Remove duplicate structure mlme_handler and action_handler. Both
structure are having same member. Replace it with mlme_action_handler.
Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 12 ++++++------
drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/rtw_mlme_ext.h | 8 +-------
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
index f314f55997bf..6529f7ece5e2 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
#include "../include/mlme_osdep.h"
#include "../include/recv_osdep.h"
-static struct mlme_handler mlme_sta_tbl[] = {
+static struct mlme_action_handler mlme_sta_tbl[] = {
{WIFI_ASSOCREQ, "OnAssocReq", &OnAssocReq},
{WIFI_ASSOCRSP, "OnAssocRsp", &OnAssocRsp},
{WIFI_REASSOCREQ, "OnReAssocReq", &OnAssocReq},
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static struct mlme_handler mlme_sta_tbl[] = {
{WIFI_ACTION, "OnAction", &OnAction},
};
-static struct action_handler OnAction_tbl[] = {
+static struct mlme_action_handler OnAction_tbl[] = {
{RTW_WLAN_CATEGORY_SPECTRUM_MGMT, "ACTION_SPECTRUM_MGMT", on_action_spct},
{RTW_WLAN_CATEGORY_QOS, "ACTION_QOS", &OnAction_qos},
{RTW_WLAN_CATEGORY_DLS, "ACTION_DLS", &OnAction_dls},
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ void free_mlme_ext_priv(struct mlme_ext_priv *pmlmeext)
}
}
-static void _mgt_dispatcher(struct adapter *padapter, struct mlme_handler *ptable, struct recv_frame *precv_frame)
+static void _mgt_dispatcher(struct adapter *padapter, struct mlme_action_handler *ptable, struct recv_frame *precv_frame)
{
u8 bc_addr[ETH_ALEN] = {0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff};
u8 *pframe = precv_frame->rx_data;
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ static void _mgt_dispatcher(struct adapter *padapter, struct mlme_handler *ptabl
void mgt_dispatcher(struct adapter *padapter, struct recv_frame *precv_frame)
{
int index;
- struct mlme_handler *ptable;
+ struct mlme_action_handler *ptable;
#ifdef CONFIG_88EU_AP_MODE
struct mlme_priv *pmlmepriv = &padapter->mlmepriv;
#endif /* CONFIG_88EU_AP_MODE */
@@ -4221,7 +4221,7 @@ unsigned int OnAction(struct adapter *padapter, struct recv_frame *precv_frame)
{
int i;
unsigned char category;
- struct action_handler *ptable;
+ struct mlme_action_handler *ptable;
unsigned char *frame_body;
u8 *pframe = precv_frame->rx_data;
@@ -4229,7 +4229,7 @@ unsigned int OnAction(struct adapter *padapter, struct recv_frame *precv_frame)
category = frame_body[0];
- for (i = 0; i < sizeof(OnAction_tbl) / sizeof(struct action_handler); i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < sizeof(OnAction_tbl) / sizeof(struct mlme_action_handler); i++) {
ptable = &OnAction_tbl[i];
if (category == ptable->num)
ptable->func(padapter, precv_frame);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/rtw_mlme_ext.h b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/rtw_mlme_ext.h
index d2f4d3ce7b90..99ee28e4c500 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/rtw_mlme_ext.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/rtw_mlme_ext.h
@@ -213,18 +213,12 @@ enum SCAN_STATE {
SCAN_STATE_MAX,
};
-struct mlme_handler {
+struct mlme_action_handler {
unsigned int num;
char *str;
unsigned int (*func)(struct adapter *adapt, struct recv_frame *frame);
};
-struct action_handler {
- unsigned int num;
- char* str;
- unsigned int (*func)(struct adapter *adapt, struct recv_frame *frame);
-};
-
struct ss_res {
int state;
int bss_cnt;
--
2.32.0
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 04:33:10PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
> Remove duplicate structure mlme_handler and action_handler. Both
> structure are having same member. Replace it with mlme_action_handler.
Why merge both names together? Why not just pick one name and stick
with that if they really do the same thing?
thanks,
greg k-h
On 06/09/21 7:19 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 04:33:10PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
>> Remove duplicate structure mlme_handler and action_handler. Both
>> structure are having same member. Replace it with mlme_action_handler.
>
> Why merge both names together? Why not just pick one name and stick
> with that if they really do the same thing?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Yes, we can pick one name also . I think action_handler name will be better.
Thanks for review Greg,
Regards,
Saurav Girepunje