2012-04-18 14:28:58

by Anisse Astier

Subject: [PATCH] rt2800: add chipset revision RT5390R support

About 70% of the chips with revision RT5390R initialize incorrectly, using
the auxiliary antenna instead of the main one. The net result is that
signal reception is very poor (no AP further than 1M).

This chipset differs from RT5390 and RT5390F by its support of hardware
antenna diversity. Therefore antenna selection should be done
differently, by disabling software features and previously selected
antenna.

This changeset does just that, and makes all RT5390R work properly.

This is based on Ralink's 2012_03_22_RT5572_Linux_STA_v2.6.0.0_DPO
driver.

Signed-off-by: Anisse Astier <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 10 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
index 063bfa8..1ce2634 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
#define REV_RT3090E 0x0211
#define REV_RT3390E 0x0211
#define REV_RT5390F 0x0502
+#define REV_RT5390R 0x1502

/*
* Signal information.
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
index bd19802..6c95101 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
@@ -3356,6 +3356,16 @@ static int rt2800_init_bbp(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, GPIO_CTRL_CFG, reg);
}

+ /* This chip has hardware antenna diversity*/
+ if (rt2x00_rt_rev_gte(rt2x00dev, RT5390, REV_RT5390R)) {
+ rt2x00dev->default_ant.tx = ANTENNA_HW_DIVERSITY; /* Unused */
+ rt2x00dev->default_ant.rx = ANTENNA_HW_DIVERSITY; /* Unused */
+
+ rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 150, 0); /* Disable Antenna Software OFDM */
+ rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 151, 0); /* Disable Antenna Software CCK */
+ rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 154, 0); /* Clear previously selected antenna */
+ }
+
rt2800_bbp_read(rt2x00dev, 152, &value);
if (ant == 0)
rt2x00_set_field8(&value, BBP152_RX_DEFAULT_ANT, 1);
--
1.7.9.4

2012-04-20 17:07:40

by Gertjan van Wingerde

Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2800: add chipset revision RT5390R support

Hi Anisse,


On 18 apr. 2012, at 16:23, Anisse Astier <[email protected]> wrote:

> About 70% of the chips with revision RT5390R initialize incorrectly, using
> the auxiliary antenna instead of the main one. The net result is that
> signal reception is very poor (no AP further than 1M).
>
> This chipset differs from RT5390 and RT5390F by its support of hardware
> antenna diversity. Therefore antenna selection should be done
> differently, by disabling software features and previously selected
> antenna.
>
> This changeset does just that, and makes all RT5390R work properly.
>
> This is based on Ralink's 2012_03_22_RT5572_Linux_STA_v2.6.0.0_DPO
> driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anisse Astier <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
> index 063bfa8..1ce2634 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
> #define REV_RT3090E 0x0211
> #define REV_RT3390E 0x0211
> #define REV_RT5390F 0x0502
> +#define REV_RT5390R 0x1502
>
> /*
> * Signal information.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> index bd19802..6c95101 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> @@ -3356,6 +3356,16 @@ static int rt2800_init_bbp(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, GPIO_CTRL_CFG, reg);
> }
>
> + /* This chip has hardware antenna diversity*/
> + if (rt2x00_rt_rev_gte(rt2x00dev, RT5390, REV_RT5390R)) {
> + rt2x00dev->default_ant.tx = ANTENNA_HW_DIVERSITY; /* Unused */
> + rt2x00dev->default_ant.rx = ANTENNA_HW_DIVERSITY; /* Unused */
> +
> + rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 150, 0); /* Disable Antenna Software OFDM */
> + rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 151, 0); /* Disable Antenna Software CCK */
> + rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 154, 0); /* Clear previously selected antenna */
> + }
> +
> rt2800_bbp_read(rt2x00dev, 152, &value);
> if (ant == 0)
> rt2x00_set_field8(&value, BBP152_RX_DEFAULT_ANT, 1);

Thanks for figuring this out. However, I think the default_ant initializations should be put at the place where the other initializations for the same field are (I believe that is somewhere in the rt2800_init_eeprom function (or a function with a similar name).
The BBP CSR writes are in the right place.

---
Gertjan

2012-04-23 10:37:48

by Anisse Astier

Subject: [PATCH v2] rt2800: add chipset revision RT5390R support

About 70% of the chips with revision RT5390R initialize incorrectly, using
the auxiliary antenna instead of the main one. The net result is that
signal reception is very poor (no AP further than 1M).

This chipset differs from RT5390 and RT5390F by its support of hardware
antenna diversity. Therefore antenna selection should be done
differently, by disabling software features and previously selected
antenna.

