From ACPI spec[1] below 3 modes for CPPC can be defined:
1. Non autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies operating frequency/
performance level through `Desired Performance` register and platform
follows that.
2. Guided autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies min and max
frequencies/ performance levels through `Minimum Performance` and
`Maximum Performance` register, and platform can autonomously select an
operating frequency in this range.
3. Fully autonomous: OS only hints (via EPP) to platform for the required
energy performance preference for the workload and platform autonomously
scales the frequency.
Currently (1) is supported by amd_pstate as passive mode, and (3) is
implemented by EPP support[2]. This change is to support (2).
In guided autonomous mode the min_perf is based on the input from the
scaling governor. For example, in case of schedutil this value depends
on the current utilization. And max_perf is set to max capacity.
To activate guided auto mode ``amd_pstate=guided`` command line
parameter has to be passed in the kernel.
Below are the results (normalized) of benchmarks with this patch:
System: Genoa 96C 192T
Kernel: 6.2.0-rc2 + EPP v11 + patch
Scaling governor: schedutil
================ dbench comparisons ================
dbench result comparison:
Here results are throughput (MB/s)
Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct)
2 1.07 (0.00 pct) 1.06 (-0.93 pct) 1.07 (0.00 pct)
4 1.68 (0.00 pct) 1.70 (1.19 pct) 1.72 (2.38 pct)
8 2.61 (0.00 pct) 2.68 (2.68 pct) 2.76 (5.74 pct)
16 4.16 (0.00 pct) 4.24 (1.92 pct) 4.53 (8.89 pct)
32 5.98 (0.00 pct) 6.17 (3.17 pct) 7.30 (22.07 pct)
64 8.67 (0.00 pct) 8.99 (3.69 pct) 10.71 (23.52 pct)
128 11.98 (0.00 pct) 12.52 (4.50 pct) 14.67 (22.45 pct)
256 15.73 (0.00 pct) 16.13 (2.54 pct) 17.81 (13.22 pct)
512 15.77 (0.00 pct) 16.32 (3.48 pct) 16.39 (3.93 pct)
dbench power comparison:
Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (4.00 pct)
2 0.99 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-2.02 pct) 1.02 (3.03 pct)
4 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.98 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct)
8 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (1.02 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct)
16 0.99 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (1.01 pct) 1.04 (5.05 pct)
32 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.07 (4.90 pct)
64 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.11 (5.71 pct)
128 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.15 (6.48 pct)
256 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (7.14 pct)
512 1.18 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (-0.84 pct) 1.26 (6.77 pct)
================ git-source comparisons ================
git-source result comparison:
Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec)
Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.93 (-7.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct)
git-source power comparison:
Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.96 (-4.00 pct)
================ kernbench comparisons ================
kernbench result comparison:
Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec)
Load: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct)
48 1.26 (0.00 pct) 1.28 (1.58 pct) 1.25 (-0.79 pct)
64 1.39 (0.00 pct) 1.47 (5.75 pct) 1.43 (2.87 pct)
96 1.48 (0.00 pct) 1.50 (1.35 pct) 1.49 (0.67 pct)
128 1.29 (0.00 pct) 1.32 (2.32 pct) 1.33 (3.10 pct)
192 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct) 1.21 (3.41 pct)
256 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.18 (0.85 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct)
384 1.16 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (0.86 pct) 1.21 (4.31 pct)
kernbench power comparison:
Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct)
48 0.87 (0.00 pct) 0.81 (-6.89 pct) 0.88 (1.14 pct)
64 0.81 (0.00 pct) 0.73 (-9.87 pct) 0.77 (-4.93 pct)
96 0.75 (0.00 pct) 0.74 (-1.33 pct) 0.75 (0.00 pct)
128 0.83 (0.00 pct) 0.79 (-4.81 pct) 0.83 (0.00 pct)
192 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct)
256 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct)
384 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct)
================ tbench comparisons ================
tbench result comparison:
Here results are throughput (MB/s)
Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.70 (-30.00 pct) 1.37 (37.00 pct)
2 2.64 (0.00 pct) 1.39 (-47.34 pct) 2.70 (2.27 pct)
4 4.89 (0.00 pct) 2.75 (-43.76 pct) 5.28 (7.97 pct)
8 9.46 (0.00 pct) 5.42 (-42.70 pct) 10.22 (8.03 pct)
16 19.05 (0.00 pct) 10.42 (-45.30 pct) 19.94 (4.67 pct)
32 37.50 (0.00 pct) 20.23 (-46.05 pct) 36.87 (-1.68 pct)
64 61.24 (0.00 pct) 43.08 (-29.65 pct) 62.96 (2.80 pct)
128 67.16 (0.00 pct) 69.08 (2.85 pct) 67.34 (0.26 pct)
256 154.59 (0.00 pct) 162.33 (5.00 pct) 156.78 (1.41 pct)
512 154.02 (0.00 pct) 156.74 (1.76 pct) 153.48 (-0.35 pct)
tbench power comparison:
Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.08 (8.00 pct)
2 1.04 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-6.73 pct) 1.11 (6.73 pct)
4 1.12 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (-11.60 pct) 1.18 (5.35 pct)
8 1.25 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (-16.80 pct) 1.31 (4.80 pct)
16 1.53 (0.00 pct) 1.13 (-26.14 pct) 1.58 (3.26 pct)
32 2.01 (0.00 pct) 1.36 (-32.33 pct) 2.03 (0.99 pct)
64 2.58 (0.00 pct) 2.14 (-17.05 pct) 2.61 (1.16 pct)
128 2.80 (0.00 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct)
256 3.39 (0.00 pct) 3.43 (1.17 pct) 3.42 (0.88 pct)
512 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct)
Note: this series is based on top of EPP v11 [3] series
Change log:
v2 -> v3:
- Addressed review comments form Mario.
