2015-12-08 15:32:26

by Arnd Bergmann

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] soc: TI knav_qmss: fix dma_addr_t printing

The knav_qmss driver is currently broken when CONFIG_LPAE is
set, which is a bit surprising because I'd expect that any serious
users of this platforms would have more than 2GB of RAM and require
LPAE.

The compiler clearly warns about an incorrect use of dma_addr_t
in the debug kernel messages:

ti/knav_qmss_queue.c: In function 'knav_queue_setup_region':
ti/knav_qmss_queue.c:1025:117: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 9 has type 'dma_addr_t {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
ti/knav_qmss_queue.c:1025:117: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 10 has type 'dma_addr_t {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
ti/knav_qmss_queue.c: In function 'knav_queue_setup_link_ram':
ti/knav_qmss_queue.c:1175:118: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'dma_addr_t {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]

This patch changes all the debugging output to use the correct
%pad format string that works with both 32-bit and 64-bit dma_addr_t.
As the variable naming is somewhat confusing here, I also change
all *_phys names to *_dma when they refer to bus addresses that
are used for DMA rather than a physical memory address as seen from
the CPU. This is particularly important on keystone, because the
two things are not the same there.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
---
drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss.h | 4 ++--
drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_acc.c | 14 +++++++-------
drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss.h b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss.h
index 6ff936cacb70..905b974d1bdc 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss.h
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss.h
@@ -93,13 +93,13 @@ struct knav_reg_pdsp_regs {
struct knav_reg_acc_command {
u32 command;
u32 queue_mask;
- u32 list_phys;
+ u32 list_dma;
u32 queue_num;
u32 timer_config;
};

struct knav_link_ram_block {
- dma_addr_t phys;
+ dma_addr_t dma;
void *virt;
size_t size;
};
diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_acc.c b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_acc.c
index d2d48f2802bc..0612ebae0a09 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_acc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_acc.c
@@ -122,8 +122,8 @@ static irqreturn_t knav_acc_int_handler(int irq, void *_instdata)
channel = acc->channel;
list_dma = acc->list_dma[acc->list_index];
list_cpu = acc->list_cpu[acc->list_index];
- dev_dbg(kdev->dev, "acc-irq: channel %d, list %d, virt %p, phys %x\n",
- channel, acc->list_index, list_cpu, list_dma);
+ dev_dbg(kdev->dev, "acc-irq: channel %d, list %d, virt %p, dma %pad\n",
+ channel, acc->list_index, list_cpu, &list_dma);
if (atomic_read(&acc->retrigger_count)) {
atomic_dec(&acc->retrigger_count);
__knav_acc_notify(range, acc);
@@ -297,12 +297,12 @@ knav_acc_write(struct knav_device *kdev, struct knav_pdsp_info *pdsp,
u32 result;

dev_dbg(kdev->dev, "acc command %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x\n",
- cmd->command, cmd->queue_mask, cmd->list_phys,
+ cmd->command, cmd->queue_mask, cmd->list_dma,
cmd->queue_num, cmd->timer_config);

writel_relaxed(cmd->timer_config, &pdsp->acc_command->timer_config);
writel_relaxed(cmd->queue_num, &pdsp->acc_command->queue_num);
- writel_relaxed(cmd->list_phys, &pdsp->acc_command->list_phys);
+ writel_relaxed(cmd->list_dma, &pdsp->acc_command->list_dma);
writel_relaxed(cmd->queue_mask, &pdsp->acc_command->queue_mask);
writel_relaxed(cmd->command, &pdsp->acc_command->command);

@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static void knav_acc_setup_cmd(struct knav_device *kdev,
memset(cmd, 0, sizeof(*cmd));
cmd->command = acc->channel;
cmd->queue_mask = queue_mask;
- cmd->list_phys = acc->list_dma[0];
+ cmd->list_dma = (u32)acc->list_dma[0];
cmd->queue_num = info->list_entries << 16;
cmd->queue_num |= queue_base;

@@ -591,8 +591,8 @@ int knav_init_acc_range(struct knav_device *kdev,
acc->list_cpu[1] = list_mem + list_size;
acc->list_dma[0] = list_dma;
acc->list_dma[1] = list_dma + list_size;
- dev_dbg(kdev->dev, "%s: channel %d, phys %08x, virt %8p\n",
- acc->name, acc->channel, list_dma, list_mem);
+ dev_dbg(kdev->dev, "%s: channel %d, dma %pad, virt %8p\n",
+ acc->name, acc->channel, &list_dma, list_mem);
}

range->ops = &knav_acc_range_ops;
diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
index 8c03a80b482d..b73e3534f67b 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
@@ -1023,9 +1023,9 @@ static void knav_queue_setup_region(struct knav_device *kdev,
list_add(&pool->region_inst, &region->pools);

dev_dbg(kdev->dev,
- "region %s (%d): size:%d, link:%d@%d, phys:%08x-%08x, virt:%p-%p\n",
+ "region %s (%d): size:%d, link:%d@%d, dma:%pad-%pad, virt:%p-%p\n",
region->name, id, region->desc_size, region->num_desc,
- region->link_index, region->dma_start, region->dma_end,
+ region->link_index, &region->dma_start, &region->dma_end,
region->virt_start, region->virt_end);

hw_desc_size = (region->desc_size / 16) - 1;
@@ -1033,7 +1033,7 @@ static void knav_queue_setup_region(struct knav_device *kdev,

