2020-12-10 05:28:36

by Dmitry Torokhov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] Input: edt-ft5x06 - consolidate handling of number of electrodes

Instead of using special-casing retrieval of number of X/Y electrodes
based on the firmware, let's select default values and mark registers as
non-existent on firmwares that do not support this operation.

Also mark "report rate" register as non-existent for generic firmwares as
having it set to 0 does not make sense.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
---
drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c | 43 ++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
index 6ff81d48da86..2eefbc2485bc 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
@@ -69,6 +69,9 @@
#define EDT_RAW_DATA_RETRIES 100
#define EDT_RAW_DATA_DELAY 1000 /* usec */

+#define EDT_DEFAULT_NUM_X 1024
+#define EDT_DEFAULT_NUM_Y 1024
+
enum edt_pmode {
EDT_PMODE_NOT_SUPPORTED,
EDT_PMODE_HIBERNATE,
@@ -977,8 +980,7 @@ static void edt_ft5x06_ts_get_defaults(struct device *dev,
}
}

-static void
-edt_ft5x06_ts_get_parameters(struct edt_ft5x06_ts_data *tsdata)
+static void edt_ft5x06_ts_get_parameters(struct edt_ft5x06_ts_data *tsdata)
{
struct edt_reg_addr *reg_addr = &tsdata->reg_addr;

@@ -997,21 +999,17 @@ edt_ft5x06_ts_get_parameters(struct edt_ft5x06_ts_data *tsdata)
if (reg_addr->reg_report_rate != NO_REGISTER)
tsdata->report_rate = edt_ft5x06_register_read(tsdata,
reg_addr->reg_report_rate);
- if (tsdata->version == EDT_M06 ||
- tsdata->version == EDT_M09 ||
- tsdata->version == EDT_M12) {
+ tsdata->num_x = EDT_DEFAULT_NUM_X;
+ if (reg_addr->reg_num_x != NO_REGISTER)
tsdata->num_x = edt_ft5x06_register_read(tsdata,
reg_addr->reg_num_x);
+ tsdata->num_y = EDT_DEFAULT_NUM_Y;
+ if (reg_addr->reg_num_y != NO_REGISTER)
tsdata->num_y = edt_ft5x06_register_read(tsdata,
reg_addr->reg_num_y);
- } else {
- tsdata->num_x = -1;
- tsdata->num_y = -1;
- }
}

-static void
-edt_ft5x06_ts_set_regs(struct edt_ft5x06_ts_data *tsdata)
+static void edt_ft5x06_ts_set_regs(struct edt_ft5x06_ts_data *tsdata)
{
struct edt_reg_addr *reg_addr = &tsdata->reg_addr;

@@ -1041,22 +1039,25 @@ edt_ft5x06_ts_set_regs(struct edt_ft5x06_ts_data *tsdata)

case EV_FT:
reg_addr->reg_threshold = EV_REGISTER_THRESHOLD;
+ reg_addr->reg_report_rate = NO_REGISTER;
reg_addr->reg_gain = EV_REGISTER_GAIN;
reg_addr->reg_offset = NO_REGISTER;
reg_addr->reg_offset_x = EV_REGISTER_OFFSET_X;
reg_addr->reg_offset_y = EV_REGISTER_OFFSET_Y;
reg_addr->reg_num_x = NO_REGISTER;
reg_addr->reg_num_y = NO_REGISTER;
- reg_addr->reg_report_rate = NO_REGISTER;
break;

case GENERIC_FT:
/* this is a guesswork */
reg_addr->reg_threshold = M09_REGISTER_THRESHOLD;
+ reg_addr->reg_report_rate = NO_REGISTER;
reg_addr->reg_gain = M09_REGISTER_GAIN;
reg_addr->reg_offset = M09_REGISTER_OFFSET;
reg_addr->reg_offset_x = NO_REGISTER;
reg_addr->reg_offset_y = NO_REGISTER;
+ reg_addr->reg_num_x = NO_REGISTER;
+ reg_addr->reg_num_y = NO_REGISTER;
break;
}
}
@@ -1195,20 +1196,10 @@ static int edt_ft5x06_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
input->id.bustype = BUS_I2C;
input->dev.parent = &client->dev;

