2017-09-13 17:26:34

by Jarkko Sakkinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] tpm: fix type of a local variable in tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl()

The local variable 'attrs' should have the type __be32 instead of u32.

Fixes: 58472f5cd4f6 ("tpm: validate TPM 2.0 commands")
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
index 70ee32816c48..f40d20671a78 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
@@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ static int tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl(struct tpm_chip *chip)
{
struct tpm_buf buf;
u32 nr_commands;
- u32 *attrs;
+ __be32 *attrs;
u32 cc;
int i;
int rc;
@@ -1020,7 +1020,7 @@ static int tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl(struct tpm_chip *chip)

chip->nr_commands = nr_commands;

- attrs = (u32 *)&buf.data[TPM_HEADER_SIZE + 9];
+ attrs = (__be32 *)&buf.data[TPM_HEADER_SIZE + 9];
for (i = 0; i < nr_commands; i++, attrs++) {
chip->cc_attrs_tbl[i] = be32_to_cpup(attrs);
cc = chip->cc_attrs_tbl[i] & 0xFFFF;
--
2.14.1


2017-09-13 18:14:35

by Jason Gunthorpe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tpm: fix type of a local variable in tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl()

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:26:20AM -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> The local variable 'attrs' should have the type __be32 instead of u32.
>
> Fixes: 58472f5cd4f6 ("tpm: validate TPM 2.0 commands")
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>

All 3 look good to me:

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>

Jason

2017-09-13 23:04:38

by Jarkko Sakkinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tpm: fix type of a local variable in tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl()

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:14:21PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:26:20AM -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > The local variable 'attrs' should have the type __be32 instead of u32.
> >
> > Fixes: 58472f5cd4f6 ("tpm: validate TPM 2.0 commands")
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
>
> All 3 look good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
>
> Jason

Thanks!

/Jarkko