- Picked up RB tag from Mario.
- Rebase on top of EPP v11 [3].
v1 -> v2:
- Fix issue with shared mem systems.
- Rebase on top of EPP series.
[1]: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/[email protected]/
Wyes Karny (6):
acpi: cppc: Add min and max perf reg writing support
acpi: cppc: Add auto select register read/write support
cpufreq: amd_pstate: Add guided autonomous mode
Documentation: amd_pstate: Move amd_pstate param to alphabetical order
cpufreq: amd_pstate: Add guided mode control support via sysfs
Documentation: amd_pstate: Update amd_pstate status sysfs for guided
.../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 41 ++--
Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst | 32 ++-
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 113 ++++++++++-
drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 184 +++++++++++++-----
include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 11 ++
include/linux/amd-pstate.h | 2 +
6 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
Hi Ray,
On 1/20/2023 2:48 PM, Huang Rui wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 07:50:11PM +0800, Karny, Wyes wrote:
>> From ACPI spec[1] below 3 modes for CPPC can be defined:
>> 1. Non autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies operating frequency/
>> performance level through `Desired Performance` register and platform
>> follows that.
>> 2. Guided autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies min and max
>> frequencies/ performance levels through `Minimum Performance` and
>> `Maximum Performance` register, and platform can autonomously select an
>> operating frequency in this range.
>> 3. Fully autonomous: OS only hints (via EPP) to platform for the required
>> energy performance preference for the workload and platform autonomously
>> scales the frequency.
>>
>> Currently (1) is supported by amd_pstate as passive mode, and (3) is
>> implemented by EPP support[2]. This change is to support (2).
>>
>> In guided autonomous mode the min_perf is based on the input from the
>> scaling governor. For example, in case of schedutil this value depends
>> on the current utilization. And max_perf is set to max capacity.
>>
>> To activate guided auto mode ``amd_pstate=guided`` command line
>> parameter has to be passed in the kernel.
>>
>> Below are the results (normalized) of benchmarks with this patch:
>> System: Genoa 96C 192T
>> Kernel: 6.2.0-rc2 + EPP v11 + patch
>> Scaling governor: schedutil
>>
>> ================ dbench comparisons ================
>> dbench result comparison:
>> Here results are throughput (MB/s)
>> Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
>> 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct)
>> 2 1.07 (0.00 pct) 1.06 (-0.93 pct) 1.07 (0.00 pct)
>> 4 1.68 (0.00 pct) 1.70 (1.19 pct) 1.72 (2.38 pct)
>> 8 2.61 (0.00 pct) 2.68 (2.68 pct) 2.76 (5.74 pct)
>> 16 4.16 (0.00 pct) 4.24 (1.92 pct) 4.53 (8.89 pct)
>> 32 5.98 (0.00 pct) 6.17 (3.17 pct) 7.30 (22.07 pct)
>> 64 8.67 (0.00 pct) 8.99 (3.69 pct) 10.71 (23.52 pct)
>> 128 11.98 (0.00 pct) 12.52 (4.50 pct) 14.67 (22.45 pct)
>> 256 15.73 (0.00 pct) 16.13 (2.54 pct) 17.81 (13.22 pct)
>> 512 15.77 (0.00 pct) 16.32 (3.48 pct) 16.39 (3.93 pct)
>> dbench power comparison:
>> Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
>> 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (4.00 pct)
>> 2 0.99 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-2.02 pct) 1.02 (3.03 pct)
>> 4 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.98 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct)
>> 8 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (1.02 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct)
>> 16 0.99 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (1.01 pct) 1.04 (5.05 pct)
>> 32 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.07 (4.90 pct)
>> 64 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.11 (5.71 pct)
>> 128 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.15 (6.48 pct)
>> 256 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (7.14 pct)
>> 512 1.18 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (-0.84 pct) 1.26 (6.77 pct)
>>
>> ================ git-source comparisons ================
>> git-source result comparison:
>> Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec)
>> Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
>> 192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.93 (-7.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct)
>> git-source power comparison:
>> Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
>> 192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.96 (-4.00 pct)
>>
>> ================ kernbench comparisons ================
>> kernbench result comparison:
>> Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec)
>> Load: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
>> 32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct)
>> 48 1.26 (0.00 pct) 1.28 (1.58 pct) 1.25 (-0.79 pct)
>> 64 1.39 (0.00 pct) 1.47 (5.75 pct) 1.43 (2.87 pct)
>> 96 1.48 (0.00 pct) 1.50 (1.35 pct) 1.49 (0.67 pct)
>> 128 1.29 (0.00 pct) 1.32 (2.32 pct) 1.33 (3.10 pct)
>> 192 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct) 1.21 (3.41 pct)
>> 256 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.18 (0.85 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct)
>> 384 1.16 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (0.86 pct) 1.21 (4.31 pct)
>> kernbench power comparison:
>> Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
>> 32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct)
>> 48 0.87 (0.00 pct) 0.81 (-6.89 pct) 0.88 (1.14 pct)
>> 64 0.81 (0.00 pct) 0.73 (-9.87 pct) 0.77 (-4.93 pct)
>> 96 0.75 (0.00 pct) 0.74 (-1.33 pct) 0.75 (0.00 pct)
>> 128 0.83 (0.00 pct) 0.79 (-4.81 pct) 0.83 (0.00 pct)
>> 192 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct)
>> 256 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct)
>> 384 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct)
>>
>> ================ tbench comparisons ================
>> tbench result comparison:
>> Here results are throughput (MB/s)
>> Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
>> 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.70 (-30.00 pct) 1.37 (37.00 pct)
>> 2 2.64 (0.00 pct) 1.39 (-47.34 pct) 2.70 (2.27 pct)
>> 4 4.89 (0.00 pct) 2.75 (-43.76 pct) 5.28 (7.97 pct)
>> 8 9.46 (0.00 pct) 5.42 (-42.70 pct) 10.22 (8.03 pct)
>> 16 19.05 (0.00 pct) 10.42 (-45.30 pct) 19.94 (4.67 pct)
>> 32 37.50 (0.00 pct) 20.23 (-46.05 pct) 36.87 (-1.68 pct)
>> 64 61.24 (0.00 pct) 43.08 (-29.65 pct) 62.96 (2.80 pct)
>> 128 67.16 (0.00 pct) 69.08 (2.85 pct) 67.34 (0.26 pct)
>> 256 154.59 (0.00 pct) 162.33 (5.00 pct) 156.78 (1.41 pct)
>> 512 154.02 (0.00 pct) 156.74 (1.76 pct) 153.48 (-0.35 pct)
>> tbench power comparison:
>> Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
>> 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.08 (8.00 pct)
>> 2 1.04 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-6.73 pct) 1.11 (6.73 pct)
>> 4 1.12 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (-11.60 pct) 1.18 (5.35 pct)
>> 8 1.25 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (-16.80 pct) 1.31 (4.80 pct)
>> 16 1.53 (0.00 pct) 1.13 (-26.14 pct) 1.58 (3.26 pct)
>> 32 2.01 (0.00 pct) 1.36 (-32.33 pct) 2.03 (0.99 pct)
>> 64 2.58 (0.00 pct) 2.14 (-17.05 pct) 2.61 (1.16 pct)
>> 128 2.80 (0.00 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct)
>> 256 3.39 (0.00 pct) 3.43 (1.17 pct) 3.42 (0.88 pct)
>> 512 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct)
>>
>> Note: this series is based on top of EPP v11 [3] series
>>
>> Change log:
>>
>> v2 -> v3:
>> - Addressed review comments form Mario.
>> - Picked up RB tag from Mario.
>> - Rebase on top of EPP v11 [3].
>>
>> v1 -> v2:
>> - Fix issue with shared mem systems.
>> - Rebase on top of EPP series.
>>
>> [1]: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf
>> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
>> [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/[email protected]/
>>
>>
>> Wyes Karny (6):
>> acpi: cppc: Add min and max perf reg writing support
>> acpi: cppc: Add auto select register read/write support
>> cpufreq: amd_pstate: Add guided autonomous mode
>> Documentation: amd_pstate: Move amd_pstate param to alphabetical order
>> cpufreq: amd_pstate: Add guided mode control support via sysfs
>> Documentation: amd_pstate: Update amd_pstate status sysfs for guided
>>
>
> Wyes, thanks for the patches. I will take a look at them after Chinese new
> year.
Sure, thanks!
Happy new year!
>
> Thanks,
> Ray
--
Thanks & Regards,
Wyes
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 07:50:11PM +0800, Karny, Wyes wrote:
> From ACPI spec[1] below 3 modes for CPPC can be defined:
> 1. Non autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies operating frequency/
> performance level through `Desired Performance` register and platform
> follows that.
> 2. Guided autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies min and max
> frequencies/ performance levels through `Minimum Performance` and
> `Maximum Performance` register, and platform can autonomously select an
> operating frequency in this range.
> 3. Fully autonomous: OS only hints (via EPP) to platform for the required
> energy performance preference for the workload and platform autonomously
> scales the frequency.
>
> Currently (1) is supported by amd_pstate as passive mode, and (3) is
> implemented by EPP support[2]. This change is to support (2).
>
> In guided autonomous mode the min_perf is based on the input from the
> scaling governor. For example, in case of schedutil this value depends
> on the current utilization. And max_perf is set to max capacity.
>
> To activate guided auto mode ``amd_pstate=guided`` command line
> parameter has to be passed in the kernel.
>
> Below are the results (normalized) of benchmarks with this patch:
> System: Genoa 96C 192T
> Kernel: 6.2.0-rc2 + EPP v11 + patch
> Scaling governor: schedutil
>
> ================ dbench comparisons ================
> dbench result comparison:
> Here results are throughput (MB/s)
> Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct)
> 2 1.07 (0.00 pct) 1.06 (-0.93 pct) 1.07 (0.00 pct)
> 4 1.68 (0.00 pct) 1.70 (1.19 pct) 1.72 (2.38 pct)
> 8 2.61 (0.00 pct) 2.68 (2.68 pct) 2.76 (5.74 pct)
> 16 4.16 (0.00 pct) 4.24 (1.92 pct) 4.53 (8.89 pct)
> 32 5.98 (0.00 pct) 6.17 (3.17 pct) 7.30 (22.07 pct)
> 64 8.67 (0.00 pct) 8.99 (3.69 pct) 10.71 (23.52 pct)
> 128 11.98 (0.00 pct) 12.52 (4.50 pct) 14.67 (22.45 pct)
> 256 15.73 (0.00 pct) 16.13 (2.54 pct) 17.81 (13.22 pct)
> 512 15.77 (0.00 pct) 16.32 (3.48 pct) 16.39 (3.93 pct)
> dbench power comparison:
> Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (4.00 pct)
> 2 0.99 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-2.02 pct) 1.02 (3.03 pct)
> 4 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.98 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct)
> 8 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (1.02 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct)
> 16 0.99 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (1.01 pct) 1.04 (5.05 pct)
> 32 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.07 (4.90 pct)
> 64 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.11 (5.71 pct)
> 128 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.15 (6.48 pct)
> 256 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (7.14 pct)
> 512 1.18 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (-0.84 pct) 1.26 (6.77 pct)
>
> ================ git-source comparisons ================
> git-source result comparison:
> Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec)
> Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> 192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.93 (-7.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct)
> git-source power comparison:
> Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> 192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.96 (-4.00 pct)
>
> ================ kernbench comparisons ================
> kernbench result comparison:
> Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec)
> Load: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> 32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct)
> 48 1.26 (0.00 pct) 1.28 (1.58 pct) 1.25 (-0.79 pct)
> 64 1.39 (0.00 pct) 1.47 (5.75 pct) 1.43 (2.87 pct)
> 96 1.48 (0.00 pct) 1.50 (1.35 pct) 1.49 (0.67 pct)
> 128 1.29 (0.00 pct) 1.32 (2.32 pct) 1.33 (3.10 pct)
> 192 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct) 1.21 (3.41 pct)
> 256 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.18 (0.85 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct)
> 384 1.16 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (0.86 pct) 1.21 (4.31 pct)
> kernbench power comparison:
> Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> 32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct)
> 48 0.87 (0.00 pct) 0.81 (-6.89 pct) 0.88 (1.14 pct)
> 64 0.81 (0.00 pct) 0.73 (-9.87 pct) 0.77 (-4.93 pct)
> 96 0.75 (0.00 pct) 0.74 (-1.33 pct) 0.75 (0.00 pct)
> 128 0.83 (0.00 pct) 0.79 (-4.81 pct) 0.83 (0.00 pct)
> 192 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct)
> 256 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct)
> 384 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct)
>
> ================ tbench comparisons ================
> tbench result comparison:
> Here results are throughput (MB/s)
> Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.70 (-30.00 pct) 1.37 (37.00 pct)
> 2 2.64 (0.00 pct) 1.39 (-47.34 pct) 2.70 (2.27 pct)
> 4 4.89 (0.00 pct) 2.75 (-43.76 pct) 5.28 (7.97 pct)
> 8 9.46 (0.00 pct) 5.42 (-42.70 pct) 10.22 (8.03 pct)
> 16 19.05 (0.00 pct) 10.42 (-45.30 pct) 19.94 (4.67 pct)
> 32 37.50 (0.00 pct) 20.23 (-46.05 pct) 36.87 (-1.68 pct)
> 64 61.24 (0.00 pct) 43.08 (-29.65 pct) 62.96 (2.80 pct)
> 128 67.16 (0.00 pct) 69.08 (2.85 pct) 67.34 (0.26 pct)
> 256 154.59 (0.00 pct) 162.33 (5.00 pct) 156.78 (1.41 pct)
> 512 154.02 (0.00 pct) 156.74 (1.76 pct) 153.48 (-0.35 pct)
> tbench power comparison:
> Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.08 (8.00 pct)
> 2 1.04 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-6.73 pct) 1.11 (6.73 pct)
> 4 1.12 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (-11.60 pct) 1.18 (5.35 pct)
> 8 1.25 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (-16.80 pct) 1.31 (4.80 pct)
> 16 1.53 (0.00 pct) 1.13 (-26.14 pct) 1.58 (3.26 pct)
> 32 2.01 (0.00 pct) 1.36 (-32.33 pct) 2.03 (0.99 pct)
> 64 2.58 (0.00 pct) 2.14 (-17.05 pct) 2.61 (1.16 pct)
> 128 2.80 (0.00 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct)
> 256 3.39 (0.00 pct) 3.43 (1.17 pct) 3.42 (0.88 pct)
> 512 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct)
>
> Note: this series is based on top of EPP v11 [3] series
>
> Change log:
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - Addressed review comments form Mario.
