2016-10-31 17:59:31

by Christoph Hellwig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: block device direct I/O fast path

Hi Jens,

this small series adds a fasth path to the block device direct I/O
code. It uses new magic created by Kent to avoid allocating an array
for the pages, and as part of that allows small, non-aio direct I/O
requests to be done without memory allocations or atomic ops and with
a minimal cache footprint. It's basically a cut down version of the
new iomap direct I/O code, and in the future it might also make sense
to move the main direct I/O code to a similar model. But indepedent
of that it's always worth to optimize the case of small, non-I/O
requests as allocating the bio and biovec on stack and a trivial
completion handler will always win over a full blown implementation.


2016-10-31 17:59:34

by Christoph Hellwig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] block: fast-path for small and simple direct I/O requests

This patch adds a small and simple fast patch for small direct I/O
requests on block devices that don't use AIO. Between the neat
bio_iov_iter_get_pages helper that avoids allocating a page array
for get_user_pages and the on-stack bio and biovec this avoid memory
allocations and atomic operations entirely in the direct I/O code
(lower levels might still do memory allocations and will usually
have at least some atomic operations, though).

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
---
fs/block_dev.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 05b5533..d4134a3 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#include <linux/cleancache.h>
#include <linux/dax.h>
#include <linux/badblocks.h>
+#include <linux/task_io_accounting_ops.h>
#include <linux/falloc.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include "internal.h"
@@ -175,12 +176,91 @@ static struct inode *bdev_file_inode(struct file *file)
return file->f_mapping->host;
}

+#define DIO_INLINE_BIO_VECS 4
+
+static void blkdev_bio_end_io_simple(struct bio *bio)
+{
+ struct task_struct *waiter = bio->bi_private;
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(bio->bi_private, NULL);
+ wake_up_process(waiter);
+}
+
+static ssize_t
+__blkdev_direct_IO_simple(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
+ int nr_pages)
+{
+ struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
+ struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(bdev_file_inode(file));
+ unsigned blkbits = blksize_bits(bdev_logical_block_size(bdev));
+ struct bio_vec inline_vecs[DIO_INLINE_BIO_VECS], *bvec;
+ loff_t pos = iocb->ki_pos;
+ bool should_dirty = false;
+ struct bio bio;
+ ssize_t ret;
+ blk_qc_t qc;
+ int i;
+
+ if ((pos | iov_iter_alignment(iter)) & ((1 << blkbits) - 1))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ bio_init(&bio);
+ bio.bi_max_vecs = nr_pages;
+ bio.bi_io_vec = inline_vecs;
+ bio.bi_bdev = bdev;
+ bio.bi_iter.bi_sector = pos >> blkbits;
+ bio.bi_private = current;
+ bio.bi_end_io = blkdev_bio_end_io_simple;
+
+ ret = bio_iov_iter_get_pages(&bio, iter);
+ if (unlikely(ret))
+ return ret;
+ ret = bio.bi_iter.bi_size;
+
+ if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ) {
+ bio_set_op_attrs(&bio, REQ_OP_READ, 0);
+ if (iter->type == ITER_IOVEC)
+ should_dirty = true;
+ } else {
+ bio_set_op_attrs(&bio, REQ_OP_WRITE, WRITE_ODIRECT);
+ task_io_account_write(ret);
+ }
+
+ qc = submit_bio(&bio);
+ for (;;) {
+ set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ if (!READ_ONCE(bio.bi_private))
+ break;
+ if (!(iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_HIPRI) ||
+ !blk_poll(bdev_get_queue(bdev), qc))
+ io_schedule();
+ }
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+
+ bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, &bio, i) {
+ if (should_dirty && !PageCompound(bvec->bv_page))
+ set_page_dirty_lock(bvec->bv_page);
+ put_page(bvec->bv_page);
+ }
+
+ if (unlikely(bio.bi_error))
+ return bio.bi_error;
+ iocb->ki_pos += ret;
+ return ret;
+}
+
static ssize_t
blkdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
{
struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
struct inode *inode = bdev_file_inode(file);
+ int nr_pages;

