There were a few warnings when compiling the wl1271 driver on 64 bit
architectures. This was due to size mismatch of integers.
This commit fixes the following warnings:
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_main.c: In function 'wl1271_irq_work':
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_main.c:184: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_boot.c: In function 'wl1271_boot_upload_firmware_chunk':
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_boot.c:103: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 2 has type 'size_t'
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_boot.c:150: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 2 has type 'size_t'
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_boot.c: In function 'wl1271_boot_enable_interrupts':
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_boot.c:278: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_boot.c | 9 +++++----
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_main.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_boot.c b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_boot.c
index 4c22f25..2b5d101 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_boot.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_boot.c
@@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ static int wl1271_boot_upload_firmware_chunk(struct wl1271 *wl, void *buf,
wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "starting firmware upload");
- wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "fw_data_len %d chunk_size %d", fw_data_len,
- CHUNK_SIZE);
+ wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "fw_data_len %d chunk_size %d",
+ (u32) fw_data_len, CHUNK_SIZE);
if ((fw_data_len % 4) != 0) {
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static int wl1271_boot_upload_firmware_chunk(struct wl1271 *wl, void *buf,
addr = dest + chunk_num * CHUNK_SIZE;
p = buf + chunk_num * CHUNK_SIZE;
wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "uploading fw last chunk (%d B) 0x%p to 0x%x",
- fw_data_len % CHUNK_SIZE, p, addr);
+ (u32) fw_data_len % CHUNK_SIZE, p, addr);
wl1271_spi_mem_write(wl, addr, p, fw_data_len % CHUNK_SIZE);
return 0;
@@ -275,7 +275,8 @@ static int wl1271_boot_upload_nvs(struct wl1271 *wl)
static void wl1271_boot_enable_interrupts(struct wl1271 *wl)
{
enable_irq(wl->irq);
- wl1271_reg_write32(wl, ACX_REG_INTERRUPT_MASK, ~(WL1271_INTR_MASK));
+ wl1271_reg_write32(wl, ACX_REG_INTERRUPT_MASK,
+ WL1271_ACX_INTR_ALL & ~(WL1271_INTR_MASK));
wl1271_reg_write32(wl, HI_CFG, HI_CFG_DEF_VAL);
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_main.c
index 3bb45ce..4102d59 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_main.c
@@ -181,7 +181,8 @@ static void wl1271_irq_work(struct work_struct *work)
} while (intr && --ctr);
out_sleep:
- wl1271_reg_write32(wl, ACX_REG_INTERRUPT_MASK, ~(WL1271_INTR_MASK));
+ wl1271_reg_write32(wl, ACX_REG_INTERRUPT_MASK,
+ WL1271_ACX_INTR_ALL & ~(WL1271_INTR_MASK));
wl1271_ps_elp_sleep(wl);
out:
--
1.6.0.4
ext John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:41:11PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
>
>> Thanks! I didn't know about the z length modifier for printf (everyday
>> learning something new!), I should have checked the manpage. I'll fix
>> this and send v2 of my patch.
>>
>
> I've got it fixed-up already...
>
Thanks, I noticed that it was already fixed in wireless-next after I had
already sent v2. Sorry for the trouble.
--
Cheers,
Luca.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:41:11PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> ext Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Luciano,
>>
>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:58:27 +0300 Luciano Coelho <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_boot.c
>>> @@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ static int wl1271_boot_upload_firmware_chunk(struct wl1271 *wl, void *buf,
>>> wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "starting firmware upload");
>>> - wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "fw_data_len %d chunk_size %d",
>>> fw_data_len,
>>> - CHUNK_SIZE);
>>> + wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "fw_data_len %d chunk_size %d",
>>> + (u32) fw_data_len, CHUNK_SIZE);
>>>
>>
>> fw_data_len is a size_t and so should be printed with %zd.
>>
>>
>>> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static int wl1271_boot_upload_firmware_chunk(struct wl1271 *wl, void *buf,
>>> addr = dest + chunk_num * CHUNK_SIZE;
>>> p = buf + chunk_num * CHUNK_SIZE;
>>> wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "uploading fw last chunk (%d B) 0x%p to 0x%x",
>>> - fw_data_len % CHUNK_SIZE, p, addr);
>>> + (u32) fw_data_len % CHUNK_SIZE, p, addr);
>>>
>>
>> ditto.
>>
>
> Thanks! I didn't know about the z length modifier for printf (everyday
> learning something new!), I should have checked the manpage. I'll fix
> this and send v2 of my patch.
I've got it fixed-up already...
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.
Hi Luciano,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:58:27 +0300 Luciano Coelho <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_boot.c
> @@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ static int wl1271_boot_upload_firmware_chunk(struct wl1271 *wl, void *buf,
>
> wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "starting firmware upload");
>
> - wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "fw_data_len %d chunk_size %d", fw_data_len,
> - CHUNK_SIZE);
> + wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "fw_data_len %d chunk_size %d",
> + (u32) fw_data_len, CHUNK_SIZE);
fw_data_len is a size_t and so should be printed with %zd.
> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static int wl1271_boot_upload_firmware_chunk(struct wl1271 *wl, void *buf,
> addr = dest + chunk_num * CHUNK_SIZE;
> p = buf + chunk_num * CHUNK_SIZE;
> wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "uploading fw last chunk (%d B) 0x%p to 0x%x",
> - fw_data_len % CHUNK_SIZE, p, addr);
> + (u32) fw_data_len % CHUNK_SIZE, p, addr);
ditto.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
ext Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Luciano,
>
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:58:27 +0300 Luciano Coelho <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_boot.c
>> @@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ static int wl1271_boot_upload_firmware_chunk(struct wl1271 *wl, void *buf,
>>
>> wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "starting firmware upload");
>>
>> - wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "fw_data_len %d chunk_size %d", fw_data_len,
>> - CHUNK_SIZE);
>> + wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "fw_data_len %d chunk_size %d",
>> + (u32) fw_data_len, CHUNK_SIZE);
>>
>
> fw_data_len is a size_t and so should be printed with %zd.
>
>
>> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static int wl1271_boot_upload_firmware_chunk(struct wl1271 *wl, void *buf,
>> addr = dest + chunk_num * CHUNK_SIZE;
>> p = buf + chunk_num * CHUNK_SIZE;
>> wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "uploading fw last chunk (%d B) 0x%p to 0x%x",
>> - fw_data_len % CHUNK_SIZE, p, addr);
>> + (u32) fw_data_len % CHUNK_SIZE, p, addr);
>>
>
> ditto.
>
Thanks! I didn't know about the z length modifier for printf (everyday
learning something new!), I should have checked the manpage. I'll fix
this and send v2 of my patch.
--
Cheers,
Luca.
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:41:11 +0300 Luciano Coelho wrote:
> ext Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Luciano,
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:58:27 +0300 Luciano Coelho <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_boot.c
> >> @@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ static int wl1271_boot_upload_firmware_chunk(struct wl1271 *wl, void *buf,
> >>
> >> wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "starting firmware upload");
> >>
> >> - wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "fw_data_len %d chunk_size %d", fw_data_len,
> >> - CHUNK_SIZE);
> >> + wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "fw_data_len %d chunk_size %d",
> >> + (u32) fw_data_len, CHUNK_SIZE);
> >>
> >
> > fw_data_len is a size_t and so should be printed with %zd.
> >
> >
> >> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static int wl1271_boot_upload_firmware_chunk(struct wl1271 *wl, void *buf,
> >> addr = dest + chunk_num * CHUNK_SIZE;
> >> p = buf + chunk_num * CHUNK_SIZE;
> >> wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "uploading fw last chunk (%d B) 0x%p to 0x%x",
> >> - fw_data_len % CHUNK_SIZE, p, addr);
> >> + (u32) fw_data_len % CHUNK_SIZE, p, addr);
> >>
> >
> > ditto.
> >
>
> Thanks! I didn't know about the z length modifier for printf (everyday
> learning something new!), I should have checked the manpage. I'll fix
> this and send v2 of my patch.
man page is fine, but you can also check (in the kernel source tree)
Documentation/printk-formats.txt
---
~Randy
LPC 2009, Sept. 23-25, Portland, Oregon
http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2009/