> - Picked up RB tag from Mario.
> - Rebase on top of EPP v11 [3].
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - Fix issue with shared mem systems.
> - Rebase on top of EPP series.
>
> [1]: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/[email protected]/
>
>
> Wyes Karny (6):
> acpi: cppc: Add min and max perf reg writing support
> acpi: cppc: Add auto select register read/write support
> cpufreq: amd_pstate: Add guided autonomous mode
> Documentation: amd_pstate: Move amd_pstate param to alphabetical order
> cpufreq: amd_pstate: Add guided mode control support via sysfs
> Documentation: amd_pstate: Update amd_pstate status sysfs for guided
>
Wyes, thanks for the patches. I will take a look at them after Chinese new
year.
Thanks,
Ray
On 19.01.23 11:50, Wyes Karny wrote:
>>From ACPI spec[1] below 3 modes for CPPC can be defined:
> 1. Non autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies operating frequency/
> performance level through `Desired Performance` register and platform
> follows that.
> 2. Guided autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies min and max
> frequencies/ performance levels through `Minimum Performance` and
> `Maximum Performance` register, and platform can autonomously select an
> operating frequency in this range.
> 3. Fully autonomous: OS only hints (via EPP) to platform for the required
> energy performance preference for the workload and platform autonomously
> scales the frequency.
>
> Currently (1) is supported by amd_pstate as passive mode, and (3) is
> implemented by EPP support[2]. This change is to support (2).
>
> In guided autonomous mode the min_perf is based on the input from the
> scaling governor. For example, in case of schedutil this value depends
> on the current utilization. And max_perf is set to max capacity.
>
> To activate guided auto mode ``amd_pstate=guided`` command line
> parameter has to be passed in the kernel.
>
> Below are the results (normalized) of benchmarks with this patch:
> System: Genoa 96C 192T
> Kernel: 6.2.0-rc2 + EPP v11 + patch
> Scaling governor: schedutil
>
> ================ dbench comparisons ================
> dbench result comparison:
> Here results are throughput (MB/s)
> Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct)
> 2 1.07 (0.00 pct) 1.06 (-0.93 pct) 1.07 (0.00 pct)
> 4 1.68 (0.00 pct) 1.70 (1.19 pct) 1.72 (2.38 pct)
> 8 2.61 (0.00 pct) 2.68 (2.68 pct) 2.76 (5.74 pct)
> 16 4.16 (0.00 pct) 4.24 (1.92 pct) 4.53 (8.89 pct)
> 32 5.98 (0.00 pct) 6.17 (3.17 pct) 7.30 (22.07 pct)
> 64 8.67 (0.00 pct) 8.99 (3.69 pct) 10.71 (23.52 pct)
> 128 11.98 (0.00 pct) 12.52 (4.50 pct) 14.67 (22.45 pct)
> 256 15.73 (0.00 pct) 16.13 (2.54 pct) 17.81 (13.22 pct)
> 512 15.77 (0.00 pct) 16.32 (3.48 pct) 16.39 (3.93 pct)
> dbench power comparison:
> Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (4.00 pct)
> 2 0.99 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-2.02 pct) 1.02 (3.03 pct)
> 4 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.98 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct)
> 8 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (1.02 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct)
> 16 0.99 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (1.01 pct) 1.04 (5.05 pct)
> 32 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.07 (4.90 pct)
> 64 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.11 (5.71 pct)
> 128 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.15 (6.48 pct)
> 256 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (7.14 pct)
> 512 1.18 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (-0.84 pct) 1.26 (6.77 pct)
>
> ================ git-source comparisons ================
> git-source result comparison:
> Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec)
> Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> 192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.93 (-7.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct)
> git-source power comparison:
> Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> 192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.96 (-4.00 pct)
>
> ================ kernbench comparisons ================
> kernbench result comparison:
> Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec)
> Load: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> 32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct)
> 48 1.26 (0.00 pct) 1.28 (1.58 pct) 1.25 (-0.79 pct)
> 64 1.39 (0.00 pct) 1.47 (5.75 pct) 1.43 (2.87 pct)
> 96 1.48 (0.00 pct) 1.50 (1.35 pct) 1.49 (0.67 pct)
> 128 1.29 (0.00 pct) 1.32 (2.32 pct) 1.33 (3.10 pct)
> 192 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct) 1.21 (3.41 pct)
