2024-02-21 08:28:51

by Praveen Kumar Kannoju

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH net-next v6] bonding: rate-limit bonding driver inspect messages

Through the routine bond_mii_monitor(), bonding driver inspects and commits
the slave state changes. During the times when slave state change and
failure in aqcuiring rtnl lock happen at the same time, the routine
bond_mii_monitor() reschedules itself to come around after 1 msec to commit
the new state.

During this, it executes the routine bond_miimon_inspect() to re-inspect
the state chane and prints the corresponding slave state on to the console.
Hence we do see a message at every 1 msec till the rtnl lock is acquired
and state chage is committed.

This patch doesn't change how bond functions. It only simply limits this
kind of log flood.

Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar Kannoju <[email protected]>
---
v6:
- Minor space additions addressed.
v5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
- Redundant indentation addressed.
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
- Rectification in the patch subject and versioning details.
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
- Commit message is modified to provide summary of the issue, because of
which rate-limiting the bonding driver messages is needed.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
- Use exising net_ratelimit() instead of introducing new rate-limit
parameter.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 4e0600c..51fdb79 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2609,7 +2609,7 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_FAIL);
commit++;
slave->delay = bond->params.downdelay;
- if (slave->delay) {
+ if (slave->delay && net_ratelimit()) {
slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status down for %sinterface, disabling it in %d ms\n",
(BOND_MODE(bond) ==
BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) ?
@@ -2623,9 +2623,10 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
/* recovered before downdelay expired */
bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_UP);
slave->last_link_up = jiffies;
- slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status up again after %d ms\n",
- (bond->params.downdelay - slave->delay) *
- bond->params.miimon);
+ if (net_ratelimit())
+ slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status up again after %d ms\n",
+ (bond->params.downdelay - slave->delay) *
+ bond->params.miimon);
commit++;
continue;
}
@@ -2647,7 +2648,7 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
commit++;
slave->delay = bond->params.updelay;

- if (slave->delay) {
+ if (slave->delay && net_ratelimit()) {
slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status up, enabling it in %d ms\n",
ignore_updelay ? 0 :
bond->params.updelay *
@@ -2657,9 +2658,10 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
case BOND_LINK_BACK:
if (!link_state) {
bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_DOWN);
- slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status down again after %d ms\n",
- (bond->params.updelay - slave->delay) *
- bond->params.miimon);
+ if (net_ratelimit())
+ slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status down again after %d ms\n",
+ (bond->params.updelay - slave->delay) *
+ bond->params.miimon);
commit++;
continue;
}
--
1.8.3.1



2024-02-21 10:39:23

by Simon Horman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6] bonding: rate-limit bonding driver inspect messages

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 01:57:52PM +0530, Praveen Kumar Kannoju wrote:
> Through the routine bond_mii_monitor(), bonding driver inspects and commits
> the slave state changes. During the times when slave state change and
> failure in aqcuiring rtnl lock happen at the same time, the routine
> bond_mii_monitor() reschedules itself to come around after 1 msec to commit
> the new state.
>
> During this, it executes the routine bond_miimon_inspect() to re-inspect
> the state chane and prints the corresponding slave state on to the console.
> Hence we do see a message at every 1 msec till the rtnl lock is acquired
> and state chage is committed.
>
> This patch doesn't change how bond functions. It only simply limits this
> kind of log flood.
>
> Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar Kannoju <[email protected]>
> ---
> v6:
> - Minor space additions addressed.
> v5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> - Redundant indentation addressed.
> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> - Rectification in the patch subject and versioning details.
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> - Commit message is modified to provide summary of the issue, because of
> which rate-limiting the bonding driver messages is needed.
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> - Use exising net_ratelimit() instead of introducing new rate-limit
> parameter.
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Hi Praveen,

Thanks for addressing my review of v4.
This version looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>

..

2024-02-21 10:44:38

by Praveen Kumar Kannoju

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v6] bonding: rate-limit bonding driver inspect messages

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
> Sent: 21 February 2024 04:09 PM
> To: Praveen Kannoju <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Rajesh Sivaramasubramaniom
> <[email protected]>; Rama Nichanamatlu <[email protected]>; Manjunath Patil
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6] bonding: rate-limit bonding driver inspect messages
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 01:57:52PM +0530, Praveen Kumar Kannoju wrote:
> > Through the routine bond_mii_monitor(), bonding driver inspects and
> > commits the slave state changes. During the times when slave state
> > change and failure in aqcuiring rtnl lock happen at the same time, the
> > routine
> > bond_mii_monitor() reschedules itself to come around after 1 msec to
> > commit the new state.
> >
> > During this, it executes the routine bond_miimon_inspect() to
> > re-inspect the state chane and prints the corresponding slave state on to the console.
> > Hence we do see a message at every 1 msec till the rtnl lock is
> > acquired and state chage is committed.
> >
> > This patch doesn't change how bond functions. It only simply limits
> > this kind of log flood.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar Kannoju <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > v6:
> > - Minor space additions addressed.
> > v5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> > - Redundant indentation addressed.
> > v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> > - Rectification in the patch subject and versioning details.
> > v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> > - Commit message is modified to provide summary of the issue, because of
> > which rate-limiting the bonding driver messages is needed.
> > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> > - Use exising net_ratelimit() instead of introducing new rate-limit
> > parameter.
> > v1:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240214044245.33170-1-praveen.kannoju@or
> > acle.com/
> > ---
> > drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Hi Praveen,
>
> Thanks for addressing my review of v4.
> This version looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
>
> ...

