The current implementation supports device-pecific callbacks for the
init function with a function pointer. The patch that introduced this
feature did not update one call to the tps25750 init function to turn it
into a call with the new pointer in the resume function.
Fixes: d49f90822015 ("usb: typec: tipd: add init and reset functions to tipd_data")
Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <[email protected]>
---
drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
index a956eb976906..8a7cdfee27a1 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
@@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused tps6598x_resume(struct device *dev)
return ret;
if (ret == TPS_MODE_PTCH) {
- ret = tps25750_init(tps);
+ ret = tps->data->init(tps);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
---
base-commit: e7d3b9f28654dbfce7e09f8028210489adaf6a33
change-id: 20240104-dev_spec_init-4df8711295cd
Best regards,
--
Javier Carrasco <[email protected]>
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 06:07:12PM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> The current implementation supports device-pecific callbacks for the
> init function with a function pointer. The patch that introduced this
> feature did not update one call to the tps25750 init function to turn it
> into a call with the new pointer in the resume function.
>
> Fixes: d49f90822015 ("usb: typec: tipd: add init and reset functions to tipd_data")
> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <[email protected]>
This was suggested by Roger, no?
Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
> index a956eb976906..8a7cdfee27a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
> @@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused tps6598x_resume(struct device *dev)
> return ret;
>
> if (ret == TPS_MODE_PTCH) {
> - ret = tps25750_init(tps);
> + ret = tps->data->init(tps);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
thans,
--
heikki
On 05.01.24 13:36, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 06:07:12PM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
>> The current implementation supports device-pecific callbacks for the
>> init function with a function pointer. The patch that introduced this
>> feature did not update one call to the tps25750 init function to turn it
>> into a call with the new pointer in the resume function.
>>
>> Fixes: d49f90822015 ("usb: typec: tipd: add init and reset functions to tipd_data")
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <[email protected]>
>
> This was suggested by Roger, no?
>
Yes, it was. Thanks for the reminder.
Could the following trailer be added before applying?
Suggested-by: Roger Quadros <[email protected]>
Otherwise I will resend the patch with that addition.
> Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <[email protected]>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
>> index a956eb976906..8a7cdfee27a1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
>> @@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused tps6598x_resume(struct device *dev)
>> return ret;
>>
>> if (ret == TPS_MODE_PTCH) {
>> - ret = tps25750_init(tps);
>> + ret = tps->data->init(tps);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> }
>
> thans,
>
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 01:42:47PM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> On 05.01.24 13:36, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 06:07:12PM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> >> The current implementation supports device-pecific callbacks for the
> >> init function with a function pointer. The patch that introduced this
> >> feature did not update one call to the tps25750 init function to turn it
> >> into a call with the new pointer in the resume function.
> >>
> >> Fixes: d49f90822015 ("usb: typec: tipd: add init and reset functions to tipd_data")
> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <[email protected]>
> >
> > This was suggested by Roger, no?
> >
>
> Yes, it was. Thanks for the reminder.
>
> Could the following trailer be added before applying?
>
> Suggested-by: Roger Quadros <[email protected]>
The tools automatically just added that now, thanks.
greg k-h