Removed Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message checkpatch warnings.
Issue found by checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Dhaval Shah <[email protected]>
---
drivers/platform/x86/dell-smo8800.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-smo8800.c b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-smo8800.c
index 1d87237bc731..9590d5e7c5ca 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-smo8800.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-smo8800.c
@@ -150,10 +150,8 @@ static int smo8800_add(struct acpi_device *device)
struct smo8800_device *smo8800;
smo8800 = devm_kzalloc(&device->dev, sizeof(*smo8800), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!smo8800) {
- dev_err(&device->dev, "failed to allocate device data\n");
+ if (!smo8800)
return -ENOMEM;
- }
smo8800->dev = &device->dev;
smo8800->miscdev.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
--
2.11.0
On Wednesday 13 December 2017 13:53:54 Dhaval Shah wrote:
> Removed Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message checkpatch warnings.
> Issue found by checkpatch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dhaval Shah <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/dell-smo8800.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-smo8800.c b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-smo8800.c
> index 1d87237bc731..9590d5e7c5ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-smo8800.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-smo8800.c
> @@ -150,10 +150,8 @@ static int smo8800_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> struct smo8800_device *smo8800;
>
> smo8800 = devm_kzalloc(&device->dev, sizeof(*smo8800), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!smo8800) {
> - dev_err(&device->dev, "failed to allocate device data\n");
Hi! Any particular reason for removing error message?
> + if (!smo8800)
> return -ENOMEM;
> - }
>
> smo8800->dev = &device->dev;
> smo8800->miscdev.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
--
Pali Rohár
[email protected]
Hi Pali Rohar,
Thanks for the review.
________________________________________
> From: Pali Roh?r <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 2:00 PM
> To: Dhaval Shah
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-smo8800: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message
>
> On Wednesday 13 December 2017 13:53:54 Dhaval Shah wrote:
> > Removed Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message checkpatch warnings.
> > Issue found by checkpatch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dhaval Shah <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/platform/x86/dell-smo8800.c | 4 +---
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-smo8800.c b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-smo8800.c
> > index 1d87237bc731..9590d5e7c5ca 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-smo8800.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-smo8800.c
> > @@ -150,10 +150,8 @@ static int smo8800_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> > struct smo8800_device *smo8800;
> >
> > smo8800 = devm_kzalloc(&device->dev, sizeof(*smo8800), GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!smo8800) {
> > - dev_err(&device->dev, "failed to allocate device data\n");
>
> Hi! Any particular reason for removing error message?
>
When you give the -ENOMEM as error in return then this message info will be provided by the kernel subsystem. no need to give this printk and that's why checkpatch gives warning in this case.
> > + if (!smo8800)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > - }
> >
> > smo8800->dev = &device->dev;
> > smo8800->miscdev.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
--
Pali Roh?r
[email protected]
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Pali Rohár <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 December 2017 13:53:54 Dhaval Shah wrote:
>> Removed Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message checkpatch warnings.
>> Issue found by checkpatch.
>> - dev_err(&device->dev, "failed to allocate device data\n");
>
> Hi! Any particular reason for removing error message?
If you look into drivers/base/dd.c (real_probe() function IIRC) it
issues a warning when probe fails with error code.
So, basically all error messages in ->probe() are redundant (except
maybe those that prints more than error message itself).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko