Remove invalid conditional statements to make the code clean
Signed-off-by: You Kangren <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/legacy/ray_cs.c | 13 -------------
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/legacy/ray_cs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/legacy/ray_cs.c
index 96f34d90f601..0022038b0758 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/legacy/ray_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/legacy/ray_cs.c
@@ -2116,7 +2116,6 @@ static void rx_data(struct net_device *dev, struct rcs __iomem *prcs,
#endif
if (!sniffer) {
- if (translate) {
/* TBD length needs fixing for translated header */
if (rx_len < (ETH_HLEN + RX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH) ||
rx_len >
@@ -2126,18 +2125,6 @@ static void rx_data(struct net_device *dev, struct rcs __iomem *prcs,
"ray_cs invalid packet length %d received\n",
rx_len);
return;
- }
- } else { /* encapsulated ethernet */
-
- if (rx_len < (ETH_HLEN + RX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH) ||
- rx_len >
- (dev->mtu + RX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH + ETH_HLEN +
- FCS_LEN)) {
- pr_debug(
- "ray_cs invalid packet length %d received\n",
- rx_len);
- return;
- }
}
}
pr_debug("ray_cs rx_data packet\n");
--
2.39.0
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 06:27:50PM +0800, You Kangren wrote:
> Remove invalid conditional statements to make the code clean
>
> Signed-off-by: You Kangren <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/legacy/ray_cs.c | 13 -------------
> 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/legacy/ray_cs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/legacy/ray_cs.c
> index 96f34d90f601..0022038b0758 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/legacy/ray_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/legacy/ray_cs.c
> @@ -2116,7 +2116,6 @@ static void rx_data(struct net_device *dev, struct rcs __iomem *prcs,
> #endif
>
> if (!sniffer) {
> - if (translate) {
> /* TBD length needs fixing for translated header */
> if (rx_len < (ETH_HLEN + RX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH) ||
> rx_len >
> @@ -2126,18 +2125,6 @@ static void rx_data(struct net_device *dev, struct rcs __iomem *prcs,
> "ray_cs invalid packet length %d received\n",
> rx_len);
> return;
> - }
Hi You Kangren,
Some minor nits from my side:
1. The indentation of the code is now wrong,
it should be adjusted one tab-stop to the left.
2. The two remaining conditions can be collapsed,
which leads to a further reduction in indentation.
3. Also, the indentation of the "TBD" comment was wrong before this patch,
and is still wrong. So we can probably fix that while we are here.
I suggest folding in something like this (completely untested!).
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/legacy/ray_cs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/legacy/ray_cs.c
index f0bc7a06a257..f339927f1f56 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/legacy/ray_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/legacy/ray_cs.c
@@ -2116,17 +2116,12 @@ static void rx_data(struct net_device *dev, struct rcs __iomem *prcs,
u_char linksrcaddr[ETH_ALEN]; /* Other end of the wireless link */
#endif
- if (!sniffer) {
-/* TBD length needs fixing for translated header */
- if (rx_len < (ETH_HLEN + RX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH) ||
- rx_len >
- (dev->mtu + RX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH + ETH_HLEN +
- FCS_LEN)) {
- pr_debug(
- "ray_cs invalid packet length %d received\n",
- rx_len);
- return;
- }
+ /* TBD length needs fixing for translated header */
+ if (!sniffer && (rx_len < (ETH_HLEN + RX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH) ||
+ rx_len > (dev->mtu + RX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH +
+ ETH_HLEN + FCS_LEN))) {
+ pr_debug("ray_cs invalid packet length %d received\n", rx_len);
+ return;
}
pr_debug("ray_cs rx_data packet\n");
/* If fragmented packet, verify sizes of fragments add up */
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 8:36 PM You Kangren <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Remove invalid conditional statements to make the code clean
>
> Signed-off-by: You Kangren <[email protected]>
"to make the code clean" isn't enough to explain why this change might
be wanted. Are both branches the same? Is there a compiler warning?
How did you find this? etc.
Thanks,
--
Julian Calaby
Email: [email protected]
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:44 PM 尤康仁 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear Julian,
>
> I found a warning at compiling time that the if and else branches had no effect here. I looked at the code and found that the contents of both branches were the same, so I merged the contents of both branches into one and committed the changes.
That's great, but it needs to be in the commit message.
Thanks,
--
Julian Calaby
Email: [email protected]
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/