> 256 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.18 (0.85 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct)
> 384 1.16 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (0.86 pct) 1.21 (4.31 pct)
> kernbench power comparison:
> Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> 32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct)
> 48 0.87 (0.00 pct) 0.81 (-6.89 pct) 0.88 (1.14 pct)
> 64 0.81 (0.00 pct) 0.73 (-9.87 pct) 0.77 (-4.93 pct)
> 96 0.75 (0.00 pct) 0.74 (-1.33 pct) 0.75 (0.00 pct)
> 128 0.83 (0.00 pct) 0.79 (-4.81 pct) 0.83 (0.00 pct)
> 192 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct)
> 256 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct)
> 384 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct)
>
> ================ tbench comparisons ================
> tbench result comparison:
> Here results are throughput (MB/s)
> Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.70 (-30.00 pct) 1.37 (37.00 pct)
> 2 2.64 (0.00 pct) 1.39 (-47.34 pct) 2.70 (2.27 pct)
> 4 4.89 (0.00 pct) 2.75 (-43.76 pct) 5.28 (7.97 pct)
> 8 9.46 (0.00 pct) 5.42 (-42.70 pct) 10.22 (8.03 pct)
> 16 19.05 (0.00 pct) 10.42 (-45.30 pct) 19.94 (4.67 pct)
> 32 37.50 (0.00 pct) 20.23 (-46.05 pct) 36.87 (-1.68 pct)
> 64 61.24 (0.00 pct) 43.08 (-29.65 pct) 62.96 (2.80 pct)
> 128 67.16 (0.00 pct) 69.08 (2.85 pct) 67.34 (0.26 pct)
> 256 154.59 (0.00 pct) 162.33 (5.00 pct) 156.78 (1.41 pct)
> 512 154.02 (0.00 pct) 156.74 (1.76 pct) 153.48 (-0.35 pct)
> tbench power comparison:
> Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.08 (8.00 pct)
> 2 1.04 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-6.73 pct) 1.11 (6.73 pct)
> 4 1.12 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (-11.60 pct) 1.18 (5.35 pct)
> 8 1.25 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (-16.80 pct) 1.31 (4.80 pct)
> 16 1.53 (0.00 pct) 1.13 (-26.14 pct) 1.58 (3.26 pct)
> 32 2.01 (0.00 pct) 1.36 (-32.33 pct) 2.03 (0.99 pct)
> 64 2.58 (0.00 pct) 2.14 (-17.05 pct) 2.61 (1.16 pct)
> 128 2.80 (0.00 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct)
> 256 3.39 (0.00 pct) 3.43 (1.17 pct) 3.42 (0.88 pct)
> 512 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct)
>
> Note: this series is based on top of EPP v11 [3] series
>
> Change log:
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - Addressed review comments form Mario.
> - Picked up RB tag from Mario.
> - Rebase on top of EPP v11 [3].
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - Fix issue with shared mem systems.
> - Rebase on top of EPP series.
>
> [1]: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/[email protected]/
>
>
> Wyes Karny (6):
> acpi: cppc: Add min and max perf reg writing support
> acpi: cppc: Add auto select register read/write support
> cpufreq: amd_pstate: Add guided autonomous mode
> Documentation: amd_pstate: Move amd_pstate param to alphabetical order
> cpufreq: amd_pstate: Add guided mode control support via sysfs
> Documentation: amd_pstate: Update amd_pstate status sysfs for guided
>
> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 41 ++--
> Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst | 32 ++-
> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 113 ++++++++++-
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 184 +++++++++++++-----
> include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 11 ++
> include/linux/amd-pstate.h | 2 +
> 6 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
>
The "active" mode seems to be broken here on a Zen2 3900X running Linux 6.1.
Frequency remains stuck at minimum which is +-500 MHz.
Some queries of the new /sys devices lead to I/O error:
# LANG=C cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/amd_pstate_*
166
cat:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/amd_pstate_lowest_nonlinear_freq:
Input/output error
cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/amd_pstate_max_freq:
Input/output error
The "guided" mode seems to work fine with no stuck frequency, but also
produces I/O error on some /sys files.
I haven't tested "passive".
Cheers,
Tor Vic
On 24 Jan 20:40, Tor Vic wrote:
>
>
> On 19.01.23 11:50, Wyes Karny wrote:
> > > From ACPI spec[1] below 3 modes for CPPC can be defined:
> > 1. Non autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies operating frequency/
> > performance level through `Desired Performance` register and platform
> > follows that.
> > 2. Guided autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies min and max
> > frequencies/ performance levels through `Minimum Performance` and
> > `Maximum Performance` register, and platform can autonomously select an
> > operating frequency in this range.
