2021-01-11 08:54:21

by Jaegeuk Kim

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: WB is not allowed in RPMB_LUN

From: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>

Kernel stack violation when getting unit_descriptor/wb_buf_alloc_units from
rpmb lun. The reason is the unit descriptor length is different per LU.

The lengh of Normal LU is 45, while the one of rpmb LU is 35.

int ufshcd_read_desc_param(struct ufs_hba *hba, ...)
{
param_offset=41;
param_size=4;
buff_len=45;
...
buff_len=35 by rpmb LU;

if (is_kmalloc) {
/* Make sure we don't copy more data than available */
if (param_offset + param_size > buff_len)
param_size = buff_len - param_offset;
--> param_size = 250;
memcpy(param_read_buf, &desc_buf[param_offset], param_size);
--> memcpy(param_read_buf, desc_buf+41, 250);

[ 141.868974][ T9174] Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: wb_buf_alloc_units_show+0x11c/0x11c
}
}

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c | 3 ++-
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 6 ++++--
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c
index 08e72b7eef6a..50e90416262b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c
@@ -792,7 +792,8 @@ static ssize_t _pname##_show(struct device *dev, \
struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev); \
struct ufs_hba *hba = shost_priv(sdev->host); \
u8 lun = ufshcd_scsi_to_upiu_lun(sdev->lun); \
- if (!ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun(&hba->dev_info, lun)) \
+ if (!ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun(&hba->dev_info, lun, \
+ _duname##_DESC_PARAM##_puname)) \
return -EINVAL; \
return ufs_sysfs_read_desc_param(hba, QUERY_DESC_IDN_##_duname, \
lun, _duname##_DESC_PARAM##_puname, buf, _size); \
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
index 14dfda735adf..7a0069c83900 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
@@ -552,13 +552,15 @@ struct ufs_dev_info {
* @return: true if the lun has a matching unit descriptor, false otherwise
*/
static inline bool ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun(struct ufs_dev_info *dev_info,
- u8 lun)
+ u8 lun, u8 param_offset)
{
if (!dev_info || !dev_info->max_lu_supported) {
pr_err("Max General LU supported by UFS isn't initialized\n");
return false;
}
-
+ /* WB is not allowed in RPMB_WLUN */
+ if (param_offset == UNIT_DESC_PARAM_WB_BUF_ALLOC_UNITS)
+ return lun < dev_info->max_lu_supported;
return lun == UFS_UPIU_RPMB_WLUN || (lun < dev_info->max_lu_supported);
}

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 2a715f13fe1d..48cbd4f294dd 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -3425,7 +3425,7 @@ static inline int ufshcd_read_unit_desc_param(struct ufs_hba *hba,
* Unit descriptors are only available for general purpose LUs (LUN id
* from 0 to 7) and RPMB Well known LU.
*/
- if (!ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun(&hba->dev_info, lun))
+ if (!ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun(&hba->dev_info, lun, param_offset))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;

return ufshcd_read_desc_param(hba, QUERY_DESC_IDN_UNIT, lun,
--
2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog


2021-01-11 09:23:26

by Avri Altman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: WB is not allowed in RPMB_LUN

> static inline bool ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun(struct ufs_dev_info *dev_info,
> - u8 lun)
> + u8 lun, u8 param_offset)
> {
> if (!dev_info || !dev_info->max_lu_supported) {
> pr_err("Max General LU supported by UFS isn't initialized\n");
> return false;
> }
> -
> + /* WB is not allowed in RPMB_WLUN */
/* wb is only allowed to either a sha*/
> + if (param_offset == UNIT_DESC_PARAM_WB_BUF_ALLOC_UNITS)
> + return lun < dev_info->max_lu_supported;
I think here you should use UFS_UPIU_MAX_WB_LUN_ID and not dev_info->max_lu_supported.

Thanks,
Avri

2021-01-11 10:02:06

by Jaegeuk Kim

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: WB is not allowed in RPMB_LUN

On 01/11, Avri Altman wrote:
> > static inline bool ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun(struct ufs_dev_info *dev_info,
> > - u8 lun)
> > + u8 lun, u8 param_offset)
> > {
> > if (!dev_info || !dev_info->max_lu_supported) {
> > pr_err("Max General LU supported by UFS isn't initialized\n");
> > return false;
> > }
> > -
> > + /* WB is not allowed in RPMB_WLUN */
> /* wb is only allowed to either a sha*/
> > + if (param_offset == UNIT_DESC_PARAM_WB_BUF_ALLOC_UNITS)
> > + return lun < dev_info->max_lu_supported;
> I think here you should use UFS_UPIU_MAX_WB_LUN_ID and not dev_info->max_lu_supported.

Ok, sending v3.

>
> Thanks,
> Avri