2023-09-20 01:07:26

by Charlie Jenkins

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v7 2/4] riscv: Checksum header

Provide checksum algorithms that have been designed to leverage riscv
instructions such as rotate. In 64-bit, can take advantage of the larger
register to avoid some overflow checking.

Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <[email protected]>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..dc0dd89f2a13
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * IP checksum routines
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 Rivos Inc.
+ */
+#ifndef __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
+#define __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
+
+#include <linux/in6.h>
+#include <linux/uaccess.h>
+
+#define ip_fast_csum ip_fast_csum
+
+#include <asm-generic/checksum.h>
+
+/*
+ * Quickly compute an IP checksum with the assumption that IPv4 headers will
+ * always be in multiples of 32-bits, and have an ihl of at least 5.
+ * @ihl is the number of 32 bit segments and must be greater than or equal to 5.
+ * @iph is assumed to be word aligned.
+ */
+static inline __sum16 ip_fast_csum(const void *iph, unsigned int ihl)
+{
+ unsigned long csum = 0;
+ int pos = 0;
+
+ do {
+ csum += ((const unsigned int *)iph)[pos];
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT))
+ csum += csum < ((const unsigned int *)iph)[pos];
+ } while (++pos < ihl);
+
+ /*
+ * ZBB only saves three instructions on 32-bit and five on 64-bit so not
+ * worth checking if supported without Alternatives.
+ */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) &&
+ IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE)) {
+ unsigned long fold_temp;
+
+ asm_volatile_goto(ALTERNATIVE("j %l[no_zbb]", "nop", 0,
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB, 1)
+ :
+ :
+ :
+ : no_zbb);
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT)) {
+ asm(".option push \n\
+ .option arch,+zbb \n\
+ not %[fold_temp], %[csum] \n\
+ rori %[csum], %[csum], 16 \n\
+ sub %[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum] \n\
+ .option pop"
+ : [csum] "+r" (csum), [fold_temp] "=&r" (fold_temp));
+ } else {
+ asm(".option push \n\
+ .option arch,+zbb \n\
+ rori %[fold_temp], %[csum], 32 \n\
+ add %[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum] \n\
+ srli %[csum], %[csum], 32 \n\
+ not %[fold_temp], %[csum] \n\
+ roriw %[csum], %[csum], 16 \n\
+ subw %[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum] \n\
+ .option pop"
+ : [csum] "+r" (csum), [fold_temp] "=&r" (fold_temp));
+ }
+ return csum >> 16;
+ }
+no_zbb:
+#ifndef CONFIG_32BIT
+ csum += (csum >> 32) | (csum << 32);
+ csum >>= 32;
+#endif
+ return csum_fold((__force __wsum)csum);
+}
+
+#endif // __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H

--
2.42.0


2023-10-12 14:54:35

by Conor Dooley

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] riscv: Checksum header

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 11:44:31AM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> Provide checksum algorithms that have been designed to leverage riscv
> instructions such as rotate. In 64-bit, can take advantage of the larger
> register to avoid some overflow checking.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <[email protected]>

Same here,
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>

I think there are some "issues" attributed to this patch by the
automation - but they spurious. This diff here could not cause a
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c:1271: warning: Function parameter or member 'peer_device' not described in 'drbd_bm_write_copy_pages'
after all.

Cheers,
Conor.

> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..dc0dd89f2a13
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * IP checksum routines
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 Rivos Inc.
> + */
> +#ifndef __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
> +#define __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
> +
> +#include <linux/in6.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +
> +#define ip_fast_csum ip_fast_csum
> +
> +#include <asm-generic/checksum.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * Quickly compute an IP checksum with the assumption that IPv4 headers will
> + * always be in multiples of 32-bits, and have an ihl of at least 5.
> + * @ihl is the number of 32 bit segments and must be greater than or equal to 5.
> + * @iph is assumed to be word aligned.
> + */
> +static inline __sum16 ip_fast_csum(const void *iph, unsigned int ihl)
> +{
> + unsigned long csum = 0;
> + int pos = 0;
> +
> + do {
> + csum += ((const unsigned int *)iph)[pos];
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT))
> + csum += csum < ((const unsigned int *)iph)[pos];
> + } while (++pos < ihl);
> +
> + /*
> + * ZBB only saves three instructions on 32-bit and five on 64-bit so not
> + * worth checking if supported without Alternatives.
> + */
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) &&
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE)) {
> + unsigned long fold_temp;
> +
> + asm_volatile_goto(ALTERNATIVE("j %l[no_zbb]", "nop", 0,
> + RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB, 1)
> + :
> + :
> + :
> + : no_zbb);
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT)) {
> + asm(".option push \n\
> + .option arch,+zbb \n\
> + not %[fold_temp], %[csum] \n\
> + rori %[csum], %[csum], 16 \n\
> + sub %[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum] \n\
> + .option pop"
> + : [csum] "+r" (csum), [fold_temp] "=&r" (fold_temp));
> + } else {
> + asm(".option push \n\
> + .option arch,+zbb \n\
> + rori %[fold_temp], %[csum], 32 \n\
> + add %[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum] \n\
> + srli %[csum], %[csum], 32 \n\
> + not %[fold_temp], %[csum] \n\
> + roriw %[csum], %[csum], 16 \n\
> + subw %[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum] \n\
> + .option pop"
> + : [csum] "+r" (csum), [fold_temp] "=&r" (fold_temp));
> + }
> + return csum >> 16;
> + }
> +no_zbb:
> +#ifndef CONFIG_32BIT
> + csum += (csum >> 32) | (csum << 32);
> + csum >>= 32;
> +#endif
> + return csum_fold((__force __wsum)csum);
> +}
> +
> +#endif // __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
>
> --
> 2.42.0
>


Attachments:
(No filename) (3.37 kB)
signature.asc (235.00 B)
Download all attachments

2023-10-25 06:50:38

by Wang, Xiao W

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 2/4] riscv: Checksum header

Hi Charlie,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-riscv <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
> Charlie Jenkins
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 2:45 AM
> To: Charlie Jenkins <[email protected]>; Palmer Dabbelt
> <[email protected]>; Conor Dooley <[email protected]>; Samuel Holland
> <[email protected]>; David Laight <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]
> Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]>; Albert Ou
> <[email protected]>; Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH v7 2/4] riscv: Checksum header
>
> Provide checksum algorithms that have been designed to leverage riscv
> instructions such as rotate. In 64-bit, can take advantage of the larger
> register to avoid some overflow checking.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h | 79
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..dc0dd89f2a13
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * IP checksum routines
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 Rivos Inc.
> + */
> +#ifndef __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
> +#define __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
> +
> +#include <linux/in6.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +
> +#define ip_fast_csum ip_fast_csum
> +
> +#include <asm-generic/checksum.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * Quickly compute an IP checksum with the assumption that IPv4 headers
> will
> + * always be in multiples of 32-bits, and have an ihl of at least 5.
> + * @ihl is the number of 32 bit segments and must be greater than or equal
> to 5.
> + * @iph is assumed to be word aligned.

Not sure if the assumption is always true. It looks the implementation in "lib/checksum.c" doesn't take this assumption.
The ip header can comes after a 14-Byte ether header, which may start from a word-aligned or DMA friendly address.

> + */
> +static inline __sum16 ip_fast_csum(const void *iph, unsigned int ihl)
> +{
> + unsigned long csum = 0;
> + int pos = 0;
> +
> + do {
> + csum += ((const unsigned int *)iph)[pos];
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT))
> + csum += csum < ((const unsigned int *)iph)[pos];
> + } while (++pos < ihl);
> +
> + /*
> + * ZBB only saves three instructions on 32-bit and five on 64-bit so not
> + * worth checking if supported without Alternatives.
> + */
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) &&
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE)) {
> + unsigned long fold_temp;
> +
> + asm_volatile_goto(ALTERNATIVE("j %l[no_zbb]", "nop", 0,
> + RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB, 1)
> + :
> + :
> + :
> + : no_zbb);
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT)) {
> + asm(".option push \n\
> + .option arch,+zbb \n\
> + not %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> \n\
> + rori %[csum], %[csum], 16 \n\
> + sub %[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> \n\
> + .option pop"
> + : [csum] "+r" (csum), [fold_temp] "=&r" (fold_temp));
> + } else {
> + asm(".option push \n\
> + .option arch,+zbb \n\
> + rori %[fold_temp], %[csum], 32 \n\
> + add %[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> \n\
> + srli %[csum], %[csum], 32 \n\
> + not %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> \n\
> + roriw %[csum], %[csum], 16 \n\
> + subw %[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> \n\
> + .option pop"
> + : [csum] "+r" (csum), [fold_temp] "=&r" (fold_temp));
> + }
> + return csum >> 16;
> + }
> +no_zbb:
> +#ifndef CONFIG_32BIT
> + csum += (csum >> 32) | (csum << 32);

Just like patch 3/4 does, we can call ror64(csum, 32).

BRs,
Xiao

> + csum >>= 32;
> +#endif
> + return csum_fold((__force __wsum)csum);
> +}
> +
> +#endif // __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
>
> --
> 2.42.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

2023-10-25 20:37:50

by Charlie Jenkins

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] riscv: Checksum header

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 06:50:05AM +0000, Wang, Xiao W wrote:
> Hi Charlie,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-riscv <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
> > Charlie Jenkins
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 2:45 AM
> > To: Charlie Jenkins <[email protected]>; Palmer Dabbelt
> > <[email protected]>; Conor Dooley <[email protected]>; Samuel Holland
> > <[email protected]>; David Laight <[email protected]>;
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> > [email protected]
> > Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]>; Albert Ou
> > <[email protected]>; Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> > Subject: [PATCH v7 2/4] riscv: Checksum header
> >
> > Provide checksum algorithms that have been designed to leverage riscv
> > instructions such as rotate. In 64-bit, can take advantage of the larger
> > register to avoid some overflow checking.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h | 79
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> > b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..dc0dd89f2a13
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/*
> > + * IP checksum routines
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2023 Rivos Inc.
> > + */
> > +#ifndef __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
> > +#define __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/in6.h>
> > +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > +
> > +#define ip_fast_csum ip_fast_csum
> > +
> > +#include <asm-generic/checksum.h>
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Quickly compute an IP checksum with the assumption that IPv4 headers
> > will
> > + * always be in multiples of 32-bits, and have an ihl of at least 5.
> > + * @ihl is the number of 32 bit segments and must be greater than or equal
> > to 5.
> > + * @iph is assumed to be word aligned.
>
> Not sure if the assumption is always true. It looks the implementation in "lib/checksum.c" doesn't take this assumption.
> The ip header can comes after a 14-Byte ether header, which may start from a word-aligned or DMA friendly address.

While lib/checksum.c does not make this assumption, other architectures
(x86, ARM, powerpc, mips, arc) do make this assumption. Architectures
seem to only align the header on a word boundary in do_csum. I worry
that the benefit of aligning iph in this "fast" csum function would
disproportionately impact hardware that has fast misaligned accesses.

- Charlie

>
> > + */
> > +static inline __sum16 ip_fast_csum(const void *iph, unsigned int ihl)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long csum = 0;
> > + int pos = 0;
> > +
> > + do {
> > + csum += ((const unsigned int *)iph)[pos];
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT))
> > + csum += csum < ((const unsigned int *)iph)[pos];
> > + } while (++pos < ihl);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * ZBB only saves three instructions on 32-bit and five on 64-bit so not
> > + * worth checking if supported without Alternatives.
> > + */
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) &&
> > + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE)) {
> > + unsigned long fold_temp;
> > +
> > + asm_volatile_goto(ALTERNATIVE("j %l[no_zbb]", "nop", 0,
> > + RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB, 1)
> > + :
> > + :
> > + :
> > + : no_zbb);
> > +
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT)) {
> > + asm(".option push \n\
> > + .option arch,+zbb \n\
> > + not %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> > \n\
> > + rori %[csum], %[csum], 16 \n\
> > + sub %[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> > \n\
> > + .option pop"
> > + : [csum] "+r" (csum), [fold_temp] "=&r" (fold_temp));
> > + } else {
> > + asm(".option push \n\
> > + .option arch,+zbb \n\
> > + rori %[fold_temp], %[csum], 32 \n\
> > + add %[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> > \n\
> > + srli %[csum], %[csum], 32 \n\
> > + not %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> > \n\
> > + roriw %[csum], %[csum], 16 \n\
> > + subw %[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> > \n\
> > + .option pop"
> > + : [csum] "+r" (csum), [fold_temp] "=&r" (fold_temp));
> > + }
> > + return csum >> 16;
> > + }
> > +no_zbb:
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_32BIT
> > + csum += (csum >> 32) | (csum << 32);
>
> Just like patch 3/4 does, we can call ror64(csum, 32).
>
> BRs,
> Xiao
>
> > + csum >>= 32;
> > +#endif
> > + return csum_fold((__force __wsum)csum);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif // __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
> >
> > --
> > 2.42.0
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

2023-10-25 20:53:22

by Arnd Bergmann

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] riscv: Checksum header

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023, at 22:37, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 06:50:05AM +0000, Wang, Xiao W wrote:

