hv_get_nested_reg only translates SINT0, resulting in the wrong sint
being registered by nested vmbus.
Fix the issue with new utility function hv_is_sint_reg.
While at it, improve clarity of hv_set_non_nested_register and hv_is_synic_reg.
Signed-off-by: Nuno Das Neves <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 11 +++++++----
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
index 9ae1a344536b..684c547c1cca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
@@ -225,10 +225,13 @@ extern bool hv_isolation_type_snp(void);
static inline bool hv_is_synic_reg(unsigned int reg)
{
- if ((reg >= HV_REGISTER_SCONTROL) &&
- (reg <= HV_REGISTER_SINT15))
- return true;
- return false;
+ return (reg >= HV_REGISTER_SCONTROL) &&
+ (reg <= HV_REGISTER_SINT15);
+}
+static inline bool hv_is_sint_reg(unsigned int reg)
+{
+ return (reg >= HV_REGISTER_SINT0) &&
+ (reg <= HV_REGISTER_SINT15);
}
u64 hv_get_register(unsigned int reg);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
index 0ceb6d1f9c3c..6bd344e1200f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ struct ms_hyperv_info ms_hyperv;
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
static inline unsigned int hv_get_nested_reg(unsigned int reg)
{
+ if (hv_is_sint_reg(reg))
+ return reg - HV_REGISTER_SINT0 + HV_REGISTER_NESTED_SINT0;
+
switch (reg) {
case HV_REGISTER_SIMP:
return HV_REGISTER_NESTED_SIMP;
@@ -53,8 +56,6 @@ static inline unsigned int hv_get_nested_reg(unsigned int reg)
return HV_REGISTER_NESTED_SVERSION;
case HV_REGISTER_SCONTROL:
return HV_REGISTER_NESTED_SCONTROL;
- case HV_REGISTER_SINT0:
- return HV_REGISTER_NESTED_SINT0;
case HV_REGISTER_EOM:
return HV_REGISTER_NESTED_EOM;
default:
@@ -80,8 +81,7 @@ void hv_set_non_nested_register(unsigned int reg, u64 value)
hv_ghcb_msr_write(reg, value);
/* Write proxy bit via wrmsl instruction */
- if (reg >= HV_REGISTER_SINT0 &&
- reg <= HV_REGISTER_SINT15)
+ if (hv_is_sint_reg(reg))
wrmsrl(reg, value | 1 << 20);
} else {
wrmsrl(reg, value);
--
2.25.1
A few comments on style.
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:02:52PM -0800, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
> hv_get_nested_reg only translates SINT0, resulting in the wrong sint
> being registered by nested vmbus.
Please put a blank line between paragraphs.
> Fix the issue with new utility function hv_is_sint_reg.
> While at it, improve clarity of hv_set_non_nested_register and hv_is_synic_reg.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nuno Das Neves <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 11 +++++++----
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> index 9ae1a344536b..684c547c1cca 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> @@ -225,10 +225,13 @@ extern bool hv_isolation_type_snp(void);
>
> static inline bool hv_is_synic_reg(unsigned int reg)
> {
> - if ((reg >= HV_REGISTER_SCONTROL) &&
> - (reg <= HV_REGISTER_SINT15))
> - return true;
> - return false;
> + return (reg >= HV_REGISTER_SCONTROL) &&
> + (reg <= HV_REGISTER_SINT15);
> +}
Please put a new line here.
I can fix these issues too if you don't end up sending a new version due
to other issues.
Jinank, please take a look. The code looks sensible to me, but I would
like you to have a look too.
Thanks,
Wei.
