Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: a6bd6c933339 Add linux-next specific files for 20240328
git tree: linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=15c85eb1180000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=b0058bda1436e073
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0438378d6f157baae1a2
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7c1618ff7d25/disk-a6bd6c93.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/875519f620fe/vmlinux-a6bd6c93.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/ad92b057fb96/bzImage-a6bd6c93.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: [email protected]
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2400 at kernel/kcov.c:860 kcov_remote_start+0x549/0x7e0 kernel/kcov.c:860
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 2400 Comm: kworker/u8:7 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-next-20240328-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/29/2024
Workqueue: events_unbound cfg80211_wiphy_work
RIP: 0010:kcov_remote_start+0x549/0x7e0 kernel/kcov.c:860
Code: 4c 89 ff be 03 00 00 00 e8 14 99 16 03 e9 fd fa ff ff e8 8a 26 ea 09 41 f7 c6 00 02 00 00 0f 84 eb fa ff ff e9 7f fc ff ff 90 <0f> 0b 90 e8 8f 43 ea 09 89 c0 48 c7 c7 c8 d4 02 00 48 03 3c c5 d0
RSP: 0018:ffffc90009b17aa8 EFLAGS: 00010002
RAX: 0000000080000000 RBX: ffff888029649e00 RCX: 0000000000000002
RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffffff8bcae740 RDI: ffffffff8c1f77c0
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff92f3358f R09: 1ffffffff25e66b1
R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff25e66b2 R12: ffffffff8195747e
R13: ffff88807c8cd748 R14: 0000000000000246 R15: ffff8880b952d4c8
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fc66d258d58 CR3: 00000000222ca000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
kcov_remote_start_common include/linux/kcov.h:48 [inline]
ieee80211_iface_work+0x21f/0xf10 net/mac80211/iface.c:1654
cfg80211_wiphy_work+0x221/0x260 net/wireless/core.c:437
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3218 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xa2c/0x1830 kernel/workqueue.c:3299
worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3380
kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at [email protected].
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
On Thu, 2024-03-28 at 04:00 -0700, syzbot wrote:
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2400 at kernel/kcov.c:860 kcov_remote_start+0x549/0x7e0 kernel/kcov.c:860
This is
/*
* Check that kcov_remote_start() is not called twice in background
* threads nor called by user tasks (with enabled kcov).
*/
mode = READ_ONCE(t->kcov_mode);
if (WARN_ON(in_task() && kcov_mode_enabled(mode))) {
local_unlock_irqrestore(&kcov_percpu_data.lock, flags);
return;
}
but I have no idea what that even means?
> Workqueue: events_unbound cfg80211_wiphy_work
> RIP: 0010:kcov_remote_start+0x549/0x7e0 kernel/kcov.c:860
...
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> kcov_remote_start_common include/linux/kcov.h:48 [inline]
> ieee80211_iface_work+0x21f/0xf10 net/mac80211/iface.c:1654
> cfg80211_wiphy_work+0x221/0x260 net/wireless/core.c:437
> process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3218 [inline]
> process_scheduled_works+0xa2c/0x1830 kernel/workqueue.c:3299
> worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3380
It's a worker thread. Was this not intended to be called in threads?
johannes
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 12:45 PM Johannes Berg
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2024-03-28 at 04:00 -0700, syzbot wrote:
> >
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2400 at kernel/kcov.c:860 kcov_remote_start+0x549/0x7e0 kernel/kcov.c:860
>
> This is
>
> /*
> * Check that kcov_remote_start() is not called twice in background
> * threads nor called by user tasks (with enabled kcov).
> */
> mode = READ_ONCE(t->kcov_mode);
> if (WARN_ON(in_task() && kcov_mode_enabled(mode))) {
> local_unlock_irqrestore(&kcov_percpu_data.lock, flags);
> return;
> }
>
> but I have no idea what that even means?
>
> > Workqueue: events_unbound cfg80211_wiphy_work
> > RIP: 0010:kcov_remote_start+0x549/0x7e0 kernel/kcov.c:860
> ...
> > Call Trace:
> > <TASK>
> > kcov_remote_start_common include/linux/kcov.h:48 [inline]
> > ieee80211_iface_work+0x21f/0xf10 net/mac80211/iface.c:1654
> > cfg80211_wiphy_work+0x221/0x260 net/wireless/core.c:437
> > process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3218 [inline]
> > process_scheduled_works+0xa2c/0x1830 kernel/workqueue.c:3299
> > worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3380
>
> It's a worker thread. Was this not intended to be called in threads?
I think the problem is that the KCOV annotations in the NFC code are
buggy: kcov_remote_stop() is never called if the loop in nci_rx_work()
exits on one of the breaks. With the recent addition of the nci_plen()
check, this started happening often. But breaks existed in the loop
before that too.
We need to move kcov_remote_stop() into the loop and call it every
time the loop exits.
Dmitry, could you PTAL and confirm this? You added the annotation for
NFC, AFAICS.
Thanks!