When sending an email to [email protected], the server
responds '550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.'
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <[email protected]>
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index d984bd745e93..0db8909f4fc0 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -4156,7 +4156,6 @@ M: Franky Lin <[email protected]>
M: Hante Meuleman <[email protected]>
L: [email protected]
L: [email protected]
-L: [email protected]
S: Supported
F: drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/
--
2.17.1
Lukas Bulwahn <[email protected]> wrote:
> When sending an email to [email protected], the server
> responds '550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.'
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <[email protected]>
Patch applied to wireless.git, thanks.
044879ce5406 MAINTAINERS: wifi: brcm80211: remove non-existing [email protected]
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/[email protected]/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
On December 19, 2023 5:12:19 AM Kalle Valo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Lukas Bulwahn <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> When sending an email to [email protected], the server
>> responds '550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <[email protected]>
>
> Patch applied to wireless.git, thanks.
>
> 044879ce5406 MAINTAINERS: wifi: brcm80211: remove non-existing
> [email protected]
Is the claim here true? In another thread I replied all including this list
and I am not getting a bounce message.
Googling error code 550 seems to indicate a sender issue:
""""
This means the recipient's server doesn't trust the domain name you are
using. If this happens, then your email IP is blacklisted, and your
messages will bounce.
"""
Regards,
Arend
> --
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/[email protected]/
>
> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 10:01 AM Arend Van Spriel
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On December 19, 2023 5:12:19 AM Kalle Valo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Lukas Bulwahn <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> When sending an email to [email protected], the server
> >> responds '550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.'
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <[email protected]>
> >
> > Patch applied to wireless.git, thanks.
> >
> > 044879ce5406 MAINTAINERS: wifi: brcm80211: remove non-existing
> > [email protected]
>
> Is the claim here true? In another thread I replied all including this list
> and I am not getting a bounce message.
>
> Googling error code 550 seems to indicate a sender issue:
>
> """"
> This means the recipient's server doesn't trust the domain name you are
> using. If this happens, then your email IP is blacklisted, and your
> messages will bounce.
> """
>
Well, I am using a standard gmail email account and the email is
connect from some server from google. It is unfortunate if emails from
such email accounts would be excluded to reach the people behind this
infineon.com email.
In the end, if the actual content the receivers get at this
infineon.com email is so partial, they might just use and follow all
discussion they are interested in with the tools (lei and friends)
relying on lore.kernel.org.
Lukas
On Tue, 2023-12-19 at 10:01 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> >
> > > When sending an email to [email protected], the server
> > > responds '550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.'
>
> Is the claim here true? In another thread I replied all including this list
> and I am not getting a bounce message.
I also got the bounce, FWIW. And Lukas is using gmail ... if you're not
accepting mail from gmail I'm not sure you get to call it "email" in the
21st century, for (better or) worse...
johannes
Johannes Berg <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, 2023-12-19 at 10:01 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>> >
>> > > When sending an email to [email protected], the server
>> > > responds '550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.'
>>
>> Is the claim here true? In another thread I replied all including this list
>> and I am not getting a bounce message.
>
> I also got the bounce, FWIW. And Lukas is using gmail ... if you're not
> accepting mail from gmail I'm not sure you get to call it "email" in the
> 21st century, for (better or) worse...
And is Infineon even contributing anything to upstream? At least I don't
have recollection any recent activity, though happy to be proven wrong.
We shouldn't have dormant information in MAINTAINERS file.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 12:53:18PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Johannes Berg <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 2023-12-19 at 10:01 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > When sending an email to [email protected], the server
> >> > > responds '550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.'
> >>
> >> Is the claim here true? In another thread I replied all including this list
> >> and I am not getting a bounce message.
> >
> > I also got the bounce, FWIW. And Lukas is using gmail ... if you're not
> > accepting mail from gmail I'm not sure you get to call it "email" in the
> > 21st century, for (better or) worse...
>
> And is Infineon even contributing anything to upstream? At least I don't
> have recollection any recent activity, though happy to be proven wrong.
> We shouldn't have dormant information in MAINTAINERS file.
>
I'm also using gmail (and GMX as backup). When I sent my reply about rPI
testing [1] with [email protected] Cc'ed, I got `Address
not found` error instead (but the DSN message was in spam folder instead
as I treated it as junk).
For Infineon, they're now focusing on TPM subsystem, with the latest message
is 6 months (or a semester in academic speak) ago [2].
Thanks.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara