2024-04-15 17:01:35

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 00/20] RISC-V: ACPI: Add external interrupt controller support

This series adds support for the below ECR approved by ASWG.
1) MADT - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oMGPyOD58JaPgMl1pKasT-VKsIKia7zR/view?usp=sharing

The series primarily enables irqchip drivers for RISC-V ACPI based
platforms.

The series can be broadly categorized like below.

1) PCI ACPI related functions are migrated from arm64 to common file so
that we don't need to duplicate them for RISC-V.

2) Added support for re-ordering the probe of interrupt controllers when
IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE is used.

3) To ensure probe order between interrupt controllers and devices,
implicit dependency is created similar to when _DEP is present.

4) When PNP devices like Generic 16550A UART, have the dependency on the
interrupt controller, they will not be added to PNP data structures. So,
added second phase of pnpacpi_init to handle this.

5) ACPI support added in RISC-V interrupt controller drivers.

This series is still kept as RFC to seek feedback on above design
changes. Looking forward for the feedback!

Changes since RFC v3:
1) Moved to _DEP method instead of fw_devlink.
2) PLIC/APLIC driver probe using namespace devices.
3) Handling PNP devices as part of clearing dependency.
4) Rebased to latest linux-next to get AIA DT drivers.

Changes since RFC v2:
1) Introduced fw_devlink for ACPI nodes for IRQ dependency.
2) Dropped patches in drivers which are not required due to
fw_devlink support.
3) Dropped pci_set_msi() patch and added a patch in
pci_create_root_bus().
4) Updated pnp_irq() patch so that none of the actual PNP
drivers need to change.

Changes since RFC v1:
1) Abandoned swnode approach as per Marc's feedback.
2) To cope up with AIA series changes which changed irqchip driver
probe from core_initcall() to platform_driver, added patches
to support deferred probing.
3) Rebased on top of Anup's AIA v11 and added tags.

To test the series,

1) Qemu should be built using the riscv_acpi_namespace_v1 branch at
https://github.com/vlsunil/qemu.git

2) EDK2 should be built using the instructions at:
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/OvmfPkg/RiscVVirt/README.md

3) Build Linux using this series.

Run Qemu:
qemu-system-riscv64 \
-M virt,pflash0=pflash0,pflash1=pflash1,aia=aplic-imsic \
-m 2G -smp 8 \
-serial mon:stdio \
-device virtio-gpu-pci -full-screen \
-device qemu-xhci \
-device usb-kbd \
-blockdev node-name=pflash0,driver=file,read-only=on,filename=RISCV_VIRT_CODE.fd \
-blockdev node-name=pflash1,driver=file,filename=RISCV_VIRT_VARS.fd \
-netdev user,id=net0 -device virtio-net-pci,netdev=net0 \
-kernel arch/riscv/boot/Image \
-initrd rootfs.cpio \
-append "root=/dev/ram ro console=ttyS0 rootwait earlycon=uart8250,mmio,0x10000000"

To boot with APLIC only, use aia=aplic.
To boot with PLIC, remove aia= option.

This series is also available in acpi_b2_v4_autodep_v1 branch at
https://github.com/vlsunil/linux.git

Based-on: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tag/?h=next-20240415

Sunil V L (20):
arm64: PCI: Migrate ACPI related functions to pci-acpi.c
RISC-V: ACPI: Implement PCI related functionality
PCI: Make pci_create_root_bus() declare its reliance on MSI domains
ACPI: scan.c: Add weak arch specific function to reorder the IRQCHIP
probe
ACPI: RISC-V: Implement arch function to reorder irqchip probe entries
ACPI: bus: Add acpi_riscv_init function
RISC-V: Kconfig: Select deferred GSI probe for ACPI systems
ACPI: scan: Refactor dependency creation
drivers/acpi/scan.c: Update _DEP honor list
RISC-V: ACPI: Initialize GSI mapping structures
ACPI: scan.c: Define weak function to populate dependencies
RISC-V: ACPI: Implement function to add implicit dependencies
ACPI/PNP: Initialize PNP devices skipped due to _DEP
irqchip: riscv-intc: Add ACPI support for AIA
irqchip: riscv-imsic: Add ACPI support
irqchip: riscv-aplic: Add ACPI support
irqchip: irq-sifive-plic: Add ACPI support
ACPI: bus: Add RINTC IRQ model for RISC-V
irqchip: riscv-intc: Set ACPI irqmodel
ACPI: pci_link: Clear the dependencies after probe

arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 191 ------------
arch/riscv/Kconfig | 3 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h | 57 ++++
arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c | 31 +-
drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 3 +
drivers/acpi/bus.c | 4 +
drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 3 +
drivers/acpi/riscv/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/acpi/riscv/init.c | 14 +
drivers/acpi/riscv/init.h | 4 +
drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c | 323 +++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 69 +++--
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c | 20 +-
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c | 70 +++--
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.h | 1 +
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-msi.c | 9 +-
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-early.c | 52 +++-
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c | 32 +-
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-state.c | 115 ++++----
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-state.h | 2 +-
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c | 102 ++++++-
drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 89 ++++--
drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 182 ++++++++++++
drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +
drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c | 24 +-
drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c | 63 ++--
include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 2 +
include/linux/acpi.h | 9 +
include/linux/irqchip/riscv-imsic.h | 10 +
include/linux/pnp.h | 7 +
30 files changed, 1108 insertions(+), 388 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/riscv/init.c
create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/riscv/init.h
create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c

--
2.40.1



2024-04-15 17:01:57

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 01/20] arm64: PCI: Migrate ACPI related functions to pci-acpi.c

The functions defined in arm64 for ACPI support are required
for RISC-V also. To avoid duplication, move these functions
to common location.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 191 ----------------------------------------
drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 182 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 191 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
index f872c57e9909..fd9a7bed83ce 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
@@ -6,28 +6,7 @@
* Copyright (C) 2014 ARM Ltd.
*/

-#include <linux/acpi.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/io.h>
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
-#include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
-#include <linux/pci-ecam.h>
-#include <linux/slab.h>
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
-/*
- * Try to assign the IRQ number when probing a new device
- */
-int pcibios_alloc_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
-{
- if (!acpi_disabled)
- acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev);
-
- return 0;
-}
-#endif

/*
* raw_pci_read/write - Platform-specific PCI config space access.
@@ -61,173 +40,3 @@ int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *bus)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibus_to_node);

#endif
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
-
-struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info {
- struct acpi_pci_root_info common;
- struct pci_config_window *cfg; /* config space mapping */
-};
-
-int acpi_pci_bus_find_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
- struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata;
- struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device(cfg->parent);
- struct acpi_pci_root *root = acpi_driver_data(adev);
-
- return root->segment;
-}
-
-int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
-{
- struct pci_config_window *cfg;
- struct acpi_device *adev;
- struct device *bus_dev;
-
- if (acpi_disabled)
- return 0;
-
- cfg = bridge->bus->sysdata;
-
- /*
- * On Hyper-V there is no corresponding ACPI device for a root bridge,
- * therefore ->parent is set as NULL by the driver. And set 'adev' as
- * NULL in this case because there is no proper ACPI device.
- */
- if (!cfg->parent)
- adev = NULL;
- else
- adev = to_acpi_device(cfg->parent);
-
- bus_dev = &bridge->bus->dev;
-
- ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bridge->dev, adev);
- set_dev_node(bus_dev, acpi_get_node(acpi_device_handle(adev)));
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
-{
- struct resource_entry *entry, *tmp;
- int status;
-
- status = acpi_pci_probe_root_resources(ci);
- resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources) {
- if (!(entry->res->flags & IORESOURCE_WINDOW))
- resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
- }
- return status;
-}
-
-/*
- * Lookup the bus range for the domain in MCFG, and set up config space
- * mapping.
- */
-static struct pci_config_window *
-pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
-{
- struct device *dev = &root->device->dev;
- struct resource *bus_res = &root->secondary;
- u16 seg = root->segment;
- const struct pci_ecam_ops *ecam_ops;
- struct resource cfgres;
- struct acpi_device *adev;
- struct pci_config_window *cfg;
- int ret;
-
- ret = pci_mcfg_lookup(root, &cfgres, &ecam_ops);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(dev, "%04x:%pR ECAM region not found\n", seg, bus_res);
- return NULL;
- }
-
- adev = acpi_resource_consumer(&cfgres);
- if (adev)
- dev_info(dev, "ECAM area %pR reserved by %s\n", &cfgres,
- dev_name(&adev->dev));
- else
- dev_warn(dev, FW_BUG "ECAM area %pR not reserved in ACPI namespace\n",
- &cfgres);
-
- cfg = pci_ecam_create(dev, &cfgres, bus_res, ecam_ops);
- if (IS_ERR(cfg)) {
- dev_err(dev, "%04x:%pR error %ld mapping ECAM\n", seg, bus_res,
- PTR_ERR(cfg));
- return NULL;
- }
-
- return cfg;
-}
-
-/* release_info: free resources allocated by init_info */
-static void pci_acpi_generic_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
-{
- struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri;
-
- ri = container_of(ci, struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info, common);
- pci_ecam_free(ri->cfg);
- kfree(ci->ops);
- kfree(ri);
-}
-
-/* Interface called from ACPI code to setup PCI host controller */
-struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
-{
- struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri;
- struct pci_bus *bus, *child;
- struct acpi_pci_root_ops *root_ops;
- struct pci_host_bridge *host;
-
- ri = kzalloc(sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!ri)
- return NULL;
-
- root_ops = kzalloc(sizeof(*root_ops), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!root_ops) {
- kfree(ri);
- return NULL;
- }
-
- ri->cfg = pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(root);
- if (!ri->cfg) {
- kfree(ri);
- kfree(root_ops);
- return NULL;
- }
-
- root_ops->release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info;
- root_ops->prepare_resources = pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources;
- root_ops->pci_ops = (struct pci_ops *)&ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops;
- bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, root_ops, &ri->common, ri->cfg);
- if (!bus)
- return NULL;
-
- /* If we must preserve the resource configuration, claim now */
- host = pci_find_host_bridge(bus);
- if (host->preserve_config)
- pci_bus_claim_resources(bus);
-
- /*
- * Assign whatever was left unassigned. If we didn't claim above,
- * this will reassign everything.
- */
- pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources(bus);
-
- list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node)
- pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
-
- return bus;
-}
-
-void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
- acpi_pci_add_bus(bus);
-}
-
-void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
- acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
-}
-
-#endif
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
index 004575091596..e8d84fa435da 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/pci_hotplug.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
+#include <linux/pci-ecam.h>
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
#include <linux/rwsem.h>
@@ -1519,3 +1520,184 @@ static int __init acpi_pci_init(void)
return 0;
}
arch_initcall(acpi_pci_init);
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
+
+/*
+ * Try to assign the IRQ number when probing a new device
+ */
+int pcibios_alloc_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+ if (!acpi_disabled)
+ acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info {
+ struct acpi_pci_root_info common;
+ struct pci_config_window *cfg; /* config space mapping */
+};
+
+int acpi_pci_bus_find_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus)
+{
+ struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata;
+ struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device(cfg->parent);
+ struct acpi_pci_root *root = acpi_driver_data(adev);
+
+ return root->segment;
+}
+
+int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
+{
+ struct pci_config_window *cfg;
+ struct acpi_device *adev;
+ struct device *bus_dev;
+
+ if (acpi_disabled)
+ return 0;
+
+ cfg = bridge->bus->sysdata;
+
+ /*
+ * On Hyper-V there is no corresponding ACPI device for a root bridge,
+ * therefore ->parent is set as NULL by the driver. And set 'adev' as
+ * NULL in this case because there is no proper ACPI device.
+ */
+ if (!cfg->parent)
+ adev = NULL;
+ else
+ adev = to_acpi_device(cfg->parent);
+
+ bus_dev = &bridge->bus->dev;
+
+ ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bridge->dev, adev);
+ set_dev_node(bus_dev, acpi_get_node(acpi_device_handle(adev)));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
+{
+ struct resource_entry *entry, *tmp;
+ int status;
+
+ status = acpi_pci_probe_root_resources(ci);
+ resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources) {
+ if (!(entry->res->flags & IORESOURCE_WINDOW))
+ resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
+ }
+ return status;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Lookup the bus range for the domain in MCFG, and set up config space
+ * mapping.
+ */
+static struct pci_config_window *
+pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &root->device->dev;
+ struct resource *bus_res = &root->secondary;
+ u16 seg = root->segment;
+ const struct pci_ecam_ops *ecam_ops;
+ struct resource cfgres;
+ struct acpi_device *adev;
+ struct pci_config_window *cfg;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = pci_mcfg_lookup(root, &cfgres, &ecam_ops);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "%04x:%pR ECAM region not found\n", seg, bus_res);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ adev = acpi_resource_consumer(&cfgres);
+ if (adev)
+ dev_info(dev, "ECAM area %pR reserved by %s\n", &cfgres,
+ dev_name(&adev->dev));
+ else
+ dev_warn(dev, FW_BUG "ECAM area %pR not reserved in ACPI namespace\n",
+ &cfgres);
+
+ cfg = pci_ecam_create(dev, &cfgres, bus_res, ecam_ops);
+ if (IS_ERR(cfg)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "%04x:%pR error %ld mapping ECAM\n", seg, bus_res,
+ PTR_ERR(cfg));
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ return cfg;
+}
+
+/* release_info: free resources allocated by init_info */
+static void pci_acpi_generic_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
+{
+ struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri;
+
+ ri = container_of(ci, struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info, common);
+ pci_ecam_free(ri->cfg);
+ kfree(ci->ops);
+ kfree(ri);
+}
+
+/* Interface called from ACPI code to setup PCI host controller */
+struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
+{
+ struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri;
+ struct pci_bus *bus, *child;
+ struct acpi_pci_root_ops *root_ops;
+ struct pci_host_bridge *host;
+
+ ri = kzalloc(sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!ri)
+ return NULL;
+
+ root_ops = kzalloc(sizeof(*root_ops), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!root_ops) {
+ kfree(ri);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ ri->cfg = pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(root);
+ if (!ri->cfg) {
+ kfree(ri);
+ kfree(root_ops);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ root_ops->release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info;
+ root_ops->prepare_resources = pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources;
+ root_ops->pci_ops = (struct pci_ops *)&ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops;
+ bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, root_ops, &ri->common, ri->cfg);
+ if (!bus)
+ return NULL;
+
+ /* If we must preserve the resource configuration, claim now */
+ host = pci_find_host_bridge(bus);
+ if (host->preserve_config)
+ pci_bus_claim_resources(bus);
+
+ /*
+ * Assign whatever was left unassigned. If we didn't claim above,
+ * this will reassign everything.
+ */
+ pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources(bus);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node)
+ pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
+
+ return bus;
+}
+
+void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
+{
+ acpi_pci_add_bus(bus);
+}
+
+void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
+{
+ acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
+}
+
+#endif
--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:02:51

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 03/20] PCI: Make pci_create_root_bus() declare its reliance on MSI domains

Similar to commit 9ec37efb8783 ("PCI/MSI: Make
pci_host_common_probe() declare its reliance on MSI domains"), declare
this dependency for PCI probe in ACPI based flow.

