Now that we have a reasonable separation of structs that follow
the subchannel and mdev lifecycles, there's no reason we can't
call the official vfio_alloc_device routine for our private data,
and behave like everyone else.
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <[email protected]>
---
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 29 -----------------------------
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++----------
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 3 ---
drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 3 ---
4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
index 686a9b9f6731..9bbf41315aca 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
@@ -146,35 +146,6 @@ static void vfio_ccw_sch_irq(struct subchannel *sch)
vfio_ccw_fsm_event(private, VFIO_CCW_EVENT_INTERRUPT);
}
-struct vfio_ccw_private *vfio_ccw_alloc_private(struct subchannel *sch)
-{
- struct vfio_ccw_private *private;
-
- private = kzalloc(sizeof(*private), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!private)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-
- return private;
-}
-
-void vfio_ccw_free_private(struct vfio_ccw_private *private)
-{
- struct vfio_ccw_crw *crw, *temp;
-
- list_for_each_entry_safe(crw, temp, &private->crw, next) {
- list_del(&crw->next);
- kfree(crw);
- }
-
- kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_crw_region, private->crw_region);
- kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_schib_region, private->schib_region);
- kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_cmd_region, private->cmd_region);
- kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_io_region, private->io_region);
- kfree(private->cp.guest_cp);
- mutex_destroy(&private->io_mutex);
- kfree(private);
-}
-
static void vfio_ccw_free_parent(struct device *dev)
{
struct vfio_ccw_parent *parent = container_of(dev, struct vfio_ccw_parent, dev);
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
index 261cb8150abb..9619dc35080f 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
@@ -103,15 +103,10 @@ static int vfio_ccw_mdev_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
struct vfio_ccw_private *private;
int ret;
- private = vfio_ccw_alloc_private(sch);
- if (!private)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- ret = vfio_init_device(&private->vdev, &mdev->dev, &vfio_ccw_dev_ops);
- if (ret) {
- kfree(private);
- return ret;
- }
+ private = vfio_alloc_device(vfio_ccw_private, vdev, &mdev->dev,
+ &vfio_ccw_dev_ops);
+ if (IS_ERR(private))
+ return PTR_ERR(private);
dev_set_drvdata(&parent->dev, private);
@@ -136,8 +131,21 @@ static void vfio_ccw_mdev_release_dev(struct vfio_device *vdev)
{
struct vfio_ccw_private *private =
container_of(vdev, struct vfio_ccw_private, vdev);
+ struct vfio_ccw_crw *crw, *temp;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(crw, temp, &private->crw, next) {
+ list_del(&crw->next);
+ kfree(crw);
+ }
+
+ kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_crw_region, private->crw_region);
+ kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_schib_region, private->schib_region);
+ kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_cmd_region, private->cmd_region);
+ kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_io_region, private->io_region);
+ kfree(private->cp.guest_cp);
+ mutex_destroy(&private->io_mutex);
- vfio_ccw_free_private(private);
+ vfio_free_device(vdev);
}
static void vfio_ccw_mdev_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
index ddaf6846022d..2ca408881659 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
@@ -116,9 +116,6 @@ int vfio_ccw_sch_quiesce(struct subchannel *sch);
void vfio_ccw_sch_io_todo(struct work_struct *work);
void vfio_ccw_crw_todo(struct work_struct *work);
-struct vfio_ccw_private *vfio_ccw_alloc_private(struct subchannel *sch);
-void vfio_ccw_free_private(struct vfio_ccw_private *private);
-
extern struct mdev_driver vfio_ccw_mdev_driver;
/*
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 2d168793d4e1..28f36c6d9d3f 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -386,8 +386,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(_vfio_alloc_device);
/*
* Initialize a vfio_device so it can be registered to vfio core.
- *
- * Only vfio-ccw driver should call this interface.
*/
int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device *device, struct device *dev,
const struct vfio_device_ops *ops)
@@ -422,7 +420,6 @@ int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device *device, struct device *dev,
ida_free(&vfio.device_ida, device->index);
return ret;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_init_device);
/*
* The helper called by driver @release callback to free the device
--
2.34.1
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 06:21:34PM +0200, Eric Farman wrote:
> /*
> * Initialize a vfio_device so it can be registered to vfio core.
> - *
> - * Only vfio-ccw driver should call this interface.
> */
> int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device *device, struct device *dev,
> const struct vfio_device_ops *ops)
> @@ -422,7 +420,6 @@ int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device *device, struct device *dev,
> ida_free(&vfio.device_ida, device->index);
> return ret;
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_init_device);
Should be made static as well
Jason
On Wed, 2022-10-19 at 14:15 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 06:21:34PM +0200, Eric Farman wrote:
>
> > /*
> > * Initialize a vfio_device so it can be registered to vfio core.
> > - *
> > - * Only vfio-ccw driver should call this interface.
> > */
> > int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device *device, struct device
> > *dev,
> > const struct vfio_device_ops *ops)
> > @@ -422,7 +420,6 @@ int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device
> > *device, struct device *dev,
> > ida_free(&vfio.device_ida, device->index);
> > return ret;
> > }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_init_device);
>
> Should be made static as well
Agreed. Only reason I didn't was there's a prototype in
include/linux/vfio.h to satisfy the call to vfio_init_device from
_vfio_alloc_device, and I didn't want to get into moving things around
if I didn't need to. I can do that on top, if you'd like.
Eric
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 01:57:41PM -0400, Eric Farman wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-10-19 at 14:15 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 06:21:34PM +0200, Eric Farman wrote:
> >
> > > /*
> > > * Initialize a vfio_device so it can be registered to vfio core.
> > > - *
> > > - * Only vfio-ccw driver should call this interface.
> > > */
> > > int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device *device, struct device
> > > *dev,
> > > const struct vfio_device_ops *ops)
> > > @@ -422,7 +420,6 @@ int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device
> > > *device, struct device *dev,
> > > ida_free(&vfio.device_ida, device->index);
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_init_device);
> >
> > Should be made static as well
>
> Agreed. Only reason I didn't was there's a prototype in
> include/linux/vfio.h to satisfy the call to vfio_init_device from
> _vfio_alloc_device, and I didn't want to get into moving things around
> if I didn't need to. I can do that on top, if you'd like.
You can just add a one line forward static declaration at the top of
the file in this patch.
Jason
> From: Eric Farman
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 12:22 AM
>
> Now that we have a reasonable separation of structs that follow
> the subchannel and mdev lifecycles, there's no reason we can't
> call the official vfio_alloc_device routine for our private data,
> and behave like everyone else.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <[email protected]>
This looks good to me. With Jason's suggestion handled,
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <[email protected]>