2019-04-30 00:20:30

by Tobin C. Harding

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] sched/cpufreq: Fix kobject memleak

Currently error return from kobject_init_and_add() is not followed by a
call to kobject_put(). This means there is a memory leak.

Add call to kobject_put() in error path of kobject_init_and_add().

Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <[email protected]>
---

Resend with SOB tag.

kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 5c41ea367422..3638d2377e3c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -771,6 +771,7 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
return 0;

fail:
+ kobject_put(&tunables->attr_set.kobj);
policy->governor_data = NULL;
sugov_tunables_free(tunables);

--
2.21.0


2019-04-30 04:26:10

by Ingo Molnar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] sched/cpufreq: Fix kobject memleak


* Tobin C. Harding <[email protected]> wrote:

> Currently error return from kobject_init_and_add() is not followed by a
> call to kobject_put(). This means there is a memory leak.
>
> Add call to kobject_put() in error path of kobject_init_and_add().
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Resend with SOB tag.

Please ignore my previous mail :-)

Thanks,

Ingo

2019-04-30 05:18:11

by Tobin C. Harding

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] sched/cpufreq: Fix kobject memleak

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 06:24:43AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Tobin C. Harding <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Currently error return from kobject_init_and_add() is not followed by a
> > call to kobject_put(). This means there is a memory leak.
> >
> > Add call to kobject_put() in error path of kobject_init_and_add().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > Resend with SOB tag.
>
> Please ignore my previous mail :-)

Cheers Ingo, caught myself not checkpatching :(

thanks,
Tobin.