- if (tsdata->version == EDT_M06 ||
- tsdata->version == EDT_M09 ||
- tsdata->version == EDT_M12) {
- input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_X,
- 0, tsdata->num_x * 64 - 1, 0, 0);
- input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y,
- 0, tsdata->num_y * 64 - 1, 0, 0);
- } else {
- /* Unknown maximum values. Specify via devicetree */
- input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_X,
- 0, 65535, 0, 0);
- input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y,
- 0, 65535, 0, 0);
- }
+ input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_X,
+ 0, tsdata->num_x * 64 - 1, 0, 0);
+ input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y,
+ 0, tsdata->num_y * 64 - 1, 0, 0);

touchscreen_parse_properties(input, true, &tsdata->prop);

--
2.29.2.576.ga3fc446d84-goog


--
Dmitry


2020-12-10 09:55:59

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: edt-ft5x06 - consolidate handling of number of electrodes

On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 03:09:10PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Instead of using special-casing retrieval of number of X/Y electrodes
> based on the firmware, let's select default values and mark registers as
> non-existent on firmwares that do not support this operation.
>
> Also mark "report rate" register as non-existent for generic firmwares as
> having it set to 0 does not make sense.

Makes sense, FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>

> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c | 43 ++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
> index 6ff81d48da86..2eefbc2485bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
> @@ -69,6 +69,9 @@
> #define EDT_RAW_DATA_RETRIES 100
> #define EDT_RAW_DATA_DELAY 1000 /* usec */
>
> +#define EDT_DEFAULT_NUM_X 1024
> +#define EDT_DEFAULT_NUM_Y 1024
> +
> enum edt_pmode {
> EDT_PMODE_NOT_SUPPORTED,
> EDT_PMODE_HIBERNATE,
> @@ -977,8 +980,7 @@ static void edt_ft5x06_ts_get_defaults(struct device *dev,
> }
> }
>
> -static void
> -edt_ft5x06_ts_get_parameters(struct edt_ft5x06_ts_data *tsdata)
> +static void edt_ft5x06_ts_get_parameters(struct edt_ft5x06_ts_data *tsdata)
> {
> struct edt_reg_addr *reg_addr = &tsdata->reg_addr;
>
> @@ -997,21 +999,17 @@ edt_ft5x06_ts_get_parameters(struct edt_ft5x06_ts_data *tsdata)
> if (reg_addr->reg_report_rate != NO_REGISTER)
> tsdata->report_rate = edt_ft5x06_register_read(tsdata,
> reg_addr->reg_report_rate);
> - if (tsdata->version == EDT_M06 ||
> - tsdata->version == EDT_M09 ||
> - tsdata->version == EDT_M12) {
> + tsdata->num_x = EDT_DEFAULT_NUM_X;
> + if (reg_addr->reg_num_x != NO_REGISTER)
> tsdata->num_x = edt_ft5x06_register_read(tsdata,
> reg_addr->reg_num_x);
> + tsdata->num_y = EDT_DEFAULT_NUM_Y;
> + if (reg_addr->reg_num_y != NO_REGISTER)
> tsdata->num_y = edt_ft5x06_register_read(tsdata,
> reg_addr->reg_num_y);
> - } else {
> - tsdata->num_x = -1;
> - tsdata->num_y = -1;
> - }
> }
>
> -static void
> -edt_ft5x06_ts_set_regs(struct edt_ft5x06_ts_data *tsdata)
> +static void edt_ft5x06_ts_set_regs(struct edt_ft5x06_ts_data *tsdata)
> {
> struct edt_reg_addr *reg_addr = &tsdata->reg_addr;
>
> @@ -1041,22 +1039,25 @@ edt_ft5x06_ts_set_regs(struct edt_ft5x06_ts_data *tsdata)
>
> case EV_FT:
> reg_addr->reg_threshold = EV_REGISTER_THRESHOLD;
> + reg_addr->reg_report_rate = NO_REGISTER;
> reg_addr->reg_gain = EV_REGISTER_GAIN;
> reg_addr->reg_offset = NO_REGISTER;
> reg_addr->reg_offset_x = EV_REGISTER_OFFSET_X;
> reg_addr->reg_offset_y = EV_REGISTER_OFFSET_Y;
> reg_addr->reg_num_x = NO_REGISTER;
> reg_addr->reg_num_y = NO_REGISTER;
> - reg_addr->reg_report_rate = NO_REGISTER;
> break;
>
> case GENERIC_FT:
> /* this is a guesswork */
> reg_addr->reg_threshold = M09_REGISTER_THRESHOLD;
> + reg_addr->reg_report_rate = NO_REGISTER;
> reg_addr->reg_gain = M09_REGISTER_GAIN;
> reg_addr->reg_offset = M09_REGISTER_OFFSET;
> reg_addr->reg_offset_x = NO_REGISTER;
> reg_addr->reg_offset_y = NO_REGISTER;
> + reg_addr->reg_num_x = NO_REGISTER;
> + reg_addr->reg_num_y = NO_REGISTER;
> break;
> }
> }
> @@ -1195,20 +1196,10 @@ static int edt_ft5x06_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> input->id.bustype = BUS_I2C;
> input->dev.parent = &client->dev;
>
> - if (tsdata->version == EDT_M06 ||
> - tsdata->version == EDT_M09 ||
> - tsdata->version == EDT_M12) {
> - input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_X,
> - 0, tsdata->num_x * 64 - 1, 0, 0);
> - input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y,
> - 0, tsdata->num_y * 64 - 1, 0, 0);
> - } else {
> - /* Unknown maximum values. Specify via devicetree */
> - input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_X,
> - 0, 65535, 0, 0);
> - input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y,
> - 0, 65535, 0, 0);
> - }
> + input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_X,
> + 0, tsdata->num_x * 64 - 1, 0, 0);
> + input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y,
> + 0, tsdata->num_y * 64 - 1, 0, 0);
>
> touchscreen_parse_properties(input, true, &tsdata->prop);
>
> --
> 2.29.2.576.ga3fc446d84-goog
>
>
> --
> Dmitry