Thank you for the review, Simon, Hangbin and Jay.

-
Praveen.

2024-02-21 12:12:25

by Hangbin Liu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6] bonding: rate-limit bonding driver inspect messages

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 01:57:52PM +0530, Praveen Kumar Kannoju wrote:
> Through the routine bond_mii_monitor(), bonding driver inspects and commits
> the slave state changes. During the times when slave state change and
> failure in aqcuiring rtnl lock happen at the same time, the routine
> bond_mii_monitor() reschedules itself to come around after 1 msec to commit
> the new state.
>
> During this, it executes the routine bond_miimon_inspect() to re-inspect
> the state chane and prints the corresponding slave state on to the console.
> Hence we do see a message at every 1 msec till the rtnl lock is acquired
> and state chage is committed.
>
> This patch doesn't change how bond functions. It only simply limits this
> kind of log flood.
>
> Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar Kannoju <[email protected]>
> ---
> v6:
> - Minor space additions addressed.
> v5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> - Redundant indentation addressed.
> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> - Rectification in the patch subject and versioning details.
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> - Commit message is modified to provide summary of the issue, because of
> which rate-limiting the bonding driver messages is needed.
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> - Use exising net_ratelimit() instead of introducing new rate-limit
> parameter.
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> ---

Thanks for your patient update.

Reviewed-by: Hangbin Liu <[email protected]>

2024-02-21 15:50:00

by Jay Vosburgh

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6] bonding: rate-limit bonding driver inspect messages

Praveen Kumar Kannoju <[email protected]> wrote:

>Through the routine bond_mii_monitor(), bonding driver inspects and commits
>the slave state changes. During the times when slave state change and
>failure in aqcuiring rtnl lock happen at the same time, the routine
>bond_mii_monitor() reschedules itself to come around after 1 msec to commit
>the new state.
>
>During this, it executes the routine bond_miimon_inspect() to re-inspect
>the state chane and prints the corresponding slave state on to the console.
>Hence we do see a message at every 1 msec till the rtnl lock is acquired
>and state chage is committed.
>
>This patch doesn't change how bond functions. It only simply limits this
>kind of log flood.
>
>Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar Kannoju <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Jay Vosburgh <[email protected]>


>---
>v6:
> - Minor space additions addressed.
>v5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> - Redundant indentation addressed.
>v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> - Rectification in the patch subject and versioning details.
>v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> - Commit message is modified to provide summary of the issue, because of
> which rate-limiting the bonding driver messages is needed.
>v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> - Use exising net_ratelimit() instead of introducing new rate-limit
> parameter.
>v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
>---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>index 4e0600c..51fdb79 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>@@ -2609,7 +2609,7 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
> bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_FAIL);
> commit++;
> slave->delay = bond->params.downdelay;
>- if (slave->delay) {
>+ if (slave->delay && net_ratelimit()) {
> slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status down for %sinterface, disabling it in %d ms\n",
> (BOND_MODE(bond) ==
> BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) ?
>@@ -2623,9 +2623,10 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
> /* recovered before downdelay expired */
> bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_UP);
> slave->last_link_up = jiffies;
>- slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status up again after %d ms\n",
>- (bond->params.downdelay - slave->delay) *
>- bond->params.miimon);
>+ if (net_ratelimit())
>+ slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status up again after %d ms\n",
>+ (bond->params.downdelay - slave->delay) *
>+ bond->params.miimon);
> commit++;
> continue;
> }
>@@ -2647,7 +2648,7 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
> commit++;
> slave->delay = bond->params.updelay;
>
>- if (slave->delay) {
>+ if (slave->delay && net_ratelimit()) {
> slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status up, enabling it in %d ms\n",
> ignore_updelay ? 0 :
> bond->params.updelay *
>@@ -2657,9 +2658,10 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
> case BOND_LINK_BACK:
> if (!link_state) {
> bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_DOWN);
>- slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status down again after %d ms\n",
>- (bond->params.updelay - slave->delay) *
>- bond->params.miimon);
>+ if (net_ratelimit())
>+ slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status down again after %d ms\n",
>+ (bond->params.updelay - slave->delay) *
>+ bond->params.miimon);
> commit++;
> continue;
> }
>--
>1.8.3.1
>
>

2024-02-23 03:21:17

by patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6] bonding: rate-limit bonding driver inspect messages

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>:

On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:57:52 +0530 you wrote:
> Through the routine bond_mii_monitor(), bonding driver inspects and commits
> the slave state changes. During the times when slave state change and
> failure in aqcuiring rtnl lock happen at the same time, the routine
> bond_mii_monitor() reschedules itself to come around after 1 msec to commit
> the new state.
>
> During this, it executes the routine bond_miimon_inspect() to re-inspect
> the state chane and prints the corresponding slave state on to the console.
> Hence we do see a message at every 1 msec till the rtnl lock is acquired
> and state chage is committed.
>
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,v6] bonding: rate-limit bonding driver inspect messages
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/a4634aa71fee

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html