> > 3. Fully autonomous: OS only hints (via EPP) to platform for the required
> > energy performance preference for the workload and platform autonomously
> > scales the frequency.
> >
> > Currently (1) is supported by amd_pstate as passive mode, and (3) is
> > implemented by EPP support[2]. This change is to support (2).
> >
> > In guided autonomous mode the min_perf is based on the input from the
> > scaling governor. For example, in case of schedutil this value depends
> > on the current utilization. And max_perf is set to max capacity.
> >
> > To activate guided auto mode ``amd_pstate=guided`` command line
> > parameter has to be passed in the kernel.
> >
> > Below are the results (normalized) of benchmarks with this patch:
> > System: Genoa 96C 192T
> > Kernel: 6.2.0-rc2 + EPP v11 + patch
> > Scaling governor: schedutil
> >
> > ================ dbench comparisons ================
> > dbench result comparison:
> > Here results are throughput (MB/s)
> > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct)
> > 2 1.07 (0.00 pct) 1.06 (-0.93 pct) 1.07 (0.00 pct)
> > 4 1.68 (0.00 pct) 1.70 (1.19 pct) 1.72 (2.38 pct)
> > 8 2.61 (0.00 pct) 2.68 (2.68 pct) 2.76 (5.74 pct)
> > 16 4.16 (0.00 pct) 4.24 (1.92 pct) 4.53 (8.89 pct)
> > 32 5.98 (0.00 pct) 6.17 (3.17 pct) 7.30 (22.07 pct)
> > 64 8.67 (0.00 pct) 8.99 (3.69 pct) 10.71 (23.52 pct)
> > 128 11.98 (0.00 pct) 12.52 (4.50 pct) 14.67 (22.45 pct)
> > 256 15.73 (0.00 pct) 16.13 (2.54 pct) 17.81 (13.22 pct)
> > 512 15.77 (0.00 pct) 16.32 (3.48 pct) 16.39 (3.93 pct)
> > dbench power comparison:
> > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (4.00 pct)
> > 2 0.99 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-2.02 pct) 1.02 (3.03 pct)
> > 4 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.98 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct)
> > 8 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (1.02 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct)
> > 16 0.99 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (1.01 pct) 1.04 (5.05 pct)
> > 32 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.07 (4.90 pct)
> > 64 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.11 (5.71 pct)
> > 128 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.15 (6.48 pct)
> > 256 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (7.14 pct)
> > 512 1.18 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (-0.84 pct) 1.26 (6.77 pct)
> >
> > ================ git-source comparisons ================
> > git-source result comparison:
> > Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec)
> > Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> > 192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.93 (-7.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct)
> > git-source power comparison:
> > Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> > 192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.96 (-4.00 pct)
> >
> > ================ kernbench comparisons ================
> > kernbench result comparison:
> > Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec)
> > Load: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> > 32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct)
> > 48 1.26 (0.00 pct) 1.28 (1.58 pct) 1.25 (-0.79 pct)
> > 64 1.39 (0.00 pct) 1.47 (5.75 pct) 1.43 (2.87 pct)
> > 96 1.48 (0.00 pct) 1.50 (1.35 pct) 1.49 (0.67 pct)
> > 128 1.29 (0.00 pct) 1.32 (2.32 pct) 1.33 (3.10 pct)
> > 192 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct) 1.21 (3.41 pct)
> > 256 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.18 (0.85 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct)
> > 384 1.16 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (0.86 pct) 1.21 (4.31 pct)
> > kernbench power comparison:
> > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> > 32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct)
> > 48 0.87 (0.00 pct) 0.81 (-6.89 pct) 0.88 (1.14 pct)
> > 64 0.81 (0.00 pct) 0.73 (-9.87 pct) 0.77 (-4.93 pct)
> > 96 0.75 (0.00 pct) 0.74 (-1.33 pct) 0.75 (0.00 pct)
> > 128 0.83 (0.00 pct) 0.79 (-4.81 pct) 0.83 (0.00 pct)
> > 192 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct)
> > 256 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct)
> > 384 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct)
> >
> > ================ tbench comparisons ================
> > tbench result comparison:
> > Here results are throughput (MB/s)
> > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.70 (-30.00 pct) 1.37 (37.00 pct)
> > 2 2.64 (0.00 pct) 1.39 (-47.34 pct) 2.70 (2.27 pct)
> > 4 4.89 (0.00 pct) 2.75 (-43.76 pct) 5.28 (7.97 pct)
> > 8 9.46 (0.00 pct) 5.42 (-42.70 pct) 10.22 (8.03 pct)
> > 16 19.05 (0.00 pct) 10.42 (-45.30 pct) 19.94 (4.67 pct)
> > 32 37.50 (0.00 pct) 20.23 (-46.05 pct) 36.87 (-1.68 pct)
> > 64 61.24 (0.00 pct) 43.08 (-29.65 pct) 62.96 (2.80 pct)
> > 128 67.16 (0.00 pct) 69.08 (2.85 pct) 67.34 (0.26 pct)
> > 256 154.59 (0.00 pct) 162.33 (5.00 pct) 156.78 (1.41 pct)
> > 512 154.02 (0.00 pct) 156.74 (1.76 pct) 153.48 (-0.35 pct)
> > tbench power comparison:
> > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided
> > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.08 (8.00 pct)
> > 2 1.04 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-6.73 pct) 1.11 (6.73 pct)
> > 4 1.12 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (-11.60 pct) 1.18 (5.35 pct)
> > 8 1.25 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (-16.80 pct) 1.31 (4.80 pct)
> > 16 1.53 (0.00 pct) 1.13 (-26.14 pct) 1.58 (3.26 pct)
> > 32 2.01 (0.00 pct) 1.36 (-32.33 pct) 2.03 (0.99 pct)
> > 64 2.58 (0.00 pct) 2.14 (-17.05 pct) 2.61 (1.16 pct)
> > 128 2.80 (0.00 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct)
> > 256 3.39 (0.00 pct) 3.43 (1.17 pct) 3.42 (0.88 pct)
> > 512 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct)
> >
> > Note: this series is based on top of EPP v11 [3] series
> >
> > Change log:
> >
> > v2 -> v3:
> > - Addressed review comments form Mario.
