The vfio_ap module tries to register for the vfio_ap bus - but that's
the interface that it provides itself, so this does not make much sense,
thus let's simply drop this statement now.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <[email protected]>
---
See also my previous patch to register it for the "ap" bus instead:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/[email protected]/
... but since it has been decided to not auto-load the module uncondi-
tionally, I'd like to suggest to rather drop this line now instead.
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
index 29ebd54f8919..4ac9c6521ec1 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
@@ -46,8 +46,6 @@ static struct ap_device_id ap_queue_ids[] = {
{ /* end of sibling */ },
};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(vfio_ap, ap_queue_ids);
-
static struct ap_matrix_mdev *vfio_ap_mdev_for_queue(struct vfio_ap_queue *q)
{
struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev;
--
2.27.0
Reviewed-by: Tony Krowiak <[email protected]>
On 4/13/22 5:44 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The vfio_ap module tries to register for the vfio_ap bus - but that's
> the interface that it provides itself, so this does not make much sense,
> thus let's simply drop this statement now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <[email protected]>
> ---
> See also my previous patch to register it for the "ap" bus instead:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/[email protected]/
> ... but since it has been decided to not auto-load the module uncondi-
> tionally, I'd like to suggest to rather drop this line now instead.
>
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
> index 29ebd54f8919..4ac9c6521ec1 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
> @@ -46,8 +46,6 @@ static struct ap_device_id ap_queue_ids[] = {
> { /* end of sibling */ },
> };
>
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(vfio_ap, ap_queue_ids);
> -
> static struct ap_matrix_mdev *vfio_ap_mdev_for_queue(struct vfio_ap_queue *q)
> {
> struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev;
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 10:23:38AM -0400, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Tony Krowiak <[email protected]>
>
> On 4/13/22 5:44 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > The vfio_ap module tries to register for the vfio_ap bus - but that's
> > the interface that it provides itself, so this does not make much sense,
> > thus let's simply drop this statement now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > See also my previous patch to register it for the "ap" bus instead:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/[email protected]/
> > ... but since it has been decided to not auto-load the module uncondi-
> > tionally, I'd like to suggest to rather drop this line now instead.
> >
> > drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
...
Applied, thanks.