From: Daniel Palmer <[email protected]>
Add a driver for the CPU pll/ARM pll/MIPS pll that is present
in MStar SoCs.
Currently there is no documentation for this block so it's possible
this driver isn't entirely correct.
Only tested on the version of this IP in the MStar/SigmaStar
ARMv7 SoCs.
Co-authored-by: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer <[email protected]>
---
drivers/clk/mstar/Kconfig | 8 +
drivers/clk/mstar/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/clk/mstar/clk-msc313-cpupll.c | 221 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mstar/clk-msc313-cpupll.c
diff --git a/drivers/clk/mstar/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/mstar/Kconfig
index de37e1bce2d2..146eeb637318 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/mstar/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/clk/mstar/Kconfig
@@ -1,4 +1,11 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+config MSTAR_MSC313_CPUPLL
+ bool "MStar CPUPLL driver"
+ depends on ARCH_MSTARV7 || COMPILE_TEST
+ default ARCH_MSTARV7
+ help
+ Support for the CPU PLL present on MStar/Sigmastar SoCs.
+
config MSTAR_MSC313_MPLL
bool "MStar MPLL driver"
depends on ARCH_MSTARV7 || COMPILE_TEST
@@ -7,3 +14,4 @@ config MSTAR_MSC313_MPLL
help
Support for the MPLL PLL and dividers block present on
MStar/Sigmastar SoCs.
+
diff --git a/drivers/clk/mstar/Makefile b/drivers/clk/mstar/Makefile
index f8dcd25ede1d..21296a04e65a 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/mstar/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/clk/mstar/Makefile
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
#
# Makefile for mstar specific clk
#
-
+obj-$(CONFIG_MSTAR_MSC313_CPUPLL) += clk-msc313-cpupll.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MSTAR_MSC313_MPLL) += clk-msc313-mpll.o
diff --git a/drivers/clk/mstar/clk-msc313-cpupll.c b/drivers/clk/mstar/clk-msc313-cpupll.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c57b509e8c20
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/clk/mstar/clk-msc313-cpupll.c
@@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 Daniel Palmer <[email protected]>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+
+/*
+ * This IP is not documented outside of the messy vendor driver.
+ * Below is what we think the registers look like based on looking at
+ * the vendor code and poking at the hardware:
+ *
+ * 0x140 -- LPF low. Seems to store one half of the clock transition
+ * 0x144 /
+ * 0x148 -- LPF high. Seems to store one half of the clock transition
+ * 0x14c /
+ * 0x150 -- vendor code says "toggle lpf enable"
+ * 0x154 -- mu?
+ * 0x15c -- lpf_update_count?
+ * 0x160 -- vendor code says "switch to LPF". Clock source config? Register bank?
+ * 0x164 -- vendor code says "from low to high" which seems to mean transition from LPF low to
+ * LPF high.
+ * 0x174 -- Seems to be the PLL lock status bit
+ * 0x180 -- Seems to be the current frequency, this might need to be populated by software?
+ * 0x184 / The vendor driver uses these to set the initial value of LPF low
+ *
+ * Frequency seems to be calculated like this:
+ * (parent clock (432mhz) / register_magic_value) * 16 * 524288
+ * Only the lower 24 bits of the resulting value will be used. In addition, the
+ * PLL doesn't seem to be able to lock on frequencies lower than 220 MHz, as
+ * divisor 0xfb586f (220 MHz) works but 0xfb7fff locks up.
+ *
+ * Vendor values:
+ * frequency - register value
+ *
+ * 400000000 - 0x0067AE14
+ * 600000000 - 0x00451EB8,
+ * 800000000 - 0x0033D70A,
+ * 1000000000 - 0x002978d4,
+ */
+
+#define REG_LPF_LOW_L 0x140
+#define REG_LPF_LOW_H 0x144
+#define REG_LPF_HIGH_BOTTOM 0x148
+#define REG_LPF_HIGH_TOP 0x14c
+#define REG_LPF_TOGGLE 0x150
+#define REG_LPF_MYSTERYTWO 0x154
+#define REG_LPF_UPDATE_COUNT 0x15c
+#define REG_LPF_MYSTERYONE 0x160
+#define REG_LPF_TRANSITIONCTRL 0x164
+#define REG_LPF_LOCK 0x174
+#define REG_CURRENT 0x180
+
+#define LPF_LOCK_TIMEOUT 100000000
+
+#define MULTIPLIER_1 16
+#define MULTIPLIER_2 524288
+#define MULTIPLIER (MULTIPLIER_1 * MULTIPLIER_2)
+
+struct msc313_cpupll {
+ void __iomem *base;
+ struct clk_hw clk_hw;
+};
+
+#define to_cpupll(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct msc313_cpupll, clk_hw)
+
+static u32 msc313_cpupll_reg_read32(struct msc313_cpupll *cpupll, unsigned int reg)
+{
+ u32 value;
+
+ value = ioread16(cpupll->base + reg + 4) << 16;
+ value |= ioread16(cpupll->base + reg);
+
+ return value;
+}
+
+static void msc313_cpupll_reg_write32(struct msc313_cpupll *cpupll, unsigned int reg, u32 value)
+{
+ u16 l = value & 0xffff, h = (value >> 16) & 0xffff;
+
+ iowrite16(l, cpupll->base + reg);
+ iowrite16(h, cpupll->base + reg + 4);
+}
+
+static void msc313_cpupll_setfreq(struct msc313_cpupll *cpupll, u32 regvalue)
+{
+ ktime_t timeout;
+
+ msc313_cpupll_reg_write32(cpupll, REG_LPF_HIGH_BOTTOM, regvalue);
+
+ iowrite16(0x1, cpupll->base + REG_LPF_MYSTERYONE);
+ iowrite16(0x6, cpupll->base + REG_LPF_MYSTERYTWO);
+ iowrite16(0x8, cpupll->base + REG_LPF_UPDATE_COUNT);
+ iowrite16(BIT(12), cpupll->base + REG_LPF_TRANSITIONCTRL);
+
+ iowrite16(0, cpupll->base + REG_LPF_TOGGLE);
+ iowrite16(1, cpupll->base + REG_LPF_TOGGLE);
+
+ timeout = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(), LPF_LOCK_TIMEOUT);
+ while (!(ioread16(cpupll->base + REG_LPF_LOCK))) {
+ if (ktime_after(ktime_get(), timeout)) {
+ pr_err("timeout waiting for LPF_LOCK\n");
+ return;
+ }
+ cpu_relax();
+ }
+
+ iowrite16(0, cpupll->base + REG_LPF_TOGGLE);
+
+ msc313_cpupll_reg_write32(cpupll, REG_LPF_LOW_L, regvalue);
+}
+
+static unsigned long msc313_cpupll_frequencyforreg(u32 reg, unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+ unsigned long long prescaled = ((unsigned long long)parent_rate) * MULTIPLIER;
+
+ if (prescaled == 0 || reg == 0)
+ return 0;
+ return DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL(prescaled, reg);
+}
+
+static u32 msc313_cpupll_regforfrequecy(unsigned long rate, unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+ unsigned long long prescaled = ((unsigned long long)parent_rate) * MULTIPLIER;
+
+ if (prescaled == 0 || rate == 0)
+ return 0;
+ return DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(prescaled, rate);
+}
+
+static unsigned long msc313_cpupll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+ struct msc313_cpupll *cpupll = to_cpupll(hw);
+
+ return msc313_cpupll_frequencyforreg(msc313_cpupll_reg_read32(cpupll, REG_LPF_LOW_L),
+ parent_rate);
+}
+
+static long msc313_cpupll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
+ unsigned long *parent_rate)
+{
+ u32 reg = msc313_cpupll_regforfrequecy(rate, *parent_rate);
+ long rounded = msc313_cpupll_frequencyforreg(reg, *parent_rate);
+
+ /*
+ * This is my poor attempt at making sure the resulting
+ * rate doesn't overshoot the requested rate.
