2022-01-10 21:45:04

by Sander Vanheule

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] dt-bindings: power: reset: gpio-restart: Correct default priority

Commit bcd56fe1aa97 ("power: reset: gpio-restart: increase priority
slightly") changed the default restart priority 129, but did not update
the documentation. Correct this, so the driver and documentation have
the same default value.

Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <[email protected]>
---
This is a resubmission of RFC:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/cfcd00257daba5aa30b8d20a62ba542be1a6914c.1640887456.git.sander@svanheule.net/

The commit message for bcd56fe1aa97 mentions that it is a workaround for
rk3288-veryon boards. However, commit e28ea9dbc52d3 ("ARM: dts:
rockchip: add shared rk3288-veyron files") later adds a gpio-restart
node with a priority value of <200> for those boards, effectively
rendering bcd56fe1aa97 obsolete (for their use case).

Perhaps bcd56fe1aa97 could just be reverted instead of updating the
documentation.

An argument against reverting (a 6 year old patch) is that other boards
may have come to depend on the default value of 129. I don't know about
out-of-tree user of gpio-restart, but there are a few in-tree users of
gpio-restart /without/ an explicit priority:

arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-ppd.dts (commit 2952d67637716)
DTS submitted after changed default, but DTS copyright predates the
changed default.

arch/microblaze/boot/dts/system.dts (commit 7cca9b8b7c5bc)
The original DTS commit predates the changed default, but didn't use
gpio-restart. The commit adding gpio-restart appears to indicate no
other restart handlers are present on this platform, although it could
be these were just being shadowed by the custom restart code.

arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts (commit 0a91330b2af9f)
Recently added board; couldn't find any obvious alternative restart
handlers.

Best,
Sander

.../devicetree/bindings/power/reset/gpio-restart.yaml | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/gpio-restart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/gpio-restart.yaml
index 3dd22220cb5f..a72d5c721516 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/gpio-restart.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/gpio-restart.yaml
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ properties:
priority:
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
description: |
- A priority ranging from 0 to 255 (default 128) according to the following guidelines:
+ A priority ranging from 0 to 255 (default 129) according to the following guidelines:

0: Restart handler of last resort, with limited restart capabilities.
128: Default restart handler; use if no other restart handler is expected to be available,
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ properties:
255: Highest priority restart handler, will preempt all other restart handlers.
minimum: 0
maximum: 255
- default: 128
+ default: 129

active-delay:
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
--
2.33.1



2022-01-12 02:18:24

by Rob Herring (Arm)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: power: reset: gpio-restart: Correct default priority

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 22:44:56 +0100, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> Commit bcd56fe1aa97 ("power: reset: gpio-restart: increase priority
> slightly") changed the default restart priority 129, but did not update
> the documentation. Correct this, so the driver and documentation have
> the same default value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <[email protected]>
> ---
> This is a resubmission of RFC:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/cfcd00257daba5aa30b8d20a62ba542be1a6914c.1640887456.git.sander@svanheule.net/
>
> The commit message for bcd56fe1aa97 mentions that it is a workaround for
> rk3288-veryon boards. However, commit e28ea9dbc52d3 ("ARM: dts:
> rockchip: add shared rk3288-veyron files") later adds a gpio-restart
> node with a priority value of <200> for those boards, effectively
> rendering bcd56fe1aa97 obsolete (for their use case).
>
> Perhaps bcd56fe1aa97 could just be reverted instead of updating the
> documentation.
>
> An argument against reverting (a 6 year old patch) is that other boards
> may have come to depend on the default value of 129. I don't know about
> out-of-tree user of gpio-restart, but there are a few in-tree users of
> gpio-restart /without/ an explicit priority:
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-ppd.dts (commit 2952d67637716)
> DTS submitted after changed default, but DTS copyright predates the
> changed default.
>
> arch/microblaze/boot/dts/system.dts (commit 7cca9b8b7c5bc)
> The original DTS commit predates the changed default, but didn't use
> gpio-restart. The commit adding gpio-restart appears to indicate no
> other restart handlers are present on this platform, although it could
> be these were just being shadowed by the custom restart code.
>
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts (commit 0a91330b2af9f)
> Recently added board; couldn't find any obvious alternative restart
> handlers.
>
> Best,
> Sander
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/power/reset/gpio-restart.yaml | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>

2022-01-12 20:49:11

by Sander Vanheule

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: power: reset: gpio-restart: Correct default priority

Hi Rob,

On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 20:18 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 22:44:56 +0100, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> > Commit bcd56fe1aa97 ("power: reset: gpio-restart: increase priority
> > slightly") changed the default restart priority 129, but did not update
> > the documentation. Correct this, so the driver and documentation have
> > the same default value.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > This is a resubmission of RFC:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/cfcd00257daba5aa30b8d20a62ba542be1a6914c.1640887456.git.sander@svanheule.net/
> >
> > The commit message for bcd56fe1aa97 mentions that it is a workaround for
> > rk3288-veryon boards. However, commit e28ea9dbc52d3 ("ARM: dts:
> > rockchip: add shared rk3288-veyron files") later adds a gpio-restart
> > node with a priority value of <200> for those boards, effectively
> > rendering bcd56fe1aa97 obsolete (for their use case).
> >
> > Perhaps bcd56fe1aa97 could just be reverted instead of updating the
> > documentation.
> >
> > An argument against reverting (a 6 year old patch) is that other boards
> > may have come to depend on the default value of 129. I don't know about
> > out-of-tree user of gpio-restart, but there are a few in-tree users of
> > gpio-restart /without/ an explicit priority:
> >
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-ppd.dts (commit 2952d67637716)
> >   DTS submitted after changed default, but DTS copyright predates the
> >   changed default.
> >
> > arch/microblaze/boot/dts/system.dts (commit 7cca9b8b7c5bc)
> >   The original DTS commit predates the changed default, but didn't use
> >   gpio-restart. The commit adding gpio-restart appears to indicate no
> >   other restart handlers are present on this platform, although it could
> >   be these were just being shadowed by the custom restart code.
> >
> > arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts (commit 0a91330b2af9f)
> >   Recently added board; couldn't find any obvious alternative restart
> >   handlers.
> >
> > Best,
> > Sander
> >
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/power/reset/gpio-restart.yaml         | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>

