From: Quentin Schulz <[email protected]>
This scary message may happen if the panel or bridge is not probed
before the LVDS controller is, resulting in some head scratching because
the LVDS panel is actually working, since a later try will eventually
find the panel or bridge.
Therefore let's demote this error message into a debug message to not
scare users unnecessarily.
Fixes: 34cc0aa25456 ("drm/rockchip: Add support for Rockchip Soc LVDS")
Cc: Quentin Schulz <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c
index f0f47e9abf5a..52e2ce2a61a8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int rockchip_lvds_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
ret = -EINVAL;
goto err_put_port;
} else if (ret) {
- DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to find panel and bridge node\n");
+ DRM_DEV_DEBUG(dev, "failed to find panel and bridge node\n");
ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
goto err_put_port;
}
---
base-commit: 7475e51b87969e01a6812eac713a1c8310372e8a
change-id: 20231117-rk-lvds-defer-msg-b2944b73d791
Best regards,
--
Quentin Schulz <[email protected]>
Hi Quentin,
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 3:31 PM Quentin Schulz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Quentin Schulz <[email protected]>
>
> This scary message may happen if the panel or bridge is not probed
> before the LVDS controller is, resulting in some head scratching because
> the LVDS panel is actually working, since a later try will eventually
> find the panel or bridge.
>
> Therefore let's demote this error message into a debug message to not
> scare users unnecessarily.
...
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c
> index f0f47e9abf5a..52e2ce2a61a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c
> @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int rockchip_lvds_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto err_put_port;
> } else if (ret) {
> - DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to find panel and bridge node\n");
> + DRM_DEV_DEBUG(dev, "failed to find panel and bridge node\n");
> ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
What about using dev_err_probe() instead?
Hi Fabio,
On 11/17/23 20:27, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Quentin,
>
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 3:31 PM Quentin Schulz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> From: Quentin Schulz <[email protected]>
>>
>> This scary message may happen if the panel or bridge is not probed
>> before the LVDS controller is, resulting in some head scratching because
>> the LVDS panel is actually working, since a later try will eventually
>> find the panel or bridge.
>>
>> Therefore let's demote this error message into a debug message to not
>> scare users unnecessarily.
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c
>> index f0f47e9abf5a..52e2ce2a61a8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c
>> @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int rockchip_lvds_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>> goto err_put_port;
>> } else if (ret) {
>> - DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to find panel and bridge node\n");
>> + DRM_DEV_DEBUG(dev, "failed to find panel and bridge node\n");
>> ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>
> What about using dev_err_probe() instead?
Either is fine by me, will send a v2 and DRM maintainers can decide for
themselves before merging :)
Cheers,
Quentin