+ */
+ for (; rounded >= rate && reg > 0; reg--)
+ rounded = msc313_cpupll_frequencyforreg(reg, *parent_rate);
+
+ return rounded;
+}
+
+static int msc313_cpupll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+ struct msc313_cpupll *cpupll = to_cpupll(hw);
+ u32 reg = msc313_cpupll_regforfrequecy(rate, parent_rate);
+
+ msc313_cpupll_setfreq(cpupll, reg);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct clk_ops msc313_cpupll_ops = {
+ .recalc_rate = msc313_cpupll_recalc_rate,
+ .round_rate = msc313_cpupll_round_rate,
+ .set_rate = msc313_cpupll_set_rate,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id msc313_cpupll_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "mstar,msc313-cpupll" },
+ {}
+};
+
+static const struct clk_parent_data cpupll_parent = {
+ .index = 0,
+};
+
+static int msc313_cpupll_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct clk_init_data clk_init = {};
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ struct msc313_cpupll *cpupll;
+ int ret;
+
+ cpupll = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cpupll), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!cpupll)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ cpupll->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(cpupll->base))
+ return PTR_ERR(cpupll->base);
+
+ /* LPF might not contain the current frequency so fix that up */
+ msc313_cpupll_reg_write32(cpupll, REG_LPF_LOW_L,
+ msc313_cpupll_reg_read32(cpupll, REG_CURRENT));
+
+ clk_init.name = dev_name(dev);
+ clk_init.ops = &msc313_cpupll_ops;
+ clk_init.parent_data = &cpupll_parent;
+ clk_init.num_parents = 1;
+ cpupll->clk_hw.init = &clk_init;
+
+ ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &cpupll->clk_hw);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return of_clk_add_hw_provider(pdev->dev.of_node, of_clk_hw_simple_get, &cpupll->clk_hw);
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver msc313_cpupll_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "mstar-msc313-cpupll",
+ .of_match_table = msc313_cpupll_of_match,
+ },
+ .probe = msc313_cpupll_probe,
+};
+builtin_platform_driver(msc313_cpupll_driver);
--
2.35.1
Quoting Romain Perier (2022-06-03 12:05:09)
> From: Daniel Palmer <[email protected]>
>
> Add a driver for the CPU pll/ARM pll/MIPS pll that is present
> in MStar SoCs.
>
> Currently there is no documentation for this block so it's possible
> this driver isn't entirely correct.
>
> Only tested on the version of this IP in the MStar/SigmaStar
> ARMv7 SoCs.
>
> Co-authored-by: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
This is not a standard tag, maybe Co-developed-by is what you want? A
Signed-off-by tag should be here from Willy Tarreau then.
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer <[email protected]>
Your Signed-off-by needs to be here. I can't apply this otherwise.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mstar/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/mstar/Kconfig
> index de37e1bce2d2..146eeb637318 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/mstar/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mstar/Kconfig
> @@ -1,4 +1,11 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +config MSTAR_MSC313_CPUPLL
> + bool "MStar CPUPLL driver"
> + depends on ARCH_MSTARV7 || COMPILE_TEST
> + default ARCH_MSTARV7
> + help
> + Support for the CPU PLL present on MStar/Sigmastar SoCs.
> +
> config MSTAR_MSC313_MPLL
> bool "MStar MPLL driver"
> depends on ARCH_MSTARV7 || COMPILE_TEST
> @@ -7,3 +14,4 @@ config MSTAR_MSC313_MPLL
> help
> Support for the MPLL PLL and dividers block present on
> MStar/Sigmastar SoCs.
> +
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mstar/Makefile b/drivers/clk/mstar/Makefile
> index f8dcd25ede1d..21296a04e65a 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/mstar/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mstar/Makefile
> @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
> #
> # Makefile for mstar specific clk
> #
> -
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MSTAR_MSC313_CPUPLL) += clk-msc313-cpupll.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MSTAR_MSC313_MPLL) += clk-msc313-mpll.o
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mstar/clk-msc313-cpupll.c b/drivers/clk/mstar/clk-msc313-cpupll.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c57b509e8c20
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mstar/clk-msc313-cpupll.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2019 Daniel Palmer <[email protected]>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
Ought to include kernel.h and device.h too.
> +
[...]
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops msc313_cpupll_ops = {
> + .recalc_rate = msc313_cpupll_recalc_rate,
> + .round_rate = msc313_cpupll_round_rate,
> + .set_rate = msc313_cpupll_set_rate,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id msc313_cpupll_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "mstar,msc313-cpupll" },
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_parent_data cpupll_parent = {
Why not put this on the stack? It doesn't have to live forever.