This is required especially for RISC-V platforms where MSI controller
can be absent. However, setting this for all architectures seem to cause
issues on non RISC-V architectures [1]. Hence, enabled this only for
RISC-V.

[1] - https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/[email protected]

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 1325fbae2f28..e09915bee2ee 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -3048,6 +3048,9 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
bridge->sysdata = sysdata;
bridge->busnr = bus;
bridge->ops = ops;
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV
+ bridge->msi_domain = true;
+#endif

error = pci_register_host_bridge(bridge);
if (error < 0)
--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:03:00

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 02/20] RISC-V: ACPI: Implement PCI related functionality

Replace the dummy implementation for PCI related functions with actual
implementation. This needs ECAM and MCFG CONFIG options to be enabled
for RISC-V.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
arch/riscv/Kconfig | 2 ++
arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c | 31 ++++++++++++++-----------------
drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index 6d64888134ba..69cc0509a19a 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ config 32BIT
config RISCV
def_bool y
select ACPI_GENERIC_GSI if ACPI
+ select ACPI_MCFG if (ACPI && PCI)
select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY if ACPI
select ARCH_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT
select ARCH_ENABLE_HUGEPAGE_MIGRATION if HUGETLB_PAGE && MIGRATION
@@ -173,6 +174,7 @@ config RISCV
select OF_EARLY_FLATTREE
select OF_IRQ
select PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC if PCI
+ select PCI_ECAM if (ACPI && PCI)
select PCI_MSI if PCI
select RISCV_ALTERNATIVE if !XIP_KERNEL
select RISCV_APLIC
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
index e619edc8b0cc..41aa77c8484b 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
@@ -306,29 +306,26 @@ void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size)
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI

/*
- * These interfaces are defined just to enable building ACPI core.
- * TODO: Update it with actual implementation when external interrupt
- * controller support is added in RISC-V ACPI.
+ * raw_pci_read/write - Platform-specific PCI config space access.
*/
-int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn,
- int reg, int len, u32 *val)
+int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
+ unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val)
{
- return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
-}
+ struct pci_bus *b = pci_find_bus(domain, bus);

-int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn,
- int reg, int len, u32 val)
-{
- return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
+ if (!b)
+ return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
+ return b->ops->read(b, devfn, reg, len, val);
}

-int acpi_pci_bus_find_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus)
+int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
+ unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val)
{
- return -1;
-}
+ struct pci_bus *b = pci_find_bus(domain, bus);

-struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
-{
- return NULL;
+ if (!b)
+ return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
+ return b->ops->write(b, devfn, reg, len, val);
}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_PCI */
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
index e8d84fa435da..b5892d0fa68c 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
@@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@ static int __init acpi_pci_init(void)
}
arch_initcall(acpi_pci_init);

-#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_RISCV)

/*
* Try to assign the IRQ number when probing a new device
--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:03:56

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 07/20] RISC-V: Kconfig: Select deferred GSI probe for ACPI systems

On RISC-V platforms, apart from root interrupt controllers (which
provide local interrupts and IPI), other interrupt controllers in the
hierarchy are probed late. Enable this CONFIG option for RISC-V ACPI
based platforms.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 3 +++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index 69cc0509a19a..d8cdb3535e44 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ config RISCV
select ACPI_GENERIC_GSI if ACPI
select ACPI_MCFG if (ACPI && PCI)
select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY if ACPI
+ select ARCH_ACPI_DEFERRED_GSI if ACPI
select ARCH_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT
select ARCH_ENABLE_HUGEPAGE_MIGRATION if HUGETLB_PAGE && MIGRATION
select ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK if PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
index e3a7c2aedd5f..ebec1707f662 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
@@ -587,6 +587,9 @@ config ACPI_PRMT
substantially increase computational overhead related to the
initialization of some server systems.

+config ARCH_ACPI_DEFERRED_GSI
+ bool
+
endif # ACPI

config X86_PM_TIMER
--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:04:53

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 11/20] ACPI: scan.c: Define weak function to populate dependencies

Some architectures like RISC-V need to add dependencies without explicit
_DEP. Define a weak function which can be implemented by the architecture.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 11 +++++++++++
include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 07e91616b7d4..8e23b9508716 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -2073,11 +2073,22 @@ int acpi_scan_add_dep(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_handle_list *dep_devices)
return count;
}

+u32 __weak arch_acpi_add_auto_dep(acpi_handle handle) { return 0; }
+
static u32 acpi_scan_check_dep(acpi_handle handle)
{
struct acpi_handle_list dep_devices;
u32 count = 0;

+ /*
+ * Some architectures like RISC-V need to add dependencies for
+ * all devices which use GSI to the interrupt controller so that
+ * interrupt controller is probed before any of those devices.
+ * Instead of mandating _DEP on all the devices, detect the
+ * dependency and add automatically.
+ */
+ count += arch_acpi_add_auto_dep(handle);
+
/*
* Check for _HID here to avoid deferring the enumeration of:
* 1. PCI devices.
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index 28a9b87c23fa..5fba4075d764 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -994,6 +994,7 @@ static inline void acpi_put_acpi_dev(struct acpi_device *adev)
int acpi_wait_for_acpi_ipmi(void);

int acpi_scan_add_dep(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_handle_list *dep_devices);
+u32 arch_acpi_add_auto_dep(acpi_handle handle);
#else /* CONFIG_ACPI */

static inline int register_acpi_bus_type(void *bus) { return 0; }
--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:05:12

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 12/20] RISC-V: ACPI: Implement function to add implicit dependencies

RISC-V interrupt controllers for wired interrupts are platform devices
and hence their driver will be probed late. Also, APLIC which is one
such interrupt controller can not be probed early since it needs MSI
services. This needs a probing order between the interrupt controller
driver and the device drivers.

_DEP is typically used to indicate such dependencies. However, the
dependency may be already available like GSI mapping. Hence, instead of
an explicit _DEP, architecture can find the implicit dependencies and
add to the dependency list.

For RISC-V, add the dependencies for below use cases.

1) For devices which has IRQ resource, find out the interrupt controller
using GSI number map and add the dependency.

2) For PCI host bridges:
a) If _PRT indicate PCI link devices, add dependency on the link
device.
b) If _PRT indicates GSI, find out the interrupt controller
using GSI number map and add the dependency.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 132 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c b/drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c
index de0f1ba92068..f98645461bbe 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c
@@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ struct riscv_ext_intc_list {
struct list_head list;
};

+struct acpi_irq_dep_ctx {
+ int rc;
+ unsigned int index;
+ acpi_handle handle;
+};
+
LIST_HEAD(ext_intc_list);

static int irqchip_cmp_func(const void *in0, const void *in1)
@@ -189,3 +195,129 @@ int __init riscv_acpi_init_gsi_mapping(void)
acpi_get_devices("RSCV0001", riscv_acpi_create_gsi_map, NULL, NULL);
return 0;
}
+
+static acpi_status riscv_acpi_irq_get_parent(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *context)
+{
+ struct acpi_irq_dep_ctx *ctx = context;
+ struct acpi_resource_irq *irq;
+ struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *eirq;
+
+ switch (ares->type) {
+ case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IRQ:
+ irq = &ares->data.irq;
+ if (ctx->index >= irq->interrupt_count) {
+ ctx->index -= irq->interrupt_count;
+ return AE_OK;
+ }
+ ctx->handle = riscv_acpi_get_gsi_handle(irq->interrupts[ctx->index]);
+ return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
+ case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_IRQ:
+ eirq = &ares->data.extended_irq;
+ if (eirq->producer_consumer == ACPI_PRODUCER)
+ return AE_OK;
+
+ if (ctx->index >= eirq->interrupt_count) {
+ ctx->index -= eirq->interrupt_count;
+ return AE_OK;
+ }
+
+ /* Not supported */
+ if (eirq->resource_source.string_length)
+ return AE_OK;
+
+ ctx->handle = riscv_acpi_get_gsi_handle(eirq->interrupts[ctx->index]);
+ return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
+ }
+
+ return AE_OK;
+}
+
+static int riscv_acpi_irq_get_dep(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, acpi_handle *gsi_handle)
+{
+ struct acpi_irq_dep_ctx ctx;
+
+ ctx.rc = -EINVAL;
+ ctx.index = index;
+ acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS, riscv_acpi_irq_get_parent, &ctx);
+ *gsi_handle = ctx.handle;
+ if (*gsi_handle)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static u32 riscv_acpi_add_prt_dep(acpi_handle handle)
+{
+ struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
+ struct acpi_pci_routing_table *entry;
+ struct acpi_handle_list dep_devices;
+ acpi_handle gsi_handle;
+ acpi_handle link_handle;
+ acpi_status status;
+ u32 count = 0;
+
+ status = acpi_get_irq_routing_table(handle, &buffer);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+ kfree(buffer.pointer);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ entry = buffer.pointer;
+ while (entry && (entry->length > 0)) {
+ if (entry->source[0]) {
+ acpi_get_handle(handle, entry->source, &link_handle);
+ dep_devices.count = 1;
+ dep_devices.handles = kcalloc(1, sizeof(*dep_devices.handles), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dep_devices.handles)
+ continue;
+
+ dep_devices.handles[0] = link_handle;
+ count += acpi_scan_add_dep(handle, &dep_devices);
+ } else {
+ gsi_handle = riscv_acpi_get_gsi_handle(entry->source_index);
+ dep_devices.count = 1;
+ dep_devices.handles = kcalloc(1, sizeof(*dep_devices.handles), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dep_devices.handles)
+ continue;
+
+ dep_devices.handles[0] = gsi_handle;
+ count += acpi_scan_add_dep(handle, &dep_devices);
+ }
+
+ entry = (struct acpi_pci_routing_table *)
+ ((unsigned long)entry + entry->length);
+ }
+
+ kfree(buffer.pointer);
+ return count;
+}
+
+static u32 riscv_acpi_add_irq_dep(acpi_handle handle)
+{
+ struct acpi_handle_list dep_devices;
+ acpi_handle gsi_handle;
+ u32 count = 0;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0;
+ riscv_acpi_irq_get_dep(handle, i, &gsi_handle);
+ i++) {
+ dep_devices.count = 1;
+ dep_devices.handles = kcalloc(1, sizeof(*dep_devices.handles), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dep_devices.handles)
+ continue;
+
+ dep_devices.handles[0] = gsi_handle;
+ count += acpi_scan_add_dep(handle, &dep_devices);
+ }
+
+ return count;
+}
+
+u32 arch_acpi_add_auto_dep(acpi_handle handle)
+{
+ if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_PRT"))
+ return riscv_acpi_add_prt_dep(handle);
+
+ return riscv_acpi_add_irq_dep(handle);
+}
--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:05:38

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 13/20] ACPI/PNP: Initialize PNP devices skipped due to _DEP

When PNP devices have _DEP, they will not be enumerated in
pnpacpi_init() unless the dependency is met. Hence, when such PNP
device's supplier device is probed, the PNP device need to be added to
the PNP data structures. So, introduce pnpacpi_init_2() for doing this
which gets called as part of clearing the dependency.

This is currently required for RISC-V. Hence, restricted the code with a
CONFIG option enabled for RISC-V.