> +static inline bool hv_is_sint_reg(unsigned int reg)
> +{
> + return (reg >= HV_REGISTER_SINT0) &&
> + (reg <= HV_REGISTER_SINT15);
> }
>
> u64 hv_get_register(unsigned int reg);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> index 0ceb6d1f9c3c..6bd344e1200f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ struct ms_hyperv_info ms_hyperv;
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
> static inline unsigned int hv_get_nested_reg(unsigned int reg)
> {
> + if (hv_is_sint_reg(reg))
> + return reg - HV_REGISTER_SINT0 + HV_REGISTER_NESTED_SINT0;
> +
> switch (reg) {
> case HV_REGISTER_SIMP:
> return HV_REGISTER_NESTED_SIMP;
> @@ -53,8 +56,6 @@ static inline unsigned int hv_get_nested_reg(unsigned int reg)
> return HV_REGISTER_NESTED_SVERSION;
> case HV_REGISTER_SCONTROL:
> return HV_REGISTER_NESTED_SCONTROL;
> - case HV_REGISTER_SINT0:
> - return HV_REGISTER_NESTED_SINT0;
> case HV_REGISTER_EOM:
> return HV_REGISTER_NESTED_EOM;
> default:
> @@ -80,8 +81,7 @@ void hv_set_non_nested_register(unsigned int reg, u64 value)
> hv_ghcb_msr_write(reg, value);
>
> /* Write proxy bit via wrmsl instruction */
> - if (reg >= HV_REGISTER_SINT0 &&
> - reg <= HV_REGISTER_SINT15)
> + if (hv_is_sint_reg(reg))
> wrmsrl(reg, value | 1 << 20);
> } else {
> wrmsrl(reg, value);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
On 2/13/2023 6:28 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> A few comments on style.
>
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:02:52PM -0800, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
>> hv_get_nested_reg only translates SINT0, resulting in the wrong sint
>> being registered by nested vmbus.
>
> Please put a blank line between paragraphs.
>
Ok
>> Fix the issue with new utility function hv_is_sint_reg.
>> While at it, improve clarity of hv_set_non_nested_register and hv_is_synic_reg.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nuno Das Neves <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 11 +++++++----
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c | 8 ++++----
>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
>> index 9ae1a344536b..684c547c1cca 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
>> @@ -225,10 +225,13 @@ extern bool hv_isolation_type_snp(void);
>>
>> static inline bool hv_is_synic_reg(unsigned int reg)
>> {
>> - if ((reg >= HV_REGISTER_SCONTROL) &&
>> - (reg <= HV_REGISTER_SINT15))
>> - return true;
>> - return false;
>> + return (reg >= HV_REGISTER_SCONTROL) &&
>> + (reg <= HV_REGISTER_SINT15);
>> +}
>
> Please put a new line here.
>
Ok
> I can fix these issues too if you don't end up sending a new version due
> to other issues.
>
> Jinank, please take a look. The code looks sensible to me, but I would
> like you to have a look too.
>
I'll wait for Jinank to take a look before posting another version...
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 02:17:52PM -0800, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
> On 2/13/2023 6:28 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> > A few comments on style.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:02:52PM -0800, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
> >> hv_get_nested_reg only translates SINT0, resulting in the wrong sint
> >> being registered by nested vmbus.
> >
> > Please put a blank line between paragraphs.
> >
>
> Ok
>
> >> Fix the issue with new utility function hv_is_sint_reg.
> >> While at it, improve clarity of hv_set_non_nested_register and hv_is_synic_reg.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nuno Das Neves <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 11 +++++++----
> >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c | 8 ++++----
> >> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> >> index 9ae1a344536b..684c547c1cca 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> >> @@ -225,10 +225,13 @@ extern bool hv_isolation_type_snp(void);
> >>
> >> static inline bool hv_is_synic_reg(unsigned int reg)
> >> {
> >> - if ((reg >= HV_REGISTER_SCONTROL) &&
> >> - (reg <= HV_REGISTER_SINT15))
> >> - return true;
> >> - return false;
> >> + return (reg >= HV_REGISTER_SCONTROL) &&
> >> + (reg <= HV_REGISTER_SINT15);
> >> +}
> >
> > Please put a new line here.
> >
>
> Ok
>
> > I can fix these issues too if you don't end up sending a new version due
> > to other issues.
> >
> > Jinank, please take a look. The code looks sensible to me, but I would
> > like you to have a look too.
> >
>
> I'll wait for Jinank to take a look before posting another version...
>
If Jinank is happy with the change, I can just fix things up for you
before I commit this patch.
Wei.