for_each_qmgr(kdev, qmgr) {
regs = qmgr->reg_region + id;
- writel_relaxed(region->dma_start, &regs->base);
+ writel_relaxed((u32)region->dma_start, &regs->base);
writel_relaxed(region->link_index, &regs->start_index);
writel_relaxed(hw_desc_size << 16 | hw_num_desc,
&regs->size_count);
@@ -1145,14 +1145,14 @@ static int knav_get_link_ram(struct knav_device *kdev,
* queue_base specified => using internal or onchip
* link ram WARNING - we do not "reserve" this block
*/
- block->phys = (dma_addr_t)temp[0];
+ block->dma = (dma_addr_t)temp[0];
block->virt = NULL;
block->size = temp[1];
} else {
block->size = temp[1];
/* queue_base not specific => allocate requested size */
block->virt = dmam_alloc_coherent(kdev->dev,
- 8 * block->size, &block->phys,
+ 8 * block->size, &block->dma,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!block->virt) {
dev_err(kdev->dev, "failed to alloc linkram\n");
@@ -1172,18 +1172,18 @@ static int knav_queue_setup_link_ram(struct knav_device *kdev)

for_each_qmgr(kdev, qmgr) {
block = &kdev->link_rams[0];
- dev_dbg(kdev->dev, "linkram0: phys:%x, virt:%p, size:%x\n",
- block->phys, block->virt, block->size);
- writel_relaxed(block->phys, &qmgr->reg_config->link_ram_base0);
+ dev_dbg(kdev->dev, "linkram0: dma:%pad, virt:%p, size:%x\n",
+ &block->dma, block->virt, block->size);
+ writel_relaxed((u32)block->dma, &qmgr->reg_config->link_ram_base0);
writel_relaxed(block->size, &qmgr->reg_config->link_ram_size0);

block++;
if (!block->size)
continue;

- dev_dbg(kdev->dev, "linkram1: phys:%x, virt:%p, size:%x\n",
- block->phys, block->virt, block->size);
- writel_relaxed(block->phys, &qmgr->reg_config->link_ram_base1);
+ dev_dbg(kdev->dev, "linkram1: dma:%pad, virt:%p, size:%x\n",
+ &block->dma, block->virt, block->size);
+ writel_relaxed(block->dma, &qmgr->reg_config->link_ram_base1);
}

return 0;
--
2.1.0.rc2


2015-12-08 16:54:27

by Santosh Shilimkar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: TI knav_qmss: fix dma_addr_t printing

On 12/8/2015 7:30 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The knav_qmss driver is currently broken when CONFIG_LPAE is
> set, which is a bit surprising because I'd expect that any serious
> users of this platforms would have more than 2GB of RAM and require
> LPAE.
>
Well it has been working with LPAE enable always. The production
systems do but IIRC, some of the Eval board were still build with
just 2 GB memory.

> The compiler clearly warns about an incorrect use of dma_addr_t
> in the debug kernel messages:
>
> ti/knav_qmss_queue.c: In function 'knav_queue_setup_region':
> ti/knav_qmss_queue.c:1025:117: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 9 has type 'dma_addr_t {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
> ti/knav_qmss_queue.c:1025:117: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 10 has type 'dma_addr_t {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
> ti/knav_qmss_queue.c: In function 'knav_queue_setup_link_ram':
> ti/knav_qmss_queue.c:1175:118: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'dma_addr_t {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
>
%x should have been %llx or %pad as your patch does now.

> This patch changes all the debugging output to use the correct
> %pad format string that works with both 32-bit and 64-bit dma_addr_t.
> As the variable naming is somewhat confusing here, I also change
> all *_phys names to *_dma when they refer to bus addresses that
> are used for DMA rather than a physical memory address as seen from
> the CPU. This is particularly important on keystone, because the
> two things are not the same there.
>
Right. Rename sounds good.

> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> ---
Thanks for the patch Arnd !!

Wingman/Murali,
Can you guys please test this patch and update the thread ?
I will queue this up for next merge window.

2015-12-08 21:35:22

by Arnd Bergmann

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: TI knav_qmss: fix dma_addr_t printing

On Tuesday 08 December 2015 08:53:53 santosh shilimkar wrote:
> On 12/8/2015 7:30 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The knav_qmss driver is currently broken when CONFIG_LPAE is
> > set, which is a bit surprising because I'd expect that any serious
> > users of this platforms would have more than 2GB of RAM and require
> > LPAE.
> >
> Well it has been working with LPAE enable always. The production
> systems do but IIRC, some of the Eval board were still build with
> just 2 GB memory.

Maybe that just means that the debug code is never used and we can remove
all the dev_dbg instead? That might actually be nicer as it would reduce
the amount of code in your driver (slightly).

Arnd

2015-12-08 22:28:53

by Santosh Shilimkar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: TI knav_qmss: fix dma_addr_t printing

On 12/8/2015 1:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 December 2015 08:53:53 santosh shilimkar wrote:
>> On 12/8/2015 7:30 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> The knav_qmss driver is currently broken when CONFIG_LPAE is
>>> set, which is a bit surprising because I'd expect that any serious
>>> users of this platforms would have more than 2GB of RAM and require
>>> LPAE.
>>>
>> Well it has been working with LPAE enable always. The production
>> systems do but IIRC, some of the Eval board were still build with
>> just 2 GB memory.
>
> Maybe that just means that the debug code is never used and we can remove
> all the dev_dbg instead? That might actually be nicer as it would reduce
> the amount of code in your driver (slightly).
>
It was added in intention so that it is useful. I agree if it is not
used or useful, we should remove it.

Regards,
Santosh