Document the compatible strings for the SL631 Action Camera with IMX179.
Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
index afa00268c7db..0fa0c0b5d89f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
@@ -754,6 +754,12 @@ properties:
- const: sinlinx,sina33
- const: allwinner,sun8i-a33
+ - description: SL631 Action Camera with IMX179
+ items:
+ - const: unknown,sl631-imx179
+ - const: unknown,sl631
+ - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3
+
- description: Tanix TX6
items:
- const: oranth,tanix-tx6
--
2.28.0
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 07:21:36PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Document the compatible strings for the SL631 Action Camera with IMX179.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> index afa00268c7db..0fa0c0b5d89f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> @@ -754,6 +754,12 @@ properties:
> - const: sinlinx,sina33
> - const: allwinner,sun8i-a33
>
> + - description: SL631 Action Camera with IMX179
> + items:
> + - const: unknown,sl631-imx179
> + - const: unknown,sl631
> + - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3
> +
unknown is not a valid vendor (and you should explain why you picked
that vendor name in the first place).
Maxime
Hi,
On Mon 02 Nov 20, 11:13, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 07:21:36PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > Document the compatible strings for the SL631 Action Camera with IMX179.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> > index afa00268c7db..0fa0c0b5d89f 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> > @@ -754,6 +754,12 @@ properties:
> > - const: sinlinx,sina33
> > - const: allwinner,sun8i-a33
> >
> > + - description: SL631 Action Camera with IMX179
> > + items:
> > + - const: unknown,sl631-imx179
> > + - const: unknown,sl631
> > + - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3
> > +
>
> unknown is not a valid vendor (and you should explain why you picked
> that vendor name in the first place).
Ah right, it's not in the vendor prefixes. The rationale is that there is no
indication of what the vendor might be on the PCB. Should I maybe use
allwinner here? It looks derived from a V3 reference design anyway
(at least the pin assignment matches e.g. Sochip's S3 EVB and other known S3
boards too apparently) so this could make sense.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Developer of free digital technology and hardware support.
Website: https://www.paulk.fr/
Coding blog: https://code.paulk.fr/
Git repositories: https://git.paulk.fr/ https://git.code.paulk.fr/
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 11:33:40AM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon 02 Nov 20, 11:13, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 07:21:36PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > > Document the compatible strings for the SL631 Action Camera with IMX179.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml | 6 ++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> > > index afa00268c7db..0fa0c0b5d89f 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> > > @@ -754,6 +754,12 @@ properties:
> > > - const: sinlinx,sina33
> > > - const: allwinner,sun8i-a33
> > >
> > > + - description: SL631 Action Camera with IMX179
> > > + items:
> > > + - const: unknown,sl631-imx179
> > > + - const: unknown,sl631
> > > + - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3
> > > +
> >
> > unknown is not a valid vendor (and you should explain why you picked
> > that vendor name in the first place).
>
> Ah right, it's not in the vendor prefixes. The rationale is that there is no
> indication of what the vendor might be on the PCB. Should I maybe use
> allwinner here?
You should mention it in the commit log for a start :)
But yeah, we've used allwinner as a fallback for those cases so far.
Maxime
On Mon 02 Nov 20, 15:27, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 11:33:40AM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon 02 Nov 20, 11:13, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 07:21:36PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > > > Document the compatible strings for the SL631 Action Camera with IMX179.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml | 6 ++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> > > > index afa00268c7db..0fa0c0b5d89f 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> > > > @@ -754,6 +754,12 @@ properties:
> > > > - const: sinlinx,sina33
> > > > - const: allwinner,sun8i-a33
> > > >
> > > > + - description: SL631 Action Camera with IMX179
> > > > + items:
> > > > + - const: unknown,sl631-imx179
> > > > + - const: unknown,sl631
> > > > + - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3
> > > > +
> > >
> > > unknown is not a valid vendor (and you should explain why you picked
> > > that vendor name in the first place).
> >
> > Ah right, it's not in the vendor prefixes. The rationale is that there is no
> > indication of what the vendor might be on the PCB. Should I maybe use
> > allwinner here?
>
> You should mention it in the commit log for a start :)
Definitely.
> But yeah, we've used allwinner as a fallback for those cases so far.
Okay then, I'll go with that and add some explanation in the commit log.
Thanks for the review!
Cheers,
Paul
--
Developer of free digital technology and hardware support.
Website: https://www.paulk.fr/
Coding blog: https://code.paulk.fr/
Git repositories: https://git.paulk.fr/ https://git.code.paulk.fr/