> + .index = 0,
> +};
> +
> +static int msc313_cpupll_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct clk_init_data clk_init = {};
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct msc313_cpupll *cpupll;
> + int ret;
> +
> + cpupll = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cpupll), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cpupll)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + cpupll->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(cpupll->base))
> + return PTR_ERR(cpupll->base);
> +
> + /* LPF might not contain the current frequency so fix that up */
> + msc313_cpupll_reg_write32(cpupll, REG_LPF_LOW_L,
> + msc313_cpupll_reg_read32(cpupll, REG_CURRENT));
> +
> + clk_init.name = dev_name(dev);
> + clk_init.ops = &msc313_cpupll_ops;
> + clk_init.parent_data = &cpupll_parent;
> + clk_init.num_parents = 1;
> + cpupll->clk_hw.init = &clk_init;
> +
> + ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &cpupll->clk_hw);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return of_clk_add_hw_provider(pdev->dev.of_node, of_clk_hw_simple_get, &cpupll->clk_hw);
Use devm to add the provider too.
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 12:17:40PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Romain Perier (2022-06-03 12:05:09)
> > From: Daniel Palmer <[email protected]>
> >
> > Add a driver for the CPU pll/ARM pll/MIPS pll that is present
> > in MStar SoCs.
> >
> > Currently there is no documentation for this block so it's possible
> > this driver isn't entirely correct.
> >
> > Only tested on the version of this IP in the MStar/SigmaStar
> > ARMv7 SoCs.
> >
> > Co-authored-by: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
>
> This is not a standard tag, maybe Co-developed-by is what you want?
Yeah it's the same. We're seeing 122 co-authored-by tags in the
kernel's history vs 3122 co-developed-by, so that's only 3% but
at least not a fantasist one..
> A Signed-off-by tag should be here from Willy Tarreau then.
Not all commits follow this, but indeed some do. Regardless I
really don't care at all about my name being listed there.
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer <[email protected]>
>
> Your Signed-off-by needs to be here. I can't apply this otherwise.
Quite frankly, we're talking about an old patch that was first
submitted 9 months ago (!), let's not postpone it even further just
for headers reason, please just drop this line mentioning my
little contribution, I don't care a single second at all, really.
Thanks,
Willy
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 09:33:40AM +0200, Romain Perier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quiet frankly I don't want to debate about this , as is it seems to be
> basically "the rule" (see
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.0/process/submitting-patches.html).
> It is okay for you Willy, if I transform your tag to
> "Co-developed-by:" plus a "Signed-off-by" ? So Stephen can apply it ,
> and everyone is happy :)
Yes absolutely! I just wanted to avoid yet another round trip.
Many thanks Romain!
Willy
Hi,
Quiet frankly I don't want to debate about this , as is it seems to be
basically "the rule" (see
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.0/process/submitting-patches.html).
It is okay for you Willy, if I transform your tag to
"Co-developed-by:" plus a "Signed-off-by" ? So Stephen can apply it ,
and everyone is happy :)
Cheers,
Romain
Le ven. 30 sept. 2022 à 21:35, Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 12:17:40PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Romain Perier (2022-06-03 12:05:09)
> > > From: Daniel Palmer <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Add a driver for the CPU pll/ARM pll/MIPS pll that is present
> > > in MStar SoCs.
> > >
> > > Currently there is no documentation for this block so it's possible
> > > this driver isn't entirely correct.
> > >
> > > Only tested on the version of this IP in the MStar/SigmaStar
> > > ARMv7 SoCs.
> > >
> > > Co-authored-by: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
> >
> > This is not a standard tag, maybe Co-developed-by is what you want?
>
> Yeah it's the same. We're seeing 122 co-authored-by tags in the
> kernel's history vs 3122 co-developed-by, so that's only 3% but
> at least not a fantasist one..
>
> > A Signed-off-by tag should be here from Willy Tarreau then.
>
> Not all commits follow this, but indeed some do. Regardless I
> really don't care at all about my name being listed there.
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer <[email protected]>
> >
> > Your Signed-off-by needs to be here. I can't apply this otherwise.
