2016-11-25 07:45:24

by Rosia, Nicolae

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: twl6030: add dependency on OF

This driver was converted to device tree only,
add dependency on OF symbol and drop of_match_ptr

Signed-off-by: Nicolae Rosia <[email protected]>
---
drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/Kconfig b/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
index 936f7cc..ef70672 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
@@ -839,6 +839,7 @@ config REGULATOR_TPS80031
config REGULATOR_TWL4030
tristate "TI TWL4030/TWL5030/TWL6030/TPS659x0 PMIC"
depends on TWL4030_CORE
+ depends on OF
help
This driver supports the voltage regulators provided by
this family of companion chips.
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c
index 4864b9d..1f327d7 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c
@@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ static struct platform_driver twlreg_driver = {
*/
.driver = {
.name = "twl6030_reg",
- .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(twl_of_match),
+ .of_match_table = twl_of_match,
},
};

--
2.9.3


2016-11-25 13:04:53

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: twl6030: add dependency on OF

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 09:43:35AM +0200, Nicolae Rosia wrote:

> This driver was converted to device tree only,
> add dependency on OF symbol and drop of_match_ptr

These are two different changes :(

> config REGULATOR_TWL4030
> tristate "TI TWL4030/TWL5030/TWL6030/TPS659x0 PMIC"
> depends on TWL4030_CORE
> + depends on OF

This should be OF || COMPILE_TEST so people can still get build coverage
without DT.

> --- a/drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c
> @@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ static struct platform_driver twlreg_driver = {
> */
> .driver = {
> .name = "twl6030_reg",
> - .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(twl_of_match),
> + .of_match_table = twl_of_match,

This buys us nothing, it's not going to make any practical difference
but on the other hand it costs nothing to have it there either. The
only impact I can see this having is causing someone doing a cut'n'paste
to miss the of_match_ptr() out.


Attachments:
(No filename) (968.00 B)
signature.asc (455.00 B)
Download all attachments

2016-11-25 13:11:45

by Nicolae Rosia

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: twl6030: add dependency on OF

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 09:43:35AM +0200, Nicolae Rosia wrote:
>
>> This driver was converted to device tree only,
>> add dependency on OF symbol and drop of_match_ptr
>
> These are two different changes :(
>
Ok, will send a patch only for Kconfig.

>> config REGULATOR_TWL4030
>> tristate "TI TWL4030/TWL5030/TWL6030/TPS659x0 PMIC"
>> depends on TWL4030_CORE
>> + depends on OF
>
> This should be OF || COMPILE_TEST so people can still get build coverage
> without DT.
>
Ok.

>> --- a/drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c
>> @@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ static struct platform_driver twlreg_driver = {
>> */
>> .driver = {
>> .name = "twl6030_reg",
>> - .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(twl_of_match),
>> + .of_match_table = twl_of_match,
>
> This buys us nothing, it's not going to make any practical difference
> but on the other hand it costs nothing to have it there either. The
> only impact I can see this having is causing someone doing a cut'n'paste
> to miss the of_match_ptr() out.
I did this because I received a comment on another patch [0].

Thanks,
Nicolae

[0] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/694021/

2016-11-25 13:18:07

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: twl6030: add dependency on OF

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 03:09:43PM +0200, Nicolae Rosia wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote:

> >> - .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(twl_of_match),
> >> + .of_match_table = twl_of_match,

> > This buys us nothing, it's not going to make any practical difference
> > but on the other hand it costs nothing to have it there either. The
> > only impact I can see this having is causing someone doing a cut'n'paste
> > to miss the of_match_ptr() out.

> I did this because I received a comment on another patch [0].

OK, but that still doesn't really explain what the benefit is!


Attachments:
(No filename) (644.00 B)
signature.asc (455.00 B)
Download all attachments