2021-06-10 04:31:29

by Keoseong Park

Subject: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Add indent for code alignment

Add indentation to return statement.

Signed-off-by: Keoseong Park <[email protected]>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
index 8b1d0dad0764..97dfc6e94390 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
@@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
else
return false;
#else
-return true;
+ return true;
#endif
}

--
2.17.1

2021-06-10 04:57:33

by Joe Perches

Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Add indent for code alignment

On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 13:07 +0900, Keoseong Park wrote:
> Add indentation to return statement.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
[]
> @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> ? else
> ? return false;
> ?#else
> -return true;
> + return true;
> ?#endif
> ?}
> ?

Perhaps a little refactoring instead:
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 12 ++++--------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
index c98d540ac044d..ed89839476b3b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
@@ -894,15 +894,11 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_rpm_autosuspend_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
{
/* DWC UFS Core has the Interrupt aggregation feature but is not detectable*/
-#ifndef CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC
- if ((hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) &&
- !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR))
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC))
return true;
- else
- return false;
-#else
-return true;
-#endif
+
+ return (hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) &&
+ !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR);
}

static inline bool ufshcd_can_aggressive_pc(struct ufs_hba *hba)

2021-06-17 02:49:00

by Keoseong Park

Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Add indent for code alignment

>On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 13:07 +0900, Keoseong Park wrote:
>> Add indentation to return statement.
>[]
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
>[]
>> @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>> else
>> return false;
>> #else
>> -return true;
>> + return true;
>> #endif
>> }
>>
>
>Perhaps a little refactoring instead:
>---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 12 ++++--------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
>index c98d540ac044d..ed89839476b3b 100644
>--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
>+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
>@@ -894,15 +894,11 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_rpm_autosuspend_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> {
> /* DWC UFS Core has the Interrupt aggregation feature but is not detectable*/
>-#ifndef CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC
>- if ((hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) &&
>- !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR))
>+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC))
> return true;
>- else
>- return false;
>-#else
>-return true;
>-#endif
>+
>+ return (hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) &&
>+ !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR);
> }
>
> static inline bool ufshcd_can_aggressive_pc(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>

Hello Joe,
Thanks for your advice.
As you mentioned, refactoring looks good.
However, since the content does not match the title, can I submit a patch with a new title?

Best Regards,
Keoseong

2021-06-17 21:34:47

by Joe Perches

Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Add indent for code alignment

On Thu, 2021-06-17 at 10:28 +0900, Keoseong Park wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 13:07 +0900, Keoseong Park wrote:
> > > Add indentation to return statement.
> > []
> > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> > []
> > > @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static inline bool
> > > ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > > ? else
> > > ? return false;
> > > ?#else
> > > -return true;
> > > + return true;
> > > ?#endif
> > > ?}
> > > ?
> >
> > Perhaps a little refactoring instead:
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 12 ++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> > index c98d540ac044d..ed89839476b3b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> > @@ -894,15 +894,11 @@ static inline bool
> > ufshcd_is_rpm_autosuspend_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > {
> > /* DWC UFS Core has the Interrupt aggregation feature but is not
> > detectable*/
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC
> > - if ((hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) &&
> > - !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR))
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC))
> > return true;
> > - else
> > - return false;
> > -#else
> > -return true;
> > -#endif
> > +
> > + return (hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) &&
> > + !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR);
> > }
> >
> > static inline bool ufshcd_can_aggressive_pc(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> >
>
> Hello Joe,
> Thanks for your advice.
> As you mentioned, refactoring looks good.
> However, since the content does not match the title, can I submit a
> patch with a new title?

Yes of course.