The debug message after platform_get_irq() failure is redundant
because platform_get_irq() already prints an error. Thus remove it.
The semantic patch that makes this report is available
in scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_get_irq.cocci.
Found using - http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/
Signed-off-by: Saiyam Doshi <[email protected]>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
index 5519c19bfd9c..23c4893512b2 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
@@ -1767,7 +1767,6 @@ static int qup_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
qup->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
if (qup->irq < 0) {
- dev_err(qup->dev, "No IRQ defined\n");
return qup->irq;
}
--
2.20.1
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 05:28:47PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > The semantic patch that makes this report is available
> > in scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_get_irq.cocci.
> >
> > Found using - http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/
>
> Can a tag like “Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_get_irq.cocci”
> be more helpful than the other description variant?
Okay, will update the changelog.
> > if (qup->irq < 0) {
> > - dev_err(qup->dev, "No IRQ defined\n");
> > return qup->irq;
> > }
> How do you think about to omit the curly brackets here after only a single
> statement would be used in the if branch?
Completely missed that! I will update and resend.
-Saiyam
> The semantic patch that makes this report is available
> in scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_get_irq.cocci.
>
> Found using - http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/
Can a tag like “Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_get_irq.cocci”
be more helpful than the other description variant?
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
> @@ -1767,7 +1767,6 @@ static int qup_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> qup->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> if (qup->irq < 0) {
> - dev_err(qup->dev, "No IRQ defined\n");
> return qup->irq;
> }
How do you think about to omit the curly brackets here after only a single
statement would be used in the if branch?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?id=ad062195731bea1624ce7160e79e0fcdaa25c1b5#n175
Regards,
Markus