This changeset does just that, and makes all RT5390R work properly.

This is based on Ralink's 2012_03_22_RT5572_Linux_STA_v2.6.0.0_DPO
driver.

Signed-off-by: Anisse Astier <[email protected]>
---
Changes since v1:
- moved default_ant inits to proper function, thanks to Gertjan van Wingerde !

---
drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
index 063bfa8..1ce2634 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
#define REV_RT3090E 0x0211
#define REV_RT3390E 0x0211
#define REV_RT5390F 0x0502
+#define REV_RT5390R 0x1502

/*
* Signal information.
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
index bd19802..1cd16b4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
@@ -3356,6 +3356,13 @@ static int rt2800_init_bbp(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, GPIO_CTRL_CFG, reg);
}

+ /* This chip has hardware antenna diversity*/
+ if (rt2x00_rt_rev_gte(rt2x00dev, RT5390, REV_RT5390R)) {
+ rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 150, 0); /* Disable Antenna Software OFDM */
+ rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 151, 0); /* Disable Antenna Software CCK */
+ rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 154, 0); /* Clear previously selected antenna */
+ }
+
rt2800_bbp_read(rt2x00dev, 152, &value);
if (ant == 0)
rt2x00_set_field8(&value, BBP152_RX_DEFAULT_ANT, 1);
@@ -4291,6 +4298,11 @@ int rt2800_init_eeprom(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
rt2x00dev->default_ant.rx = ANTENNA_A;
}

+ if (rt2x00_rt_rev_gte(rt2x00dev, RT5390, REV_RT5390R)) {
+ rt2x00dev->default_ant.tx = ANTENNA_HW_DIVERSITY; /* Unused */
+ rt2x00dev->default_ant.rx = ANTENNA_HW_DIVERSITY; /* Unused */
+ }
+
/*
* Determine external LNA informations.
*/
--
1.7.9.4

2012-04-23 07:50:20

by Anisse Astier

Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2800: add chipset revision RT5390R support

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:07:38 +0200, Gertjan van Wingerde <[email protected]> wrote :

> Hi Anisse,
>
>
> On 18 apr. 2012, at 16:23, Anisse Astier <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > About 70% of the chips with revision RT5390R initialize incorrectly, using
> > the auxiliary antenna instead of the main one. The net result is that
> > signal reception is very poor (no AP further than 1M).
> >
> > This chipset differs from RT5390 and RT5390F by its support of hardware
> > antenna diversity. Therefore antenna selection should be done
> > differently, by disabling software features and previously selected
> > antenna.
> >
> > This changeset does just that, and makes all RT5390R work properly.
> >
> > This is based on Ralink's 2012_03_22_RT5572_Linux_STA_v2.6.0.0_DPO
> > driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anisse Astier <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h | 1 +
> > drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
> > index 063bfa8..1ce2634 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
> > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
> > #define REV_RT3090E 0x0211
> > #define REV_RT3390E 0x0211
> > #define REV_RT5390F 0x0502
> > +#define REV_RT5390R 0x1502
> >
> > /*
> > * Signal information.
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> > index bd19802..6c95101 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> > @@ -3356,6 +3356,16 @@ static int rt2800_init_bbp(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> > rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, GPIO_CTRL_CFG, reg);
> > }
> >
> > + /* This chip has hardware antenna diversity*/
> > + if (rt2x00_rt_rev_gte(rt2x00dev, RT5390, REV_RT5390R)) {
> > + rt2x00dev->default_ant.tx = ANTENNA_HW_DIVERSITY; /* Unused */
> > + rt2x00dev->default_ant.rx = ANTENNA_HW_DIVERSITY; /* Unused */
> > +
> > + rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 150, 0); /* Disable Antenna Software OFDM */
> > + rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 151, 0); /* Disable Antenna Software CCK */
> > + rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 154, 0); /* Clear previously selected antenna */
> > + }
> > +
> > rt2800_bbp_read(rt2x00dev, 152, &value);
> > if (ant == 0)
> > rt2x00_set_field8(&value, BBP152_RX_DEFAULT_ANT, 1);
>
> Thanks for figuring this out. However, I think the default_ant initializations should be put at the place where the other initializations for the same field are (I believe that is somewhere in the rt2800_init_eeprom function (or a function with a similar name).

I'm not even sure those are needed. I put them there in case someone
would want to use them in the future. What do you think ?