Since pnpacpi_add_device() can be called now even after boot,
__init attribute is removed from pnpacpi_add_device() and its dependent
functions.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 4 +++
drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c | 24 ++++++++++---
drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
include/linux/pnp.h | 7 ++++
4 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 8e23b9508716..086ae040a5ad 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/dma-map-ops.h>
#include <linux/platform_data/x86/apple.h>
#include <linux/pgtable.h>
+#include <linux/pnp.h>
#include <linux/crc32.h>
#include <linux/dma-direct.h>

@@ -2370,6 +2371,9 @@ static void acpi_scan_clear_dep_fn(struct work_struct *work)
acpi_bus_attach(cdw->adev, (void *)true);
acpi_scan_lock_release();

+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ACPI_DEFERRED_GSI) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PNPACPI))
+ pnpacpi_init_2(cdw->adev);
+
acpi_dev_put(cdw->adev);
kfree(cdw);
}
diff --git a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c b/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
index a0927081a003..c81893fc1fb2 100644
--- a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static int num;
#define TEST_ALPHA(c) \
if (!('A' <= (c) && (c) <= 'Z')) \
return 0
-static int __init ispnpidacpi(const char *id)
+static int ispnpidacpi(const char *id)
{
TEST_ALPHA(id[0]);
TEST_ALPHA(id[1]);
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ struct pnp_protocol pnpacpi_protocol = {
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pnpacpi_protocol);

-static const char *__init pnpacpi_get_id(struct acpi_device *device)
+static const char *pnpacpi_get_id(struct acpi_device *device)
{
struct acpi_hardware_id *id;

@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ static const char *__init pnpacpi_get_id(struct acpi_device *device)
return NULL;
}

-static int __init pnpacpi_add_device(struct acpi_device *device)
+static int pnpacpi_add_device(struct acpi_device *device)
{
struct pnp_dev *dev;
const char *pnpid;
@@ -283,6 +283,23 @@ static int __init pnpacpi_add_device(struct acpi_device *device)
return 0;
}

+int pnpacpi_disabled;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_ACPI_DEFERRED_GSI
+void pnpacpi_init_2(struct acpi_device *adev)
+{
+ if (acpi_disabled || pnpacpi_disabled)
+ return;
+
+ if (!adev)
+ return;
+
+ if (acpi_is_pnp_device(adev) && acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(adev))
+ pnpacpi_add_device(adev);
+}
+
+#endif
+
static acpi_status __init pnpacpi_add_device_handler(acpi_handle handle,
u32 lvl, void *context,
void **rv)
@@ -296,7 +313,6 @@ static acpi_status __init pnpacpi_add_device_handler(acpi_handle handle,
return AE_OK;
}

-int pnpacpi_disabled __initdata;
static int __init pnpacpi_init(void)
{
if (acpi_disabled || pnpacpi_disabled) {
diff --git a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c b/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c
index c02ce0834c2c..1008599901a2 100644
--- a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c
+++ b/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c
@@ -289,9 +289,9 @@ int pnpacpi_parse_allocated_resource(struct pnp_dev *dev)
return 0;
}

-static __init void pnpacpi_parse_dma_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
- unsigned int option_flags,
- struct acpi_resource_dma *p)
+static void pnpacpi_parse_dma_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
+ unsigned int option_flags,
+ struct acpi_resource_dma *p)
{
int i;
unsigned char map = 0, flags;
@@ -303,9 +303,9 @@ static __init void pnpacpi_parse_dma_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
pnp_register_dma_resource(dev, option_flags, map, flags);
}

-static __init void pnpacpi_parse_irq_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
- unsigned int option_flags,
- struct acpi_resource_irq *p)
+static void pnpacpi_parse_irq_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
+ unsigned int option_flags,
+ struct acpi_resource_irq *p)
{
int i;
pnp_irq_mask_t map;
@@ -320,9 +320,9 @@ static __init void pnpacpi_parse_irq_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
pnp_register_irq_resource(dev, option_flags, &map, flags);
}

-static __init void pnpacpi_parse_ext_irq_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
- unsigned int option_flags,
- struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *p)
+static void pnpacpi_parse_ext_irq_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
+ unsigned int option_flags,
+ struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *p)
{
int i;
pnp_irq_mask_t map;
@@ -344,9 +344,9 @@ static __init void pnpacpi_parse_ext_irq_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
pnp_register_irq_resource(dev, option_flags, &map, flags);
}

-static __init void pnpacpi_parse_port_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
- unsigned int option_flags,
- struct acpi_resource_io *io)
+static void pnpacpi_parse_port_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
+ unsigned int option_flags,
+ struct acpi_resource_io *io)
{
unsigned char flags = 0;

@@ -357,16 +357,16 @@ static __init void pnpacpi_parse_port_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
}

static __init void pnpacpi_parse_fixed_port_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
- unsigned int option_flags,
- struct acpi_resource_fixed_io *io)
+ unsigned int option_flags,
+ struct acpi_resource_fixed_io *io)
{
pnp_register_port_resource(dev, option_flags, io->address, io->address,
0, io->address_length, IORESOURCE_IO_FIXED);
}

-static __init void pnpacpi_parse_mem24_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
- unsigned int option_flags,
- struct acpi_resource_memory24 *p)
+static void pnpacpi_parse_mem24_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
+ unsigned int option_flags,
+ struct acpi_resource_memory24 *p)
{
unsigned char flags = 0;

@@ -376,9 +376,9 @@ static __init void pnpacpi_parse_mem24_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
p->alignment, p->address_length, flags);
}

-static __init void pnpacpi_parse_mem32_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
- unsigned int option_flags,
- struct acpi_resource_memory32 *p)
+static void pnpacpi_parse_mem32_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
+ unsigned int option_flags,
+ struct acpi_resource_memory32 *p)
{
unsigned char flags = 0;

@@ -388,9 +388,9 @@ static __init void pnpacpi_parse_mem32_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
p->alignment, p->address_length, flags);
}

-static __init void pnpacpi_parse_fixed_mem32_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
- unsigned int option_flags,
- struct acpi_resource_fixed_memory32 *p)
+static void pnpacpi_parse_fixed_mem32_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
+ unsigned int option_flags,
+ struct acpi_resource_fixed_memory32 *p)
{
unsigned char flags = 0;

@@ -400,9 +400,9 @@ static __init void pnpacpi_parse_fixed_mem32_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
0, p->address_length, flags);
}

-static __init void pnpacpi_parse_address_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
- unsigned int option_flags,
- struct acpi_resource *r)
+static void pnpacpi_parse_address_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
+ unsigned int option_flags,
+ struct acpi_resource *r)
{
struct acpi_resource_address64 addr, *p = &addr;
acpi_status status;
@@ -427,9 +427,9 @@ static __init void pnpacpi_parse_address_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
IORESOURCE_IO_FIXED);
}

-static __init void pnpacpi_parse_ext_address_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
- unsigned int option_flags,
- struct acpi_resource *r)
+static void pnpacpi_parse_ext_address_option(struct pnp_dev *dev,
+ unsigned int option_flags,
+ struct acpi_resource *r)
{
struct acpi_resource_extended_address64 *p = &r->data.ext_address64;
unsigned char flags = 0;
@@ -451,8 +451,7 @@ struct acpipnp_parse_option_s {
unsigned int option_flags;
};

-static __init acpi_status pnpacpi_option_resource(struct acpi_resource *res,
- void *data)
+static acpi_status pnpacpi_option_resource(struct acpi_resource *res, void *data)
{
int priority;
struct acpipnp_parse_option_s *parse_data = data;
@@ -547,7 +546,7 @@ static __init acpi_status pnpacpi_option_resource(struct acpi_resource *res,
return AE_OK;
}

-int __init pnpacpi_parse_resource_option_data(struct pnp_dev *dev)
+int pnpacpi_parse_resource_option_data(struct pnp_dev *dev)
{
struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = dev->data;
acpi_handle handle = acpi_dev->handle;
diff --git a/include/linux/pnp.h b/include/linux/pnp.h
index ddbe7c3ca4ce..440f8c268a29 100644
--- a/include/linux/pnp.h
+++ b/include/linux/pnp.h
@@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ static inline struct acpi_device *pnp_acpi_device(struct pnp_dev *dev)
return dev->data;
return NULL;
}
+
#else
#define pnp_acpi_device(dev) 0
#endif
@@ -514,4 +515,10 @@ static inline void pnp_unregister_driver(struct pnp_driver *drv) { }
module_driver(__pnp_driver, pnp_register_driver, \
pnp_unregister_driver)

+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_ACPI_DEFERRED_GSI
+void pnpacpi_init_2(struct acpi_device *adev);
+#else
+static inline void pnpacpi_init_2(struct acpi_device *adev) { }
+#endif
+
#endif /* _LINUX_PNP_H */
--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:05:56

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 14/20] irqchip: riscv-intc: Add ACPI support for AIA

The RINTC subtype structure in MADT also has information about other
interrupt controllers. Save this information and provide interfaces to
retrieve them when required by corresponding drivers.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h | 35 ++++++++++++
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h
index 44a0b128c602..6bd578b1ffc9 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h
@@ -25,9 +25,22 @@ enum riscv_irqchip_type {
ACPI_RISCV_IRQCHIP_APLIC = 0x03,
};

+/*
+ * The ext_intc_id format is as follows:
+ * Bits [31:24] APLIC/PLIC ID
+ * Bits [15:0] APLIC IDC ID / PLIC S-Mode Context ID for this hart
+ */
+#define APLIC_PLIC_ID(x) ((x) >> 24)
+#define IDC_CONTEXT_ID(x) ((x) & 0x0000ffff)
+
int riscv_acpi_get_gsi_info(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, u32 *gsi_base,
u32 *id, u32 *nr_irqs, u32 *nr_idcs);
struct fwnode_handle *riscv_acpi_get_gsi_domain_id(u32 gsi);
+int __init acpi_get_intc_index_hartid(u32 index, unsigned long *hartid);
+int acpi_get_ext_intc_parent_hartid(u8 id, u32 idx, unsigned long *hartid);
+void acpi_get_plic_nr_contexts(u8 id, int *nr_contexts);
+int acpi_get_plic_context(u8 id, u32 idx, int *context_id);
+int __init acpi_get_imsic_mmio_info(u32 index, struct resource *res);

#else
static inline int riscv_acpi_get_gsi_info(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, u32 *gsi_base,
@@ -36,6 +49,28 @@ static inline int riscv_acpi_get_gsi_info(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, u32 *gsi
return 0;
}

+static inline int __init acpi_get_intc_index_hartid(u32 index, unsigned long *hartid)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static inline int acpi_get_ext_intc_parent_hartid(u8 id, u32 idx, unsigned long *hartid)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static inline void acpi_get_plic_nr_contexts(u8 id, int *nr_contexts) { }
+
+static inline int acpi_get_plic_context(u8 id, u32 idx, int *context_id)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static inline int __init acpi_get_imsic_mmio_info(u32 index, struct resource *res)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */

#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_IRQ_H */
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
index 9e71c4428814..b20272151aed 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
@@ -249,14 +249,101 @@ IRQCHIP_DECLARE(riscv, "riscv,cpu-intc", riscv_intc_init);
IRQCHIP_DECLARE(andes, "andestech,cpu-intc", riscv_intc_init);

#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+struct rintc_data {
+ u32 ext_intc_id;
+ unsigned long hart_id;
+ u64 imsic_addr;
+ u32 imsic_size;
+};
+
+static u32 nr_rintc;
+static struct rintc_data *rintc_acpi_data[NR_CPUS];
+
+int acpi_get_intc_index_hartid(u32 index, unsigned long *hartid)
+{
+ if (index >= nr_rintc)
+ return -1;
+
+ *hartid = rintc_acpi_data[index]->hart_id;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int acpi_get_ext_intc_parent_hartid(u8 id, u32 idx, unsigned long *hartid)
+{
+ int i, j = 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_rintc; i++) {
+ if (APLIC_PLIC_ID(rintc_acpi_data[i]->ext_intc_id) == id) {
+ if (idx == j) {
+ *hartid = rintc_acpi_data[i]->hart_id;
+ return 0;
+ }
+ j++;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return -1;
+}
+
+void acpi_get_plic_nr_contexts(u8 id, int *nr_contexts)
+{
+ int i, j = 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_rintc; i++) {
+ if (APLIC_PLIC_ID(rintc_acpi_data[i]->ext_intc_id) == id)
+ j++;
+ }
+
+ *nr_contexts = j;
+}
+
+int acpi_get_plic_context(u8 id, u32 idx, int *context_id)
+{
+ int i, j = 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_rintc; i++) {
+ if (APLIC_PLIC_ID(rintc_acpi_data[i]->ext_intc_id) == id) {
+ if (idx == j) {
+ *context_id = IDC_CONTEXT_ID(rintc_acpi_data[i]->ext_intc_id);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ j++;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return -1;
+}
+
+int acpi_get_imsic_mmio_info(u32 index, struct resource *res)
+{
+ if (index >= nr_rintc)
+ return -1;
+
+ res->start = rintc_acpi_data[index]->imsic_addr;
+ res->end = res->start + rintc_acpi_data[index]->imsic_size - 1;
+ res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
+ return 0;
+}
+

static int __init riscv_intc_acpi_init(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
const unsigned long end)
{
- struct fwnode_handle *fn;
struct acpi_madt_rintc *rintc;
+ struct fwnode_handle *fn;
+ int rc;

rintc = (struct acpi_madt_rintc *)header;
+ rintc_acpi_data[nr_rintc] = kzalloc(sizeof(*rintc_acpi_data[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!rintc_acpi_data[nr_rintc])
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ rintc_acpi_data[nr_rintc]->ext_intc_id = rintc->ext_intc_id;
+ rintc_acpi_data[nr_rintc]->hart_id = rintc->hart_id;
+ rintc_acpi_data[nr_rintc]->imsic_addr = rintc->imsic_addr;
+ rintc_acpi_data[nr_rintc]->imsic_size = rintc->imsic_size;
+ nr_rintc++;

/*
* The ACPI MADT will have one INTC for each CPU (or HART)
@@ -273,7 +360,13 @@ static int __init riscv_intc_acpi_init(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
return -ENOMEM;
}

- return riscv_intc_init_common(fn, &riscv_intc_chip);
+ rc = riscv_intc_init_common(fn, &riscv_intc_chip);
+ if (rc) {
+ irq_domain_free_fwnode(fn);
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
}

IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE(riscv_intc, ACPI_MADT_TYPE_RINTC, NULL,
--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:06:11

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 15/20] irqchip: riscv-imsic: Add ACPI support

RISC-V IMSIC interrupt controller provides IPI and MSI support.
Currently, DT based drivers setup the IPI feature early during boot but
defer setting up the MSI functionality. However, in ACPI systems, PCI
scan happens early during boot and PCI subsystem expects MSI controller
is already setup. Hence, in case of ACPI, both IPI and MSI features
are initialized early itself.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-early.c | 52 +++++++++-
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c | 32 ++++--
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-state.c | 115 ++++++++++-----------
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-state.h | 2 +-
include/linux/irqchip/riscv-imsic.h | 10 ++
5 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-early.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-early.c
index 886418ec06cb..d8161243791d 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-early.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-early.c
@@ -5,13 +5,16 @@
*/

#define pr_fmt(fmt) "riscv-imsic: " fmt
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
+#include <linux/irqchip/riscv-imsic.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>

@@ -182,7 +185,7 @@ static int __init imsic_early_dt_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_no
int rc;

/* Setup IMSIC state */
- rc = imsic_setup_state(fwnode);
+ rc = imsic_setup_state(fwnode, NULL);
if (rc) {
pr_err("%pfwP: failed to setup state (error %d)\n", fwnode, rc);
return rc;
@@ -199,3 +202,50 @@ static int __init imsic_early_dt_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_no
}

IRQCHIP_DECLARE(riscv_imsic, "riscv,imsics", imsic_early_dt_init);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+
+static struct fwnode_handle *imsic_acpi_fwnode;
+
+struct fwnode_handle *imsic_acpi_get_fwnode(struct device *dev)
+{
+ return imsic_acpi_fwnode;
+}
+
+static int __init imsic_early_acpi_init(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
+ const unsigned long end)
+{
+ struct acpi_madt_imsic *imsic = (struct acpi_madt_imsic *)header;
+ int rc;
+
+ imsic_acpi_fwnode = irq_domain_alloc_named_fwnode("imsic");
+ if (!imsic_acpi_fwnode) {
+ pr_err("unable to allocate IMSIC FW node\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ /* Setup IMSIC state */
+ rc = imsic_setup_state(imsic_acpi_fwnode, (void *)imsic);
+ if (rc) {
+ pr_err("%pfwP: failed to setup state (error %d)\n", imsic_acpi_fwnode, rc);
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+ /* Do early setup of IMSIC state and IPIs */
+ rc = imsic_early_probe(imsic_acpi_fwnode);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ rc = imsic_platform_acpi_probe(imsic_acpi_fwnode);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
+ if (!rc)
+ pci_msi_register_fwnode_provider(&imsic_acpi_get_fwnode);
+#endif
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
+IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE(riscv_imsic, ACPI_MADT_TYPE_IMSIC, NULL,
+ 1, imsic_early_acpi_init);
+#endif
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c
index 11723a763c10..64905e6f52d7 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
*/

#define pr_fmt(fmt) "riscv-imsic: " fmt
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/bitmap.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
@@ -348,18 +349,37 @@ int imsic_irqdomain_init(void)
return 0;
}

-static int imsic_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int imsic_platform_probe_common(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
{
- struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-
- if (imsic && imsic->fwnode != dev->fwnode) {
- dev_err(dev, "fwnode mismatch\n");
+ if (imsic && imsic->fwnode != fwnode) {
+ pr_err("%pfwP: fwnode mismatch\n", fwnode);
return -ENODEV;
}

return imsic_irqdomain_init();
}

+static int imsic_platform_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ return imsic_platform_probe_common(pdev->dev.fwnode);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+
+/*
+ * On ACPI based systems, PCI enumeration happens early during boot in
+ * acpi_scan_init(). PCI enumeration expects MSI domain setup before
+ * it calls pci_set_msi_domain(). Hence, unlike in DT where
+ * imsic-platform drive probe happens late during boot, ACPI based
+ * systems need to setup the MSI domain early.
+ */
+int imsic_platform_acpi_probe(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
+{
+ return imsic_platform_probe_common(fwnode);
+}
+
+#endif
+
static const struct of_device_id imsic_platform_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "riscv,imsics" },
{}
@@ -370,6 +390,6 @@ static struct platform_driver imsic_platform_driver = {
.name = "riscv-imsic",
.of_match_table = imsic_platform_match,
},
- .probe = imsic_platform_probe,
+ .probe = imsic_platform_dt_probe,
};
builtin_platform_driver(imsic_platform_driver);
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-state.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-state.c
index 5479f872e62b..608b87dd0784 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-state.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-state.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
*/

#define pr_fmt(fmt) "riscv-imsic: " fmt
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/bitmap.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
@@ -516,12 +517,8 @@ static int __init imsic_get_parent_hartid(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
struct of_phandle_args parent;
int rc;

- /*
- * Currently, only OF fwnode is supported so extend this
- * function for ACPI support.
- */
if (!is_of_node(fwnode))
- return -EINVAL;
+ return acpi_get_intc_index_hartid(index, hartid);

rc = of_irq_parse_one(to_of_node(fwnode), index, &parent);
if (rc)
@@ -540,12 +537,8 @@ static int __init imsic_get_parent_hartid(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
static int __init imsic_get_mmio_resource(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
u32 index, struct resource *res)
{
- /*
- * Currently, only OF fwnode is supported so extend this
- * function for ACPI support.
- */
if (!is_of_node(fwnode))
- return -EINVAL;
+ return acpi_get_imsic_mmio_info(index, res);

return of_address_to_resource(to_of_node(fwnode), index, res);
}
@@ -553,20 +546,15 @@ static int __init imsic_get_mmio_resource(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
static int __init imsic_parse_fwnode(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
struct imsic_global_config *global,
u32 *nr_parent_irqs,
- u32 *nr_mmios)
+ u32 *nr_mmios,
+ void *opaque)
{
+ struct acpi_madt_imsic *imsic = (struct acpi_madt_imsic *)opaque;
unsigned long hartid;
struct resource res;
int rc;
u32 i;

- /*
- * Currently, only OF fwnode is supported so extend this
- * function for ACPI support.
- */
- if (!is_of_node(fwnode))
- return -EINVAL;
-
*nr_parent_irqs = 0;
*nr_mmios = 0;

@@ -578,51 +566,60 @@ static int __init imsic_parse_fwnode(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
return -EINVAL;
}

- /* Find number of guest index bits in MSI address */
- rc = of_property_read_u32(to_of_node(fwnode), "riscv,guest-index-bits",
- &global->guest_index_bits);
- if (rc)
- global->guest_index_bits = 0;
+ if (is_of_node(fwnode)) {
+ /* Find number of guest index bits in MSI address */
+ rc = of_property_read_u32(to_of_node(fwnode), "riscv,guest-index-bits",
+ &global->guest_index_bits);
+ if (rc)
+ global->guest_index_bits = 0;

- /* Find number of HART index bits */
- rc = of_property_read_u32(to_of_node(fwnode), "riscv,hart-index-bits",
- &global->hart_index_bits);
- if (rc) {
- /* Assume default value */
- global->hart_index_bits = __fls(*nr_parent_irqs);
- if (BIT(global->hart_index_bits) < *nr_parent_irqs)
- global->hart_index_bits++;
- }
+ /* Find number of HART index bits */
+ rc = of_property_read_u32(to_of_node(fwnode), "riscv,hart-index-bits",
+ &global->hart_index_bits);
+ if (rc) {
+ /* Assume default value */
+ global->hart_index_bits = __fls(*nr_parent_irqs);
+ if (BIT(global->hart_index_bits) < *nr_parent_irqs)
+ global->hart_index_bits++;
+ }

- /* Find number of group index bits */
- rc = of_property_read_u32(to_of_node(fwnode), "riscv,group-index-bits",
- &global->group_index_bits);
- if (rc)
- global->group_index_bits = 0;
+ /* Find number of group index bits */
+ rc = of_property_read_u32(to_of_node(fwnode), "riscv,group-index-bits",
+ &global->group_index_bits);
+ if (rc)
+ global->group_index_bits = 0;

- /*
- * Find first bit position of group index.
- * If not specified assumed the default APLIC-IMSIC configuration.
- */
- rc = of_property_read_u32(to_of_node(fwnode), "riscv,group-index-shift",
- &global->group_index_shift);
- if (rc)
- global->group_index_shift = IMSIC_MMIO_PAGE_SHIFT * 2;
+ /*
+ * Find first bit position of group index.
+ * If not specified assumed the default APLIC-IMSIC configuration.
+ */
+ rc = of_property_read_u32(to_of_node(fwnode), "riscv,group-index-shift",
+ &global->group_index_shift);
+ if (rc)
+ global->group_index_shift = IMSIC_MMIO_PAGE_SHIFT * 2;
+
+ /* Find number of interrupt identities */
+ rc = of_property_read_u32(to_of_node(fwnode), "riscv,num-ids",
+ &global->nr_ids);
+ if (rc) {
+ pr_err("%pfwP: number of interrupt identities not found\n", fwnode);
+ return rc;
+ }

- /* Find number of interrupt identities */
- rc = of_property_read_u32(to_of_node(fwnode), "riscv,num-ids",
- &global->nr_ids);
- if (rc) {
- pr_err("%pfwP: number of interrupt identities not found\n", fwnode);
- return rc;
+ /* Find number of guest interrupt identities */
+ rc = of_property_read_u32(to_of_node(fwnode), "riscv,num-guest-ids",
+ &global->nr_guest_ids);
+ if (rc)
+ global->nr_guest_ids = global->nr_ids;
+ } else {
+ global->guest_index_bits = imsic->guest_index_bits;
+ global->hart_index_bits = imsic->hart_index_bits;
+ global->group_index_bits = imsic->group_index_bits;
+ global->group_index_shift = imsic->group_index_shift;
+ global->nr_ids = imsic->num_ids;
+ global->nr_guest_ids = imsic->num_guest_ids;
}

- /* Find number of guest interrupt identities */
- rc = of_property_read_u32(to_of_node(fwnode), "riscv,num-guest-ids",
- &global->nr_guest_ids);
- if (rc)
- global->nr_guest_ids = global->nr_ids;
-
/* Sanity check guest index bits */
i = BITS_PER_LONG - IMSIC_MMIO_PAGE_SHIFT;
if (i < global->guest_index_bits) {
@@ -688,7 +685,7 @@ static int __init imsic_parse_fwnode(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
return 0;
}

-int __init imsic_setup_state(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
+int __init imsic_setup_state(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, void *opaque)
{
u32 i, j, index, nr_parent_irqs, nr_mmios, nr_handlers = 0;
struct imsic_global_config *global;
@@ -729,7 +726,7 @@ int __init imsic_setup_state(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
}

/* Parse IMSIC fwnode */
- rc = imsic_parse_fwnode(fwnode, global, &nr_parent_irqs, &nr_mmios);
+ rc = imsic_parse_fwnode(fwnode, global, &nr_parent_irqs, &nr_mmios, opaque);
if (rc)
goto out_free_local;

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-state.h b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-state.h
index 5ae2f69b035b..391e44280827 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-state.h
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-state.h
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ void imsic_vector_debug_show_summary(struct seq_file *m, int ind);

void imsic_state_online(void);
void imsic_state_offline(void);
-int imsic_setup_state(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode);
+int imsic_setup_state(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, void *opaque);
int imsic_irqdomain_init(void);

#endif
diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/riscv-imsic.h b/include/linux/irqchip/riscv-imsic.h
index faf0b800b1b0..e08680b1932b 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqchip/riscv-imsic.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqchip/riscv-imsic.h
@@ -84,4 +84,14 @@ static inline const struct imsic_global_config *imsic_get_global_config(void)

#endif

+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+int imsic_platform_acpi_probe(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode);
+struct fwnode_handle *imsic_acpi_get_fwnode(struct device *dev);
+#else
+static inline struct fwnode_handle *imsic_acpi_get_fwnode(struct device *dev)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+#endif
+
#endif
--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:07:32

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 16/20] irqchip: riscv-aplic: Add ACPI support

Add ACPI support in APLIC drivers. It used the namespace device to probe
and MADT to get other details required. Use the mapping created early
during boot to get the details about the APLIC.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c | 20 ++++---
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++--------
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.h | 1 +
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-msi.c | 9 ++-
4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c
index 06bace9b7497..ccf08e617e5a 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
* Copyright (C) 2022 Ventana Micro Systems Inc.
*/

+#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/bitfield.h>
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
@@ -192,17 +193,20 @@ static int aplic_direct_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
}

static int aplic_direct_parse_parent_hwirq(struct device *dev, u32 index,
- u32 *parent_hwirq, unsigned long *parent_hartid)
+ u32 *parent_hwirq, unsigned long *parent_hartid,
+ struct aplic_priv *priv)
{
struct of_phandle_args parent;
int rc;

- /*
- * Currently, only OF fwnode is supported so extend this
- * function for ACPI support.
- */
- if (!is_of_node(dev->fwnode))
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (!is_of_node(dev->fwnode)) {
+ rc = acpi_get_ext_intc_parent_hartid(priv->id, index, parent_hartid);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ *parent_hwirq = RV_IRQ_EXT;
+ return 0;
+ }

rc = of_irq_parse_one(to_of_node(dev->fwnode), index, &parent);
if (rc)
@@ -240,7 +244,7 @@ int aplic_direct_setup(struct device *dev, void __iomem *regs)
/* Setup per-CPU IDC and target CPU mask */
current_cpu = get_cpu();
for (i = 0; i < priv->nr_idcs; i++) {
- rc = aplic_direct_parse_parent_hwirq(dev, i, &hwirq, &hartid);
+ rc = aplic_direct_parse_parent_hwirq(dev, i, &hwirq, &hartid, priv);
if (rc) {
dev_warn(dev, "parent irq for IDC%d not found\n", i);
continue;
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c
index 774a0c97fdab..c1fd328ddf7d 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c
@@ -4,8 +4,10 @@
* Copyright (C) 2022 Ventana Micro Systems Inc.
*/

+#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/bitfield.h>
#include <linux/irqchip/riscv-aplic.h>
+#include <linux/irqchip/riscv-imsic.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_irq.h>
@@ -125,39 +127,50 @@ static void aplic_init_hw_irqs(struct aplic_priv *priv)
writel(0, priv->regs + APLIC_DOMAINCFG);
}

+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+static const struct acpi_device_id aplic_acpi_match[] = {
+ { "RSCV0002", 0 },
+ {}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, aplic_acpi_match);
+
+#endif
+
int aplic_setup_priv(struct aplic_priv *priv, struct device *dev, void __iomem *regs)
{
struct of_phandle_args parent;
int rc;

- /*
- * Currently, only OF fwnode is supported so extend this
- * function for ACPI support.
- */
- if (!is_of_node(dev->fwnode))
- return -EINVAL;
-
/* Save device pointer and register base */
priv->dev = dev;
priv->regs = regs;

- /* Find out number of interrupt sources */
- rc = of_property_read_u32(to_of_node(dev->fwnode), "riscv,num-sources",
- &priv->nr_irqs);
- if (rc) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to get number of interrupt sources\n");
- return rc;
- }
-
- /*
- * Find out number of IDCs based on parent interrupts
- *
- * If "msi-parent" property is present then we ignore the
- * APLIC IDCs which forces the APLIC driver to use MSI mode.
- */
- if (!of_property_present(to_of_node(dev->fwnode), "msi-parent")) {
- while (!of_irq_parse_one(to_of_node(dev->fwnode), priv->nr_idcs, &parent))
- priv->nr_idcs++;
+ if (is_of_node(dev->fwnode)) {
+ /* Find out number of interrupt sources */
+ rc = of_property_read_u32(to_of_node(dev->fwnode), "riscv,num-sources",
+ &priv->nr_irqs);
+ if (rc) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to get number of interrupt sources\n");
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Find out number of IDCs based on parent interrupts
+ *
+ * If "msi-parent" property is present then we ignore the
+ * APLIC IDCs which forces the APLIC driver to use MSI mode.
+ */
+ if (!of_property_present(to_of_node(dev->fwnode), "msi-parent")) {
+ while (!of_irq_parse_one(to_of_node(dev->fwnode), priv->nr_idcs, &parent))
+ priv->nr_idcs++;
+ }
+ } else {
+ rc = riscv_acpi_get_gsi_info(dev->fwnode, &priv->gsi_base, &priv->id,
+ &priv->nr_irqs, &priv->nr_idcs);
+ if (rc) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to find GSI mapping\n");
+ return rc;
+ }
}

/* Setup initial state APLIC interrupts */
@@ -186,6 +199,9 @@ static int aplic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
*/
if (is_of_node(dev->fwnode))
msi_mode = of_property_present(to_of_node(dev->fwnode), "msi-parent");
+ else
+ msi_mode = imsic_acpi_get_fwnode(NULL) ? 1 : 0;
+
if (msi_mode)
rc = aplic_msi_setup(dev, regs);
else
@@ -193,6 +209,11 @@ static int aplic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (rc)
dev_err(dev, "failed to setup APLIC in %s mode\n", msi_mode ? "MSI" : "direct");

+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+ if (!acpi_disabled)
+ acpi_dev_clear_dependencies(ACPI_COMPANION(dev));
+#endif
+
return rc;
}

@@ -205,6 +226,7 @@ static struct platform_driver aplic_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "riscv-aplic",
.of_match_table = aplic_match,
+ .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(aplic_acpi_match),
},
.probe = aplic_probe,
};
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.h b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.h
index 4393927d8c80..9fbf45c7b4f7 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.h
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.h
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct aplic_priv {
u32 gsi_base;
u32 nr_irqs;
u32 nr_idcs;
+ u32 id;
void __iomem *regs;
struct aplic_msicfg msicfg;
};
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-msi.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-msi.c
index 028444af48bd..f5020241e0ed 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-msi.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-msi.c
@@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ static const struct msi_domain_template aplic_msi_template = {
int aplic_msi_setup(struct device *dev, void __iomem *regs)
{
const struct imsic_global_config *imsic_global;
+ struct irq_domain *msi_domain;
struct aplic_priv *priv;
struct aplic_msicfg *mc;
phys_addr_t pa;
@@ -239,8 +240,14 @@ int aplic_msi_setup(struct device *dev, void __iomem *regs)
* IMSIC and the IMSIC MSI domains are created later through
* the platform driver probing so we set it explicitly here.
*/
- if (is_of_node(dev->fwnode))
+ if (is_of_node(dev->fwnode)) {
of_msi_configure(dev, to_of_node(dev->fwnode));
+ } else {
+ msi_domain = irq_find_matching_fwnode(imsic_acpi_get_fwnode(dev),
+ DOMAIN_BUS_PLATFORM_MSI);
+ if (msi_domain)
+ dev_set_msi_domain(dev, msi_domain);
+ }
}

if (!msi_create_device_irq_domain(dev, MSI_DEFAULT_DOMAIN, &aplic_msi_template,
--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:07:44

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 17/20] irqchip: irq-sifive-plic: Add ACPI support

Add ACPI support in PLIC driver. Use the mapping created early during
boot to get details about the PLIC.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
Co-developed-by: Haibo Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <[email protected]>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
index f3d4cb9e34f7..5fa45701ea24 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
* Copyright (C) 2017 SiFive
* Copyright (C) 2018 Christoph Hellwig
*/
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
@@ -70,6 +71,8 @@ struct plic_priv {
unsigned long plic_quirks;
unsigned int nr_irqs;
unsigned long *prio_save;
+ u32 gsi_base;
+ int id;
};

struct plic_handler {
@@ -327,6 +330,10 @@ static int plic_irq_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
{
struct plic_priv *priv = d->host_data;

+ /* For DT, gsi_base is always zero. */
+ if (fwspec->param[0] >= priv->gsi_base)
+ fwspec->param[0] = fwspec->param[0] - priv->gsi_base;
+
if (test_bit(PLIC_QUIRK_EDGE_INTERRUPT, &priv->plic_quirks))
return irq_domain_translate_twocell(d, fwspec, hwirq, type);

@@ -427,18 +434,32 @@ static const struct of_device_id plic_match[] = {
{}
};

+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+
+static const struct acpi_device_id plic_acpi_match[] = {
+ { "RSCV0001", 0 },
+ {}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, plic_acpi_match);
+
+#endif
static int plic_parse_nr_irqs_and_contexts(struct platform_device *pdev,
- u32 *nr_irqs, u32 *nr_contexts)
+ u32 *nr_irqs, u32 *nr_contexts,
+ u32 *gsi_base, u32 *id)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
int rc;

- /*
- * Currently, only OF fwnode is supported so extend this
- * function for ACPI support.
- */
- if (!is_of_node(dev->fwnode))
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (!is_of_node(dev->fwnode)) {
+ riscv_acpi_get_gsi_info(dev->fwnode, gsi_base, id, nr_irqs, NULL);
+ acpi_get_plic_nr_contexts(*id, nr_contexts);
+ if (WARN_ON(!*nr_contexts)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "no PLIC context available\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+ }

rc = of_property_read_u32(to_of_node(dev->fwnode), "riscv,ndev", nr_irqs);
if (rc) {
@@ -452,23 +473,29 @@ static int plic_parse_nr_irqs_and_contexts(struct platform_device *pdev,
return -EINVAL;
}

+ *gsi_base = 0;
+ *id = 0;
+
return 0;
}

static int plic_parse_context_parent(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 context,
- u32 *parent_hwirq, int *parent_cpu)
+ u32 *parent_hwirq, int *parent_cpu, u32 id)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct of_phandle_args parent;
unsigned long hartid;
int rc;

- /*
- * Currently, only OF fwnode is supported so extend this
- * function for ACPI support.
- */
- if (!is_of_node(dev->fwnode))
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (!is_of_node(dev->fwnode)) {
+ rc = acpi_get_ext_intc_parent_hartid(id, context, &hartid);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ *parent_cpu = riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(hartid);
+ *parent_hwirq = RV_IRQ_EXT;
+ return 0;
+ }

rc = of_irq_parse_one(to_of_node(dev->fwnode), context, &parent);
if (rc)
@@ -493,7 +520,9 @@ static int plic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct irq_domain *domain;
struct plic_priv *priv;
irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
+ int id, context_id;
bool cpuhp_setup;
+ u32 gsi_base;

if (is_of_node(dev->fwnode)) {
const struct of_device_id *id;
@@ -503,7 +532,7 @@ static int plic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
plic_quirks = (unsigned long)id->data;
}

- error = plic_parse_nr_irqs_and_contexts(pdev, &nr_irqs, &nr_contexts);
+ error = plic_parse_nr_irqs_and_contexts(pdev, &nr_irqs, &nr_contexts, &gsi_base, &id);
if (error)
return error;

@@ -514,6 +543,8 @@ static int plic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
priv->dev = dev;
priv->plic_quirks = plic_quirks;
priv->nr_irqs = nr_irqs;
+ priv->gsi_base = gsi_base;
+ priv->id = id;

priv->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
if (WARN_ON(!priv->regs))
@@ -524,12 +555,22 @@ static int plic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENOMEM;

for (i = 0; i < nr_contexts; i++) {
- error = plic_parse_context_parent(pdev, i, &parent_hwirq, &cpu);
+ error = plic_parse_context_parent(pdev, i, &parent_hwirq, &cpu, priv->id);
if (error) {
dev_warn(dev, "hwirq for context%d not found\n", i);
continue;
}

+ if (is_of_node(dev->fwnode)) {
+ context_id = i;
+ } else {
+ error = acpi_get_plic_context(priv->id, i, &context_id);
+ if (error) {
+ dev_warn(dev, "invalid context id for context%d\n", i);
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
+
/*
* Skip contexts other than external interrupts for our
* privilege level.
@@ -575,10 +616,10 @@ static int plic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &priv->lmask);
handler->present = true;
handler->hart_base = priv->regs + CONTEXT_BASE +
- i * CONTEXT_SIZE;
+ context_id * CONTEXT_SIZE;
raw_spin_lock_init(&handler->enable_lock);
handler->enable_base = priv->regs + CONTEXT_ENABLE_BASE +
- i * CONTEXT_ENABLE_SIZE;
+ context_id * CONTEXT_ENABLE_SIZE;
handler->priv = priv;

handler->enable_save = devm_kcalloc(dev, DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_irqs, 32),
@@ -594,8 +635,8 @@ static int plic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
nr_handlers++;
}

- priv->irqdomain = irq_domain_add_linear(to_of_node(dev->fwnode), nr_irqs + 1,
- &plic_irqdomain_ops, priv);
+ priv->irqdomain = irq_domain_create_linear(dev->fwnode, nr_irqs + 1,
+ &plic_irqdomain_ops, priv);
if (WARN_ON(!priv->irqdomain))
goto fail_cleanup_contexts;

@@ -622,13 +663,18 @@ static int plic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
}

+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+ if (!acpi_disabled)
+ acpi_dev_clear_dependencies(ACPI_COMPANION(dev));
+#endif
+
dev_info(dev, "mapped %d interrupts with %d handlers for %d contexts.\n",
nr_irqs, nr_handlers, nr_contexts);
return 0;

fail_cleanup_contexts:
for (i = 0; i < nr_contexts; i++) {
- if (plic_parse_context_parent(pdev, i, &parent_hwirq, &cpu))
+ if (plic_parse_context_parent(pdev, i, &parent_hwirq, &cpu, priv->id))
continue;
if (parent_hwirq != RV_IRQ_EXT || cpu < 0)
continue;
@@ -647,6 +693,7 @@ static struct platform_driver plic_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "riscv-plic",
.of_match_table = plic_match,
+ .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(plic_acpi_match),
},
.probe = plic_probe,
};
--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:07:57

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 18/20] ACPI: bus: Add RINTC IRQ model for RISC-V

Add the IRQ model for RISC-V INTC so that acpi_set_irq_model can use this
for RISC-V.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
drivers/acpi/bus.c | 3 +++
include/linux/acpi.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
index 17ee483c3bf4..6739db258a95 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
@@ -1190,6 +1190,9 @@ static int __init acpi_bus_init_irq(void)
case ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_LPIC:
message = "LPIC";
break;
+ case ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_RINTC:
+ message = "RINTC";
+ break;
default:
pr_info("Unknown interrupt routing model\n");
return -ENODEV;
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index f8f92aaf97ad..c4b6d5c3aaed 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ enum acpi_irq_model_id {
ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_PLATFORM,
ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC,
ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_LPIC,
+ ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_RINTC,
ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_COUNT
};

--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:07:58

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 04/20] ACPI: scan.c: Add weak arch specific function to reorder the IRQCHIP probe

Unlike OF framework, the irqchip probe using IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE has no
order defined. Depending on the driver Makefile is not a good idea. So,
usually it is worked around by mandating only root interrupt controller
probed using IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE and other interrupt controllers are
probed via cascade mechanism.

However, this is also not a clean solution because if there are multiple
root controllers (ex: RINTC in RISC-V which is per CPU) which need to be
probed first, then the cascade will happen for every root controller.
So, introduce a architecture specific weak function to order the probing
of the interrupt controllers which can be implemented by different
architectures as per their interrupt controller hierarchy.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 3 +++
include/linux/acpi.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 68f101323f53..de30a0af7a2f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -2749,6 +2749,8 @@ static int __init acpi_match_madt(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
return 0;
}

+void __weak arch_sort_irqchip_probe(struct acpi_probe_entry *ap_head, int nr) { }
+
int __init __acpi_probe_device_table(struct acpi_probe_entry *ap_head, int nr)
{
int count = 0;
@@ -2757,6 +2759,7 @@ int __init __acpi_probe_device_table(struct acpi_probe_entry *ap_head, int nr)
return 0;

mutex_lock(&acpi_probe_mutex);
+ arch_sort_irqchip_probe(ap_head, nr);
for (ape = ap_head; nr; ape++, nr--) {
if (ACPI_COMPARE_NAMESEG(ACPI_SIG_MADT, ape->id)) {
acpi_probe_count = 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index 168201e4c782..914ecd22ba64 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -1337,6 +1337,8 @@ struct acpi_probe_entry {
kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
};

+void arch_sort_irqchip_probe(struct acpi_probe_entry *ap_head, int nr);
+
#define ACPI_DECLARE_PROBE_ENTRY(table, name, table_id, subtable, \
valid, data, fn) \
static const struct acpi_probe_entry __acpi_probe_##name \
--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:08:09

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 19/20] irqchip: riscv-intc: Set ACPI irqmodel

INTC being the root interrupt controller, set the ACPI irqmodel with
callback function to get the GSI domain id.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
index b20272151aed..af7a2f78f0ee 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
@@ -326,6 +326,10 @@ int acpi_get_imsic_mmio_info(u32 index, struct resource *res)
return 0;
}

+static struct fwnode_handle *ext_entc_get_gsi_domain_id(u32 gsi)
+{
+ return riscv_acpi_get_gsi_domain_id(gsi);
+}

static int __init riscv_intc_acpi_init(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
const unsigned long end)
@@ -366,6 +370,7 @@ static int __init riscv_intc_acpi_init(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
return rc;
}

+ acpi_set_irq_model(ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_RINTC, ext_entc_get_gsi_domain_id);
return 0;
}

--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:08:20

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 05/20] ACPI: RISC-V: Implement arch function to reorder irqchip probe entries

ACPI MADT entries for interrupt controllers don't have a way to describe
the hierarchy. However, the hierarchy is known to the architecture and
on RISC-V platforms, the MADT sub table types are ordered in the
incremental order from the root controller which is RINTC. So, add
architecture function for RISC-V to reorder the interrupt controller
probing as per the hierarchy as below.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
drivers/acpi/riscv/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/riscv/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/riscv/Makefile
index 86b0925f612d..dceec808cfab 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/riscv/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/acpi/riscv/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
-obj-y += rhct.o
+obj-y += rhct.o irq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE) += cpuidle.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB) += cppc.o
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c b/drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..36e0525b3235
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2023, Ventana Micro Systems Inc
+ * Author: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <linux/sort.h>
+
+static int irqchip_cmp_func(const void *in0, const void *in1)
+{
+ struct acpi_probe_entry *elem0 = (struct acpi_probe_entry *)in0;
+ struct acpi_probe_entry *elem1 = (struct acpi_probe_entry *)in1;
+
+ return (elem0->type > elem1->type) - (elem0->type < elem1->type);
+}
+
+/*
+ * RISC-V irqchips in MADT of ACPI spec are defined in the same order how
+ * they should be probed. Since IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE doesn't define any
+ * order, this arch function will reorder the probe functions as per the
+ * required order for the architecture.
+ */
+void arch_sort_irqchip_probe(struct acpi_probe_entry *ap_head, int nr)
+{
+ struct acpi_probe_entry *ape = ap_head;
+
+ if (nr == 1 || !ACPI_COMPARE_NAMESEG(ACPI_SIG_MADT, ape->id))
+ return;
+ sort(ape, nr, sizeof(*ape), irqchip_cmp_func, NULL);
+}
--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:08:29

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 20/20] ACPI: pci_link: Clear the dependencies after probe

RISC-V platforms need to use dependencies between PCI host bridge, Link
devices and the interrupt controllers to ensure probe order. The
dependency is like below.

