From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
When kernel find out that the incoming Just-Works pairing is
initiated by a paired device, it is user space's responsibility to
decide the next action.
This patch includes the following:
- add JustWorksRepairing policy as an option in main.conf
- handle the confirmation request from kernel
---
The Just-Works repairing policy could be one of the following:
- never: default; reject the repairing immediately.
- confirm: prompt a confirmation dialog to user.
- always: always accept the repairing.
Changes in v3:
- move the check from src/agent.c to src/device.c
- fix the enum declaration in src/hcid.h
Changes in v2:
- let RequestAuthorization handle the situation
- remove the changes in client/
src/device.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
src/hcid.h | 8 ++++++++
src/main.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/main.conf | 5 +++++
4 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/device.c b/src/device.c
index a4fe10980..a9cda47b3 100644
--- a/src/device.c
+++ b/src/device.c
@@ -6141,6 +6141,22 @@ int device_confirm_passkey(struct btd_device *device, uint8_t type,
struct authentication_req *auth;
int err;
+ /* Just-Works repairing policy */
+ if (confirm_hint && (device_is_paired(device, BDADDR_BREDR) ||
+ device_is_paired(device, BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC))) {
+ if (main_opts.jw_repairing == JW_REPAIRING_NEVER) {
+ btd_adapter_confirm_reply(device->adapter,
+ &device->bdaddr,
+ type, FALSE);
+ return 0;
+ } else if (main_opts.jw_repairing == JW_REPAIRING_ALWAYS) {
+ btd_adapter_confirm_reply(device->adapter,
+ &device->bdaddr,
+ type, TRUE);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+
auth = new_auth(device, type, AUTH_TYPE_CONFIRM, FALSE);
if (!auth)
return -EPERM;
diff --git a/src/hcid.h b/src/hcid.h
index adea85ce2..ca405fde4 100644
--- a/src/hcid.h
+++ b/src/hcid.h
@@ -35,6 +35,12 @@ typedef enum {
BT_GATT_CACHE_NO,
} bt_gatt_cache_t;
+enum jw_repairing_t {
+ JW_REPAIRING_NEVER,
+ JW_REPAIRING_CONFIRM,
+ JW_REPAIRING_ALWAYS,
+};
+
struct main_opts {
char *name;
uint32_t class;
@@ -58,6 +64,8 @@ struct main_opts {
uint16_t gatt_mtu;
uint8_t key_size;
+
+ enum jw_repairing_t jw_repairing;
};
extern struct main_opts main_opts;
diff --git a/src/main.c b/src/main.c
index 1a6ab36a3..fc8c869fc 100644
--- a/src/main.c
+++ b/src/main.c
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ static const char *supported_options[] = {
"MultiProfile",
"FastConnectable",
"Privacy",
+ "JustWorksRepairing",
NULL
};
@@ -193,6 +194,20 @@ static bt_gatt_cache_t parse_gatt_cache(const char *cache)
}
}
+static enum jw_repairing_t parse_jw_repairing(const char *jw_repairing)
+{
+ if (!strcmp(jw_repairing, "never")) {
+ return JW_REPAIRING_NEVER;
+ } else if (!strcmp(jw_repairing, "confirm")) {
+ return JW_REPAIRING_CONFIRM;
+ } else if (!strcmp(jw_repairing, "always")) {
+ return JW_REPAIRING_ALWAYS;
+ } else {
+ return JW_REPAIRING_NEVER;
+ }
+}
+
+
static void check_options(GKeyFile *config, const char *group,
const char **options)
{
@@ -331,6 +346,18 @@ static void parse_config(GKeyFile *config)
g_free(str);
}
+ str = g_key_file_get_string(config, "General",
+ "JustWorksRepairing", &err);
+ if (err) {
+ DBG("%s", err->message);
+ g_clear_error(&err);
+ main_opts.jw_repairing = JW_REPAIRING_NEVER;
+ } else {
+ DBG("just_works_repairing=%s", str);
+ main_opts.jw_repairing = parse_jw_repairing(str);
+ g_free(str);
+ }
+
str = g_key_file_get_string(config, "General", "Name", &err);
if (err) {
DBG("%s", err->message);
diff --git a/src/main.conf b/src/main.conf
index 40687a755..bb5ff5b15 100644
--- a/src/main.conf
+++ b/src/main.conf
@@ -72,6 +72,11 @@
# Defaults to "off"
# Privacy = off
+# Specify the policy to the JUST-WORKS repairing initiated by peer
+# Possible values: "never", "confirm", "always"
+# Defaults to "never"
+#JustWorksRepairing = never
+
[GATT]
# GATT attribute cache.
# Possible values:
--
2.25.0.265.gbab2e86ba0-goog
Hi Howard,
On 14. Feb 2020, at 5.45, Howard Chung <[email protected]> wrote:
> @@ -6141,6 +6141,22 @@ int device_confirm_passkey(struct btd_device *device, uint8_t type,
> struct authentication_req *auth;
> int err;
>
> + /* Just-Works repairing policy */
> + if (confirm_hint && (device_is_paired(device, BDADDR_BREDR) ||
> + device_is_paired(device, BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC))) {
Wouldn’t a single call to device_is_paired() using “type” (the address type that’s part of the mgmt event) be the right thing to do here?
Johan
Hi Howard,
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:35 PM Johan Hedberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Howard,
>
> On 14. Feb 2020, at 5.45, Howard Chung <[email protected]> wrote:
> > @@ -6141,6 +6141,22 @@ int device_confirm_passkey(struct btd_device *device, uint8_t type,
> > struct authentication_req *auth;
> > int err;
> >
> > + /* Just-Works repairing policy */
> > + if (confirm_hint && (device_is_paired(device, BDADDR_BREDR) ||
> > + device_is_paired(device, BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC))) {
>
> Wouldn’t a single call to device_is_paired() using “type” (the address type that’s part of the mgmt event) be the right thing to do here?
+1, other than that it looks pretty good now so we should be able to
merge after this change.
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz