Oleksij Rempel ([email protected])

Number of posts: 89 (0.07 per day)
First post: 2008-10-21 06:27:23
Last post: 2012-06-05 18:39:44

Previous Page
Date List Subject
2009-10-10 07:30:35 linux-kernel Re: ext4 corruptions
2009-10-09 19:21:06 linux-kernel ext4 corruptions
2009-07-24 19:49:58 linux-kernel is ICQ10 broken by design? or there is some ehci vs uhci issue.
2009-07-18 20:29:58 linux-kernel [kmemleak] 60 wornings on sysfs_new_dirent+0x10c
2009-07-18 13:46:10 linux-kernel Re: PM: resume devices took 9.176 seconds
2009-07-18 13:30:09 linux-kernel Re: ext4 memory leak (was Re: [PATCH] x86: _edata should include all .data.* sections on X86_64)
2009-07-18 11:43:12 linux-kernel [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Add quirk for Intel DG45ID board to avoid low memory corruption
2009-07-15 15:57:49 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Solve the issue with memory corruption on Intel BIOS.
2009-07-15 12:16:23 linux-kernel [PATCH] Lowmemory corruption. Quirk for Intel DG45ID board.
2009-07-15 08:54:23 linux-kernel Re: ext4 memory leak (was Re: [PATCH] x86: _edata should include all .data.* sections on X86_64)
2009-07-15 05:55:25 linux-kernel [PATCH] Solve the issue with memory corruption on Intel BIOS.
2009-07-14 14:18:27 linux-kernel possible memory leak on i915_gem_create_ioctl
2009-07-14 10:37:10 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] x86: _edata should include all .data.* sections on X86_64
2009-07-14 10:13:50 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] x86: _edata should include all .data.* sections on X86_64
2009-07-14 08:29:02 linux-kernel Re: 60 memory leaks.. or is it some thing wrong with kmemleak?
2009-07-14 06:08:42 linux-kernel 60 memory leaks.. or is it some thing wrong with kmemleak?
2009-07-11 09:41:44 linux-kernel Re: Intel BIOS - Corrupted low memory at ffff880000004200
2009-07-10 14:45:12 linux-kernel Re: Intel BIOS - Corrupted low memory at ffff880000004200
2009-07-10 14:04:26 linux-kernel Re: Intel BIOS - Corrupted low memory at ffff880000004200
2009-07-10 12:17:14 linux-kernel Re: Intel BIOS - Corrupted low memory at ffff880000004200
2009-07-06 16:25:00 linux-kernel Re: Intel BIOS - Corrupted low memory at ffff880000004200
2009-07-06 16:21:22 linux-kernel PM: resume devices took 9.176 seconds
2009-07-06 14:57:00 linux-kernel Intel BIOS - Corrupted low memory at ffff880000004200
2009-03-16 07:35:22 linux-kernel Re: smart cache. ist is possible?
2009-03-15 22:06:48 linux-kernel Re: smart cache. ist is possible?
2009-03-15 15:29:16 linux-kernel smart cache. ist is possible?
2009-01-20 13:45:28 linux-kernel Re: [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
2009-01-20 09:10:19 linux-kernel Re: [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
2009-01-14 07:39:15 linux-kernel Re: [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
2009-01-11 14:52:20 linux-kernel Re: [Bug #12420] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x45e/0x750()
2009-01-06 18:47:29 linux-kernel [regression] glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"
2008-11-06 08:51:25 linux-wireless [PATCH] ipw2200: make assocaittion only if SSID is known.
2008-11-05 08:59:18 linux-wireless Re: [PATCH] make assocaittion only if SSID is known.
2008-11-05 08:46:08 linux-wireless [PATCH] ipw2200: make assocaittion only if SSID is known.
2008-11-04 22:01:45 linux-wireless [PATCH] make assocaittion only if SSID is known.
2008-11-03 22:28:10 linux-wireless Re: why differnet wlan drivers need different settings?
2008-10-25 20:45:37 linux-wireless Re: why differnet wlan drivers need different settings?
2008-10-21 06:27:23 linux-kernel Re: [saa7133] resource map sanity check conflict