Interrupt controller <-- Link Device <-- PCI Host bridge.

If there is no dependency added between Link device and PCI Host Bridge,
then the PCI end points can get probed prior to link device unable to
get mapping for INTx.

So, add the link device's HID to dependency honor list and also clear it
after its probe.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 3 +++
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
index aa1038b8aec4..48cdcedafad6 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -748,6 +748,9 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_add(struct acpi_device *device,
if (result)
kfree(link);

+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ACPI_DEFERRED_GSI))
+ acpi_dev_clear_dependencies(device);
+
return result < 0 ? result : 1;
}

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 086ae040a5ad..32865af071ce 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -835,6 +835,7 @@ static const char * const acpi_honor_dep_ids[] = {
"INTC10CF", /* IVSC (MTL) driver must be loaded to allow i2c access to camera sensors */
"RSCV0001", /* RISC-V PLIC */
"RSCV0002", /* RISC-V APLIC */
+ "PNP0C0F", /* PCI Link Device */
NULL
};

--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:08:38

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 06/20] ACPI: bus: Add acpi_riscv_init function

Add a new function for RISC-V to do any architecture specific
initialization. This function will be used to create platform devices
like APLIC, PLIC, RISC-V IOMMU etc. This is similar to acpi_arm_init().

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
drivers/acpi/bus.c | 1 +
drivers/acpi/riscv/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/acpi/riscv/init.c | 12 ++++++++++++
include/linux/acpi.h | 6 ++++++
4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/riscv/init.c

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
index 844c46447914..17ee483c3bf4 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
@@ -1446,6 +1446,7 @@ static int __init acpi_init(void)
acpi_hest_init();
acpi_ghes_init();
acpi_arm_init();
+ acpi_riscv_init();
acpi_scan_init();
acpi_ec_init();
acpi_debugfs_init();
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/riscv/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/riscv/Makefile
index dceec808cfab..42d351859aeb 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/riscv/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/acpi/riscv/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
-obj-y += rhct.o irq.o
+obj-y += rhct.o irq.o init.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE) += cpuidle.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB) += cppc.o
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/riscv/init.c b/drivers/acpi/riscv/init.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b5807bbdb171
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/acpi/riscv/init.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2023, Ventana Micro Systems Inc
+ * Author: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
+
+void __init acpi_riscv_init(void)
+{
+}
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index 914ecd22ba64..f8f92aaf97ad 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -1525,6 +1525,12 @@ void acpi_arm_init(void);
static inline void acpi_arm_init(void) { }
#endif

+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV
+void acpi_riscv_init(void);
+#else
+static inline void acpi_riscv_init(void) { }
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PCC
void acpi_init_pcc(void);
#else
--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:09:16

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 08/20] ACPI: scan: Refactor dependency creation

Some architectures like RISC-V will use implicit dependencies like GSI
map to create dependencies between interrupt controller and devices. To
support doing that, the function which creates the dependency, is
refactored bit and made public so that dependency can be added from
outside of scan.c as well.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index de30a0af7a2f..c8f40d81b6cb 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -2028,33 +2028,18 @@ static void acpi_scan_init_hotplug(struct acpi_device *adev)
}
}

-static u32 acpi_scan_check_dep(acpi_handle handle)
+int acpi_scan_add_dep(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_handle_list *dep_devices)
{
- struct acpi_handle_list dep_devices;
u32 count;
int i;

- /*
- * Check for _HID here to avoid deferring the enumeration of:
- * 1. PCI devices.
- * 2. ACPI nodes describing USB ports.
- * Still, checking for _HID catches more then just these cases ...
- */
- if (!acpi_has_method(handle, "_DEP") || !acpi_has_method(handle, "_HID"))
- return 0;
-
- if (!acpi_evaluate_reference(handle, "_DEP", NULL, &dep_devices)) {
- acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Failed to evaluate _DEP.\n");
- return 0;
- }
-
- for (count = 0, i = 0; i < dep_devices.count; i++) {
+ for (count = 0, i = 0; i < dep_devices->count; i++) {
struct acpi_device_info *info;
struct acpi_dep_data *dep;
bool skip, honor_dep;
acpi_status status;

- status = acpi_get_object_info(dep_devices.handles[i], &info);
+ status = acpi_get_object_info(dep_devices->handles[i], &info);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Error reading _DEP device info\n");
continue;
@@ -2073,7 +2058,7 @@ static u32 acpi_scan_check_dep(acpi_handle handle)

count++;

- dep->supplier = dep_devices.handles[i];
+ dep->supplier = dep_devices->handles[i];
dep->consumer = handle;
dep->honor_dep = honor_dep;

@@ -2082,7 +2067,30 @@ static u32 acpi_scan_check_dep(acpi_handle handle)
mutex_unlock(&acpi_dep_list_lock);
}

- acpi_handle_list_free(&dep_devices);
+ acpi_handle_list_free(dep_devices);
+ return count;
+}
+
+static u32 acpi_scan_check_dep(acpi_handle handle)
+{
+ struct acpi_handle_list dep_devices;
+ u32 count = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Check for _HID here to avoid deferring the enumeration of:
+ * 1. PCI devices.
+ * 2. ACPI nodes describing USB ports.
+ * Still, checking for _HID catches more then just these cases ...
+ */
+ if (!acpi_has_method(handle, "_DEP") || !acpi_has_method(handle, "_HID"))
+ return count;
+
+ if (!acpi_evaluate_reference(handle, "_DEP", NULL, &dep_devices)) {
+ acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Failed to evaluate _DEP.\n");
+ return count;
+ }
+
+ count += acpi_scan_add_dep(handle, &dep_devices);
return count;
}

diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index 1a4dfd7a1c4a..28a9b87c23fa 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -993,6 +993,7 @@ static inline void acpi_put_acpi_dev(struct acpi_device *adev)

int acpi_wait_for_acpi_ipmi(void);

+int acpi_scan_add_dep(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_handle_list *dep_devices);
#else /* CONFIG_ACPI */

static inline int register_acpi_bus_type(void *bus) { return 0; }
--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:09:36

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 09/20] drivers/acpi/scan.c: Update _DEP honor list

RISC-V PLIC and APLIC will have _DEP from devices using GSI. So, add
these devices into the honor list.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index c8f40d81b6cb..07e91616b7d4 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -832,6 +832,8 @@ static const char * const acpi_honor_dep_ids[] = {
"INTC1095", /* IVSC (ADL) driver must be loaded to allow i2c access to camera sensors */
"INTC100A", /* IVSC (RPL) driver must be loaded to allow i2c access to camera sensors */
"INTC10CF", /* IVSC (MTL) driver must be loaded to allow i2c access to camera sensors */
+ "RSCV0001", /* RISC-V PLIC */
+ "RSCV0002", /* RISC-V APLIC */
NULL
};

--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 17:09:55

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 10/20] RISC-V: ACPI: Initialize GSI mapping structures

RISC-V has PLIC and APLIC in MADT as well as namespace devices.
Initialize the list of those structures using MADT and namespace devices
to create mapping between the ACPI handle and the GSI ranges. This is
will be used later to add dependencies.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h | 22 +++++
drivers/acpi/riscv/init.c | 2 +
drivers/acpi/riscv/init.h | 4 +
drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c | 159 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 187 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/riscv/init.h

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h
index 8e10a94430a2..44a0b128c602 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h
@@ -16,4 +16,26 @@ void riscv_set_intc_hwnode_fn(struct fwnode_handle *(*fn)(void));

struct fwnode_handle *riscv_get_intc_hwnode(void);

+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+
+enum riscv_irqchip_type {
+ ACPI_RISCV_IRQCHIP_INTC = 0x00,
+ ACPI_RISCV_IRQCHIP_IMSIC = 0x01,
+ ACPI_RISCV_IRQCHIP_PLIC = 0x02,
+ ACPI_RISCV_IRQCHIP_APLIC = 0x03,
+};
+
+int riscv_acpi_get_gsi_info(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, u32 *gsi_base,
+ u32 *id, u32 *nr_irqs, u32 *nr_idcs);
+struct fwnode_handle *riscv_acpi_get_gsi_domain_id(u32 gsi);
+
+#else
+static inline int riscv_acpi_get_gsi_info(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, u32 *gsi_base,
+ u32 *id, u32 *nr_irqs, u32 *nr_idcs)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
+
#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_IRQ_H */
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/riscv/init.c b/drivers/acpi/riscv/init.c
index b5807bbdb171..56780af6ceb3 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/riscv/init.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/riscv/init.c
@@ -6,7 +6,9 @@
*/

#include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include "init.h"

void __init acpi_riscv_init(void)
{
+ riscv_acpi_init_gsi_mapping();
}
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/riscv/init.h b/drivers/acpi/riscv/init.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2a488ec684b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/acpi/riscv/init.h
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+#include <linux/init.h>
+
+int __init riscv_acpi_init_gsi_mapping(void);
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c b/drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c
index 36e0525b3235..de0f1ba92068 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c
@@ -7,6 +7,21 @@

#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/sort.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+
+#include "init.h"
+
+struct riscv_ext_intc_list {
+ acpi_handle handle;
+ u32 gsi_base;
+ u32 nr_irqs;
+ u32 nr_idcs;
+ u32 id;
+ u32 type;
+ struct list_head list;
+};
+
+LIST_HEAD(ext_intc_list);

static int irqchip_cmp_func(const void *in0, const void *in1)
{
@@ -30,3 +45,147 @@ void arch_sort_irqchip_probe(struct acpi_probe_entry *ap_head, int nr)
return;
sort(ape, nr, sizeof(*ape), irqchip_cmp_func, NULL);
}
+
+static int riscv_acpi_update_gsi_handle(u32 gsi_base, acpi_handle handle)
+{
+ struct riscv_ext_intc_list *ext_intc_element;
+ struct list_head *i, *tmp;
+
+ list_for_each_safe(i, tmp, &ext_intc_list) {
+ ext_intc_element = list_entry(i, struct riscv_ext_intc_list, list);
+ if (gsi_base == ext_intc_element->gsi_base) {
+ ext_intc_element->handle = handle;
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return -1;
+}
+
+static acpi_handle riscv_acpi_get_gsi_handle(u32 gsi)
+{
+ struct riscv_ext_intc_list *ext_intc_element;
+ struct list_head *i, *tmp;
+
+ list_for_each_safe(i, tmp, &ext_intc_list) {
+ ext_intc_element = list_entry(i, struct riscv_ext_intc_list, list);
+ if (gsi >= ext_intc_element->gsi_base &&
+ gsi < (ext_intc_element->gsi_base + ext_intc_element->nr_irqs))
+ return ext_intc_element->handle;
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+int riscv_acpi_get_gsi_info(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, u32 *gsi_base,
+ u32 *id, u32 *nr_irqs, u32 *nr_idcs)
+{
+ struct riscv_ext_intc_list *ext_intc_element;
+ struct list_head *i, *tmp;
+
+ list_for_each_safe(i, tmp, &ext_intc_list) {
+ ext_intc_element = list_entry(i, struct riscv_ext_intc_list, list);
+ if (ext_intc_element->handle == ACPI_HANDLE_FWNODE(fwnode)) {
+ *gsi_base = ext_intc_element->gsi_base;
+ *id = ext_intc_element->id;
+ *nr_irqs = ext_intc_element->nr_irqs;
+ if (nr_idcs)
+ *nr_idcs = ext_intc_element->nr_idcs;
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return -ENODEV;
+}
+
+struct fwnode_handle *riscv_acpi_get_gsi_domain_id(u32 gsi)
+{
+ struct riscv_ext_intc_list *ext_intc_element;
+ struct acpi_device *adev;
+ struct list_head *i, *tmp;
+
+ list_for_each_safe(i, tmp, &ext_intc_list) {
+ ext_intc_element = list_entry(i, struct riscv_ext_intc_list, list);
+ if (gsi >= ext_intc_element->gsi_base &&
+ gsi < (ext_intc_element->gsi_base + ext_intc_element->nr_irqs)) {
+ adev = acpi_fetch_acpi_dev(ext_intc_element->handle);
+ if (!adev)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return acpi_fwnode_handle(adev);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static int __init riscv_acpi_register_ext_intc(u32 gsi_base, u32 nr_irqs, u32 nr_idcs,
+ u32 id, u32 type)
+{
+ struct riscv_ext_intc_list *ext_intc_element;
+
+ ext_intc_element = kzalloc(sizeof(*ext_intc_element), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!ext_intc_element)
+ return -1;
+
+ ext_intc_element->gsi_base = gsi_base;
+ ext_intc_element->nr_irqs = nr_irqs;
+ ext_intc_element->nr_idcs = nr_idcs;
+ ext_intc_element->id = id;
+ list_add_tail(&ext_intc_element->list, &ext_intc_list);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static acpi_status __init riscv_acpi_create_gsi_map(acpi_handle handle, u32 level,
+ void *context, void **return_value)
+{
+ acpi_status status;
+ u64 gbase;
+
+ if (!acpi_has_method(handle, "_GSB"))
+ return AE_OK;
+
+ status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_GSB", NULL, &gbase);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+ acpi_handle_err(handle, "failed to evaluate _GSB method\n");
+ return AE_OK;
+ }
+
+ riscv_acpi_update_gsi_handle((u32)gbase, handle);
+ return AE_OK;
+}
+
+static int __init riscv_acpi_aplic_parse_madt(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
+ const unsigned long end)
+{
+ struct acpi_madt_aplic *aplic = (struct acpi_madt_aplic *)header;
+
+ riscv_acpi_register_ext_intc(aplic->gsi_base, aplic->num_sources,
+ aplic->num_idcs, aplic->id, ACPI_RISCV_IRQCHIP_APLIC);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init riscv_acpi_plic_parse_madt(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
+ const unsigned long end)
+{
+ struct acpi_madt_plic *plic = (struct acpi_madt_plic *)header;
+
+ riscv_acpi_register_ext_intc(plic->gsi_base, plic->num_irqs, 0,
+ plic->id, ACPI_RISCV_IRQCHIP_PLIC);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int __init riscv_acpi_init_gsi_mapping(void)
+{
+ int count = 0;
+
+ count = acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_PLIC, riscv_acpi_plic_parse_madt, 0);
+ if (count <= 0) {
+ acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_APLIC, riscv_acpi_aplic_parse_madt, 0);
+ acpi_get_devices("RSCV0002", riscv_acpi_create_gsi_map, NULL, NULL);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ acpi_get_devices("RSCV0001", riscv_acpi_create_gsi_map, NULL, NULL);
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.40.1


