2022-01-26 08:10:56

by Bob Beckett

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/5] drm/i915: add gtt misalignment test

add test to check handling of misaligned offsets and sizes

v4:
* remove spurious blank lines
* explicitly cast intel_region_id to intel_memory_type in misaligned_pin
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Robert Beckett <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 128 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
index b80788a2b7f9..f082b5ff3b5e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
@@ -22,10 +22,12 @@
*
*/

+#include "gt/intel_gtt.h"
#include <linux/list_sort.h>
#include <linux/prime_numbers.h>

#include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
+#include "gem/i915_gem_region.h"
#include "gem/selftests/mock_context.h"
#include "gt/intel_context.h"
#include "gt/intel_gpu_commands.h"
@@ -1067,6 +1069,120 @@ static int shrink_boom(struct i915_address_space *vm,
return err;
}

+static int misaligned_case(struct i915_address_space *vm, struct intel_memory_region *mr,
+ u64 addr, u64 size, unsigned long flags)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+ struct i915_vma *vma;
+ int err = 0;
+ u64 expected_vma_size, expected_node_size;
+
+ obj = i915_gem_object_create_region(mr, size, 0, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(obj))
+ return PTR_ERR(obj);
+
+ vma = i915_vma_instance(obj, vm, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(vma);
+ goto err_put;
+ }
+
+ err = i915_vma_pin(vma, 0, 0, addr | flags);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_put;
+ i915_vma_unpin(vma);
+
+ if (!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node)) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_put;
+ }
+
+ if (i915_vma_misplaced(vma, 0, 0, addr | flags)) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_put;
+ }
+
+ expected_vma_size = round_up(size, 1 << (ffs(vma->resource->page_sizes_gtt) - 1));
+ expected_node_size = expected_vma_size;
+
+ if (IS_DG2(vm->i915) && i915_gem_object_is_lmem(obj)) {
+ /* dg2 should expand lmem node to 2MB */
+ expected_vma_size = round_up(size, I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_64K);
+ expected_node_size = round_up(size, I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_2M);
+ }
+
+ if (vma->size != expected_vma_size || vma->node.size != expected_node_size) {
+ err = i915_vma_unbind(vma);
+ err = -EBADSLT;
+ goto err_put;
+ }
+
+ err = i915_vma_unbind(vma);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_put;
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node));
+
+err_put:
+ i915_gem_object_put(obj);
+ cleanup_freed_objects(vm->i915);
+ return err;
+}
+
+static int misaligned_pin(struct i915_address_space *vm,
+ u64 hole_start, u64 hole_end,
+ unsigned long end_time)
+{
+ struct intel_memory_region *mr;
+ enum intel_region_id id;
+ unsigned long flags = PIN_OFFSET_FIXED | PIN_USER;
+ int err = 0;
+ u64 hole_size = hole_end - hole_start;
+
+ if (i915_is_ggtt(vm))
+ flags |= PIN_GLOBAL;
+
+ for_each_memory_region(mr, vm->i915, id) {
+ u64 min_alignment = i915_vm_min_alignment(vm, (enum intel_memory_type)id);
+ u64 size = min_alignment;
+ u64 addr = round_up(hole_start + (hole_size / 2), min_alignment);
+
+ /* we can't test < 4k alignment due to flags being encoded in lower bits */
+ if (min_alignment != I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_4K) {
+ err = misaligned_case(vm, mr, addr + (min_alignment / 2), size, flags);
+ /* misaligned should error with -EINVAL*/
+ if (!err)
+ err = -EBADSLT;
+ if (err != -EINVAL)
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ /* test for vma->size expansion to min page size */
+ err = misaligned_case(vm, mr, addr, PAGE_SIZE, flags);
+ if (min_alignment > hole_size) {
+ if (!err)
+ err = -EBADSLT;
+ else if (err == -ENOSPC)
+ err = 0;
+ }
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ /* test for intermediate size not expanding vma->size for large alignments */
+ err = misaligned_case(vm, mr, addr, size / 2, flags);
+ if (min_alignment > hole_size) {
+ if (!err)
+ err = -EBADSLT;
+ else if (err == -ENOSPC)
+ err = 0;
+ }
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int exercise_ppgtt(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
int (*func)(struct i915_address_space *vm,
u64 hole_start, u64 hole_end,
@@ -1136,6 +1252,11 @@ static int igt_ppgtt_shrink_boom(void *arg)
return exercise_ppgtt(arg, shrink_boom);
}

+static int igt_ppgtt_misaligned_pin(void *arg)
+{
+ return exercise_ppgtt(arg, misaligned_pin);
+}
+
static int sort_holes(void *priv, const struct list_head *A,
const struct list_head *B)
{
@@ -1208,6 +1329,11 @@ static int igt_ggtt_lowlevel(void *arg)
return exercise_ggtt(arg, lowlevel_hole);
}

