The sscanf() function returns either 0 or 1 here. It doesn't return
error codes. We should return -EINVAL if the string is invalid.
Fixes: c376c1fc87b7 ("rtw88: add h2c command in debugfs")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c
index 948cb79050ea..99be7fcb5d71 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c
@@ -262,15 +262,12 @@ static ssize_t rtw_debugfs_set_rsvd_page(struct file *filp,
struct rtw_dev *rtwdev = debugfs_priv->rtwdev;
char tmp[32 + 1];
u32 offset, page_num;
- int num;
rtw_debugfs_copy_from_user(tmp, sizeof(tmp), buffer, count, 2);
- num = sscanf(tmp, "%d %d", &offset, &page_num);
-
- if (num != 2) {
+ if (sscanf(tmp, "%d %d", &offset, &page_num) != 2) {
rtw_warn(rtwdev, "invalid arguments\n");
- return num;
+ return -EINVAL;
}
debugfs_priv->rsvd_page.page_offset = offset;
--
2.30.0
Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
> The sscanf() function returns either 0 or 1 here. It doesn't return
> error codes. We should return -EINVAL if the string is invalid.
>
> Fixes: c376c1fc87b7 ("rtw88: add h2c command in debugfs")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Why do you remove the num variable? I think the code is more readable with it.
(Sorry, I'm not able to quote the code as I'm replying from patchwork script
and it doesn't support that yet.)
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/YCwgb/4F4Y+tyE56@mwanda/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 08:08:17AM +0000, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The sscanf() function returns either 0 or 1 here. It doesn't return
> > error codes. We should return -EINVAL if the string is invalid.
> >
> > Fixes: c376c1fc87b7 ("rtw88: add h2c command in debugfs")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
>
> Why do you remove the num variable? I think the code is more readable with it.
>
The way I wrote it is slightly more normal (457 vs 333) and we don't use
"num" except for the one if statement. But I can write the other way.
I'll resend.
regards,
dan carpenter