2024-04-15 23:15:38

by Bjorn Helgaas

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 03/20] PCI: Make pci_create_root_bus() declare its reliance on MSI domains

On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:30:56PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> Similar to commit 9ec37efb8783 ("PCI/MSI: Make
> pci_host_common_probe() declare its reliance on MSI domains"), declare
> this dependency for PCI probe in ACPI based flow.
>
> This is required especially for RISC-V platforms where MSI controller
> can be absent. However, setting this for all architectures seem to cause
> issues on non RISC-V architectures [1]. Hence, enabled this only for
> RISC-V.
>
> [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/[email protected]
>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 1325fbae2f28..e09915bee2ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -3048,6 +3048,9 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> bridge->sysdata = sysdata;
> bridge->busnr = bus;
> bridge->ops = ops;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV
> + bridge->msi_domain = true;
> +#endif

Ugh. I looked at [1], but that's not a very good justification for
this #ifdef. The fault mentioned in [1] would need to be fixed, but
not this way.

> error = pci_register_host_bridge(bridge);
> if (error < 0)
> --
> 2.40.1
>

2024-04-16 08:24:27

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 03/20] PCI: Make pci_create_root_bus() declare its reliance on MSI domains

Hi Bjorn,

On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 06:15:23PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:30:56PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> > Similar to commit 9ec37efb8783 ("PCI/MSI: Make
> > pci_host_common_probe() declare its reliance on MSI domains"), declare
> > this dependency for PCI probe in ACPI based flow.
> >
> > This is required especially for RISC-V platforms where MSI controller
> > can be absent. However, setting this for all architectures seem to cause
> > issues on non RISC-V architectures [1]. Hence, enabled this only for
> > RISC-V.
> >
> > [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/[email protected]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > index 1325fbae2f28..e09915bee2ee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > @@ -3048,6 +3048,9 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> > bridge->sysdata = sysdata;
> > bridge->busnr = bus;
> > bridge->ops = ops;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV
> > + bridge->msi_domain = true;
> > +#endif
>
> Ugh. I looked at [1], but that's not a very good justification for
> this #ifdef. The fault mentioned in [1] would need to be fixed, but
> not this way.
>

Thank you again for the feedback!

I agree. This is due to my limitation with knowledge and resources to
debug the issue happening on non-UEFI x86 system with some particular
PCIe RC. Also, I was worried that we get into a rat hole of
assumptions/quirks with various architecture/PCIe RC combinations.

For ex: I think the issue is, somehow MSI domain is not set at the time
of PCI host bridge registration in pci_register_host_bridge() causing
PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI to be set. This causes pci_alloc_irq_vectors() to
fail. In portdrv.c, pcie_init_service_irqs() doesn't switch to INTx
handling if MSI can not be used. It switches only if pcie_pme_no_msi()
returns true. I couldn't find who actually sets up MSI domain bit late
on this platform so that it somehow worked when we didn't set this flag.

Unfortunately, I don't have system to root cause and fix this issue with
confidence. Also, I don't know if any other architectures have similar
issues which are not caught yet. Hence, I thought it may be better
just restrict the change to RISC-V.

Let me know your thoughts. If there are better ways, I will be happy to
update.

Thanks,
Sunil



2024-04-16 20:47:06

by Bjorn Helgaas

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 03/20] PCI: Make pci_create_root_bus() declare its reliance on MSI domains

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 01:54:04PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 06:15:23PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:30:56PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> > > Similar to commit 9ec37efb8783 ("PCI/MSI: Make
> > > pci_host_common_probe() declare its reliance on MSI domains"), declare
> > > this dependency for PCI probe in ACPI based flow.
> > >
> > > This is required especially for RISC-V platforms where MSI controller
> > > can be absent. However, setting this for all architectures seem to cause
> > > issues on non RISC-V architectures [1]. Hence, enabled this only for
> > > RISC-V.
> > >
> > > [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/[email protected]
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +++
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > index 1325fbae2f28..e09915bee2ee 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > @@ -3048,6 +3048,9 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> > > bridge->sysdata = sysdata;
> > > bridge->busnr = bus;
> > > bridge->ops = ops;
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV
> > > + bridge->msi_domain = true;
> > > +#endif
> >
> > Ugh. I looked at [1], but that's not a very good justification for
> > this #ifdef. The fault mentioned in [1] would need to be fixed, but
> > not this way.
>
> Thank you again for the feedback!
>
> I agree. This is due to my limitation with knowledge and resources to
> debug the issue happening on non-UEFI x86 system with some particular
> PCIe RC. Also, I was worried that we get into a rat hole of
> assumptions/quirks with various architecture/PCIe RC combinations.

The problem is that adding #ifdefs like this leads to a rat hole
itself. We need to understand and fix the underlying issue instead.

> For ex: I think the issue is, somehow MSI domain is not set at the time
> of PCI host bridge registration in pci_register_host_bridge() causing
> PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI to be set. This causes pci_alloc_irq_vectors() to
> fail. In portdrv.c, pcie_init_service_irqs() doesn't switch to INTx
> handling if MSI can not be used. It switches only if pcie_pme_no_msi()
> returns true. I couldn't find who actually sets up MSI domain bit late
> on this platform so that it somehow worked when we didn't set this flag.
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have system to root cause and fix this issue with
> confidence. Also, I don't know if any other architectures have similar
> issues which are not caught yet. Hence, I thought it may be better
> just restrict the change to RISC-V.

It sounds like the above is a good start on analyzing the problem.

I don't quite understand your statement that pcie_init_service_irqs()
doesn't fall back to INTx when MSI/MSI-X is not available.

I'm looking at this:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c?id=v6.8#n177
pcie_port_enable_irq_vec() attempts
pci_alloc_irq_vectors(PCI_IRQ_MSIX | PCI_IRQ_MSI) and returns 0 if
successful. If it returns failure, it looks like
pcie_init_service_irqs() *does* fall through to trying INTx
(PCI_IRQ_LEGACY).

Bjorn

2024-04-17 15:41:54

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 03/20] PCI: Make pci_create_root_bus() declare its reliance on MSI domains

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 03:46:53PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 01:54:04PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> > Hi Bjorn,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 06:15:23PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:30:56PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> > > > Similar to commit 9ec37efb8783 ("PCI/MSI: Make
> > > > pci_host_common_probe() declare its reliance on MSI domains"), declare
> > > > this dependency for PCI probe in ACPI based flow.
> > > >
> > > > This is required especially for RISC-V platforms where MSI controller
> > > > can be absent. However, setting this for all architectures seem to cause
> > > > issues on non RISC-V architectures [1]. Hence, enabled this only for
> > > > RISC-V.
> > > >
> > > > [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/[email protected]
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +++
> > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > > index 1325fbae2f28..e09915bee2ee 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > > @@ -3048,6 +3048,9 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> > > > bridge->sysdata = sysdata;
> > > > bridge->busnr = bus;
> > > > bridge->ops = ops;
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV
> > > > + bridge->msi_domain = true;
> > > > +#endif
> > >
> > > Ugh. I looked at [1], but that's not a very good justification for
> > > this #ifdef. The fault mentioned in [1] would need to be fixed, but
> > > not this way.
> >
> > Thank you again for the feedback!
> >
> > I agree. This is due to my limitation with knowledge and resources to
> > debug the issue happening on non-UEFI x86 system with some particular
> > PCIe RC. Also, I was worried that we get into a rat hole of
> > assumptions/quirks with various architecture/PCIe RC combinations.
>
> The problem is that adding #ifdefs like this leads to a rat hole
> itself. We need to understand and fix the underlying issue instead.
>
Agree. Ideally, from my reading of code, this change should have worked
across architectures.

> > For ex: I think the issue is, somehow MSI domain is not set at the time
> > of PCI host bridge registration in pci_register_host_bridge() causing
> > PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI to be set. This causes pci_alloc_irq_vectors() to
> > fail. In portdrv.c, pcie_init_service_irqs() doesn't switch to INTx
> > handling if MSI can not be used. It switches only if pcie_pme_no_msi()
> > returns true. I couldn't find who actually sets up MSI domain bit late
> > on this platform so that it somehow worked when we didn't set this flag.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I don't have system to root cause and fix this issue with
> > confidence. Also, I don't know if any other architectures have similar
> > issues which are not caught yet. Hence, I thought it may be better
> > just restrict the change to RISC-V.
>
> It sounds like the above is a good start on analyzing the problem.
>
> I don't quite understand your statement that pcie_init_service_irqs()
> doesn't fall back to INTx when MSI/MSI-X is not available.
>
> I'm looking at this:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c?id=v6.8#n177
> pcie_port_enable_irq_vec() attempts
> pci_alloc_irq_vectors(PCI_IRQ_MSIX | PCI_IRQ_MSI) and returns 0 if
> successful. If it returns failure, it looks like
> pcie_init_service_irqs() *does* fall through to trying INTx
> (PCI_IRQ_LEGACY).
>
You are right. Not sure what I was looking at :-(.

I think fundamentally there are two issues here.

1) MSI domain should have been setup properly when
pci_register_host_bridge() is called. I see that pci_arch_init() which
is supposed to get called early calls x86_create_pci_msi_domain().
pci_register_host_bridge() also calls pci_set_bus_msi_domain() to setup
the MSI domain which can walk up to host bridge to find. So, not sure
why PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI is getting set. Is there an issue in walking up
the tree?

2) When it switches to legacy interrupt since MSI domain is not found,
for some reason there is an interrupt enabled without a handler. I was
suspecting PME since it was matching the IRQ#16 but it looks like PME
handlers are present. I am unable to find anything suspicious from the
log alone.

I really don't know how to proceed further. With my limited
understanding, I don't get any hint what is happening from the log.

Thanks,
Sunil

2024-04-18 11:46:16

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 03/20] PCI: Make pci_create_root_bus() declare its reliance on MSI domains

Hi Bjorn,

On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 09:03:13PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
<snip>
>
> I think fundamentally there are two issues here.
>
> 1) MSI domain should have been setup properly when
> pci_register_host_bridge() is called. I see that pci_arch_init() which
> is supposed to get called early calls x86_create_pci_msi_domain().
> pci_register_host_bridge() also calls pci_set_bus_msi_domain() to setup
> the MSI domain which can walk up to host bridge to find. So, not sure
> why PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI is getting set. Is there an issue in walking up
> the tree?
>
I think I understand now why this is happening on X86. In X86, even
though x86_create_pci_msi_domain() sets up the MSI domain, it never
informs IRQ framework. Only later in pcibios_device_add(), the device's
MSI domain will be set which is too late for this bridge logic. So, when
pci_set_bus_msi_domain() is called from pci_register_host_bridge(), it
will not get it.

It works in RISC-V (I guess ARM64 as well) because, the irqchip driver
for MSI controller registers using pci_msi_register_fwnode_provider().
But, if we set bridge->msi_domain = true in X86, it will disable MSI
even though it supports MSI which is really bad.

Please correct me if I am wrong with the analysis. If correct, what do
you think the way forward if using CONFIG option is not good? I tried to
register the domain in below commit but I don't feel it is a cleaner way.
https://github.com/vlsunil/linux/commit/d6cf76f10c225c94fffb286b7a3e803a4e37df54

Thanks,
Sunil

2024-04-18 13:50:55

by Björn Töpel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/20] RISC-V: ACPI: Add external interrupt controller support

Sunil V L <[email protected]> writes:

> This series adds support for the below ECR approved by ASWG.
> 1) MADT - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oMGPyOD58JaPgMl1pKasT-VKsIKia7zR/view?usp=sharing
>
> The series primarily enables irqchip drivers for RISC-V ACPI based
> platforms.
>
> The series can be broadly categorized like below.
>
> 1) PCI ACPI related functions are migrated from arm64 to common file so
> that we don't need to duplicate them for RISC-V.
>
> 2) Added support for re-ordering the probe of interrupt controllers when
> IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE is used.
>
> 3) To ensure probe order between interrupt controllers and devices,
> implicit dependency is created similar to when _DEP is present.
>
> 4) When PNP devices like Generic 16550A UART, have the dependency on the
> interrupt controller, they will not be added to PNP data structures. So,
> added second phase of pnpacpi_init to handle this.
>
> 5) ACPI support added in RISC-V interrupt controller drivers.
>
> This series is still kept as RFC to seek feedback on above design
> changes. Looking forward for the feedback!
>
> Changes since RFC v3:
> 1) Moved to _DEP method instead of fw_devlink.
> 2) PLIC/APLIC driver probe using namespace devices.
> 3) Handling PNP devices as part of clearing dependency.
> 4) Rebased to latest linux-next to get AIA DT drivers.
>
> Changes since RFC v2:
> 1) Introduced fw_devlink for ACPI nodes for IRQ dependency.
> 2) Dropped patches in drivers which are not required due to
> fw_devlink support.
> 3) Dropped pci_set_msi() patch and added a patch in
> pci_create_root_bus().
> 4) Updated pnp_irq() patch so that none of the actual PNP
> drivers need to change.
>
> Changes since RFC v1:
> 1) Abandoned swnode approach as per Marc's feedback.
> 2) To cope up with AIA series changes which changed irqchip driver
> probe from core_initcall() to platform_driver, added patches
> to support deferred probing.
> 3) Rebased on top of Anup's AIA v11 and added tags.
>
> To test the series,
>
> 1) Qemu should be built using the riscv_acpi_namespace_v1 branch at
> https://github.com/vlsunil/qemu.git
>
> 2) EDK2 should be built using the instructions at:
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/OvmfPkg/RiscVVirt/README.md

Hi Sunil,

I started playing with your work, and FYI: Using U-boot instead of EDK2
works out of the box (with acpi.config added to U-boot).