+ nr_pages = iov_iter_npages(iter, BIO_MAX_PAGES);
+ if (!nr_pages)
+ return 0;
+ if (is_sync_kiocb(iocb) && nr_pages <= DIO_INLINE_BIO_VECS)
+ return __blkdev_direct_IO_simple(iocb, iter, nr_pages);
return __blockdev_direct_IO(iocb, inode, I_BDEV(inode), iter,
blkdev_get_block, NULL, NULL,
DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT);
--
2.1.4

2016-10-31 18:00:01

by Christoph Hellwig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] block: add bio_iov_iter_get_pages()

From: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]>

This is a helper that pins down a range from an iov_iter and adds it to
a bio without requiring a separate memory allocation for the page array.
It will be used for upcoming direct I/O implementations for block devices
and iomap based file systems.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]>
[hch: ported to the iov_iter interface, renamed and added comments.
All blame should be directed to me and all fame should go to Kent
after this!]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
---
block/bio.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/bio.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
index db85c57..2cf6eba 100644
--- a/block/bio.c
+++ b/block/bio.c
@@ -847,6 +847,55 @@ int bio_add_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_add_page);

+/**
+ * bio_iov_iter_get_pages - pin user or kernel pages and add them to a bio
+ * @bio: bio to add pages to
+ * @iter: iov iterator describing the region to be mapped
+ *
+ * Pins as many pages from *iter and appends them to @bio's bvec array. The
+ * pages will have to be released using put_page() when done.
+ */
+int bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
+{
+ unsigned short nr_pages = bio->bi_max_vecs - bio->bi_vcnt;
+ struct bio_vec *bv = bio->bi_io_vec + bio->bi_vcnt;
+ struct page **pages = (struct page **)bv;
+ size_t offset, diff;
+ ssize_t size;
+
+ size = iov_iter_get_pages(iter, pages, LONG_MAX, nr_pages, &offset);
+ if (unlikely(size <= 0))
+ return size ? size : -EFAULT;
+ nr_pages = (size + offset + PAGE_SIZE - 1) / PAGE_SIZE;
+
+ /*
+ * Deep magic below: We need to walk the pinned pages backwards
+ * because we are abusing the space allocated for the bio_vecs
+ * for the page array. Because the bio_vecs are larger than the
+ * page pointers by definition this will always work. But it also
+ * means we can't use bio_add_page, so any changes to it's semantics
+ * need to be reflected here as well.
+ */
+ bio->bi_iter.bi_size += size;
+ bio->bi_vcnt += nr_pages;
+
+ diff = (nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE - offset) - size;
+ while (nr_pages--) {
+ bv[nr_pages].bv_page = pages[nr_pages];
+ bv[nr_pages].bv_len = PAGE_SIZE;
+ bv[nr_pages].bv_offset = 0;
+ }
+
+ bv[0].bv_offset += offset;
+ bv[0].bv_len -= offset;
+ if (diff)
+ bv[bio->bi_vcnt - 1].bv_len -= diff;
+
+ iov_iter_advance(iter, size);
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bio_iov_iter_get_pages);
+
struct submit_bio_ret {
struct completion event;
int error;
diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
index 87ce64d..c39fa0b 100644
--- a/include/linux/bio.h
+++ b/include/linux/bio.h
@@ -419,6 +419,7 @@ void bio_chain(struct bio *, struct bio *);
extern int bio_add_page(struct bio *, struct page *, unsigned int,unsigned int);
extern int bio_add_pc_page(struct request_queue *, struct bio *, struct page *,
unsigned int, unsigned int);
+int bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter);
struct rq_map_data;
extern struct bio *bio_map_user_iov(struct request_queue *,
const struct iov_iter *, gfp_t);
--
2.1.4

2016-10-31 23:19:16

by Omar Sandoval

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: fast-path for small and simple direct I/O requests

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:59:25AM -0600, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This patch adds a small and simple fast patch for small direct I/O
> requests on block devices that don't use AIO. Between the neat
> bio_iov_iter_get_pages helper that avoids allocating a page array
> for get_user_pages and the on-stack bio and biovec this avoid memory
> allocations and atomic operations entirely in the direct I/O code
> (lower levels might still do memory allocations and will usually
> have at least some atomic operations, though).
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/block_dev.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
> index 05b5533..d4134a3 100644
> --- a/fs/block_dev.c
> +++ b/fs/block_dev.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #include <linux/cleancache.h>
> #include <linux/dax.h>
> #include <linux/badblocks.h>
> +#include <linux/task_io_accounting_ops.h>
> #include <linux/falloc.h>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> #include "internal.h"
> @@ -175,12 +176,91 @@ static struct inode *bdev_file_inode(struct file *file)
> return file->f_mapping->host;
> }
>
> +#define DIO_INLINE_BIO_VECS 4
> +
> +static void blkdev_bio_end_io_simple(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *waiter = bio->bi_private;
> +
> + WRITE_ONCE(bio->bi_private, NULL);
> + wake_up_process(waiter);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t
> +__blkdev_direct_IO_simple(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
> + int nr_pages)
> +{
> + struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
> + struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(bdev_file_inode(file));
> + unsigned blkbits = blksize_bits(bdev_logical_block_size(bdev));
> + struct bio_vec inline_vecs[DIO_INLINE_BIO_VECS], *bvec;
> + loff_t pos = iocb->ki_pos;
> + bool should_dirty = false;
> + struct bio bio;
> + ssize_t ret;
> + blk_qc_t qc;
> + int i;
> +
> + if ((pos | iov_iter_alignment(iter)) & ((1 << blkbits) - 1))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + bio_init(&bio);
> + bio.bi_max_vecs = nr_pages;
> + bio.bi_io_vec = inline_vecs;
> + bio.bi_bdev = bdev;
> + bio.bi_iter.bi_sector = pos >> blkbits;
> + bio.bi_private = current;
> + bio.bi_end_io = blkdev_bio_end_io_simple;
> +
> + ret = bio_iov_iter_get_pages(&bio, iter);
> + if (unlikely(ret))
> + return ret;
> + ret = bio.bi_iter.bi_size;
> +
> + if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ) {
> + bio_set_op_attrs(&bio, REQ_OP_READ, 0);
> + if (iter->type == ITER_IOVEC)

Nit: iter_is_iovec()?

> + should_dirty = true;
> + } else {
> + bio_set_op_attrs(&bio, REQ_OP_WRITE, WRITE_ODIRECT);
> + task_io_account_write(ret);
> + }
> +
> + qc = submit_bio(&bio);
> + for (;;) {
> + set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> + if (!READ_ONCE(bio.bi_private))
> + break;
> + if (!(iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_HIPRI) ||
> + !blk_poll(bdev_get_queue(bdev), qc))
> + io_schedule();
> + }
> + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> +
> + bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, &bio, i) {
> + if (should_dirty && !PageCompound(bvec->bv_page))
> + set_page_dirty_lock(bvec->bv_page);
> + put_page(bvec->bv_page);
> + }
> +
> + if (unlikely(bio.bi_error))
> + return bio.bi_error;
> + iocb->ki_pos += ret;
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static ssize_t
> blkdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
> {
> struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
> struct inode *inode = bdev_file_inode(file);
> + int nr_pages;
>
> + nr_pages = iov_iter_npages(iter, BIO_MAX_PAGES);
> + if (!nr_pages)
> + return 0;
> + if (is_sync_kiocb(iocb) && nr_pages <= DIO_INLINE_BIO_VECS)
> + return __blkdev_direct_IO_simple(iocb, iter, nr_pages);
> return __blockdev_direct_IO(iocb, inode, I_BDEV(inode), iter,
> blkdev_get_block, NULL, NULL,
> DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT);

The bio_iov_iter_get_pages() trick is nifty. Jens had a similarly
stripped-down version of blkdev_direct_IO() for blk-mq as part of his
blk-dio branch. Looks like he just had the page array on the stack but
still had to allocate the bio.

--
Omar

2016-11-01 01:05:04

by Ming Lei

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: add bio_iov_iter_get_pages()

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]>
>
> This is a helper that pins down a range from an iov_iter and adds it to
> a bio without requiring a separate memory allocation for the page array.
> It will be used for upcoming direct I/O implementations for block devices
> and iomap based file systems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]>
> [hch: ported to the iov_iter interface, renamed and added comments.
> All blame should be directed to me and all fame should go to Kent
> after this!]
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> ---
> block/bio.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/bio.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index db85c57..2cf6eba 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -847,6 +847,55 @@ int bio_add_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_add_page);
>
> +/**
> + * bio_iov_iter_get_pages - pin user or kernel pages and add them to a bio
> + * @bio: bio to add pages to
> + * @iter: iov iterator describing the region to be mapped
> + *
> + * Pins as many pages from *iter and appends them to @bio's bvec array. The
> + * pages will have to be released using put_page() when done.
> + */
> +int bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
> +{
> + unsigned short nr_pages = bio->bi_max_vecs - bio->bi_vcnt;
> + struct bio_vec *bv = bio->bi_io_vec + bio->bi_vcnt;
> + struct page **pages = (struct page **)bv;
> + size_t offset, diff;
> + ssize_t size;
> +
> + size = iov_iter_get_pages(iter, pages, LONG_MAX, nr_pages, &offset);

BTW, if there is one multi-page version of get_user_pages_fast() and
iov_iter_get_pages(), size of page array can be reduced too.

> + if (unlikely(size <= 0))
> + return size ? size : -EFAULT;
> + nr_pages = (size + offset + PAGE_SIZE - 1) / PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> + /*
> + * Deep magic below: We need to walk the pinned pages backwards
> + * because we are abusing the space allocated for the bio_vecs
> + * for the page array. Because the bio_vecs are larger than the
> + * page pointers by definition this will always work. But it also
> + * means we can't use bio_add_page, so any changes to it's semantics
> + * need to be reflected here as well.
> + */
> + bio->bi_iter.bi_size += size;
> + bio->bi_vcnt += nr_pages;
> +
> + diff = (nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE - offset) - size;
> + while (nr_pages--) {
> + bv[nr_pages].bv_page = pages[nr_pages];
> + bv[nr_pages].bv_len = PAGE_SIZE;
> + bv[nr_pages].bv_offset = 0;
> + }
> +
> + bv[0].bv_offset += offset;
> + bv[0].bv_len -= offset;
> + if (diff)
> + bv[bio->bi_vcnt - 1].bv_len -= diff;
> +
> + iov_iter_advance(iter, size);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bio_iov_iter_get_pages);
> +
> struct submit_bio_ret {
> struct completion event;
> int error;
> diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
> index 87ce64d..c39fa0b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bio.h
> @@ -419,6 +419,7 @@ void bio_chain(struct bio *, struct bio *);
> extern int bio_add_page(struct bio *, struct page *, unsigned int,unsigned int);
> extern int bio_add_pc_page(struct request_queue *, struct bio *, struct page *,
> unsigned int, unsigned int);
> +int bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter);
> struct rq_map_data;
> extern struct bio *bio_map_user_iov(struct request_queue *,
> const struct iov_iter *, gfp_t);
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



--
Ming Lei

2016-11-01 14:19:45

by Christoph Hellwig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: fast-path for small and simple direct I/O requests

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 04:19:11PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > + if (unlikely(ret))
> > + return ret;
> > + ret = bio.bi_iter.bi_size;
> > +
> > + if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ) {
> > + bio_set_op_attrs(&bio, REQ_OP_READ, 0);
> > + if (iter->type == ITER_IOVEC)
>
> Nit: iter_is_iovec()?

Fixed.

2016-11-01 14:19:12

by Christoph Hellwig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: add bio_iov_iter_get_pages()

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 09:05:00AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > + size = iov_iter_get_pages(iter, pages, LONG_MAX, nr_pages, &offset);
>
> BTW, if there is one multi-page version of get_user_pages_fast() and
> iov_iter_get_pages(), size of page array can be reduced too.

