Nigel Cunningham ([email protected])

Number of posts: 137 (0.16 per day)
First post: 2006-01-25 00:59:03
Last post: 2008-06-03 02:08:19

Date	List	Subject
2008-06-03 02:08:19	linux-kernel	Re: [Bug #10606] 2.6.26-rc1 regression: ACPI fails to load SDT. - Dell M1530
2008-01-14 02:40:26	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH: 2/2] [SERIAL] avoid stalling suspend if serial port won't drain
2008-01-13 22:54:58	linux-kernel	Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ breaks blktrace timestamps
2008-01-13 22:51:19	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH: 2/2] [SERIAL] avoid stalling suspend if serial port won't drain
2008-01-11 09:28:52	linux-kernel	Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ breaks blktrace timestamps
2006-12-12 10:54:45	linux-kernel	[PATCH] Vmscan.c: Account for memory already freed in seeking to free more.
2006-12-12 10:37:24	linux-kernel	[PATCH] Fix swapped parameters in mm/vmscan.c.
2006-11-22 21:40:33	linux-kernel	Patches from me.
2006-11-20 22:26:33	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH -mm 0/2] Use freezeable workqueues to avoid suspend-related XFS corruptions
2006-11-20 22:03:36	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH -mm 0/2] Use freezeable workqueues to avoid suspend-related XFS corruptions
2006-11-20 11:02:46	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH -mm 0/2] Use freezeable workqueues to avoid suspend-related XFS corruptions
2006-11-08 20:48:28	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH 2.6.19 5/5] fs: freeze_bdev with semaphore not mutex
2006-08-09 11:53:59	linux-kernel	Re: swsusp and suspend2 like to overheat my laptop
2006-08-08 23:41:58	linux-kernel	Re: swsusp and suspend2 like to overheat my laptop
2006-08-08 21:54:43	linux-kernel	Re: swsusp and suspend2 like to overheat my laptop
2006-05-02 23:36:56	linux-kernel	Re: [RFC] kernel facilities for cache prefetching
2006-03-08 23:37:34	linux-kernel	Re: Nigel's work and the future of Suspend2.
2006-03-08 12:30:15	linux-kernel	Re: Nigel's work and the future of Suspend2.
2006-03-07 00:08:47	linux-kernel	Nigel's work and the future of Suspend2.
2006-02-21 04:49:08	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-20 21:04:38	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-20 20:47:48	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-20 20:30:20	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-20 11:47:04	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-20 11:47:04	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-20 11:46:40	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-20 11:46:29	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-20 11:44:43	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-20 11:43:48	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-20 02:53:50	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-20 02:14:08	linux-kernel	Re: suspend2 review [was Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)]
2006-02-20 00:28:17	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-19 21:12:37	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-17 23:31:21	linux-kernel	Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc4
2006-02-10 00:12:01	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-09 22:44:22	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-09 22:44:21	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-09 02:48:55	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-08 22:54:48	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-08 07:37:14	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-07 23:20:44	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-07 23:16:42	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-07 23:14:29	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-07 22:44:59	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-07 22:44:58	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-07 22:43:47	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-07 22:43:15	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-07 22:43:13	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-07 03:36:13	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-07 03:29:33	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-07 03:07:18	linux-kernel	Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)