Robert P. J. Day ([email protected])

Number of posts: 398 (0.07 per day)
First post: 2007-10-22 08:00:26
Last post: 2023-10-11 11:57:28

Date List Subject
2009-12-16 15:02:12 linux-kernel Re: anyone including <linux/perf_counter.h>?
2009-12-16 14:57:22 linux-kernel Re: anyone including <linux/perf_counter.h>?
2009-12-16 14:43:18 linux-kernel anyone including <linux/perf_counter.h>?
2009-12-07 11:48:58 linux-kernel Re: Sun-java5-sdk installing
2009-11-16 01:08:09 linux-kernel curious about alleged "compatibility" bits for lm-sensors
2009-09-30 19:55:26 linux-wireless unused header file drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251_netlink.h?
2009-09-29 23:11:56 linux-kernel any interest in unreferenced header files throughout the tree?
2009-09-28 20:11:04 linux-kernel final scan results: bad Kconfig "select"s
2009-09-28 19:37:12 linux-wireless Re: [ath9k-devel] Makefile ref to non-existent CONFIG_ATHEROS_AR71XX
2009-09-28 15:04:39 linux-kernel cleanup: inclusions of <linux/header> files that don't exist
2009-09-27 11:36:58 linux-kernel updated list of "bad" refs to CONFIG variables
2009-09-27 10:54:48 linux-kernel [PATCH] XEN: Fix comment spelling: CPU_HOTPLUG -> HOTPLUG_CPU
2009-09-27 09:11:28 linux-kernel fully updated wiki page of unused(?) CONFIG variables
2009-09-27 01:51:40 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Remove unused CONFIG MACH_OMAP_HTCWIZARD
2009-09-26 15:30:33 linux-kernel kernel Makefiles that refer to non-existent CONFIG variables
2009-09-26 14:04:08 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] ARM: Remove unused CONFIG reference DEBUG_S3C_PORT
2009-09-26 12:44:13 linux-kernel Re: how best to report results of my kernel tree scanning scripts?
2009-09-26 12:16:11 linux-kernel how best to report results of my kernel tree scanning scripts?
2009-09-22 12:37:52 linux-kernel Re: best practices: which "uaccess.h" should one include?
2009-09-22 06:29:24 linux-kernel best practices: which "uaccess.h" should one include?
2009-09-18 14:01:29 linux-wireless Makefile ref to non-existent CONFIG_ATHEROS_AR71XX
2009-09-17 20:08:37 linux-kernel Re: test for "spurious" IRQ ignores possible IRQ_WAKE_THREAD value
2009-09-14 20:34:49 linux-kernel Re: test for "spurious" IRQ ignores possible IRQ_WAKE_THREAD value
2009-09-14 20:30:34 linux-kernel test for "spurious" IRQ ignores possible IRQ_WAKE_THREAD value
2009-09-03 19:40:55 linux-kernel Re: yenta_socket: PCMCIA-Cards are not recognised by kernel
2009-07-31 18:17:43 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] staging/android/lowmemorykiller: fix module param errors
2009-07-23 10:08:49 linux-kernel annoying drivers/char/vr41xx_giu.c file still there
2009-07-20 01:21:40 linux-kernel [PATCH] MTD: Correct typo "MTD_DATAFLASH_VERIFY_WRITE".
2009-07-17 13:47:07 linux-kernel what is "temporary" about code in "__register_chrdev_region()"?
2009-07-15 11:31:41 linux-kernel any remaining value to EXPORT_UNUSED_SYMBOL{,_GPL} macros?
2009-07-11 12:43:13 linux-kernel Re: what means "module_param(channel_mask, channel_mask, 0644)"?
2009-07-11 11:09:47 linux-kernel Re: what means "module_param(channel_mask, channel_mask, 0644)"?
2009-07-11 11:03:26 linux-kernel what means "module_param(channel_mask, channel_mask, 0644)"?
2009-07-11 10:41:51 linux-kernel [PATCH] KERNEL: Conditionally include ramdisk-related code.
2009-07-11 04:43:32 linux-kernel Re: once again, what's with "drivers/char/vr41xx_giu.c"?
2009-07-10 09:09:18 linux-kernel once again, what's with "drivers/char/vr41xx_giu.c"?
2009-07-08 11:53:20 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] vlynq: remove duplicated #include
2009-07-08 09:00:50 linux-kernel should kernel support "rdinit=" parm without initrd support?
2009-07-05 16:09:30 linux-kernel what's with the git status of drivers/char/vr41xx_giu.c?
2009-07-05 00:46:23 linux-kernel [PATCH] SOUND: Remove commented out usage of dead MODULE_PARM().
2009-07-04 16:40:41 linux-kernel value of returning positive error code from module_init()?
2009-07-04 16:36:08 linux-kernel weekly column and a question about module_init() error codes
2009-06-30 10:20:23 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Introduce a boolean "single_bit_set" function.
2009-06-29 18:52:58 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Introduce a boolean "single_bit_set" function.
2009-06-29 01:12:20 linux-kernel [PATCH] KERNEL: Correct routine name in comment.
2009-06-28 11:58:34 linux-kernel does CONFIG_MODULE_SRCVERSION_ALL depend on MODULE_VERSION?
2009-06-25 21:45:20 linux-kernel Re: Bug in arch/x86/include/asm/boot.h [Was: next cleanup report: "bad" references to CONFIG variables]
2009-06-25 20:22:59 linux-kernel [PATCH] X86: Typo fix: "CONFIG_x86_64" -> "CONFIG_X86_64"
2009-06-25 19:29:29 linux-kernel Re: Bug in arch/x86/include/asm/boot.h [Was: next cleanup report: "bad" references to CONFIG variables]
2009-06-25 14:36:17 linux-kernel next cleanup report: "bad" references to CONFIG variables
2009-06-25 11:09:32 linux-kernel first pass of kernel cleanup script for -rc1