Hi
In Documentation/rapidio/sysfs.txt, there is a description of the sysfs
interface which could be moved to Documentation/ABI (as a bus interface under
testing).
Would such a change be useful?
The ABI documentation format looks like the following:
What: (the full sysfs path of the attribute)
Date: (date of creation)
KernelVersion: (kernel version it first showed up in)
Contact: (primary contact)
Description: (long description on usage)
I am doing this in an exercise to move sysfs ABI interfaces (which are
documented) to their right place i.e. in Documentation/ABI along with the rest.
Aishwarya
08.01.2018, 11:38, "Aishwarya Pant" <[email protected]>:
> Hi
Hello,
> In Documentation/rapidio/sysfs.txt, there is a description of the sysfs
> interface which could be moved to Documentation/ABI (as a bus interface under
> testing).
>
> Would such a change be useful?
>
> The ABI documentation format looks like the following:
>
> What: (the full sysfs path of the attribute)
> Date: (date of creation)
> KernelVersion: (kernel version it first showed up in)
> Contact: (primary contact)
> Description: (long description on usage)
Please you make the change you want after send your patch it diff format, right?
I think a better decision can be made.
> I am doing this in an exercise to move sysfs ABI interfaces (which are
> documented) to their right place i.e. in Documentation/ABI along with the rest.
>
> Aishwarya
Regards
Ozgur
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 11:58:12AM +0300, Ozgur wrote:
>
>
> 08.01.2018, 11:38, "Aishwarya Pant" <[email protected]>:
> > Hi
>
> Hello,
>
> > In Documentation/rapidio/sysfs.txt, there is a description of the sysfs
> > interface which could be moved to Documentation/ABI (as a bus interface under
> > testing).
> >
> > Would such a change be useful?
> >
> > The ABI documentation format looks like the following:
> >
> > What: (the full sysfs path of the attribute)
> > Date: (date of creation)
> > KernelVersion: (kernel version it first showed up in)
> > Contact: (primary contact)
> > Description: (long description on usage)
>
> Please you make the change you want after send your patch it diff format, right?
> I think a better decision can be made.
This is the idea. If this change is acceptable, then I can make a patch and send
it for review.
Aishwarya
>
> > I am doing this in an exercise to move sysfs ABI interfaces (which are
> > documented) to their right place i.e. in Documentation/ABI along with the rest.
> >
> > Aishwarya
>
> Regards
>
> Ozgur
08.01.2018, 12:03, "Aishwarya Pant" <[email protected]>:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 11:58:12AM +0300, Ozgur wrote:
>> 08.01.2018, 11:38, "Aishwarya Pant" <[email protected]>:
>> > Hi
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> > In Documentation/rapidio/sysfs.txt, there is a description of the sysfs
>> > interface which could be moved to Documentation/ABI (as a bus interface under
>> > testing).
>> >
>> > Would such a change be useful?
>> >
>> > The ABI documentation format looks like the following:
>> >
>> > What: (the full sysfs path of the attribute)
>> > Date: (date of creation)
>> > KernelVersion: (kernel version it first showed up in)
>> > Contact: (primary contact)
>> > Description: (long description on usage)
>>
>> Please you make the change you want after send your patch it diff format, right?
>> I think a better decision can be made.
>
> This is the idea. If this change is acceptable, then I can make a patch and send
> it for review.
Hm,
I think firstly you should send the patch then everybody checked and change is decided.
Regards
Ozgur
> Aishwarya
>
>> > I am doing this in an exercise to move sysfs ABI interfaces (which are
>> > documented) to their right place i.e. in Documentation/ABI along with the rest.
>> >
>> > Aishwarya
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Ozgur