2009-11-26 13:57:16

by Ming Lei

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [question] ath9k: 11n monitor mode

Hi Luis,

I find the wireshark can only capture 11b/g packets but any 11n packets over
my ar9283 card, and I can confirm I have set HT40+ to make it work in 11n mode.

wireshark : 1.2.2
kernel : 2.6.32-rc6

I don't know what is wrong with it, and could ath9k work well in monitor
mode of 11n? or other reason?

Look forward to your reply.

Thanks,

--
Lei Ming


2009-11-27 01:37:36

by Ming Lei

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [question] ath9k: 11n monitor mode

2009/11/27 Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]>:
> 2009/11/26 G?bor Stefanik <[email protected]>:
>> I don't know exactly, but a while ago there was a discussion about how
>> to represent HT rates in Radiotap. AFAIK mac80211 refuses to forward
>> HT packets to monitor interfaces as they don't have a valid CCK or
>> OFDM rate.
>
> Matteo added a suggested field for radiotap for MCS rates:
>
> http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/MCS

Oh, I see.

Is there any patch which may let mac80211 forward HT packets to
monitor interface now?
If there is, where could I find it?

thanks,

--
Lei Ming

2009-11-26 21:49:06

by Luis R. Rodriguez

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [question] ath9k: 11n monitor mode

2009/11/26 Gábor Stefanik <[email protected]>:
> I don't know exactly, but a while ago there was a discussion about how
> to represent HT rates in Radiotap. AFAIK mac80211 refuses to forward
> HT packets to monitor interfaces as they don't have a valid CCK or
> OFDM rate.

Matteo added a suggested field for radiotap for MCS rates:

http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/MCS

If approved it could mean then parsing MCS rates.

Luis

2009-11-27 09:43:38

by Johannes Berg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [question] ath9k: 11n monitor mode

On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 09:37 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> 2009/11/27 Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]>:
> > 2009/11/26 Gábor Stefanik <[email protected]>:
> >> I don't know exactly, but a while ago there was a discussion about how
> >> to represent HT rates in Radiotap. AFAIK mac80211 refuses to forward
> >> HT packets to monitor interfaces as they don't have a valid CCK or
> >> OFDM rate.
> >
> > Matteo added a suggested field for radiotap for MCS rates:
> >
> > http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/MCS
>
> Oh, I see.
>
> Is there any patch which may let mac80211 forward HT packets to
> monitor interface now?
> If there is, where could I find it?

It will forward all frame that it gets from the driver, just not tell
you it was an HT frame in radiotap since there's no way to -- you'll see
a frame without rate information.

johannes


Attachments:
signature.asc (801.00 B)
This is a digitally signed message part

2009-11-26 17:03:12

by Gábor Stefanik

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [question] ath9k: 11n monitor mode

I don't know exactly, but a while ago there was a discussion about how
to represent HT rates in Radiotap. AFAIK mac80211 refuses to forward
HT packets to monitor interfaces as they don't have a valid CCK or
OFDM rate.

On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Ming Lei <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> I find the wireshark can only capture 11b/g packets but any 11n packets over
> my ar9283 card, and I can confirm I have set HT40+ to make it work in 11n mode.
>
> wireshark : 1.2.2
> kernel ? ? ? : 2.6.32-rc6
>
> I don't know what is wrong with it, and could ath9k work well in monitor
> mode of 11n? ?or other reason?
>
> Look forward to your reply.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Lei Ming
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at ?http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>



--
Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-)