The csi_sel mux register is located in the CCM register base and not the
CCM_ANALOG register base. So move it to the correct position in code.
Otherwise changing the parent of the csi clock can lead to a complete
system failure due to the CCM_ANALOG_PLL_SYS_TOG register being falsely
modified.
Also remove the SET_RATE_PARENT flag since one possible supply for the
csi_sel mux is the system PLL which we don't want to modify.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Riedmueller <[email protected]>
---
No changes in v2.
---
drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c
index 5dbb6a937732..206e4c43f68f 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c
@@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ static void __init imx6ul_clocks_init(struct device_node *ccm_node)
hws[IMX6UL_PLL5_BYPASS] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("pll5_bypass", base + 0xa0, 16, 1, pll5_bypass_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(pll5_bypass_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
hws[IMX6UL_PLL6_BYPASS] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("pll6_bypass", base + 0xe0, 16, 1, pll6_bypass_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(pll6_bypass_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
hws[IMX6UL_PLL7_BYPASS] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("pll7_bypass", base + 0x20, 16, 1, pll7_bypass_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(pll7_bypass_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
- hws[IMX6UL_CLK_CSI_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("csi_sel", base + 0x3c, 9, 2, csi_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(csi_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
/* Do not bypass PLLs initially */
clk_set_parent(hws[IMX6UL_PLL1_BYPASS]->clk, hws[IMX6UL_CLK_PLL1]->clk);
@@ -270,6 +269,7 @@ static void __init imx6ul_clocks_init(struct device_node *ccm_node)
hws[IMX6UL_CLK_ECSPI_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux("ecspi_sel", base + 0x38, 18, 1, ecspi_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(ecspi_sels));
hws[IMX6UL_CLK_LCDIF_PRE_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("lcdif_pre_sel", base + 0x38, 15, 3, lcdif_pre_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(lcdif_pre_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
hws[IMX6UL_CLK_LCDIF_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux("lcdif_sel", base + 0x38, 9, 3, lcdif_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(lcdif_sels));
+ hws[IMX6UL_CLK_CSI_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux("csi_sel", base + 0x3c, 9, 2, csi_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(csi_sels));
hws[IMX6UL_CLK_LDB_DI0_DIV_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux("ldb_di0", base + 0x20, 10, 1, ldb_di0_div_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(ldb_di0_div_sels));
hws[IMX6UL_CLK_LDB_DI1_DIV_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux("ldb_di1", base + 0x20, 11, 1, ldb_di1_div_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(ldb_di1_div_sels));
--
2.25.1
According to the imx6ul Reference Manual the csi clk gate register is
CCM_CCGR3 (offset 0x74) bit 0/1. For the imx6ull on the other hand the
Reference Manual lists register CCM_CCGR2 (offset 0x70) bit 2/3 as the
csi clk gate which is the current setting.
Tests have shown though that the correct csi clk gate register for the
imx6ull is actually CCM_CCGR3 bit 0/1 as well. Thus set the correct
register for both platforms.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Riedmueller <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
- Added comment about ref manual mismatch
- Added Tested-by from Fabio
---
drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c
index 206e4c43f68f..520b100bff4b 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c
@@ -380,7 +380,6 @@ static void __init imx6ul_clocks_init(struct device_node *ccm_node)
hws[IMX6ULL_CLK_ESAI_IPG] = imx_clk_hw_gate2_shared("esai_ipg", "ahb", base + 0x70, 0, &share_count_esai);
hws[IMX6ULL_CLK_ESAI_MEM] = imx_clk_hw_gate2_shared("esai_mem", "ahb", base + 0x70, 0, &share_count_esai);
}
- hws[IMX6UL_CLK_CSI] = imx_clk_hw_gate2("csi", "csi_podf", base + 0x70, 2);
hws[IMX6UL_CLK_I2C1] = imx_clk_hw_gate2("i2c1", "perclk", base + 0x70, 6);
hws[IMX6UL_CLK_I2C2] = imx_clk_hw_gate2("i2c2", "perclk", base + 0x70, 8);
hws[IMX6UL_CLK_I2C3] = imx_clk_hw_gate2("i2c3", "perclk", base + 0x70, 10);
@@ -391,6 +390,12 @@ static void __init imx6ul_clocks_init(struct device_node *ccm_node)
hws[IMX6UL_CLK_PXP] = imx_clk_hw_gate2("pxp", "axi", base + 0x70, 30);
/* CCGR3 */
+ /*
+ * Although the imx6ull reference manual lists CCGR2 as the csi clk
+ * gate register, tests have shown that it is actually the CCGR3
+ * register bit 0/1, same as for the imx6ul.
+ */
+ hws[IMX6UL_CLK_CSI] = imx_clk_hw_gate2("csi", "csi_podf", base + 0x74, 0);
hws[IMX6UL_CLK_UART5_IPG] = imx_clk_hw_gate2("uart5_ipg", "ipg", base + 0x74, 2);
hws[IMX6UL_CLK_UART5_SERIAL] = imx_clk_hw_gate2("uart5_serial", "uart_podf", base + 0x74, 2);
if (clk_on_imx6ul()) {
--
2.25.1
On 21-09-27 09:28:56, Stefan Riedmueller wrote:
> The csi_sel mux register is located in the CCM register base and not the
> CCM_ANALOG register base. So move it to the correct position in code.
>
> Otherwise changing the parent of the csi clock can lead to a complete
> system failure due to the CCM_ANALOG_PLL_SYS_TOG register being falsely
> modified.
>
> Also remove the SET_RATE_PARENT flag since one possible supply for the
> csi_sel mux is the system PLL which we don't want to modify.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Riedmueller <[email protected]>
For both patches:
Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>
> ---
> No changes in v2.
> ---
> drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c
> index 5dbb6a937732..206e4c43f68f 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ static void __init imx6ul_clocks_init(struct device_node *ccm_node)
> hws[IMX6UL_PLL5_BYPASS] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("pll5_bypass", base + 0xa0, 16, 1, pll5_bypass_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(pll5_bypass_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
> hws[IMX6UL_PLL6_BYPASS] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("pll6_bypass", base + 0xe0, 16, 1, pll6_bypass_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(pll6_bypass_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
> hws[IMX6UL_PLL7_BYPASS] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("pll7_bypass", base + 0x20, 16, 1, pll7_bypass_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(pll7_bypass_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
> - hws[IMX6UL_CLK_CSI_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("csi_sel", base + 0x3c, 9, 2, csi_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(csi_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
>
> /* Do not bypass PLLs initially */
> clk_set_parent(hws[IMX6UL_PLL1_BYPASS]->clk, hws[IMX6UL_CLK_PLL1]->clk);
> @@ -270,6 +269,7 @@ static void __init imx6ul_clocks_init(struct device_node *ccm_node)
> hws[IMX6UL_CLK_ECSPI_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux("ecspi_sel", base + 0x38, 18, 1, ecspi_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(ecspi_sels));
> hws[IMX6UL_CLK_LCDIF_PRE_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("lcdif_pre_sel", base + 0x38, 15, 3, lcdif_pre_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(lcdif_pre_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
> hws[IMX6UL_CLK_LCDIF_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux("lcdif_sel", base + 0x38, 9, 3, lcdif_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(lcdif_sels));
> + hws[IMX6UL_CLK_CSI_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux("csi_sel", base + 0x3c, 9, 2, csi_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(csi_sels));
>
> hws[IMX6UL_CLK_LDB_DI0_DIV_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux("ldb_di0", base + 0x20, 10, 1, ldb_di0_div_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(ldb_di0_div_sels));
> hws[IMX6UL_CLK_LDB_DI1_DIV_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux("ldb_di1", base + 0x20, 11, 1, ldb_di1_div_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(ldb_di1_div_sels));
> --
> 2.25.1
>
On 21-09-27 09:28:56, Stefan Riedmueller wrote:
> The csi_sel mux register is located in the CCM register base and not the
> CCM_ANALOG register base. So move it to the correct position in code.
>
> Otherwise changing the parent of the csi clock can lead to a complete
> system failure due to the CCM_ANALOG_PLL_SYS_TOG register being falsely
> modified.
>
> Also remove the SET_RATE_PARENT flag since one possible supply for the
> csi_sel mux is the system PLL which we don't want to modify.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Riedmueller <[email protected]>
Applied both. Thanks.
> ---
> No changes in v2.
> ---
> drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c
> index 5dbb6a937732..206e4c43f68f 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ static void __init imx6ul_clocks_init(struct device_node *ccm_node)
> hws[IMX6UL_PLL5_BYPASS] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("pll5_bypass", base + 0xa0, 16, 1, pll5_bypass_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(pll5_bypass_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
> hws[IMX6UL_PLL6_BYPASS] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("pll6_bypass", base + 0xe0, 16, 1, pll6_bypass_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(pll6_bypass_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
> hws[IMX6UL_PLL7_BYPASS] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("pll7_bypass", base + 0x20, 16, 1, pll7_bypass_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(pll7_bypass_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
> - hws[IMX6UL_CLK_CSI_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("csi_sel", base + 0x3c, 9, 2, csi_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(csi_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
>
> /* Do not bypass PLLs initially */
> clk_set_parent(hws[IMX6UL_PLL1_BYPASS]->clk, hws[IMX6UL_CLK_PLL1]->clk);
> @@ -270,6 +269,7 @@ static void __init imx6ul_clocks_init(struct device_node *ccm_node)
> hws[IMX6UL_CLK_ECSPI_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux("ecspi_sel", base + 0x38, 18, 1, ecspi_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(ecspi_sels));
> hws[IMX6UL_CLK_LCDIF_PRE_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("lcdif_pre_sel", base + 0x38, 15, 3, lcdif_pre_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(lcdif_pre_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
> hws[IMX6UL_CLK_LCDIF_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux("lcdif_sel", base + 0x38, 9, 3, lcdif_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(lcdif_sels));
> + hws[IMX6UL_CLK_CSI_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux("csi_sel", base + 0x3c, 9, 2, csi_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(csi_sels));
>
> hws[IMX6UL_CLK_LDB_DI0_DIV_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux("ldb_di0", base + 0x20, 10, 1, ldb_di0_div_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(ldb_di0_div_sels));
> hws[IMX6UL_CLK_LDB_DI1_DIV_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux("ldb_di1", base + 0x20, 11, 1, ldb_di1_div_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(ldb_di1_div_sels));
> --
> 2.25.1
>