>
> Quite frankly, we're talking about an old patch that was first
> submitted 9 months ago (!), let's not postpone it even further just
> for headers reason, please just drop this line mentioning my
> little contribution, I don't care a single second at all, really.
>
> Thanks,
> Willy
Hi,
Le ven. 30 sept. 2022 à 21:17, Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> Quoting Romain Perier (2022-06-03 12:05:09)
> > From: Daniel Palmer <[email protected]>
> >
> > Add a driver for the CPU pll/ARM pll/MIPS pll that is present
> > in MStar SoCs.
> >
> > Currently there is no documentation for this block so it's possible
> > this driver isn't entirely correct.
> >
> > Only tested on the version of this IP in the MStar/SigmaStar
> > ARMv7 SoCs.
> >
> > Co-authored-by: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
>
> This is not a standard tag, maybe Co-developed-by is what you want? A
> Signed-off-by tag should be here from Willy Tarreau then.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer <[email protected]>
>
> Your Signed-off-by needs to be here. I can't apply this otherwise.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mstar/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/mstar/Kconfig
> > index de37e1bce2d2..146eeb637318 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/mstar/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/mstar/Kconfig
> > @@ -1,4 +1,11 @@
> > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +config MSTAR_MSC313_CPUPLL
> > + bool "MStar CPUPLL driver"
> > + depends on ARCH_MSTARV7 || COMPILE_TEST
> > + default ARCH_MSTARV7
> > + help
> > + Support for the CPU PLL present on MStar/Sigmastar SoCs.
> > +
> > config MSTAR_MSC313_MPLL
> > bool "MStar MPLL driver"
> > depends on ARCH_MSTARV7 || COMPILE_TEST
> > @@ -7,3 +14,4 @@ config MSTAR_MSC313_MPLL
> > help
> > Support for the MPLL PLL and dividers block present on
> > MStar/Sigmastar SoCs.
> > +
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mstar/Makefile b/drivers/clk/mstar/Makefile
> > index f8dcd25ede1d..21296a04e65a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/mstar/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/mstar/Makefile
> > @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
> > #
> > # Makefile for mstar specific clk
> > #
> > -
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_MSTAR_MSC313_CPUPLL) += clk-msc313-cpupll.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MSTAR_MSC313_MPLL) += clk-msc313-mpll.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mstar/clk-msc313-cpupll.c b/drivers/clk/mstar/clk-msc313-cpupll.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..c57b509e8c20
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/mstar/clk-msc313-cpupll.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2019 Daniel Palmer <[email protected]>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>
> Ought to include kernel.h and device.h too.
>
> > +
> [...]
> > +
> > +static const struct clk_ops msc313_cpupll_ops = {
> > + .recalc_rate = msc313_cpupll_recalc_rate,
> > + .round_rate = msc313_cpupll_round_rate,
> > + .set_rate = msc313_cpupll_set_rate,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id msc313_cpupll_of_match[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "mstar,msc313-cpupll" },
> > + {}
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct clk_parent_data cpupll_parent = {
>
> Why not put this on the stack? It doesn't have to live forever.
>
> > + .index = 0,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int msc313_cpupll_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct clk_init_data clk_init = {};
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + struct msc313_cpupll *cpupll;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + cpupll = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cpupll), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!cpupll)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + cpupll->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> > + if (IS_ERR(cpupll->base))
> > + return PTR_ERR(cpupll->base);
> > +
> > + /* LPF might not contain the current frequency so fix that up */
> > + msc313_cpupll_reg_write32(cpupll, REG_LPF_LOW_L,
> > + msc313_cpupll_reg_read32(cpupll, REG_CURRENT));
> > +
> > + clk_init.name = dev_name(dev);
> > + clk_init.ops = &msc313_cpupll_ops;
> > + clk_init.parent_data = &cpupll_parent;
> > + clk_init.num_parents = 1;
> > + cpupll->clk_hw.init = &clk_init;
> > +
> > + ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &cpupll->clk_hw);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + return of_clk_add_hw_provider(pdev->dev.of_node, of_clk_hw_simple_get, &cpupll->clk_hw);
>
> Use devm to add the provider too.
Ok, it does not seem to be huge to change, I will send another iteration.
Thanks,
Cheers,
Romain