>> > +
>> > +/*
>> > + * Quickly compute an IP checksum with the assumption that IPv4 headers
>> > will
>> > + * always be in multiples of 32-bits, and have an ihl of at least 5.
>> > + * @ihl is the number of 32 bit segments and must be greater than or equal
>> > to 5.
>> > + * @iph is assumed to be word aligned.
>>
>> Not sure if the assumption is always true. It looks the implementation in "lib/checksum.c" doesn't take this assumption.
>> The ip header can comes after a 14-Byte ether header, which may start from a word-aligned or DMA friendly address.
>
> While lib/checksum.c does not make this assumption, other architectures
> (x86, ARM, powerpc, mips, arc) do make this assumption. Architectures
> seem to only align the header on a word boundary in do_csum. I worry
> that the benefit of aligning iph in this "fast" csum function would
> disproportionately impact hardware that has fast misaligned accesses.

Most architectures set NET_IP_ALIGN to '2', which is intended
to have the IP header at a 32-bit aligned address, though
some other targets don't bother:

arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:#define NET_IP_ALIGN 0
arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h:#define NET_IP_ALIGN 0
arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:#define NET_IP_ALIGN 0
include/linux/skbuff.h:#define NET_IP_ALIGN 2

I think it's considered a driver bug if an SKB ends up
with a misaligned IP header, but it's also something that
some of the more obscure drivers get wrong.

Arnd

2023-10-25 21:12:22

by Charlie Jenkins

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] riscv: Checksum header

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 10:52:22PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023, at 22:37, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 06:50:05AM +0000, Wang, Xiao W wrote:
>
> >> > +
> >> > +/*
> >> > + * Quickly compute an IP checksum with the assumption that IPv4 headers
> >> > will
> >> > + * always be in multiples of 32-bits, and have an ihl of at least 5.
> >> > + * @ihl is the number of 32 bit segments and must be greater than or equal
> >> > to 5.
> >> > + * @iph is assumed to be word aligned.
> >>
> >> Not sure if the assumption is always true. It looks the implementation in "lib/checksum.c" doesn't take this assumption.
> >> The ip header can comes after a 14-Byte ether header, which may start from a word-aligned or DMA friendly address.
> >
> > While lib/checksum.c does not make this assumption, other architectures
> > (x86, ARM, powerpc, mips, arc) do make this assumption. Architectures
> > seem to only align the header on a word boundary in do_csum. I worry
> > that the benefit of aligning iph in this "fast" csum function would
> > disproportionately impact hardware that has fast misaligned accesses.
>
> Most architectures set NET_IP_ALIGN to '2', which is intended
> to have the IP header at a 32-bit aligned address, though
> some other targets don't bother:
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:#define NET_IP_ALIGN 0
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h:#define NET_IP_ALIGN 0
> arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:#define NET_IP_ALIGN 0
> include/linux/skbuff.h:#define NET_IP_ALIGN 2
>
> I think it's considered a driver bug if an SKB ends up
> with a misaligned IP header, but it's also something that
> some of the more obscure drivers get wrong.
>
> Arnd

Thank you for pointing that out, I had not realized that macro existed.
Since riscv keeps NET_IP_ALIGN at 0 it should be expected that
ip_fast_csum is only called with 32-bit aligned addresses. I will update
the comment and refer to that macro. riscv supports misaligned accesses
but there are no guarantees of speed.

- Charlie

2023-10-25 21:19:19

by Arnd Bergmann

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] riscv: Checksum header

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023, at 23:11, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
>
> Thank you for pointing that out, I had not realized that macro existed.
> Since riscv keeps NET_IP_ALIGN at 0 it should be expected that
> ip_fast_csum is only called with 32-bit aligned addresses. I will update
> the comment and refer to that macro. riscv supports misaligned accesses
> but there are no guarantees of speed.

Just to clarify for your comment: riscv gets the default value of '2',
which is the one that makes the header aligned.

Arnd

2023-10-25 21:21:08

by Charlie Jenkins

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] riscv: Checksum header

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:18:40PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023, at 23:11, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for pointing that out, I had not realized that macro existed.
> > Since riscv keeps NET_IP_ALIGN at 0 it should be expected that
> > ip_fast_csum is only called with 32-bit aligned addresses. I will update
> > the comment and refer to that macro. riscv supports misaligned accesses
> > but there are no guarantees of speed.
>
> Just to clarify for your comment: riscv gets the default value of '2',
> which is the one that makes the header aligned.
>
> Arnd

Oops, typo. I meant to write 2.

- Charlie