The patch looks good to me, apart from the comments from Wei regarding
styling.
On 2/13/2023 7:58 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> A few comments on style.
>
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:02:52PM -0800, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
>> hv_get_nested_reg only translates SINT0, resulting in the wrong sint
>> being registered by nested vmbus.
> Please put a blank line between paragraphs.
>
>> Fix the issue with new utility function hv_is_sint_reg.
>> While at it, improve clarity of hv_set_non_nested_register and hv_is_synic_reg.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nuno Das Neves <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 11 +++++++----
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c | 8 ++++----
>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
>> index 9ae1a344536b..684c547c1cca 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
>> @@ -225,10 +225,13 @@ extern bool hv_isolation_type_snp(void);
>>
>> static inline bool hv_is_synic_reg(unsigned int reg)
>> {
>> - if ((reg >= HV_REGISTER_SCONTROL) &&
>> - (reg <= HV_REGISTER_SINT15))
>> - return true;
>> - return false;
>> + return (reg >= HV_REGISTER_SCONTROL) &&
>> + (reg <= HV_REGISTER_SINT15);
>> +}
> Please put a new line here.
>
> I can fix these issues too if you don't end up sending a new version due
> to other issues.
>
> Jinank, please take a look. The code looks sensible to me, but I would
> like you to have a look too.
>
> Thanks,
> Wei.
>
>> +static inline bool hv_is_sint_reg(unsigned int reg)
>> +{
>> + return (reg >= HV_REGISTER_SINT0) &&
>> + (reg <= HV_REGISTER_SINT15);
>> }
>>
>> u64 hv_get_register(unsigned int reg);
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
>> index 0ceb6d1f9c3c..6bd344e1200f 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
>> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ struct ms_hyperv_info ms_hyperv;
>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
>> static inline unsigned int hv_get_nested_reg(unsigned int reg)
>> {
>> + if (hv_is_sint_reg(reg))
>> + return reg - HV_REGISTER_SINT0 + HV_REGISTER_NESTED_SINT0;
>> +
>> switch (reg) {
>> case HV_REGISTER_SIMP:
>> return HV_REGISTER_NESTED_SIMP;
>> @@ -53,8 +56,6 @@ static inline unsigned int hv_get_nested_reg(unsigned int reg)
>> return HV_REGISTER_NESTED_SVERSION;
>> case HV_REGISTER_SCONTROL:
>> return HV_REGISTER_NESTED_SCONTROL;
>> - case HV_REGISTER_SINT0:
>> - return HV_REGISTER_NESTED_SINT0;
>> case HV_REGISTER_EOM:
>> return HV_REGISTER_NESTED_EOM;
>> default:
>> @@ -80,8 +81,7 @@ void hv_set_non_nested_register(unsigned int reg, u64 value)
>> hv_ghcb_msr_write(reg, value);
>>
>> /* Write proxy bit via wrmsl instruction */
>> - if (reg >= HV_REGISTER_SINT0 &&
>> - reg <= HV_REGISTER_SINT15)
>> + if (hv_is_sint_reg(reg))
>> wrmsrl(reg, value | 1 << 20);
>> } else {
>> wrmsrl(reg, value);
>> --
>> 2.25.1
Reviewed-by: Jinank Jain <[email protected]>
On 2/15/2023 8:35 AM, Jinank Jain wrote:
> The patch looks good to me, apart from the comments from Wei regarding styling.
>
[..]
> On 2/13/2023 7:58 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
>>
>> I can fix these issues too if you don't end up sending a new version due
>> to other issues.
>>
Wei, feel free to fix the issues when you commit the patch.
Thanks
Nuno
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 02:07:13PM -0800, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
> On 2/15/2023 8:35 AM, Jinank Jain wrote:
> > The patch looks good to me, apart from the comments from Wei regarding styling.
> >
> [..]
> > On 2/13/2023 7:58 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> >>
> >> I can fix these issues too if you don't end up sending a new version due
> >> to other issues.
> >>
>
> Wei, feel free to fix the issues when you commit the patch.
>
Fixed and applied.
Thanks,
Wei.