From: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
This is consistent with the other comments in the struct.
Co-developed-by: Andrew Walbran <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Walbran <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/arm_ffa.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/arm_ffa.h b/include/linux/arm_ffa.h
index daff44d777fa..c87aeecaa9b2 100644
--- a/include/linux/arm_ffa.h
+++ b/include/linux/arm_ffa.h
@@ -244,11 +244,11 @@ struct ffa_mem_region_attributes {
*/
#define FFA_MEM_RETRIEVE_SELF_BORROWER BIT(0)
u8 flag;
- u32 composite_off;
/*
* Offset in bytes from the start of the outer `ffa_memory_region` to
* an `struct ffa_mem_region_addr_range`.
*/
+ u32 composite_off;
u64 reserved;
};
--
2.38.1.431.g37b22c650d-goog
Hi Quentin,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 05:03:25PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> From: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
>
> This is consistent with the other comments in the struct.
>
Not sure how that happened :). Anyways,
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>
I am yet to look at the other patches and I would like to have a setup
to test it as well. So I will look at the other patches and test it later.
The reason for reviewing the first 2 patches moving the code out of the
driver is to check if they can be merged for v6.2 itself.
I may start pushing FF-A v1.1 changes for v6.3 and trying to avoid conflicts
or cross tree dependencies. I know it is quite late for v6.2 but these changes
are trivial and good to get it in for v6.2 if possible.
Will, thoughts ? If you agree, please take it via arm64 for v6.2. I don't
have any FF-A changes for v6.2 ATM, so there should be not conflicts.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:53:08AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 05:03:25PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > From: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
> >
> > This is consistent with the other comments in the struct.
> >
> Not sure how that happened :). Anyways,
>
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>
>
> I am yet to look at the other patches and I would like to have a setup
> to test it as well. So I will look at the other patches and test it later.
> The reason for reviewing the first 2 patches moving the code out of the
> driver is to check if they can be merged for v6.2 itself.
>
> I may start pushing FF-A v1.1 changes for v6.3 and trying to avoid conflicts
> or cross tree dependencies. I know it is quite late for v6.2 but these changes
> are trivial and good to get it in for v6.2 if possible.
>
> Will, thoughts ? If you agree, please take it via arm64 for v6.2. I don't
> have any FF-A changes for v6.2 ATM, so there should be not conflicts.
You're asking me to merge my own patches? Of course I can do that :D
Cheers,
Will