Thanks for the review!

I've noticed the devicetree patchwork has this patch marked as "Not applicable", but
linux-pm patchwork has it marked "Handled elsewhere". Since you merged the gpio-restart
conversion patch, can you also take this one, Rob?

Best,
Sander

2022-01-13 14:08:24

by Rob Herring (Arm)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: power: reset: gpio-restart: Correct default priority

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 2:49 PM Sander Vanheule <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 20:18 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 22:44:56 +0100, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> > > Commit bcd56fe1aa97 ("power: reset: gpio-restart: increase priority
> > > slightly") changed the default restart priority 129, but did not update
> > > the documentation. Correct this, so the driver and documentation have
> > > the same default value.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > This is a resubmission of RFC:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/cfcd00257daba5aa30b8d20a62ba542be1a6914c.1640887456.git.sander@svanheule.net/
> > >
> > > The commit message for bcd56fe1aa97 mentions that it is a workaround for
> > > rk3288-veryon boards. However, commit e28ea9dbc52d3 ("ARM: dts:
> > > rockchip: add shared rk3288-veyron files") later adds a gpio-restart
> > > node with a priority value of <200> for those boards, effectively
> > > rendering bcd56fe1aa97 obsolete (for their use case).
> > >
> > > Perhaps bcd56fe1aa97 could just be reverted instead of updating the
> > > documentation.
> > >
> > > An argument against reverting (a 6 year old patch) is that other boards
> > > may have come to depend on the default value of 129. I don't know about
> > > out-of-tree user of gpio-restart, but there are a few in-tree users of
> > > gpio-restart /without/ an explicit priority:
> > >
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-ppd.dts (commit 2952d67637716)
> > > DTS submitted after changed default, but DTS copyright predates the
> > > changed default.
> > >
> > > arch/microblaze/boot/dts/system.dts (commit 7cca9b8b7c5bc)
> > > The original DTS commit predates the changed default, but didn't use
> > > gpio-restart. The commit adding gpio-restart appears to indicate no
> > > other restart handlers are present on this platform, although it could
> > > be these were just being shadowed by the custom restart code.
> > >
> > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts (commit 0a91330b2af9f)
> > > Recently added board; couldn't find any obvious alternative restart
> > > handlers.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Sander
> > >
> > > .../devicetree/bindings/power/reset/gpio-restart.yaml | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
> I've noticed the devicetree patchwork has this patch marked as "Not applicable", but
> linux-pm patchwork has it marked "Handled elsewhere". Since you merged the gpio-restart
> conversion patch, can you also take this one, Rob?

Yes, I'll pick it up.

Rob

2022-01-14 21:35:13

by Rob Herring (Arm)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: power: reset: gpio-restart: Correct default priority

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 22:44:56 +0100, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> Commit bcd56fe1aa97 ("power: reset: gpio-restart: increase priority
> slightly") changed the default restart priority 129, but did not update
> the documentation. Correct this, so the driver and documentation have
> the same default value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <[email protected]>
> ---
> This is a resubmission of RFC:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/cfcd00257daba5aa30b8d20a62ba542be1a6914c.1640887456.git.sander@svanheule.net/
>
> The commit message for bcd56fe1aa97 mentions that it is a workaround for
> rk3288-veryon boards. However, commit e28ea9dbc52d3 ("ARM: dts:
> rockchip: add shared rk3288-veyron files") later adds a gpio-restart
> node with a priority value of <200> for those boards, effectively
> rendering bcd56fe1aa97 obsolete (for their use case).
>
> Perhaps bcd56fe1aa97 could just be reverted instead of updating the
> documentation.
>
> An argument against reverting (a 6 year old patch) is that other boards
> may have come to depend on the default value of 129. I don't know about
> out-of-tree user of gpio-restart, but there are a few in-tree users of
> gpio-restart /without/ an explicit priority:
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-ppd.dts (commit 2952d67637716)
> DTS submitted after changed default, but DTS copyright predates the
> changed default.
>
> arch/microblaze/boot/dts/system.dts (commit 7cca9b8b7c5bc)
> The original DTS commit predates the changed default, but didn't use
> gpio-restart. The commit adding gpio-restart appears to indicate no
> other restart handlers are present on this platform, although it could
> be these were just being shadowed by the custom restart code.
>
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts (commit 0a91330b2af9f)
> Recently added board; couldn't find any obvious alternative restart
> handlers.
>
> Best,
> Sander
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/power/reset/gpio-restart.yaml | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>

Applied, thanks!