There isn't at the moment. I have some plans for it, but it will require
lots of mm and arch changes, so I'd like to keep it separate.

2016-11-01 17:01:24

by Jens Axboe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: block device direct I/O fast path

On Mon, Oct 31 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> this small series adds a fasth path to the block device direct I/O
> code. It uses new magic created by Kent to avoid allocating an array
> for the pages, and as part of that allows small, non-aio direct I/O
> requests to be done without memory allocations or atomic ops and with
> a minimal cache footprint. It's basically a cut down version of the
> new iomap direct I/O code, and in the future it might also make sense
> to move the main direct I/O code to a similar model. But indepedent
> of that it's always worth to optimize the case of small, non-I/O
> requests as allocating the bio and biovec on stack and a trivial
> completion handler will always win over a full blown implementation.

I'm not particularly tied to the request based implementation that I did
here:

http://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=blk-dio

I basically wanted to solve two problems with that:

1) The slow old direct-io.c code
2) Implement the hybrid polling

#1 is accomplished with your code as well, though it does lack suppor
for async IO, but that would not be hard to add.

#2 is a bit more problematic, I'm pondering how we can implement that on
top of the bio approach. The nice thing about the request based approach
is that we have a 1:1 mapping with the unit on the driver side. And we
have a place to store the timer. I don't particularly love the embedded
timer, however, it'd be great to implement that differently. Trying to
think of options there, haven't found any yet.

--
Jens Axboe

2016-11-01 17:06:40

by Christoph Hellwig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: block device direct I/O fast path

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 11:00:19AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> #2 is a bit more problematic, I'm pondering how we can implement that on
> top of the bio approach. The nice thing about the request based approach
> is that we have a 1:1 mapping with the unit on the driver side. And we
> have a place to store the timer. I don't particularly love the embedded
> timer, however, it'd be great to implement that differently. Trying to
> think of options there, haven't found any yet.

I have a couple ideas for that. Give me a few weeks and I'll send
patches.

2016-11-01 17:54:43

by Jens Axboe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: block device direct I/O fast path

On Tue, Nov 01 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 11:00:19AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > #2 is a bit more problematic, I'm pondering how we can implement that on
> > top of the bio approach. The nice thing about the request based approach
> > is that we have a 1:1 mapping with the unit on the driver side. And we
> > have a place to store the timer. I don't particularly love the embedded
> > timer, however, it'd be great to implement that differently. Trying to
> > think of options there, haven't found any yet.
>
> I have a couple ideas for that. Give me a few weeks and I'll send
> patches.

I'm not that patient :-)

For the SYNC part, it should be easy enough to do by just using an
on-stack hrtimer. I guess that will do for now, since we don't have
poll support for async O_DIRECT right now anyway.

http://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=for-4.10/dio&id=e96d9afd56791a61d463cb88f8f3b48393b71020

Untested, but should get the point across. I'll fire up a test box.

--
Jens Axboe

2016-11-01 18:22:47

by Jens Axboe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: block device direct I/O fast path

On 11/01/2016 11:54 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 11:00:19AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> #2 is a bit more problematic, I'm pondering how we can implement that on
>>> top of the bio approach. The nice thing about the request based approach
>>> is that we have a 1:1 mapping with the unit on the driver side. And we
>>> have a place to store the timer. I don't particularly love the embedded
>>> timer, however, it'd be great to implement that differently. Trying to
>>> think of options there, haven't found any yet.
>>
>> I have a couple ideas for that. Give me a few weeks and I'll send
>> patches.
>
> I'm not that patient :-)
>
> For the SYNC part, it should be easy enough to do by just using an
> on-stack hrtimer. I guess that will do for now, since we don't have
> poll support for async O_DIRECT right now anyway.
>
> http://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=for-4.10/dio&id=e96d9afd56791a61d463cb88f8f3b48393b71020
>
> Untested, but should get the point across. I'll fire up a test box.

http://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=for-4.10/dio&id=b879a97d749c5c1755d1e2f20c721eb6fde0c291

Now tested, inadvertently used the absolute timer instead of the
relative. Works for me.

--
Jens Axboe