The kernel test robot reported build failures with a 'randconfig' on s390:
>> mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c:421:11: error: a function declaration without a
prototype is deprecated in all versions of C [-Werror,-Wstrict-prototypes]
core_param(hugetlb_free_vmemmap, vmemmap_optimize_enabled, bool, 0);
^
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]/
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Fixes: 30152245c63b ("mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: replace early_param() with core_param()")
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]>
---
mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
index ba2a2596fb4e..4962dd1ba4a6 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "HugeTLB: " fmt
#include <linux/pgtable.h>
+#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
#include <linux/bootmem_info.h>
#include <asm/pgalloc.h>
#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
--
2.38.1
> On Nov 3, 2022, at 02:09, Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The kernel test robot reported build failures with a 'randconfig' on s390:
>>> mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c:421:11: error: a function declaration without a
> prototype is deprecated in all versions of C [-Werror,-Wstrict-prototypes]
> core_param(hugetlb_free_vmemmap, vmemmap_optimize_enabled, bool, 0);
> ^
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]/
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> Fixes: 30152245c63b ("mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: replace early_param() with core_param()")
Thanks for your fixing. However, the correct commit that should be fixed is
42deddf3ef5c ("s390: select ARCH_WANT_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP").
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 10:51:59AM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 3, 2022, at 02:09, Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > The kernel test robot reported build failures with a 'randconfig' on s390:
> >>> mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c:421:11: error: a function declaration without a
> > prototype is deprecated in all versions of C [-Werror,-Wstrict-prototypes]
> > core_param(hugetlb_free_vmemmap, vmemmap_optimize_enabled, bool, 0);
> > ^
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]/
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> > Fixes: 30152245c63b ("mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: replace early_param() with core_param()")
>
> Thanks for your fixing. However, the correct commit that should be fixed is
> 42deddf3ef5c ("s390: select ARCH_WANT_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP").
>
> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
Even on x86 the inclusion chain looks like:
CC mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.o
In file included from ./include/linux/module.h:22,
from ./include/linux/device/driver.h:21,
from ./include/linux/device.h:32,
from ./include/linux/blk_types.h:11,
from ./include/linux/writeback.h:13,
from ./include/linux/memcontrol.h:22,
from ./include/linux/swap.h:9,
from ./include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h:5,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/hugetlb.h:6,
from ./include/linux/hugetlb.h:802,
from mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.h:11,
from mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c:18:
./include/linux/moduleparam.h:2:2: warning: #warning included from here
With s390 defconfig:
CC mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.o
In file included from ./include/linux/module.h:22,
from ./include/linux/device/driver.h:21,
from ./include/linux/device.h:32,
from ./include/linux/blk_types.h:11,
from ./include/linux/writeback.h:13,
from ./include/linux/memcontrol.h:22,
from ./include/linux/swap.h:9,
from ./include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:18, <-- randconfig disabled this path (CONFIG_USERFAULTFD)
from ./include/linux/hugetlb.h:14,
from mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.h:11,
from mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c:17:
./include/linux/moduleparam.h:2:2: warning: #warning included from here
42deddf3ef5c ("s390: select ARCH_WANT_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP") is
just a one liner activating this feature and only present in linux-next
and s390 features branch targeting v6.2. So, if you don't want to have
Fixes: 30152245c63b ("mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: replace early_param() with core_param()")
fine with me. But then just dropping Fixes tag is probably a better
option. I hope that won't prevent it from going into some v6.1-rcX.
@Andrew
should I resend? or would you be so kind to drop Fixes tag and add Reviewed-by
without it? Thank you
On Thu, 3 Nov 2022 17:02:02 +0100 Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]> wrote:
> 42deddf3ef5c ("s390: select ARCH_WANT_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP") is
> just a one liner activating this feature and only present in linux-next
> and s390 features branch targeting v6.2. So, if you don't want to have
>
> Fixes: 30152245c63b ("mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: replace early_param() with core_param()")
>
> fine with me. But then just dropping Fixes tag is probably a better
> option. I hope that won't prevent it from going into some v6.1-rcX.
>
> @Andrew
> should I resend? or would you be so kind to drop Fixes tag and add Reviewed-by
> without it? Thank you
I retained the
Fixes: 30152245c63b ("mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: replace early_param() with core_param()")
and added Muchun's Reviewed-by:, thanks.