+static int igt_ggtt_misaligned_pin(void *arg)
+{
+ return exercise_ggtt(arg, misaligned_pin);
+}
+
static int igt_ggtt_page(void *arg)
{
const unsigned int count = PAGE_SIZE/sizeof(u32);
@@ -2180,12 +2306,14 @@ int i915_gem_gtt_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
SUBTEST(igt_ppgtt_fill),
SUBTEST(igt_ppgtt_shrink),
SUBTEST(igt_ppgtt_shrink_boom),
+ SUBTEST(igt_ppgtt_misaligned_pin),
SUBTEST(igt_ggtt_lowlevel),
SUBTEST(igt_ggtt_drunk),
SUBTEST(igt_ggtt_walk),
SUBTEST(igt_ggtt_pot),
SUBTEST(igt_ggtt_fill),
SUBTEST(igt_ggtt_page),
+ SUBTEST(igt_ggtt_misaligned_pin),
SUBTEST(igt_cs_tlb),
};

--
2.25.1


Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 4/5] drm/i915: add gtt misalignment test


On 1/25/22 20:35, Robert Beckett wrote:
> add test to check handling of misaligned offsets and sizes
>
> v4:
> * remove spurious blank lines
> * explicitly cast intel_region_id to intel_memory_type in misaligned_pin
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Beckett <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index b80788a2b7f9..f082b5ff3b5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -22,10 +22,12 @@
> *
> */
>
> +#include "gt/intel_gtt.h"
> #include <linux/list_sort.h>
> #include <linux/prime_numbers.h>
>
> #include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
> +#include "gem/i915_gem_region.h"
> #include "gem/selftests/mock_context.h"
> #include "gt/intel_context.h"
> #include "gt/intel_gpu_commands.h"
> @@ -1067,6 +1069,120 @@ static int shrink_boom(struct i915_address_space *vm,
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int misaligned_case(struct i915_address_space *vm, struct intel_memory_region *mr,
> + u64 addr, u64 size, unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> + struct i915_vma *vma;
> + int err = 0;
> + u64 expected_vma_size, expected_node_size;
> +
> + obj = i915_gem_object_create_region(mr, size, 0, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(obj))
> + return PTR_ERR(obj);
> +
> + vma = i915_vma_instance(obj, vm, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(vma);
> + goto err_put;
> + }
> +
> + err = i915_vma_pin(vma, 0, 0, addr | flags);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_put;
> + i915_vma_unpin(vma);
> +
> + if (!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node)) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_put;
> + }
> +
> + if (i915_vma_misplaced(vma, 0, 0, addr | flags)) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_put;
> + }
> +
> + expected_vma_size = round_up(size, 1 << (ffs(vma->resource->page_sizes_gtt) - 1));
> + expected_node_size = expected_vma_size;
> +
> + if (IS_DG2(vm->i915) && i915_gem_object_is_lmem(obj)) {
> + /* dg2 should expand lmem node to 2MB */

Should this test be NEEDS_COMPACT_PT()?

Otherwise LGTM. Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström
<[email protected]>


2022-01-26 22:21:44

by Bob Beckett

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 4/5] drm/i915: add gtt misalignment test



On 26/01/2022 14:05, Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote:
>
> On 1/25/22 20:35, Robert Beckett wrote:
>> add test to check handling of misaligned offsets and sizes
>>
>> v4:
>>     * remove spurious blank lines
>>     * explicitly cast intel_region_id to intel_memory_type in
>> misaligned_pin
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Beckett <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 128 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
>> index b80788a2b7f9..f082b5ff3b5e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
>> @@ -22,10 +22,12 @@
>>    *
>>    */
>> +#include "gt/intel_gtt.h"
>>   #include <linux/list_sort.h>
>>   #include <linux/prime_numbers.h>
>>   #include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
>> +#include "gem/i915_gem_region.h"
>>   #include "gem/selftests/mock_context.h"
>>   #include "gt/intel_context.h"
>>   #include "gt/intel_gpu_commands.h"
>> @@ -1067,6 +1069,120 @@ static int shrink_boom(struct
>> i915_address_space *vm,
>>       return err;
>>   }
>> +static int misaligned_case(struct i915_address_space *vm, struct
>> intel_memory_region *mr,
>> +               u64 addr, u64 size, unsigned long flags)
>> +{
>> +    struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
>> +    struct i915_vma *vma;
>> +    int err = 0;
>> +    u64 expected_vma_size, expected_node_size;
>> +
>> +    obj = i915_gem_object_create_region(mr, size, 0, 0);
>> +    if (IS_ERR(obj))
>> +        return PTR_ERR(obj);
>> +
>> +    vma = i915_vma_instance(obj, vm, NULL);
>> +    if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
>> +        err = PTR_ERR(vma);
>> +        goto err_put;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    err = i915_vma_pin(vma, 0, 0, addr | flags);
>> +    if (err)
>> +        goto err_put;
>> +    i915_vma_unpin(vma);
>> +
>> +    if (!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node)) {
>> +        err = -EINVAL;
>> +        goto err_put;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (i915_vma_misplaced(vma, 0, 0, addr | flags)) {
>> +        err = -EINVAL;
>> +        goto err_put;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    expected_vma_size = round_up(size, 1 <<
>> (ffs(vma->resource->page_sizes_gtt) - 1));
>> +    expected_node_size = expected_vma_size;
>> +
>> +    if (IS_DG2(vm->i915) && i915_gem_object_is_lmem(obj)) {
>> +        /* dg2 should expand lmem node to 2MB */
>
> Should this test be NEEDS_COMPACT_PT()?
>
> Otherwise LGTM. Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström
> <[email protected]>
Thanks. Good catch, forgot to retrofit the new macro here.
>
>