> > - Picked up RB tag from Mario.
> > - Rebase on top of EPP v11 [3].
> >
> > v1 -> v2:
> > - Fix issue with shared mem systems.
> > - Rebase on top of EPP series.
> >
> > [1]: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf
> > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> > [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/[email protected]/
> >
> >
> > Wyes Karny (6):
> > acpi: cppc: Add min and max perf reg writing support
> > acpi: cppc: Add auto select register read/write support
> > cpufreq: amd_pstate: Add guided autonomous mode
> > Documentation: amd_pstate: Move amd_pstate param to alphabetical order
> > cpufreq: amd_pstate: Add guided mode control support via sysfs
> > Documentation: amd_pstate: Update amd_pstate status sysfs for guided
> >
> > .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 41 ++--
> > Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst | 32 ++-
> > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 113 ++++++++++-
> > drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 184 +++++++++++++-----
> > include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 11 ++
> > include/linux/amd-pstate.h | 2 +
> > 6 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
> >
>
>
> The "active" mode seems to be broken here on a Zen2 3900X running Linux 6.1.
> Frequency remains stuck at minimum which is +-500 MHz.
I'll send a fix for this in v4.
>
> Some queries of the new /sys devices lead to I/O error:
>
> # LANG=C cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/amd_pstate_*
> 166
> cat:
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/amd_pstate_lowest_nonlinear_freq:
> Input/output error
> cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/amd_pstate_max_freq:
> Input/output error
I'll check this. Thanks for reporting.
>
> The "guided" mode seems to work fine with no stuck frequency, but also
> produces I/O error on some /sys files.
>
> I haven't tested "passive".
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tor Vic
Thanks,
Wyes
Hi Tor Vic,
On 24 Jan 20:40, Tor Vic wrote:
--------------------------------->8-----------------------------
>
> The "active" mode seems to be broken here on a Zen2 3900X running Linux 6.1.
> Frequency remains stuck at minimum which is +-500 MHz.
I've fixed this in v4.
>
> Some queries of the new /sys devices lead to I/O error:
>
> # LANG=C cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/amd_pstate_*
> 166
> cat:
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/amd_pstate_lowest_nonlinear_freq:
> Input/output error
> cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/amd_pstate_max_freq:
> Input/output error
>
This issue I'm not able to reproduce. Is this issue seen with only EPP
patches also?
Could you please check if this issue still there with v4?
Thanks,
Wyes
> The "guided" mode seems to work fine with no stuck frequency, but also
> produces I/O error on some /sys files.
>
> I haven't tested "passive".
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tor Vic
On 31.01.23 05:34, Wyes Karny wrote:
> Hi Tor Vic,
>
> On 24 Jan 20:40, Tor Vic wrote:
> --------------------------------->8-----------------------------
>>
>> The "active" mode seems to be broken here on a Zen2 3900X running Linux 6.1.
>> Frequency remains stuck at minimum which is +-500 MHz.
>
> I've fixed this in v4.
>
>>
>> Some queries of the new /sys devices lead to I/O error:
>>
>> # LANG=C cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/amd_pstate_*
>> 166
>> cat:
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/amd_pstate_lowest_nonlinear_freq:
>> Input/output error
>> cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/amd_pstate_max_freq:
>> Input/output error
>>
> This issue I'm not able to reproduce. Is this issue seen with only EPP
> patches also?
> Could you please check if this issue still there with v4?
No, it's gone. Could have been a mismerge, I'm sorry.
>
> Thanks,
> Wyes
Thank you!
>
>> The "guided" mode seems to work fine with no stuck frequency, but also
>> produces I/O error on some /sys files.
>>
>> I haven't tested "passive".
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Tor Vic