2021-08-24 14:46:41

by Fabio Estevam

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] ath10k: sdio: Add missing BH locking around napi_schdule()

On a i.MX-based board with a QCA9377 Wifi chip, the following errors
are seen after launching the 'hostapd' application:

hostapd /etc/wifi.conf
Configuration file: /etc/wifi.conf
wlan0: interface state UNINITIALIZED->COUNTRY_UPDATE
NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #08!!!
Using interface wlan0 with hwaddr 00:1f:7b:31:04:a0 and ssid "thessid"
IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
wlan0: interface state COUNTRY_UPDATE->ENABLED
wlan0: AP-ENABLED
NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #08!!!
NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #08!!!
NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #08!!!
NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #08!!!
...

Fix this problem by adding the BH locking around napi-schedule(),
in the same way it was done in commit e63052a5dd3c ("mlx5e: add
add missing BH locking around napi_schdule()").

Its commit log provides the following explanation:

"It's not correct to call napi_schedule() in pure process
context. Because we use __raise_softirq_irqoff() we require
callers to be in a context which will eventually lead to
softirq handling (hardirq, bh disabled, etc.).

With code as is users will see:

NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #08!!!
"

Fixes: cfee8793a74d ("ath10k: enable napi on RX path for sdio")
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c
index b746052737e0..eb705214f3f0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c
@@ -1363,8 +1363,11 @@ static void ath10k_rx_indication_async_work(struct work_struct *work)
ep->ep_ops.ep_rx_complete(ar, skb);
}

- if (test_bit(ATH10K_FLAG_CORE_REGISTERED, &ar->dev_flags))
+ if (test_bit(ATH10K_FLAG_CORE_REGISTERED, &ar->dev_flags)) {
+ local_bh_disable();
napi_schedule(&ar->napi);
+ local_bh_enable();
+ }
}

static int ath10k_sdio_read_rtc_state(struct ath10k_sdio *ar_sdio, unsigned char *state)
--
2.25.1


2021-08-31 18:25:53

by Fabio Estevam

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: sdio: Add missing BH locking around napi_schdule()

Hi Kalle,

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 11:46 AM Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On a i.MX-based board with a QCA9377 Wifi chip, the following errors
> are seen after launching the 'hostapd' application:
>
> hostapd /etc/wifi.conf
> Configuration file: /etc/wifi.conf
> wlan0: interface state UNINITIALIZED->COUNTRY_UPDATE
> NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #08!!!
> Using interface wlan0 with hwaddr 00:1f:7b:31:04:a0 and ssid "thessid"
> IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
> wlan0: interface state COUNTRY_UPDATE->ENABLED
> wlan0: AP-ENABLED
> NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #08!!!
> NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #08!!!
> NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #08!!!
> NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #08!!!
> ...
>
> Fix this problem by adding the BH locking around napi-schedule(),
> in the same way it was done in commit e63052a5dd3c ("mlx5e: add
> add missing BH locking around napi_schdule()").
>
> Its commit log provides the following explanation:
>
> "It's not correct to call napi_schedule() in pure process
> context. Because we use __raise_softirq_irqoff() we require
> callers to be in a context which will eventually lead to
> softirq handling (hardirq, bh disabled, etc.).
>
> With code as is users will see:
>
> NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #08!!!
> "
>
> Fixes: cfee8793a74d ("ath10k: enable napi on RX path for sdio")
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>

Gentle ping on this one.

2021-09-28 14:39:57

by Kalle Valo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: sdio: Add missing BH locking around napi_schdule()

Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> wrote:

> On a i.MX-based board with a QCA9377 Wifi chip, the following errors
> are seen after launching the 'hostapd' application:
>
> hostapd /etc/wifi.conf
> Configuration file: /etc/wifi.conf
> wlan0: interface state UNINITIALIZED->COUNTRY_UPDATE
> NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #08!!!
> Using interface wlan0 with hwaddr 00:1f:7b:31:04:a0 and ssid "thessid"
> IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
> wlan0: interface state COUNTRY_UPDATE->ENABLED
> wlan0: AP-ENABLED
> NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #08!!!
> NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #08!!!
> NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #08!!!
> NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #08!!!
> ...
>
> Fix this problem by adding the BH locking around napi-schedule(),
> in the same way it was done in commit e63052a5dd3c ("mlx5e: add
> add missing BH locking around napi_schdule()").
>
> Its commit log provides the following explanation:
>
> "It's not correct to call napi_schedule() in pure process
> context. Because we use __raise_softirq_irqoff() we require
> callers to be in a context which will eventually lead to
> softirq handling (hardirq, bh disabled, etc.).
>
> With code as is users will see:
>
> NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #08!!!
> "
>
> Fixes: cfee8793a74d ("ath10k: enable napi on RX path for sdio")
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]>

Patch applied to ath-next branch of ath.git, thanks.

019edd01d174 ath10k: sdio: Add missing BH locking around napi_schdule()

--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/[email protected]/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches