW_ACK,

/* keep last, obviously */
NUM_IEEE80211_HW_FLAGS
diff --git a/net/mac80211/debugfs.c b/net/mac80211/debugfs.c
index 2906c1004e1a..e433319a67f1 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/debugfs.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/debugfs.c
@@ -302,6 +302,7 @@ static const char *hw_flag_names[] = {
FLAG(USES_RSS),
FLAG(TX_AMSDU),
FLAG(TX_FRAG_LIST),
+ FLAG(REPORTS_LOW_ACK),
#undef FLAG
};

diff --git a/net/mac80211/status.c b/net/mac80211/status.c
index fabd9ff710d9..6121ed196630 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/status.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/status.c
@@ -557,6 +557,12 @@ static void ieee80211_report_used_skb(struct ieee80211_local *local,
static void ieee80211_lost_packet(struct sta_info *sta,
struct ieee80211_tx_info *info)
{
+ /* Driver supports its own algorithm for triggering CQM packet-loss
+ * mechanism.
+ */
+ if (ieee80211_hw_check(&sta->local->hw, REPORTS_LOW_ACK))
+ return;
+
/* This packet was aggregated but doesn't carry status info */
if ((info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU) &&
!(info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU))
--
2.9.3


2016-09-14 06:06:15

by Johannes Berg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: allow driver to handle packet-loss mechanism

> > The way you describe this it sounds like somehow you'll be
> > reporting the indication to userspace from the driver; but you do
> > not, and cannot do that. The description seems thus misleading?
> >
> Sorry for confusion.. The idea is that driver will report low ack
> status by ieee80211_report_low_ack and if driver wants to completely
> rely on firmware algorithm, then this flag will be used to bypass
> mac80211 packet loss mechanism. does it make sense?

Oh, so you *can* already do that. Please just say that in the commit
message.

johannes

2016-09-12 12:45:03

by Johannes Berg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: allow driver to handle packet-loss mechanism

On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 12:26 +0530, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote:
> mac80211 keeps track of missing acks and triggers CQM packet-loss
> mechanism whenever consecutive msdu failure reaches threshold limit
> (STA_LOST_PKT_THRESHOLD). Drivers like ath10k offlaoded rate countrol
> and aggregation to firmware. Such drivers have its own connection
> monitoring algorithm that is offloaded to firmware for triggering
> station kickout due to excessive tries. In VHT mode, single PPDU can
> have
> more than 50 msdus at higher rates. Under noisy environment, single
> ppdu
> failure can cause station kickout by current mac80211 lost_packet
> mechanism
> while firmware is trying to adapt its rate table. This is causing
> frequent
> connect and disconnect iteration when station is roaming around.
>
> In such scenario, driver (or firmware) is not given enough chance to
> tune its rate control. So for devices that report low ack events, add
> a
> hardware flag to rely on their mechnism.
>

The way you describe this it sounds like somehow you'll be reporting
the indication to userspace from the driver; but you do not, and cannot
do that. The description seems thus misleading?

johannes

2016-09-12 17:57:10

by Rajkumar Manoharan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: allow driver to handle packet-loss mechanism

On 2016-09-12 18:14, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 12:26 +0530, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote:
>> mac80211 keeps track of missing acks and triggers CQM packet-loss
>> mechanism whenever consecutive msdu failure reaches threshold limit
>> (STA_LOST_PKT_THRESHOLD). Drivers like ath10k offlaoded rate countrol
>> and aggregation to firmware. Such drivers have its own connection
>> monitoring algorithm that is offloaded to firmware for triggering
>> station kickout due to excessive tries. In VHT mode, single PPDU can
>> have
>> more than 50 msdus at higher rates. Under noisy environment, single
>> ppdu
>> failure can cause station kickout by current mac80211 lost_packet
>> mechanism
>> while firmware is trying to adapt its rate table. This is causing
>> frequent
>> connect and disconnect iteration when station is roaming around.
>>
>> In such scenario, driver (or firmware) is not given enough chance to
>> tune its rate control. So for devices that report low ack events, add
>> a
>> hardware flag to rely on their mechnism.
>>
>
> The way you describe this it sounds like somehow you'll be reporting
> the indication to userspace from the driver; but you do not, and cannot
> do that. The description seems thus misleading?
>
Sorry for confusion.. The idea is that driver will report low ack status
by ieee80211_report_low_ack and if driver wants to completely rely on
firmware algorithm, then this flag will be used to bypass mac80211
packet loss mechanism. does it make sense?

-Rajkumar