2024-03-01 08:27:06

by Zhiguo Niu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: fix to check return value __allocate_new_segment

__allocate_new_segment may return error when get_new_segment
fails, so its caller should check its return value.

Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <[email protected]>
---
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 2 +-
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 7 +++++--
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index db05fd0..4331012 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -3705,7 +3705,7 @@ void f2fs_allocate_segment_for_resize(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type,
unsigned int start, unsigned int end);
int f2fs_allocate_new_section(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type, bool force);
int f2fs_allocate_pinning_section(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
-void f2fs_allocate_new_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
+int f2fs_allocate_new_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
int f2fs_trim_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct fstrim_range *range);
bool f2fs_exist_trim_candidates(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
struct cp_control *cpc);
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
index 3078d56..c381f0a 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ static int recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *inode_list,
f2fs_ra_meta_pages_cond(sbi, blkaddr, ra_blocks);
}
if (!err)
- f2fs_allocate_new_segments(sbi);
+ err = f2fs_allocate_new_segments(sbi);
return err;
}

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index cdac4cb..72f6ee3 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -3163,16 +3163,19 @@ int f2fs_allocate_pinning_section(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
return err;
}

-void f2fs_allocate_new_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
+int f2fs_allocate_new_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
{
int i;
+ int err = 0;

f2fs_down_read(&SM_I(sbi)->curseg_lock);
down_write(&SIT_I(sbi)->sentry_lock);
for (i = CURSEG_HOT_DATA; i <= CURSEG_COLD_DATA; i++)
- __allocate_new_segment(sbi, i, false, false);
+ err += __allocate_new_segment(sbi, i, false, false);
up_write(&SIT_I(sbi)->sentry_lock);
f2fs_up_read(&SM_I(sbi)->curseg_lock);
+
+ return err;
}

bool f2fs_exist_trim_candidates(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
--
1.9.1



2024-03-01 08:28:18

by Zhiguo Niu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: fix to check return value of f2fs_gc_range

f2fs_gc_range may return error, so its caller
f2fs_allocate_pinning_section should determine whether
to do retry based on ist return value.

Also just do f2fs_gc_range when f2fs_allocate_new_section
return -EAGAIN, and check cp error case in f2fs_gc_range.

Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <[email protected]>
---
fs/f2fs/gc.c | 3 +++
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 13 ++++++++-----
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
index e435e1f..c60b747 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
@@ -1986,6 +1986,9 @@ int f2fs_gc_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
unsigned int segno;
unsigned int gc_secs = dry_run_sections;

+ if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
+ return -EIO;
+
for (segno = start_seg; segno <= end_seg; segno += SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi)) {
struct gc_inode_list gc_list = {
.ilist = LIST_HEAD_INIT(gc_list.ilist),
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 72f6ee3..1bb3019 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -3109,6 +3109,7 @@ static int __allocate_new_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type,
{
struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, type);
unsigned int old_segno;
+ int err = 0;

if (type == CURSEG_COLD_DATA_PINNED && !curseg->inited)
goto allocate;
@@ -3121,8 +3122,9 @@ static int __allocate_new_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type,

allocate:
old_segno = curseg->segno;
- if (new_curseg(sbi, type, true))
- return -EAGAIN;
+ err = new_curseg(sbi, type, true);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
stat_inc_seg_type(sbi, curseg);
locate_dirty_segment(sbi, old_segno);
return 0;
@@ -3151,13 +3153,14 @@ int f2fs_allocate_pinning_section(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
err = f2fs_allocate_new_section(sbi, CURSEG_COLD_DATA_PINNED, false);
f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);

- if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) && err && gc_required) {
+ if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) && err == -EAGAIN && gc_required) {
f2fs_down_write(&sbi->gc_lock);
- f2fs_gc_range(sbi, 0, GET_SEGNO(sbi, FDEV(0).end_blk), true, 1);
+ err = f2fs_gc_range(sbi, 0, GET_SEGNO(sbi, FDEV(0).end_blk), true, 1);
f2fs_up_write(&sbi->gc_lock);

gc_required = false;
- goto retry;
+ if (!err)
+ goto retry;
}

return err;
--
1.9.1


2024-03-04 01:25:41

by Chao Yu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: fix to check return value __allocate_new_segment

On 2024/3/1 16:25, Zhiguo Niu wrote:
> __allocate_new_segment may return error when get_new_segment
> fails, so its caller should check its return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>

Thanks,

2024-03-04 01:28:17

by Chao Yu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: fix to check return value of f2fs_gc_range

On 2024/3/1 16:25, Zhiguo Niu wrote:
> f2fs_gc_range may return error, so its caller
> f2fs_allocate_pinning_section should determine whether
> to do retry based on ist return value.
>
> Also just do f2fs_gc_range when f2fs_allocate_new_section
> return -EAGAIN, and check cp error case in f2fs_gc_range.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>

Thanks,

2024-03-04 18:55:26

by patchwork-bot+f2fs

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: fix to check return value __allocate_new_segment

Hello:

This series was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev)
by Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>:

On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:25:54 +0800 you wrote:
> __allocate_new_segment may return error when get_new_segment
> fails, so its caller should check its return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
> fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 2 +-
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 7 +++++--
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Here is the summary with links:
- [f2fs-dev,1/2] f2fs: fix to check return value __allocate_new_segment
https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/28f66cc65403
- [f2fs-dev,2/2] f2fs: fix to check return value of f2fs_gc_range
https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/22af1b8c31cb

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html