Hi Greg,
Now that debugfs is merged into Linus's tree, I'm looking at using it
to replace the IPoIB debugging pseudo-filesystem (ipoib_debugfs). Is
there any guidance on what the structure of debugfs should look like?
Right now I'm planning on putting all the debug info files under an
ipoib/ top level directory. Does that sound reasonable?
Thanks,
Roland
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 12:50:51PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Now that debugfs is merged into Linus's tree, I'm looking at using it
> to replace the IPoIB debugging pseudo-filesystem (ipoib_debugfs). Is
> there any guidance on what the structure of debugfs should look like?
> Right now I'm planning on putting all the debug info files under an
> ipoib/ top level directory. Does that sound reasonable?
How about mirroring the toplevel kernel source structure ?
Ie, you'd make drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib ?
It could get ugly quickly without some structure at least to
the toplevel dir.
Dave
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 04:09:45PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 12:50:51PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Now that debugfs is merged into Linus's tree, I'm looking at using it
> > to replace the IPoIB debugging pseudo-filesystem (ipoib_debugfs). Is
> > there any guidance on what the structure of debugfs should look like?
> > Right now I'm planning on putting all the debug info files under an
> > ipoib/ top level directory. Does that sound reasonable?
>
> How about mirroring the toplevel kernel source structure ?
>
> Ie, you'd make drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib ?
But who would be in charge of createing the "drivers/" subdirectory?
debugfs can't handle "/" in a directory name, like procfs does.
> It could get ugly quickly without some structure at least to
> the toplevel dir.
I say ipoib/ is fine, remember, this is for debugging stuff, it will
quickly get ugly anyway :)
thanks,
greg k-h
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 01:41:08PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 04:09:45PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 12:50:51PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > Now that debugfs is merged into Linus's tree, I'm looking at using it
> > > to replace the IPoIB debugging pseudo-filesystem (ipoib_debugfs). Is
> > > there any guidance on what the structure of debugfs should look like?
> > > Right now I'm planning on putting all the debug info files under an
> > > ipoib/ top level directory. Does that sound reasonable?
> >
> > How about mirroring the toplevel kernel source structure ?
> >
> > Ie, you'd make drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib ?
>
> But who would be in charge of createing the "drivers/" subdirectory?
> debugfs can't handle "/" in a directory name, like procfs does.
maybe it should ?
> > It could get ugly quickly without some structure at least to
> > the toplevel dir.
> I say ipoib/ is fine, remember, this is for debugging stuff, it will
> quickly get ugly anyway :)
with no heirarchy, what happens when two drivers want to make
the same directory / filenames ?
Dave
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 05:01:43PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 01:41:08PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 04:09:45PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 12:50:51PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > > Hi Greg,
> > > >
> > > > Now that debugfs is merged into Linus's tree, I'm looking at using it
> > > > to replace the IPoIB debugging pseudo-filesystem (ipoib_debugfs). Is
> > > > there any guidance on what the structure of debugfs should look like?
> > > > Right now I'm planning on putting all the debug info files under an
> > > > ipoib/ top level directory. Does that sound reasonable?
> > >
> > > How about mirroring the toplevel kernel source structure ?
> > >
> > > Ie, you'd make drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib ?
> >
> > But who would be in charge of createing the "drivers/" subdirectory?
> > debugfs can't handle "/" in a directory name, like procfs does.
>
> maybe it should ?
Right now debugfs is dentry based, not string based. If someone wants
to send me patches to change it, I'll reconsider it :)
> > > It could get ugly quickly without some structure at least to
> > > the toplevel dir.
> > I say ipoib/ is fine, remember, this is for debugging stuff, it will
> > quickly get ugly anyway :)
>
> with no heirarchy, what happens when two drivers want to make
> the same directory / filenames ?
The second call will fail. Code should always check return values,
right?
thanks,
greg k-h
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 12:50:51PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Now that debugfs is merged into Linus's tree, I'm looking at using it
> to replace the IPoIB debugging pseudo-filesystem (ipoib_debugfs).
Great!
> Is
> there any guidance on what the structure of debugfs should look like?
> Right now I'm planning on putting all the debug info files under an
> ipoib/ top level directory. Does that sound reasonable?
Anarchy rules in debugfs. Do what you want. If you stomp over someone
else's stuff, I expect complaints and maybe someone will have to
arbitrate, but odds are that will ever happen is pretty slim.
So yes, ipoib/ in the top level sounds just fine.
thanks,
greg k-h