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


2020-12-10 10:12:52

by Marco Felsch

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: edt-ft5x06 - consolidate handling of number of electrodes

Hi Dmitry,

On 20-12-09 15:09, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Instead of using special-casing retrieval of number of X/Y electrodes
> based on the firmware, let's select default values and mark registers as
> non-existent on firmwares that do not support this operation.
>
> Also mark "report rate" register as non-existent for generic firmwares as
> having it set to 0 does not make sense.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c | 43 ++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
> index 6ff81d48da86..2eefbc2485bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
> @@ -69,6 +69,9 @@

...

> case EV_FT:
> reg_addr->reg_threshold = EV_REGISTER_THRESHOLD;
> + reg_addr->reg_report_rate = NO_REGISTER;
> reg_addr->reg_gain = EV_REGISTER_GAIN;
> reg_addr->reg_offset = NO_REGISTER;
> reg_addr->reg_offset_x = EV_REGISTER_OFFSET_X;
> reg_addr->reg_offset_y = EV_REGISTER_OFFSET_Y;
> reg_addr->reg_num_x = NO_REGISTER;
> reg_addr->reg_num_y = NO_REGISTER;
> - reg_addr->reg_report_rate = NO_REGISTER;
> break;

Nit:
Unrelated change.

However the patch looks good, thanks.

Acked-by: Marco Felsch <[email protected]>

Regards,
Marco

2020-12-10 12:11:34

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: edt-ft5x06 - consolidate handling of number of electrodes

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:08:03AM +0100, Marco Felsch wrote:
> On 20-12-09 15:09, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

...

> > case EV_FT:
> > reg_addr->reg_threshold = EV_REGISTER_THRESHOLD;
> > + reg_addr->reg_report_rate = NO_REGISTER;
> > reg_addr->reg_gain = EV_REGISTER_GAIN;
> > reg_addr->reg_offset = NO_REGISTER;
> > reg_addr->reg_offset_x = EV_REGISTER_OFFSET_X;
> > reg_addr->reg_offset_y = EV_REGISTER_OFFSET_Y;
> > reg_addr->reg_num_x = NO_REGISTER;
> > reg_addr->reg_num_y = NO_REGISTER;
> > - reg_addr->reg_report_rate = NO_REGISTER;
> > break;
>
> Nit:
> Unrelated change.

I guess the motive is to get these assignments consistent between the cases.
Documentation actually allows this kind of modifications of code in one change
when them are toughly related.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


2020-12-10 13:13:14

by Simon Budig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: edt-ft5x06 - consolidate handling of number of electrodes

On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 15:09 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Instead of using special-casing retrieval of number of X/Y electrodes
> based on the firmware, let's select default values and mark registers
> as
> non-existent on firmwares that do not support this operation.
>
> Also mark "report rate" register as non-existent for generic
> firmwares as
> having it set to 0 does not make sense.

Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Simon Budig <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Simon
--
     kernel concepts GmbH Simon Budig
     Hauptstraße 16 [email protected]
     D-57076 Siegen +49-271-771091-17
     http://www.kernelconcepts.de/
     HR Siegen, HR B 9613; Geschäftsführer: Ole Reinhardt


Attachments:
signature.asc (201.00 B)
This is a digitally signed message part