> The BBP CSR writes are in the right place.
>
> ---
> Gertjan

--
Anisse

2012-04-23 09:56:23

by Gertjan van Wingerde

Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2800: add chipset revision RT5390R support

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Anisse Astier <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:07:38 +0200, Gertjan van Wingerde <[email protected]> wrote :
>
>> Hi Anisse,
>>
>>
>> On 18 apr. 2012, at 16:23, Anisse Astier <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > About 70% of the chips with revision RT5390R initialize incorrectly, using
>> > the auxiliary antenna instead of the main one. The net result is that
>> > signal reception is very poor (no AP further than 1M).
>> >
>> > This chipset differs from RT5390 and RT5390F by its support of hardware
>> > antenna diversity. Therefore antenna selection should be done
>> > differently, by disabling software features and previously selected
>> > antenna.
>> >
>> > This changeset does just that, and makes all RT5390R work properly.
>> >
>> > This is based on Ralink's 2012_03_22_RT5572_Linux_STA_v2.6.0.0_DPO
>> > driver.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Anisse Astier <[email protected]>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h ? ?| ? ?1 +
>> > drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | ? 10 ++++++++++
>> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
>> > index 063bfa8..1ce2634 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
>> > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
>> > #define REV_RT3090E ? ? ? ? ? ?0x0211
>> > #define REV_RT3390E ? ? ? ? ? ?0x0211
>> > #define REV_RT5390F ? ? ? ? ? ?0x0502
>> > +#define REV_RT5390R ? ? ? ? ? ?0x1502
>> >
>> > /*
>> > ?* Signal information.
>> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
>> > index bd19802..6c95101 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
>> > @@ -3356,6 +3356,16 @@ static int rt2800_init_bbp(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
>> > ? ? ? ? ? ?rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, GPIO_CTRL_CFG, reg);
>> > ? ? ? ?}
>> >
>> > + ? ? ? ?/* This chip has hardware antenna diversity*/
>> > + ? ? ? ?if (rt2x00_rt_rev_gte(rt2x00dev, RT5390, REV_RT5390R)) {
>> > + ? ? ? ? ? ?rt2x00dev->default_ant.tx = ANTENNA_HW_DIVERSITY; /* Unused */
>> > + ? ? ? ? ? ?rt2x00dev->default_ant.rx = ANTENNA_HW_DIVERSITY; /* Unused */
>> > +
>> > + ? ? ? ? ? ?rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 150, 0); /* Disable Antenna Software OFDM */
>> > + ? ? ? ? ? ?rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 151, 0); /* Disable Antenna Software CCK */
>> > + ? ? ? ? ? ?rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 154, 0); /* Clear previously selected antenna */
>> > + ? ? ? ?}
>> > +
>> > ? ? ? ?rt2800_bbp_read(rt2x00dev, 152, &value);
>> > ? ? ? ?if (ant == 0)
>> > ? ? ? ? ? ?rt2x00_set_field8(&value, BBP152_RX_DEFAULT_ANT, 1);
>>
>> Thanks for figuring this out. However, I think the default_ant initializations should be put at the place where the other initializations for the same field are (I believe that is somewhere in the rt2800_init_eeprom function (or a function with a similar name).
>
> I'm not even sure those are needed. I put them there in case someone
> would want to use them in the future. What do you think ?
>

I would still include them, if only to signal that for these devices
we are using HW antenna diversity. However, as indicated, please put
them at the right spot in the code.

---
Gertjan

2012-05-03 16:24:05

by Anisse Astier

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rt2800: add chipset revision RT5390R support

On Thu, 03 May 2012 18:15:00 +0200, Gertjan van Wingerde <[email protected]> wrote :

> Hi Anisse,
>
> On 05/03/12 18:10, Anisse Astier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any opinon on the patch below ?
> >
>
> Since the patch has already been merged by John I didn't think it was
> necessary anymore to comment, as I has no issues with the patch anymore.
>

Oh, sorry, I was expecting an "Applied" email.

I should have checked if it was merged first, mea culpa.


Anisse

2012-05-03 16:15:07

by Gertjan van Wingerde

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rt2800: add chipset revision RT5390R support

Hi Anisse,

On 05/03/12 18:10, Anisse Astier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any opinon on the patch below ?
>

Since the patch has already been merged by John I didn't think it was
necessary anymore to comment, as I has no issues with the patch anymore.

> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:33:11 +0200, Anisse Astier <[email protected]> wrote :
>
>> About 70% of the chips with revision RT5390R initialize incorrectly, using
>> the auxiliary antenna instead of the main one. The net result is that
>> signal reception is very poor (no AP further than 1M).
>>
>> This chipset differs from RT5390 and RT5390F by its support of hardware
>> antenna diversity. Therefore antenna selection should be done
>> differently, by disabling software features and previously selected
>> antenna.
>>
>> This changeset does just that, and makes all RT5390R work properly.
>>
>> This is based on Ralink's 2012_03_22_RT5572_Linux_STA_v2.6.0.0_DPO
>> driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anisse Astier <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> - moved default_ant inits to proper function, thanks to Gertjan van Wingerde !
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h | 1 +
>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
>> index 063bfa8..1ce2634 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
>> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
>> #define REV_RT3090E 0x0211
>> #define REV_RT3390E 0x0211
>> #define REV_RT5390F 0x0502
>> +#define REV_RT5390R 0x1502
>>
>> /*
>> * Signal information.
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
>> index bd19802..1cd16b4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
>> @@ -3356,6 +3356,13 @@ static int rt2800_init_bbp(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
>> rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, GPIO_CTRL_CFG, reg);
>> }
>>
>> + /* This chip has hardware antenna diversity*/
>> + if (rt2x00_rt_rev_gte(rt2x00dev, RT5390, REV_RT5390R)) {
>> + rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 150, 0); /* Disable Antenna Software OFDM */
>> + rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 151, 0); /* Disable Antenna Software CCK */
>> + rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 154, 0); /* Clear previously selected antenna */
>> + }
>> +
>> rt2800_bbp_read(rt2x00dev, 152, &value);
>> if (ant == 0)
>> rt2x00_set_field8(&value, BBP152_RX_DEFAULT_ANT, 1);
>> @@ -4291,6 +4298,11 @@ int rt2800_init_eeprom(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
>> rt2x00dev->default_ant.rx = ANTENNA_A;
>> }
>>
>> + if (rt2x00_rt_rev_gte(rt2x00dev, RT5390, REV_RT5390R)) {
>> + rt2x00dev->default_ant.tx = ANTENNA_HW_DIVERSITY; /* Unused */
>> + rt2x00dev->default_ant.rx = ANTENNA_HW_DIVERSITY; /* Unused */
>> + }
>> +
>> /*
>> * Determine external LNA informations.
>> */
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Anisse


--
---
Gertjan

2012-05-03 16:10:15

by Anisse Astier

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rt2800: add chipset revision RT5390R support

Hi,

Any opinon on the patch below ?

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:33:11 +0200, Anisse Astier <[email protected]> wrote :

> About 70% of the chips with revision RT5390R initialize incorrectly, using
> the auxiliary antenna instead of the main one. The net result is that
> signal reception is very poor (no AP further than 1M).
>
> This chipset differs from RT5390 and RT5390F by its support of hardware
> antenna diversity. Therefore antenna selection should be done
> differently, by disabling software features and previously selected
> antenna.
>
> This changeset does just that, and makes all RT5390R work properly.
>
> This is based on Ralink's 2012_03_22_RT5572_Linux_STA_v2.6.0.0_DPO
> driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anisse Astier <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - moved default_ant inits to proper function, thanks to Gertjan van Wingerde !
>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
> index 063bfa8..1ce2634 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
> #define REV_RT3090E 0x0211
> #define REV_RT3390E 0x0211
> #define REV_RT5390F 0x0502
> +#define REV_RT5390R 0x1502
>
> /*
> * Signal information.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> index bd19802..1cd16b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> @@ -3356,6 +3356,13 @@ static int rt2800_init_bbp(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, GPIO_CTRL_CFG, reg);
> }
>
> + /* This chip has hardware antenna diversity*/
> + if (rt2x00_rt_rev_gte(rt2x00dev, RT5390, REV_RT5390R)) {
> + rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 150, 0); /* Disable Antenna Software OFDM */
> + rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 151, 0); /* Disable Antenna Software CCK */
> + rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 154, 0); /* Clear previously selected antenna */
> + }
> +
> rt2800_bbp_read(rt2x00dev, 152, &value);
> if (ant == 0)
> rt2x00_set_field8(&value, BBP152_RX_DEFAULT_ANT, 1);
> @@ -4291,6 +4298,11 @@ int rt2800_init_eeprom(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> rt2x00dev->default_ant.rx = ANTENNA_A;
> }
>
> + if (rt2x00_rt_rev_gte(rt2x00dev, RT5390, REV_RT5390R)) {
> + rt2x00dev->default_ant.tx = ANTENNA_HW_DIVERSITY; /* Unused */
> + rt2x00dev->default_ant.rx = ANTENNA_HW_DIVERSITY; /* Unused */
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Determine external LNA informations.
> */


Regards,

Anisse