2024-05-10 11:05:21

by Francesco Dolcini

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1] wifi: mwifiex: Fix interface type change

From: Rafael Beims <[email protected]>

When changing the interface type we also need to update the bss_num, the
driver private data is searched based on a unique (bss_type, bss_num)
tuple, therefore every time bss_type changes, bss_num must also change.

This fixes for example an issue in which, after the mode changed, a
wireless scan on the changed interface would not finish, leading to
repeated -EBUSY messages to userspace when other scan requests were
sent.

Fixes: c606008b7062 ("mwifiex: Properly initialize private structure on interface type changes")
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Rafael Beims <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Francesco Dolcini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c
index b909a7665e9c..155eb0fab12a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c
@@ -926,6 +926,8 @@ mwifiex_init_new_priv_params(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}

+ priv->bss_num = mwifiex_get_unused_bss_num(adapter, priv->bss_type);
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->main_proc_lock, flags);
adapter->main_locked = false;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->main_proc_lock, flags);
--
2.39.2



2024-05-17 08:04:02

by Kalle Valo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [v1] wifi: mwifiex: Fix interface type change

Francesco Dolcini <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Rafael Beims <[email protected]>
>
> When changing the interface type we also need to update the bss_num, the
> driver private data is searched based on a unique (bss_type, bss_num)
> tuple, therefore every time bss_type changes, bss_num must also change.
>
> This fixes for example an issue in which, after the mode changed, a
> wireless scan on the changed interface would not finish, leading to
> repeated -EBUSY messages to userspace when other scan requests were
> sent.
>
> Fixes: c606008b7062 ("mwifiex: Properly initialize private structure on interface type changes")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Rafael Beims <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <[email protected]>

Patch applied to wireless-next.git, thanks.

a17b9f590f6e wifi: mwifiex: Fix interface type change

--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/[email protected]/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches


2024-05-17 08:04:41

by Kalle Valo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [v1] wifi: mwifiex: Fix interface type change

Francesco Dolcini <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Rafael Beims <[email protected]>
>
> When changing the interface type we also need to update the bss_num, the
> driver private data is searched based on a unique (bss_type, bss_num)
> tuple, therefore every time bss_type changes, bss_num must also change.
>
> This fixes for example an issue in which, after the mode changed, a
> wireless scan on the changed interface would not finish, leading to
> repeated -EBUSY messages to userspace when other scan requests were
> sent.
>
> Fixes: c606008b7062 ("mwifiex: Properly initialize private structure on interface type changes")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Rafael Beims <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <[email protected]>

BTW I removed the Reviewed-by from the commit message, I don't see the need to
have both Reviewed-by and s-o-b.

--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/[email protected]/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches


2024-05-17 08:18:14

by Francesco Dolcini

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [v1] wifi: mwifiex: Fix interface type change

On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 08:04:24AM +0000, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Francesco Dolcini <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > From: Rafael Beims <[email protected]>
> >
> > When changing the interface type we also need to update the bss_num, the
> > driver private data is searched based on a unique (bss_type, bss_num)
> > tuple, therefore every time bss_type changes, bss_num must also change.
> >
> > This fixes for example an issue in which, after the mode changed, a
> > wireless scan on the changed interface would not finish, leading to
> > repeated -EBUSY messages to userspace when other scan requests were
> > sent.
> >
> > Fixes: c606008b7062 ("mwifiex: Properly initialize private structure on interface type changes")
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael Beims <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <[email protected]>
>
> BTW I removed the Reviewed-by from the commit message, I don't see the need to
> have both Reviewed-by and s-o-b.

Sure, I was in doubt about this, in the end I added it because I have seen
this done in other subsystems, e.g. commit 6a4020b4c639 ("drm/bridge:
tc358768: fix PLL parameters computation").

Thanks
Francesco



2024-05-17 09:34:26

by Kalle Valo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [v1] wifi: mwifiex: Fix interface type change

Francesco Dolcini <[email protected]> writes:

> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 08:04:24AM +0000, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
>> Francesco Dolcini <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > From: Rafael Beims <[email protected]>
>> >
>> > When changing the interface type we also need to update the bss_num, the
>> > driver private data is searched based on a unique (bss_type, bss_num)
>> > tuple, therefore every time bss_type changes, bss_num must also change.
>> >
>> > This fixes for example an issue in which, after the mode changed, a
>> > wireless scan on the changed interface would not finish, leading to
>> > repeated -EBUSY messages to userspace when other scan requests were
>> > sent.
>> >
>> > Fixes: c606008b7062 ("mwifiex: Properly initialize private
>> > structure on interface type changes")
>> > Cc: [email protected]
>> > Signed-off-by: Rafael Beims <[email protected]>
>> > Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <[email protected]>
>>
>> BTW I removed the Reviewed-by from the commit message, I don't see the need to
>> have both Reviewed-by and s-o-b.
>
> Sure, I was in doubt about this, in the end I added it because I have seen
> this done in other subsystems, e.g. commit 6a4020b4c639 ("drm/bridge:
> tc358768: fix PLL parameters computation").

Heh, yeah we all do things a bit differently :) In my view s-o-b implies
that you have reviewed it as well but clearly not everyone think the
same. I'm fine either way, this is cosmetics anyway.

--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches