Hey,
The order of functions in phy_n.c is really messy. I wanted to collect
related functions, fix order (dependency) and name goups via comments.
Is there anything I should know? Patches are going to be huge, tons of
lines moved around the phy_n.c :(
Are there any objections against that? Any suggestions if I should
post one huge patch or few smaller ones?
--
Rafał
On 12/16/2011 12:55 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Hey,
>
> The order of functions in phy_n.c is really messy. I wanted to collect
> related functions, fix order (dependency) and name goups via comments.
>
> Is there anything I should know? Patches are going to be huge, tons of
> lines moved around the phy_n.c :(
>
> Are there any objections against that? Any suggestions if I should
> post one huge patch or few smaller ones?
Several smaller ones always help the reviewer. I would vote for that option.
Larry