2022-11-17 14:30:39

by Lu Wei

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [patch net-next] net: microchip: sparx5: remove useless code in sparx5_qos_init()

There is no need to define variable ret, so remove it
and return sparx5_leak_groups_init() directly.

Signed-off-by: Lu Wei <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_qos.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_qos.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_qos.c
index 1e79d0ef0cb8..2f39300d52cc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_qos.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_qos.c
@@ -383,13 +383,7 @@ static int sparx5_leak_groups_init(struct sparx5 *sparx5)

int sparx5_qos_init(struct sparx5 *sparx5)
{
- int ret;
-
- ret = sparx5_leak_groups_init(sparx5);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
-
- return 0;
+ return sparx5_leak_groups_init(sparx5);
}

int sparx5_tc_mqprio_add(struct net_device *ndev, u8 num_tc)
--
2.31.1



2022-11-17 15:06:18

by Daniel Machon

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] net: microchip: sparx5: remove useless code in sparx5_qos_init()

Den Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 10:58:20PM +0800 skrev Lu Wei:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> There is no need to define variable ret, so remove it
> and return sparx5_leak_groups_init() directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Wei <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_qos.c | 8 +-------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_qos.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_qos.c
> index 1e79d0ef0cb8..2f39300d52cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_qos.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_qos.c
> @@ -383,13 +383,7 @@ static int sparx5_leak_groups_init(struct sparx5 *sparx5)
>
> int sparx5_qos_init(struct sparx5 *sparx5)
> {
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = sparx5_leak_groups_init(sparx5);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> -
> - return 0;
> + return sparx5_leak_groups_init(sparx5);
> }
>
> int sparx5_tc_mqprio_add(struct net_device *ndev, u8 num_tc)
> --
> 2.31.1
>

sparx5_qos_init() will be expanded in later patch series, as new QoS
features require new initializations - so this is actually somewhat
intentional.

/ Daniel

2022-11-17 21:34:49

by Andrew Lunn

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] net: microchip: sparx5: remove useless code in sparx5_qos_init()

> sparx5_qos_init() will be expanded in later patch series, as new QoS
> features require new initializations - so this is actually somewhat
> intentional.

When do you expect such patches to land?

If it going to be soon, we can keep the code as it is. If it is going
to be a while, the bots are going to keep finding this and what to
remove it.

Andrew

2022-11-18 09:42:53

by Daniel Machon

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] net: microchip: sparx5: remove useless code in sparx5_qos_init()

Den Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 09:14:38PM +0100 skrev Andrew Lunn:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> > sparx5_qos_init() will be expanded in later patch series, as new QoS
> > features require new initializations - so this is actually somewhat
> > intentional.
>
> When do you expect such patches to land?

Most likely sometime in the next window.

>
> If it going to be soon, we can keep the code as it is. If it is going
> to be a while, the bots are going to keep finding this and what to
> remove it.

I see. If bots will be bugging us regularly, then it might just be best
to let the patch through.

>
> Andrew

/ Daniel