I changed my rootfs/boot tooling like [1], and it boots.

(For those who prefer working with U-boot UEFI instead of EDK2.)


Björn

[1] https://github.com/bjoto/riscv-rootfs-utils/commit/c0c620131f04d0c25df1504af4d0629a420b097e

2024-04-18 14:10:11

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/20] RISC-V: ACPI: Add external interrupt controller support

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 03:49:22PM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
> Sunil V L <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > This series adds support for the below ECR approved by ASWG.
> > 1) MADT - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oMGPyOD58JaPgMl1pKasT-VKsIKia7zR/view?usp=sharing
> >
> > The series primarily enables irqchip drivers for RISC-V ACPI based
> > platforms.
> >
> > The series can be broadly categorized like below.
> >
> > 1) PCI ACPI related functions are migrated from arm64 to common file so
> > that we don't need to duplicate them for RISC-V.
> >
> > 2) Added support for re-ordering the probe of interrupt controllers when
> > IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE is used.
> >
> > 3) To ensure probe order between interrupt controllers and devices,
> > implicit dependency is created similar to when _DEP is present.
> >
> > 4) When PNP devices like Generic 16550A UART, have the dependency on the
> > interrupt controller, they will not be added to PNP data structures. So,
> > added second phase of pnpacpi_init to handle this.
> >
> > 5) ACPI support added in RISC-V interrupt controller drivers.
> >
> > This series is still kept as RFC to seek feedback on above design
> > changes. Looking forward for the feedback!
> >
> > Changes since RFC v3:
> > 1) Moved to _DEP method instead of fw_devlink.
> > 2) PLIC/APLIC driver probe using namespace devices.
> > 3) Handling PNP devices as part of clearing dependency.
> > 4) Rebased to latest linux-next to get AIA DT drivers.
> >
> > Changes since RFC v2:
> > 1) Introduced fw_devlink for ACPI nodes for IRQ dependency.
> > 2) Dropped patches in drivers which are not required due to
> > fw_devlink support.
> > 3) Dropped pci_set_msi() patch and added a patch in
> > pci_create_root_bus().
> > 4) Updated pnp_irq() patch so that none of the actual PNP
> > drivers need to change.
> >
> > Changes since RFC v1:
> > 1) Abandoned swnode approach as per Marc's feedback.
> > 2) To cope up with AIA series changes which changed irqchip driver
> > probe from core_initcall() to platform_driver, added patches
> > to support deferred probing.
> > 3) Rebased on top of Anup's AIA v11 and added tags.
> >
> > To test the series,
> >
> > 1) Qemu should be built using the riscv_acpi_namespace_v1 branch at
> > https://github.com/vlsunil/qemu.git
> >
> > 2) EDK2 should be built using the instructions at:
> > https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/OvmfPkg/RiscVVirt/README.md
>
> Hi Sunil,
>
> I started playing with your work, and FYI: Using U-boot instead of EDK2
> works out of the box (with acpi.config added to U-boot).
>
> I changed my rootfs/boot tooling like [1], and it boots.
>
> (For those who prefer working with U-boot UEFI instead of EDK2.)
>
>
Hi Björn,

This is cool!. I was not aware that u-boot also supports ACPI on
RISC-V. Many thanks!

Thanks,
Sunil

2024-04-18 14:25:07

by Heinrich Schuchardt

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/20] RISC-V: ACPI: Add external interrupt controller support

On 18.04.24 15:58, Sunil V L wrote:
> Hi Björn,
>
> This is cool!. I was not aware that u-boot also supports ACPI on
> RISC-V. Many thanks!
>
> Thanks,
> Sunil

For RISC-V and ARM we have

* pass-through for QEMU ACPI tables
* pass-through for QEMU SMBIOS tables
* generation of SMBIOS tables

Generation of ACPI tables in U-Boot has up now only been implemented for
x86 but would be feasible for RISC-V boards too.

Cf. https://docs.u-boot.org/en/latest/board/emulation/acpi.html

Best regards

Heinrich

2024-04-22 19:28:45

by Rafael J. Wysocki

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/20] RISC-V: ACPI: Add external interrupt controller support

On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 7:01 PM Sunil V L <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This series adds support for the below ECR approved by ASWG.
> 1) MADT - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oMGPyOD58JaPgMl1pKasT-VKsIKia7zR/view?usp=sharing
>
> The series primarily enables irqchip drivers for RISC-V ACPI based
> platforms.
>
> The series can be broadly categorized like below.
>
> 1) PCI ACPI related functions are migrated from arm64 to common file so
> that we don't need to duplicate them for RISC-V.
>
> 2) Added support for re-ordering the probe of interrupt controllers when
> IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE is used.
>
> 3) To ensure probe order between interrupt controllers and devices,
> implicit dependency is created similar to when _DEP is present.
>
> 4) When PNP devices like Generic 16550A UART, have the dependency on the
> interrupt controller, they will not be added to PNP data structures. So,
> added second phase of pnpacpi_init to handle this.
>
> 5) ACPI support added in RISC-V interrupt controller drivers.
>
> This series is still kept as RFC to seek feedback on above design
> changes. Looking forward for the feedback!

I've looked at the patches and I don't see anything deeply concerning
in them from the ACPI core code perspective.

The changes look reasonably straightforward to me.

Thanks!

> Changes since RFC v3:
> 1) Moved to _DEP method instead of fw_devlink.
> 2) PLIC/APLIC driver probe using namespace devices.
> 3) Handling PNP devices as part of clearing dependency.
> 4) Rebased to latest linux-next to get AIA DT drivers.
>
> Changes since RFC v2:
> 1) Introduced fw_devlink for ACPI nodes for IRQ dependency.
> 2) Dropped patches in drivers which are not required due to
> fw_devlink support.
> 3) Dropped pci_set_msi() patch and added a patch in
> pci_create_root_bus().
> 4) Updated pnp_irq() patch so that none of the actual PNP
> drivers need to change.
>
> Changes since RFC v1:
> 1) Abandoned swnode approach as per Marc's feedback.
> 2) To cope up with AIA series changes which changed irqchip driver
> probe from core_initcall() to platform_driver, added patches
> to support deferred probing.
> 3) Rebased on top of Anup's AIA v11 and added tags.
>
> To test the series,
>
> 1) Qemu should be built using the riscv_acpi_namespace_v1 branch at
> https://github.com/vlsunil/qemu.git
>
> 2) EDK2 should be built using the instructions at:
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/OvmfPkg/RiscVVirt/README.md
>
> 3) Build Linux using this series.
>
> Run Qemu:
> qemu-system-riscv64 \
> -M virt,pflash0=pflash0,pflash1=pflash1,aia=aplic-imsic \
> -m 2G -smp 8 \
> -serial mon:stdio \
> -device virtio-gpu-pci -full-screen \
> -device qemu-xhci \
> -device usb-kbd \
> -blockdev node-name=pflash0,driver=file,read-only=on,filename=RISCV_VIRT_CODE.fd \
> -blockdev node-name=pflash1,driver=file,filename=RISCV_VIRT_VARS.fd \
> -netdev user,id=net0 -device virtio-net-pci,netdev=net0 \
> -kernel arch/riscv/boot/Image \
> -initrd rootfs.cpio \
> -append "root=/dev/ram ro console=ttyS0 rootwait earlycon=uart8250,mmio,0x10000000"
>
> To boot with APLIC only, use aia=aplic.
> To boot with PLIC, remove aia= option.
>
> This series is also available in acpi_b2_v4_autodep_v1 branch at
> https://github.com/vlsunil/linux.git
>
> Based-on: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-nextgit/tag/?h=next-20240415
>
> Sunil V L (20):
> arm64: PCI: Migrate ACPI related functions to pci-acpi.c
> RISC-V: ACPI: Implement PCI related functionality
> PCI: Make pci_create_root_bus() declare its reliance on MSI domains
> ACPI: scan.c: Add weak arch specific function to reorder the IRQCHIP
> probe
> ACPI: RISC-V: Implement arch function to reorder irqchip probe entries
> ACPI: bus: Add acpi_riscv_init function
> RISC-V: Kconfig: Select deferred GSI probe for ACPI systems
> ACPI: scan: Refactor dependency creation
> drivers/acpi/scan.c: Update _DEP honor list
> RISC-V: ACPI: Initialize GSI mapping structures
> ACPI: scan.c: Define weak function to populate dependencies
> RISC-V: ACPI: Implement function to add implicit dependencies
> ACPI/PNP: Initialize PNP devices skipped due to _DEP
> irqchip: riscv-intc: Add ACPI support for AIA
> irqchip: riscv-imsic: Add ACPI support
> irqchip: riscv-aplic: Add ACPI support
> irqchip: irq-sifive-plic: Add ACPI support
> ACPI: bus: Add RINTC IRQ model for RISC-V
> irqchip: riscv-intc: Set ACPI irqmodel
> ACPI: pci_link: Clear the dependencies after probe
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 191 ------------
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 3 +
> arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h | 57 ++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c | 31 +-
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 3 +
> drivers/acpi/bus.c | 4 +
> drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 3 +
> drivers/acpi/riscv/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/acpi/riscv/init.c | 14 +
> drivers/acpi/riscv/init.h | 4 +
> drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c | 323 +++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 69 +++--
> drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c | 20 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c | 70 +++--
> drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.h | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-msi.c | 9 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-early.c | 52 +++-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c | 32 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-state.c | 115 ++++----
> drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-state.h | 2 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c | 102 ++++++-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 89 ++++--
> drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 182 ++++++++++++
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +
> drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c | 24 +-
> drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c | 63 ++--
> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 2 +
> include/linux/acpi.h | 9 +
> include/linux/irqchip/riscv-imsic.h | 10 +
> include/linux/pnp.h | 7 +
> 30 files changed, 1108 insertions(+), 388 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/riscv/init.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/riscv/init.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/riscv/irq.c
>
> --
> 2.40.1
>
>

2024-04-24 17:56:03

by Björn Töpel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/20] RISC-V: ACPI: Add external interrupt controller support

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes:

> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 7:01 PM Sunil V L <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> This series adds support for the below ECR approved by ASWG.
>> 1) MADT - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oMGPyOD58JaPgMl1pKasT-VKsIKia7zR/view?usp=sharing
>>
>> The series primarily enables irqchip drivers for RISC-V ACPI based
>> platforms.
>>
>> The series can be broadly categorized like below.
>>
>> 1) PCI ACPI related functions are migrated from arm64 to common file so
>> that we don't need to duplicate them for RISC-V.
>>
>> 2) Added support for re-ordering the probe of interrupt controllers when
>> IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE is used.
>>
>> 3) To ensure probe order between interrupt controllers and devices,
>> implicit dependency is created similar to when _DEP is present.
>>
>> 4) When PNP devices like Generic 16550A UART, have the dependency on the
>> interrupt controller, they will not be added to PNP data structures. So,
>> added second phase of pnpacpi_init to handle this.
>>
>> 5) ACPI support added in RISC-V interrupt controller drivers.
>>
>> This series is still kept as RFC to seek feedback on above design
>> changes. Looking forward for the feedback!
>
> I've looked at the patches and I don't see anything deeply concerning
> in them from the ACPI core code perspective.
>
> The changes look reasonably straightforward to me.

Sunil, given Rafael's input, it sounds like it's time for a patch
proper. This is really the missing piece to make ACPI usable on RISC-V!

Thanks for the nice work!
Björn

FWIW,
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>



2024-04-29 06:41:58

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/20] RISC-V: ACPI: Add external interrupt controller support

On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 07:55:50PM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 7:01 PM Sunil V L <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> This series adds support for the below ECR approved by ASWG.
> >> 1) MADT - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oMGPyOD58JaPgMl1pKasT-VKsIKia7zR/view?usp=sharing
> >>
> >> The series primarily enables irqchip drivers for RISC-V ACPI based
> >> platforms.
> >>
> >> The series can be broadly categorized like below.
> >>
> >> 1) PCI ACPI related functions are migrated from arm64 to common file so
> >> that we don't need to duplicate them for RISC-V.
> >>
> >> 2) Added support for re-ordering the probe of interrupt controllers when
> >> IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE is used.
> >>
> >> 3) To ensure probe order between interrupt controllers and devices,
> >> implicit dependency is created similar to when _DEP is present.
> >>
> >> 4) When PNP devices like Generic 16550A UART, have the dependency on the
> >> interrupt controller, they will not be added to PNP data structures. So,
> >> added second phase of pnpacpi_init to handle this.
> >>
> >> 5) ACPI support added in RISC-V interrupt controller drivers.
> >>
> >> This series is still kept as RFC to seek feedback on above design
> >> changes. Looking forward for the feedback!
> >
> > I've looked at the patches and I don't see anything deeply concerning
> > in them from the ACPI core code perspective.
> >
> > The changes look reasonably straightforward to me.
>
> Sunil, given Rafael's input, it sounds like it's time for a patch
> proper. This is really the missing piece to make ACPI usable on RISC-V!
>
> Thanks for the nice work!
> Björn
>
> FWIW,
> Tested-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
>
Sorry for the delayed response. I was AFK last week.

Many thanks!!, Rafael. Let me send next version without RFC.

Thank you very much Björn for testing it.

Thanks,
Sunil