The 2nd trial allocation under per-cpu presumption has been
used to prevent regression of allocation failure. However, it
makes trouble for maintenance without significant benefit.
The slowpath branch is executed extremely rarely: getting
there is problematic. Therefore, we delete this branch.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Romanov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rokosov <[email protected]>
---
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 38 +++++++++--------------------------
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index cb253d80d72b..4be6caf43b1d 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -1153,9 +1153,8 @@ static ssize_t debug_stat_show(struct device *dev,
down_read(&zram->init_lock);
ret = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE,
- "version: %d\n%8llu %8llu\n",
+ "version: %d\n%8llu\n",
version,
- (u64)atomic64_read(&zram->stats.writestall),
(u64)atomic64_read(&zram->stats.miss_free));
up_read(&zram->init_lock);
@@ -1373,7 +1372,6 @@ static int __zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
}
kunmap_atomic(mem);
-compress_again:
zstrm = zcomp_stream_get(zram->comp);
src = kmap_atomic(page);
ret = zcomp_compress(zstrm, src, &comp_len);
@@ -1388,33 +1386,15 @@ static int __zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
if (comp_len >= huge_class_size)
comp_len = PAGE_SIZE;
- /*
- * handle allocation has 2 paths:
- * a) fast path is executed with preemption disabled (for
- * per-cpu streams) and has __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM bit clear,
- * since we can't sleep;
- * b) slow path enables preemption and attempts to allocate
- * the page with __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM bit set. we have to
- * put per-cpu compression stream and, thus, to re-do
- * the compression once handle is allocated.
- *
- * if we have a 'non-null' handle here then we are coming
- * from the slow path and handle has already been allocated.
- */
- if (!handle)
- handle = zs_malloc(zram->mem_pool, comp_len,
- __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM |
- __GFP_NOWARN |
- __GFP_HIGHMEM |
- __GFP_MOVABLE);
- if (!handle) {
+
+ handle = zs_malloc(zram->mem_pool, comp_len,
+ __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM |
+ __GFP_NOWARN |
+ __GFP_HIGHMEM |
+ __GFP_MOVABLE);
+
+ if (unlikely(!handle)) {
zcomp_stream_put(zram->comp);
- atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.writestall);
- handle = zs_malloc(zram->mem_pool, comp_len,
- GFP_NOIO | __GFP_HIGHMEM |
- __GFP_MOVABLE);
- if (handle)
- goto compress_again;
return -ENOMEM;
}
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
index 80c3b43b4828..158c91e54850 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
@@ -81,7 +81,6 @@ struct zram_stats {
atomic64_t huge_pages_since; /* no. of huge pages since zram set up */
atomic64_t pages_stored; /* no. of pages currently stored */
atomic_long_t max_used_pages; /* no. of maximum pages stored */
- atomic64_t writestall; /* no. of write slow paths */
atomic64_t miss_free; /* no. of missed free */
#ifdef CONFIG_ZRAM_WRITEBACK
atomic64_t bd_count; /* no. of pages in backing device */
--
2.30.1
On (22/04/27 13:03), Alexey Romanov wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> index cb253d80d72b..4be6caf43b1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> @@ -1153,9 +1153,8 @@ static ssize_t debug_stat_show(struct device *dev,
>
> down_read(&zram->init_lock);
> ret = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE,
> - "version: %d\n%8llu %8llu\n",
> + "version: %d\n%8llu\n",
> version,
> - (u64)atomic64_read(&zram->stats.writestall),
> (u64)atomic64_read(&zram->stats.miss_free));
> up_read(&zram->init_lock);
I think this also has to bump `version` to 2, since format of the
file has changed.
Thanks for the reply!
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 08:30:16PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (22/04/27 13:03), Alexey Romanov wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > index cb253d80d72b..4be6caf43b1d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > @@ -1153,9 +1153,8 @@ static ssize_t debug_stat_show(struct device *dev,
> >
> > down_read(&zram->init_lock);
> > ret = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE,
> > - "version: %d\n%8llu %8llu\n",
> > + "version: %d\n%8llu\n",
> > version,
> > - (u64)atomic64_read(&zram->stats.writestall),
> > (u64)atomic64_read(&zram->stats.miss_free));
> > up_read(&zram->init_lock);
>
> I think this also has to bump `version` to 2, since format of the
> file has changed.
Yes, I'll do that in the next patch.
Minchan, do you have any suggestions on this patch?
I want to fix Sergey suggestion and sumbit next patch.
Hi Aleksey,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 08:01:12PM +0000, Aleksey Romanov wrote:
> Thanks for the reply!
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 08:30:16PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (22/04/27 13:03), Alexey Romanov wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > > index cb253d80d72b..4be6caf43b1d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > > @@ -1153,9 +1153,8 @@ static ssize_t debug_stat_show(struct device *dev,
> > >
> > > down_read(&zram->init_lock);
> > > ret = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE,
> > > - "version: %d\n%8llu %8llu\n",
> > > + "version: %d\n%8llu\n",
> > > version,
> > > - (u64)atomic64_read(&zram->stats.writestall),
> > > (u64)atomic64_read(&zram->stats.miss_free));
> > > up_read(&zram->init_lock);
> >
> > I think this also has to bump `version` to 2, since format of the
> > file has changed.
>
> Yes, I'll do that in the next patch.
>
> Minchan, do you have any suggestions on this patch?
> I want to fix Sergey suggestion and sumbit next patch.
You need to remove zs_free in the path "Compression failed"
Since we don't have double compression, we don't need QUEUE_FLAG_STABLE_WRITES
so you could remove QUEUE_FLAG_STABLE_WRITES, too.
Thanks.