This function is passed an __iomem pointer but we use a u32
pointer instead which makes checkers like spare complain.
Furthermore, "lock" is a pretty poor variable name for a string
that will go into lockdep reports and the symbol isn't marked
static. Cleanup all this.
Cc: Robert Jarzmik <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
---
drivers/clk/pxa/clk-pxa.c | 7 ++++---
drivers/clk/pxa/clk-pxa.h | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/pxa/clk-pxa.c b/drivers/clk/pxa/clk-pxa.c
index 50fb9d0ea58d..29fc71617bad 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/pxa/clk-pxa.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/pxa/clk-pxa.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
#define MDREFR_DB2_MASK (MDREFR_K2DB2 | MDREFR_K1DB2)
#define MDREFR_DRI_MASK 0xFFF
-DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pxa_clk_lock);
static struct clk *pxa_clocks[CLK_MAX];
static struct clk_onecell_data onecell_data = {
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ int __init clk_pxa_cken_init(const struct desc_clk_cken *clks, int nb_clks)
pxa_clk->lp = clks[i].lp;
pxa_clk->hp = clks[i].hp;
pxa_clk->gate = clks[i].gate;
- pxa_clk->gate.lock = &lock;
+ pxa_clk->gate.lock = &pxa_clk_lock;
clk = clk_register_composite(NULL, clks[i].name,
clks[i].parent_names, 2,
&pxa_clk->hw, &cken_mux_ops,
@@ -155,7 +155,8 @@ void pxa2xx_core_turbo_switch(bool on)
}
void pxa2xx_cpll_change(struct pxa2xx_freq *freq,
- u32 (*mdrefr_dri)(unsigned int), u32 *mdrefr, u32 *cccr)
+ u32 (*mdrefr_dri)(unsigned int), void __iomem *mdrefr,
+ void __iomem *cccr)
{
unsigned int clkcfg = freq->clkcfg;
unsigned int unused, preset_mdrefr, postset_mdrefr;
diff --git a/drivers/clk/pxa/clk-pxa.h b/drivers/clk/pxa/clk-pxa.h
index 58abfa816d53..2b90c5917b32 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/pxa/clk-pxa.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/pxa/clk-pxa.h
@@ -155,8 +155,8 @@ void clk_pxa_dt_common_init(struct device_node *np);
void pxa2xx_core_turbo_switch(bool on);
void pxa2xx_cpll_change(struct pxa2xx_freq *freq,
- u32 (*mdrefr_dri)(unsigned int), u32 *mdrefr,
- u32 *cccr);
+ u32 (*mdrefr_dri)(unsigned int), void __iomem *mdrefr,
+ void __iomem *cccr);
int pxa2xx_determine_rate(struct clk_rate_request *req,
struct pxa2xx_freq *freqs, int nb_freqs);
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> writes:
> This function is passed an __iomem pointer but we use a u32
> pointer instead which makes checkers like spare complain.
> Furthermore, "lock" is a pretty poor variable name for a string
> that will go into lockdep reports and the symbol isn't marked
> static. Cleanup all this.
>
> Cc: Robert Jarzmik <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
Most certainly.
Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik <[email protected]>
Cheers.
--
Robert
On 11/08, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This function is passed an __iomem pointer but we use a u32
> pointer instead which makes checkers like spare complain.
> Furthermore, "lock" is a pretty poor variable name for a string
> that will go into lockdep reports and the symbol isn't marked
> static. Cleanup all this.
>
> Cc: Robert Jarzmik <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project