The device_for_each_child_node loop should call fwnode_handle_put()
before return in some error cases, which could avoid resource leaks.
Let's fix this bug in pmic_glink_altmode_probe.
Signed-off-by: Lu Hongfei <[email protected]>
---
The modifications made compared to the previous version are as follows:
1. Modified the patch title
2. Modified the commit message to make it easier to understand
patch's modifications.
drivers/soc/qcom/pmic_glink_altmode.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/pmic_glink_altmode.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/pmic_glink_altmode.c
index df48fbea4b68..a7fc6570fa1e 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/pmic_glink_altmode.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/pmic_glink_altmode.c
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ static int pmic_glink_altmode_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "reg", &port);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "missing reg property of %pOFn\n", fwnode);
- return ret;
+ goto err_node_put;
}
if (port >= ARRAY_SIZE(altmode->ports)) {
@@ -405,7 +405,8 @@ static int pmic_glink_altmode_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
if (altmode->ports[port].altmode) {
dev_err(dev, "multiple connector definition for port %u\n", port);
- return -EINVAL;
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_node_put;
}
alt_port = &altmode->ports[port];
@@ -420,33 +421,37 @@ static int pmic_glink_altmode_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
ret = devm_drm_bridge_add(dev, &alt_port->bridge);
if (ret)
- return ret;
+ goto err_node_put;
alt_port->dp_alt.svid = USB_TYPEC_DP_SID;
alt_port->dp_alt.mode = USB_TYPEC_DP_MODE;
alt_port->dp_alt.active = 1;
alt_port->typec_mux = fwnode_typec_mux_get(fwnode);
- if (IS_ERR(alt_port->typec_mux))
- return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(alt_port->typec_mux),
+ if (IS_ERR(alt_port->typec_mux)) {
+ ret = dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(alt_port->typec_mux),
"failed to acquire mode-switch for port: %d\n",
port);
+ goto err_node_put;
+ }
ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, pmic_glink_altmode_put_mux,
alt_port->typec_mux);
if (ret)
- return ret;
+ goto err_node_put;
alt_port->typec_switch = fwnode_typec_switch_get(fwnode);
- if (IS_ERR(alt_port->typec_switch))
- return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(alt_port->typec_switch),
+ if (IS_ERR(alt_port->typec_switch)) {
+ ret = dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(alt_port->typec_switch),
"failed to acquire orientation-switch for port: %d\n",
port);
+ goto err_node_put;
+ }
ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, pmic_glink_altmode_put_switch,
alt_port->typec_switch);
if (ret)
- return ret;
+ goto err_node_put;
}
altmode->client = devm_pmic_glink_register_client(dev,
@@ -455,6 +460,10 @@ static int pmic_glink_altmode_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
pmic_glink_altmode_pdr_notify,
altmode);
return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(altmode->client);
+
+err_node_put:
+ fwnode_handle_put(fwnode);
+ return ret;
}
static const struct auxiliary_device_id pmic_glink_altmode_id_table[] = {
--
2.39.0
On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 21:34:52 +0800, Lu Hongfei wrote:
> The device_for_each_child_node loop should call fwnode_handle_put()
> before return in some error cases, which could avoid resource leaks.
>
> Let's fix this bug in pmic_glink_altmode_probe.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] soc: qcom: pmic: Fix resource leaks in a device_for_each_child_node() loop
commit: 5692aeea5bcb9331e956628c3bc8fc9afcc9765d
Best regards,
--
Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
Heya!
I think this would be great candidate for backport, at least up to 6.6.
What do you think?
David
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 19:46, David Heidelberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Heya!
>
> I think this would be great candidate for backport, at least up to 6.6.
> What do you think?
Yes. Most likely it should have had:
Fixes: 080b4e24852b ("soc: qcom: pmic_glink: Introduce altmode support")
--
With best wishes
Dmitry